What's new

‘No Hindu will be expelled even if name is missing from NRC’: RSS chief on expulsion from Assam

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat has assured Hindus whose names are missing from the national register of citizens (NRC) that their exclusion from the list will not mean their expulsion from the country.

According to functionaries aware of the developments, Bhagwat was speaking at a closed door meeting between the Sangh and the BJP in Kolkata on Sunday, where he sought to allay fears that Hindus will also have to face expulsion from Assam where the final NRC list was released on August 31.

The final list excluded 1.9 million people, many of them Bengali Hindus.

While the RSS has been campaigning for identifying illegal immigrants, it has had also been pushing for bringing the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill or CAB that seeks to simplify the process of granting Indian citizenship to non-Muslims from Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan.

The RSS has been pushing for citizenship to be provided to “persecuted Hindus”, claiming that India is the only place for the community.

According to a functionary, not wishing to be named, the issue of Hindus excluded from the NRC was raised at the meeting of the Sangh that was held earlier this month in Rajasthan’s Pushkar. BJP general secretary Ram Madhav has made a presentation on the issue.

“The Sangh is of the view that the BJP government should introduce the CAB in the forthcoming winter session of Parliament,” the functionary said.

It has also asked its cadre in Assam to reach out to allay fears of those Hindus whose names are not on the NRC list.

Another functionary said the Sangh has underlined the need for bringing the CAB and identifying illegal immigrants in states along the country’s international border since it is “concerned by the changing demography in the sensitive border areas.”

BJP’s Bengal unit president Dilip Ghosh also attended the meeting.

The NRC has been a bone of contention between the BJP and Bengal’s ruling party Trinamool Congress. On Monday, West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee reiterated that her government will never allow an NRC exercise in the state.

“I am sad that six people have died in Bengal due to panic created over National Register of Citizens (NRC). We will never allow NRC here. Please have faith in me,” she said while addressing a trade union meeting in Kolkata, according to ANI.

Last week, during a meeting with Union home minister Amit Shah in New Delhi, Banerjee raised the issue of the NRC in Assam and said that no Indian should be put through difficulties.

Banerjee has been a vocal critic of the NRC and had alleged that the exercise was a mere tactic to divert attention from the country’s economic slowdown and had dared the BJP to “touch a single person living in Bengal.”

https://www.hindustantimes.com/indi...s-rss-chief/story-HBYmWBPvLmkZjgdRMkNhrO.html
 
[MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION] , so they don’t care about Indians as such but are appeasers of Hindus?
 
Stooges will still find ways to defend their fellow snakes...
 
Why is anyone shocked?

It is BJP and RSS.

Has anyone not watched them speak before?

Big LOL.
 
My Hindu ancestors fled Bangladesh and came to India and some distant relatives were killed in Bangladesh during Partition. India was supposed to be the refuge for Hindus leaving then East Pakistan. It is illogical not to understand the difference between Hindu and Muslim immigrants from East Pakistan/Bangladesh to India.
 
India showing its ‘secular’ credentials.

Will India finally have the balls to officially declare a hindu state after several thousand years?
 
[MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION] , so they don’t care about Indians as such but are appeasers of Hindus?

Can you give me a reason why muslims from BD or Pakistan be allowed to have citizenship in India?

These are the people who wanted partition and now they have their country.


The non muslims of these places are a persecuted lot who didnot get a choice and may be allowed.

Though ideally no refugees should be allowed.
 
India showing its ‘secular’ credentials.

Will India finally have the balls to officially declare a hindu state after several thousand years?

Its obvious that those who wanted the partition and got it are no more welcome here. Thats nothing to do with secularism, this is basic nstional security.
 
Everyone knew it was a guise to kick out the muslims from India.

Of course, but it's always nice to have it spelled out in writing. Even better when you see the PP supporters of the BJP justifying it after talking proudly of their secular credentials.
 
