What's new

ACA preparing for worst-case scenario that could see Australian players unemployed for 12 months

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
Australia’s cricketers have sought multi-million dollar lines of credit and the financial support of private benefactors as they prepare themselves for a protracted industrial dispute with Cricket Australia, believing the organisation wants to “starve” them out.

The Australian Cricketers Association is preparing for a worst-case scenario that could see its players unemployed for 12 months — a situation which would affect this summer’s Ashes, the Big Bash League and numerous other tours.

The ACA has not ruled out seeking its own broadcast and sponsorship deals as it now owns the intellectual property rights of all Australia’s senior cricketers.

Mitchell Starc has already gone out on his own and signed a deal with Audi, a company in competition with Toyota, one of CA’s major sponsors. Another high-profile player confirmed to T he Australian he had had some contact with McDonald’s — a rival of Big Bash sponsor KFC.

Other players are said to be exploring similar deals but all will face an issue if the dispute is ever resolved as they have been warned they cannot sign a new contract with CA if they have deals with rival sponsors.

The ACA confirmed yesterday that it was digging in for a protracted dispute. “The ACA in the process of securing a multimillion-dollar line of credit to support the unemployed players to counter attempts by CA to starve them out,” a spokesman said.

“Major international financial institutions have shown strong interests in supporting the players at this difficult time. The ACA is fielding support from private individuals who are also willing to back this move.”

The Australian understands that Sydney broadcaster Alan Jones, a member of the ACA advisory board, has been approached to help out if needed. Jones did not respond to messages yesterday.

Some senior players have also held up their hand to assist domestic players who will struggle to exist while unemployed.

CA told players, most of whom are training for no money, that they will receive no back pay if a new deal is signed and is directing the salaries to a grassroots fund.

Despite both parties preparing for a long battle, there were positive reports last night about significant progress being made in meetings yesterday.

One source close to the players said the ACA believes that if Kerry Packer could run World Series Cricket in the 1970s then they could do the same if CA continues with the lockout.

The standoff is a major problem for the Nine Network, which must take its Ashes package to the market place in such uncertain times. The broadcaster pays $100m a year for television rights and looks to recoup most of that investment during the Ashes, which only comes around every four years, as other tours do not generate as much interest.

Financial analyst UBS recently advised Channel 9 not to pay so much when rights for the next four years come up, estimating the broadcaster loses $30-40m a year on the existing deal.

Australian captain Steve Smith signalled on the weekend that players were willing to give ground but that the revenue share model, which has been in place for 19 years, must remain.

CA wants the revenue share model removed so it can direct more money to grassroots cricket.

The male players have a $58.4m payment — their share of revenues above projection in the last MOU period — due in October. The ACA is understood to be examining a way to use this to assist those in financial need, but that can only happen with the approval of players it is owed to. CA has tried to argue that half this money should be used to underwrite wages in the next MOU period — a move the players reject.

The ACA’s executive manager Tim Cruikshank is travelling to India to shop around the players to sponsors and broadcasters, but people familiar with Indian sports sponsorship were cynical about what would be achieved.

Some 230 professional cricketers have been unemployed since players and administrators failed to agree on a new MOU at the end of June — 70 domestic players on multi-year contracts remain on the payroll but are refusing to play in support of their colleagues.

The Australian A tour to South Africa was cancelled and next month’s Test tour of Bangladesh is the next major hurdle.

It is, however, the seven ODI matches against India in October that will put the most pressure on administrators.

Australia-India series are huge money-spinners for the host nations and the BCCI’s broadcast partners would be very upset if they could not provide the promised cricket. India sent the West Indies a $55m bill for cancelling a series in 2014.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...k=e9824ae6b7c988f0b6d5d7fc9bfd515c-1499723562
 
Out of every cricket association, I didn't expect Cricket Australia and their players to be in this mess.

Wow.
 
Wow !!

Cricket Australia is in a royal mess. Don't how they allowed such a show down.
 
You mean ACA is preparing to make a big public show on tell in order to maximise their bargaining position.
 
You mean ACA is preparing to make a big public show on tell in order to maximise their bargaining position.

I'm not sure about that.

We are at an impasse: the former employer is basically refusing mediation because it is saying "there's nothing to discuss, you know our offer, take it or leave it."

The union which all the unemployed players belong to realises that no compromise is going to occur: the players can only retain their existing terms and conditions by maintaining their position and starving Cricket Australia out. They may have to maintain their position and see the India ODI away series and Ashes home series fail for Cricket Australia to realise that without the players it faces financial ruin.

Increasingly it looks as if compromise - which all fans want - may not happen, and this might be an IR dispute to the death.
 
I should add that David Peever's industrial relations anti-union zealotry is already crippling Cricket Australia's future finances.

Cricket Australia's "exclusive" motor vehicle deal with Toyota lies in ruins now that Mitch Starc has exercised his newly-regained media rights to sign up with Audi on a long-term deal.

Peever thinks that workers are expendable and inter-changeable. So who is he planning to have open the bowling in The Ashes now that he is no longer the employer of Starc, Hazlewood, Cummins, Pattinson, Bird, Siddle or even Paris or Boland?
 
I'm not sure about that.

We are at an impasse: the former employer is basically refusing mediation because it is saying "there's nothing to discuss, you know our offer, take it or leave it."

The union which all the unemployed players belong to realises that no compromise is going to occur: the players can only retain their existing terms and conditions by maintaining their position and starving Cricket Australia out. They may have to maintain their position and see the India ODI away series and Ashes home series fail for Cricket Australia to realise that without the players it faces financial ruin.

