- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Runs
- 218,133
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Way more accurate than the joke ICC ranking
Thank God you agree! Was worried you would come after me![]()


Rizwan at #20 and no Babar. Beautiful.
Disappointing to see a nothing player like Shadab at #13 though. He has arguably been the biggest conman in international over the last 3-4 years.

Shadab is well deservingly in the list. He is like Rashid and Hasarnaga.
The two statistician delights don't merit a place as proved through their stat padding analysis on other thread and unsurprisingly we can see only one of them get into top 20.![]()
Decent list but I am surprised to see no one from South Africa there. I would definitely have Miller in my list.
No player from NZ either.
He is nothing like them. They are miles better leg-spinners.
Sounds about right.
No Babar and Rizwan at 20.
I can accept that.
Surprising inclusion of Shadab over Shakib. There is no way Shadab is better than Shakib.
Shadab is one of top 3 t20 spinners imo( Rashid, Hasaranga). Add his batting and fielding and he gets into every single t20 team.
I would push Narine, Bumrah and even Rashid a bit lower.
And push Shaheen, Warner and Maxwell higher up.
If you purely go by bowling You got Zampa, Shamsi, Mahraja ahead of him. Shakib is no.2 all rounder in T20I, no.1 all rounder in ODI. Why would anybody not want him?
Maxwell shouldn’t be on that list
Tim David is superior to him
None of Zampa, Shamsi and Mahraj are better bowlers than Shadab. Zampa is close but Shadab is a bigger wicket taker with similar amount of control.
You are giving me ICC rankings now? Lol. We have seen enough of him to know what he is about.
In t20 wrist spinners are always much more useful than finger spinners.
Shadab travelled in parts like South Africa, England even Zimbabwe (close to 10 an over). Look at Shakib's economy in all the countries. Apart from 8 in England everywhere in the world under 8. Shadab's stats look good due to UAE wickets.
On his day, Maxwell can do the impossible. David has to perform more in internationals for me.
These micro stats don't mean much at all. I know which bowler I'd much rather have in t20 of the 2.
These are based on CricViz's Impact Ratings.
Bit of a reality check for the PAK fans who believe batting averages are everything in T20.
Lol what is Pandya doing there? And when was the last time Sunil Narine even played an international game?
David Miller
Adam Zampa
Haris Rauf
These 3 would walk into a T20 world XI today but here not even in the top 20?
Only thing positive about this list is that it has ignored low strike rate consolidators like Kohli, Malan, Babar etc.
These are based on CricViz's Impact Ratings.
Bit of a reality check for the PAK fans who believe batting averages are everything in T20.
These are based on CricViz's Impact Ratings.
Bit of a reality check for the PAK fans who believe batting averages are everything in T20.
Another interesting analysis from cricviz on batting against high pace
Pakistan have an interesting distribution of players with Khushdil Shah surprisingly coming out as their best player against high pace. Asif Ali and Haider Ali score very quickly but get out often. Concerningly Shadab Khan, Shan Masood, Babar Azam, Mohammad Nawaz and Iftikhar Ahmed are among the weaker players on the graphic.
Obviously this has a massive assumption that consolidators don't play an important role to play in T20s today. Not all games are run fests played on highways against lolly pop bowling. Look at the last 100 games, at least 50 were low-scoring affairs (chasing < 150) where consolidators won you games. Kohli/Babar/Malan/Smith/Williamson/Hendricks have a very important role to play, which is why every team carries them. Is every team's think tank wrong and Pakpassion posters right? I dont know...
When or where did I say consolidators are not needed in T20 cricket? Of course they are needed to give the batting lineup some solidity ,(particularly at the top), but I'm talking about people who call these consolidators as "best in the world" and things like that based on the stat/avg based ICC rankings. Consolidators should only play a supporting role in a T20i Innings and let the dynamic players do the bulk of the hitting. They should never be considered as "best players" due to their low risk low reward style of play...
As always, you have comprehension issues. Rizwan is on the list anyway so he's way more valuable to the team than biryani is to Sharjeel.
The point is you're defending a corrupt cricketer and giving him more importance over the No1 ranked player in the world. And going as far as to say that the corrupt player plays for the team, while the one who has been winning matches on his own is impact less.
It's one thing having an opinion and harp about it. It's completely another if it's a highly stupid one.
Shadab is well deservingly in the list. He is like Rashid and Hasarnaga.
The two statistician delights don't merit a place as proved through their stat padding analysis on other thread and unsurprisingly we can see only one of them get into top 20.![]()
Need to use this ranking as the bench mark instead of the ICC rankings that only care about runs without context in a format like t20. These rankings care about impact and contribution toward victory.
I agree with 19 out of 20 names here.
How's Narine on this list? He barely plays any international cricket. I don't remember the last time he played for West Indies.
[MENTION=43242]Dr_Bassim[/MENTION] [MENTION=3187]fight_club[/MENTION] [MENTION=143714]Kroll[/MENTION]
Looks like these rankings don’t care about averages and 50s
[MENTION=43242]Dr_Bassim[/MENTION] [MENTION=3187]fight_club[/MENTION] [MENTION=143714]Kroll[/MENTION]
Looks like these rankings don’t care about averages and 50s