I thank RSS for proving Quaid Jinnah repeatedly correct. Even Congressi Indian's must permanently shut their mouth now. As India is now a Hindu fascist nation they should invite Sri Lankan and Nepalese Hindu's to settle in their country. Abu Kalam Azaad must be busy wiping that fried egg off his face.
 
India showing its ‘secular’ credentials.

Will India finally have the balls to officially declare a hindu state after several thousand years?

We already accepted majority refugees which are mostly Muslim in a conflict between east and west Pakistan. If west Pakistan could have given equal rights to their own brothers and sisters in east Pakistan, all these issues wouldn't have come in the first place.
 
We already accepted majority refugees which are mostly Muslim in a conflict between east and west Pakistan. If west Pakistan could have given equal rights to their own brothers and sisters in east Pakistan, all these issues wouldn't have come in the first place.

You make no sense.

India’s secular credentials are dependent on Islamic republic of Pakistan?
 
You make no sense.

India’s secular credentials are dependent on Islamic republic of Pakistan?

The point was, refugees which are demoraphically mostly Muslims were already accepted in 1971.

Its time, the minority, Hindus get the equal opportunity.

That will be actual secularism.
 
The point was, refugees which are demoraphically mostly Muslims were already accepted in 1971.

Its time, the minority, Hindus get the equal opportunity.

That will be actual secularism.

So you’re saying that in 1970s the refugees who came from east Pakistan at the time, the Indian government or state gave recognition and documents to Muslim refugees but didn’t do it for hindus? :))
 
We already accepted majority refugees which are mostly Muslim in a conflict between east and west Pakistan. If west Pakistan could have given equal rights to their own brothers and sisters in east Pakistan, all these issues wouldn't have come in the first place.

Going by your logic. If India had let the kashmiris decide their own future none of this would have happened today.
 
Its obvious that those who wanted the partition and got it are no more welcome here. Thats nothing to do with secularism, this is basic nstional security.

So illegal immigrant Hindus are no threat to India but illegal Muslim immgrants are? Doesnt India have 200 million Muslims already? Explain this logic.
 
So illegal immigrant Hindus are no threat to India but illegal Muslim immgrants are? Doesnt India have 200 million Muslims already? Explain this logic.

Muslims demanded separate nation. They got it and now letting the same separatist minded people esp from countries that have anti India groups functioning is a security risk.

The other minorities, hindus,sikhs,christians etc didnot demand a partition.
 
Muslims demanded separate nation. They got it and now letting the same separatist minded people esp from countries that have anti India groups functioning is a security risk.

The other minorities, hindus,sikhs,christians etc didnot demand a partition.
Are all Muslims of the same opinion?
 
Muslims demanded separate nation. They got it and now letting the same separatist minded people esp from countries that have anti India groups functioning is a security risk.

The other minorities, hindus,sikhs,christians etc didnot demand a partition.

How do you know who is a Muslim, Hindu or Christian if they are from anti-India groups inflitrating into India as refuguees? Surely they wouldnt be so stupid reveal their real identity?

Secondly what about teh 200million Muslims, many of them wanted partition. Are you suggesting they are a risk too?
 
How do you know who is a Muslim, Hindu or Christian if they are from anti-India groups inflitrating into India as refuguees? Surely they wouldnt be so stupid reveal their real identity?

Secondly what about teh 200million Muslims, many of them wanted partition. Are you suggesting they are a risk too?

Actions speak louder than words. If they really wanted partition, they would have migrated to Pakistan. They chose India, and are hence Indians.
 
Actions speak louder than words. If they really wanted partition, they would have migrated to Pakistan. They chose India, and are hence Indians.

I assume from this post you haven't studied parition. Millions who wanted to migrate to the new land of Pakistan didn't make it, were unable to or too scared. I have distance relatives in India, which I've never met but I know their story.
 
A lot of people have no clue why Pakistan was a major agenda point for Muslim League and it shows.

Pakistan was not just a MUSLIM ONLY land.

It was a place that was to be governed by the Muslims and everyone living there was welcome. If you didn't get the clue by now, look at the flag and see what the white stands for.

Nehru and Jinnah wanted friendly relations and even thought it would be like Canada and USA. There's a lot of documentary proof, and the new documents released by the Crown are a testament to that. The sub-division after the partition, the human tragedy that it became was an oversight of the executioners of the process.

The history of violence has since then become a major flash point and it seems that three generations later we are still going through it. I don't know how many generations it will take to normalize or if it will even ever normalize.
 
So you’re saying that in 1970s the refugees who came from east Pakistan at the time, the Indian government or state gave recognition and documents to Muslim refugees but didn’t do it for hindus? :))

Ratio wise, there were more Muslims than hindu.
 
How do you know who is a Muslim, Hindu or Christian if they are from anti-India groups inflitrating into India as refuguees? Surely they wouldnt be so stupid reveal their real identity?

Secondly what about teh 200million Muslims, many of them wanted partition. Are you suggesting they are a risk too?

Its for the enforcement agencies to find out and they are quiet good at it.


The 180mn muslims in India are Indians. Not illegal refugees or infiltrators.And anyone Indian of any religion who does anything illegal will be dealt with according to the laws.
 
Its for the enforcement agencies to find out and they are quiet good at it.


The 180mn muslims in India are Indians. Not illegal refugees or infiltrators.And anyone Indian of any religion who does anything illegal will be dealt with according to the laws.

This is obvious.

You havent addressed my point.

You claimed Muslims illegals are a security threat because of their religion. So are the Indian Muslims also a potential security threat to your great Hindu empire?
 
This is obvious.

You havent addressed my point.

You claimed Muslims illegals are a security threat because of their religion. So are the Indian Muslims also a potential security threat to your great Hindu empire?

There is no hindu empire hence there is no threat to it.

I said muslims demanded a separate nation and were the cause for partition and thats why they are a security risk. Not because of their religion
 
There is no hindu empire hence there is no threat to it.

I said muslims demanded a separate nation and were the cause for partition and thats why they are a security risk. Not because of their religion

lol. Most of those people werent even born then.

Why are Indian Muslims not a security risk? Many wanted to leave for Pakistan couldn't do so.
 
lol. Most of those people werent even born then.

Why are Indian Muslims not a security risk? Many wanted to leave for Pakistan couldn't do so.


Your statement is wrong and misleading. Not sure if you drank a koolaid or donating koolaid to others here.

1. 70% of Indian muslims say they have been treated with respect all day
2. 62% of Indian muslims say they have been happy for majority of the day
3. 89% of Indian muslims say they have freedom of speech
4. 82% of Indian muslims say they have freedom of religion
5. 83% of Indian muslims say they have freedom of assembly
6. 90% of Indian muslims have confidence in India's military
7. 72% of Indian muslims have confidence in India's financial institutions
8. 68% of Indian muslims have confidence in India's judicial system

NEUTRAL source from Gallup - https://news.gallup.com/poll/157079...-despite-economic-educational-challenges.aspx


It is one thing to speak against religious fanatics (be it saffron or green) but it is another to make complete misleading statements. Granted those percentages above will have dropped thanks to the saffron psychos' no beef, cow lynching tactics. But to claim that those opinions will have swung so much that majority of Indian muslims will want to leave India for Pakistan (with its shambolic economy) is a big big stretch.
 
Your statement is wrong and misleading. Not sure if you drank a koolaid or donating koolaid to others here.

1. 70% of Indian muslims say they have been treated with respect all day
2. 62% of Indian muslims say they have been happy for majority of the day
3. 89% of Indian muslims say they have freedom of speech
4. 82% of Indian muslims say they have freedom of religion
5. 83% of Indian muslims say they have freedom of assembly
6. 90% of Indian muslims have confidence in India's military
7. 72% of Indian muslims have confidence in India's financial institutions
8. 68% of Indian muslims have confidence in India's judicial system

NEUTRAL source from Gallup - https://news.gallup.com/poll/157079...-despite-economic-educational-challenges.aspx


It is one thing to speak against religious fanatics (be it saffron or green) but it is another to make complete misleading statements. Granted those percentages above will have dropped thanks to the saffron psychos' no beef, cow lynching tactics. But to claim that those opinions will have swung so much that majority of Indian muslims will want to leave India for Pakistan (with its shambolic economy) is a big big stretch.

I asked a question to the poster who claimed Muslim illegals are security risk but others aren't. By this logic why aren't Muslim indians a security risk as many wanted to leave for Pakistan? What you have wrote is irrlevevant to my point.
 
I asked a question to the poster who claimed Muslim illegals are security risk but others aren't. By this logic why aren't Muslim indians a security risk as many wanted to leave for Pakistan? What you have wrote is irrlevevant to my point.

My point is relevant in the overall context of Pakistanis' opinions that Indian muslims are an unhappy subjugated lot.

To your point (bolded), the percentage of minorities in either side (Hindus/Sikhs in Pakistan versus Muslims in India) who wanted to leave but could not would be the same. The absolute numbers would be different of course simply because Hindus/Sikhs in Pakistan areas in those times would have been much much smaller than Muslims in Indian areas as a whole.
 
The point was, refugees which are demoraphically mostly Muslims were already accepted in 1971.

Its time, the minority, Hindus get the equal opportunity.

That will be actual secularism.

No, that's the exact opposite of secularism. Secularism by definition means the State and Religion are separate which is why when you say it is time Hindus get the equal opportunity to rule India flies in the face of secularism.
 
My point is relevant in the overall context of Pakistanis' opinions that Indian muslims are an unhappy subjugated lot.

To your point (bolded), the percentage of minorities in either side (Hindus/Sikhs in Pakistan versus Muslims in India) who wanted to leave but could not would be the same. The absolute numbers would be different of course simply because Hindus/Sikhs in Pakistan areas in those times would have been much much smaller than Muslims in Indian areas as a whole.

I will wait for the poster to respond as you are ignoring it, thanks anyway.
 
lol. Most of those people werent even born then.

Why are Indian Muslims not a security risk? Many wanted to leave for Pakistan couldn't do so.

Doesnot matter if they were born or not. They are not Indians and live in countries that were created out of the partition.

Indian muslims are not security risk because they didnot ask for the partition of this country. Infact they havent even tried to migrated to the two Islamic republics that are India's neighbour in last 50 yrs.
 
Doesnot matter if they were born or not. They are not Indians and live in countries that were created out of the partition.

Indian muslims are not security risk because they didnot ask for the partition of this country. Infact they havent even tried to migrated to the two Islamic republics that are India's neighbour in last 50 yrs.

They did not ask to be butchered while transporting cows nor they asked Hindu majority to elect those who say put Muslims down.

You need to come up with better one.
 
Doesnot matter if they were born or not. They are not Indians and live in countries that were created out of the partition.

Indian muslims are not security risk because they didnot ask for the partition of this country. Infact they havent even tried to migrated to the two Islamic republics that are India's neighbour in last 50 yrs.

Again, many who stayed in India wanted to leave for Paksitan. Are you denying this?

You still haven't explained why wanting partition makes someone a security risk?
 
Your statement is wrong and misleading. Not sure if you drank a koolaid or donating koolaid to others here.

1. 70% of Indian muslims say they have been treated with respect all day
2. 62% of Indian muslims say they have been happy for majority of the day
3. 89% of Indian muslims say they have freedom of speech
4. 82% of Indian muslims say they have freedom of religion
5. 83% of Indian muslims say they have freedom of assembly
6. 90% of Indian muslims have confidence in India's military
7. 72% of Indian muslims have confidence in India's financial institutions
8. 68% of Indian muslims have confidence in India's judicial system

NEUTRAL source from Gallup - https://news.gallup.com/poll/157079...-despite-economic-educational-challenges.aspx


It is one thing to speak against religious fanatics (be it saffron or green) but it is another to make complete misleading statements. Granted those percentages above will have dropped thanks to the saffron psychos' no beef, cow lynching tactics. But to claim that those opinions will have swung so much that majority of Indian muslims will want to leave India for Pakistan (with its shambolic economy) is a big big stretch.

More propaganda.

The opening line of the Gallop poll : The findings in this report are based on nationally representative studies conducted in 2010 and 2011 with a total of 9,518 Indians, including 1,197 Muslim Indians.

Not only is the report you cite 8 years irrelevant, it does not factor in the period under Modi leadership - 2014 till present. Plus 1197 Muslims were asked in the study? Hmmmm.
 
More propaganda.

The opening line of the Gallop poll : The findings in this report are based on nationally representative studies conducted in 2010 and 2011 with a total of 9,518 Indians, including 1,197 Muslim Indians.

Not only is the report you cite 8 years irrelevant, it does not factor in the period under Modi leadership - 2014 till present. Plus 1197 Muslims were asked in the study? Hmmmm.

How is this a propaganda? Did you not read my entire post (including the last paragraph) or do you have selective bias? I have called out that the percentages will be lower now than in 2011 thanks to bad right wing governance in India, so how am I aiding any propaganda? According to you anyone that does not align with the Pakistani version of world status quo is some evil propagandist?

"9,518 Indians, including 1,197 Muslim Indians." - How do you think independent opinion polls work? Do you think they poll 100 Million or 1 Billion people? All neutral polls (Gallup, PEW ...) follow this convention. Gallup and PEW are among neutral and well known opinion poll sources.
 
They did not ask to be butchered while transporting cows nor they asked Hindu majority to elect those who say put Muslims down.

You need to come up with better one.

They can take up their issues within the cobstitutional mechanisms.

They didnot ask pakistanis to help in 1947, they have not asked now. They didnot care for the pakistani leadership then, they do not care now. You were a foreigner then, you are a foreigner now. Y
 
Again, many who stayed in India wanted to leave for Paksitan. Are you denying this?

You still haven't explained why wanting partition makes someone a security risk?

Did they come and tell you? No. They remained in India and are Indians. Thats the bottomline.

I dont need to explain. They wanted a separate country. They got the land. Now they are not welcome here.
 
It's high time to bring in the NRC.

Desh hai Sarai nahin !
Pakistan passport holder was studying, voting & even seeking a job in Bharat.
Had been living in India for 17 years.
India requires a major internal security audit to send back Pakistanis & Bangladeshis.
NRC is a must.Follow due process.
#IndiaFirst
#KagazDikhao
:kp
 
I wish I could explain how miserable we Assamese people have been since decades because of these illegal Bangladeshi immigrants. One big reason why I hate, loathe, and can't stand Congress. Funniest bit is that Assamese Muslims hate those illegal parasites 10x more than Assamese Hindus do.​
 
There might be atleast 2-3 crores (if not more) of illegal population in India. (Pak + Ban + rohingya )

Scary times ahead. India is not a serious country at all .

They are ticking time bomb for national security. NRC should be implemented nationwide without any delay and all infiltrators should be deported.

:kp

I wish I could explain how miserable we Assamese people have been since decades because of these illegal Bangladeshi immigrants. One big reason why I hate, loathe, and can't stand Congress. Funniest bit is that Assamese Muslims hate those illegal parasites 10x more than Assamese Hindus do.​


.
 
There might be atleast 2-3 crores (if not more) of illegal population in India. (Pak + Ban + rohingya )

Scary times ahead. India is not a serious country at all .

They are ticking time bomb for national security. NRC should be implemented nationwide without any delay and all infiltrators should be deported.

:kp

Ram bharose chal raha hae kaam.

The carelessness of our governments over the years including BJP have put us in this situation.
 
Ram bharose chal raha hae kaam.

The carelessness of our governments over the years including BJP have put us in this situation.
No, the condition of my state, Assam is solely because of Congress. The condition of my state being infiltrated by illegal parasites from Bangladesh.
 
Back
Top