Increasingly it looks as if compromise - which all fans want - may not happen, and this might be an IR dispute to the death.

Lol

The Ashes are not getting cancelled.

Will be sorted out by September at the latest.
 
Highlights from the withering dissection of Cricket Australia in the Australian Financial Review.......

"How did Australian cricket get here? Thanks to the truly unique individuals populating Cricket Australia's headquarters at 60 Jolimont Street. They're all straight out of Narnia.

James Sutherland, chief executive of 17 years, has been overtly absent from negotiations with the players. And given his bargaining team's performance, he'll be grateful for the free pass handed to him by chairman David Peever, who wanted this to be the great audition for CEO-in-waiting Kevin Roberts. Pity the former Adidas executive has played this one like Victor Trumper on debut at Nottingham.

On Sunday the Australian Cricketers' Association effectively called off this month's Australia A tour of South Africa (valuable preparation for the Test team's tour there in March). Only an English schoolboy in the back of a wardrobe feasting on psychotropic Turkish delight would expect this to pan out differently.

So is Peever and his board (including a key architect of the current revenue sharing model, Mark Taylor) hallucinating or are they all just waiting for Aslan?

CA wants to decouple players' pay from the growth in the sports revenue pie, and link it instead to surplus revenue. In plain English, Mr Tumnus and friends want the sport's current and future stars (its only real assets) not to get a share of the cash cricket actually generates (tax-free, as a not-for-profit), but what's left over after Jolimont Street spends however much of it they want to.

And on what? Well, in 2016, of the $340 million pie: $34.9 million on "media, marketing and communications" (because they're just so stellar at that), $56.7 million on "operations" and $32.2 million on "administration".

Oh, and $5.6 million on executive salaries, the distribution of which is audaciously murky.

See, Cricket Australia's eight non-executive directors are unpaid (AFL Commissioners, comparatively, are paid $20,000 but most donate their stipend to game development).

Which means only Peever, Sutherland and an unspecified number of senior CA employees "with the authority for the strategic direction and management of" CA, share the loot. CA, true to form, refuses to identify or number them.

If, say, CA's KMP pool is shared between Peever and three execs, that would be, well, hard to swallow for the so-called greedy players holding out on them.

In any campaign for change, you establish a burning platform. That's communications 101. CA's top brass, no doubt still figuring out how to cook their own breakfasts, has utterly failed to do so.

There is no impetus to change cricket's existing revenue model because nobody thinks it is broken.

There is no howling public pressure to divert professional athletes' pay into grassroots cricket because not even the clubs themselves are saying they're currently underfunded (and if they were, what was CA doing with their 74 per cent of the growing pie? Spending it on indentured chefs?).

After sitting at the feet of the union-busting Leigh Clifford at Rio Tinto (interestingly enough Jacqueline Hey is both a member of Big Leigh's Qantas board and Peever's at CA), Peever might romanticise industrial disputation.

But it's one thing replacing some numbskull on a forklift at a Hunter coal mine and another entirely treating Steve Smith or Mitchell Starc, not only elite athletes but national heroes, like numbers on a spreadsheet.

Does Peever have Roberts on the phone to Chris Corrigan's old mates Fynwest in Dubai?

"Listen I need half a dozen boys fit enough to sprint the Nullarbor. Nothing too prescriptive – just 190 centimetres tall and can bowl late in-swinging Yorkers at 150 clicks all day into the wind. Be good if they could bat too. Oh, and I need them yesterday."

Fantasy. Straight from the back of a wardrobe, where it's always winter and never Christmas."
 
Last edited:
Didn't ECB claim if this issue isn't fixed they won't tour Australia for the Ashes?

If so the pressure is on CA more-so than it is on the players involved.
 
Is there any cricket board that is not in the news for wrong reasons these days?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The compromise is getting quite close now.

1) CA stops funding the Australian Cricketers Association.
2) Revenue sharing remains, but at a lower rate of around 22%.
3) CA loses exclusive control of image rights, with The Cricketers' Brand subsidiary of ACA assuming most rights.
 
There is much to lose by not resolving pay dispute: Hayden

Australian legend Matthew Hayden said India tour is a premium test event in their cricket culture and it is important to quickly resolve the pay dispute as there is a lot at stake.

"I think it will get resolved. But I am not sure how it will get resolved. That is because there have been mediation efforts and that have not been accepted," Hayden told PTI.



"Plans have been laid out pretty substantially. There has to be a meeting of the minds. And, it has to happen quickly. We have a tour of India coming up as well. It is very important part of meeting the ICC future tours programme.

"There is a lot at stake. Not to mention of the Ashes. (Matches against) India and the Ashes are the premium test match events in the Australian cricket culture. There is so much to lose by not resolving the issues."

Talking about Test cricket, Hayden said the longer format of the game can never be replaced and it is important how the administrators and ICC balance it with the other formats.

"I have heard arguments that Twenty-20 cricket is always going to be a problem. T20 cricket is a solution. Test cricket is also a solution, to a different audience. You will never ever get test match cricket replaced. But, the administrators and International Cricket Council (ICC) in particular have to acknowledge the changing face of test cricket.

"To have 14 test matches in a domestic summer in India is going to have effects on the fan base of cricket. No questions. Then you add on the other layers, of one-dayers and T20 international(s). Something has got to give.

"I don't believe that the ICC is addressing the future tours programme as it could be to acknowledge the importance of T20 cricket, but also at the end of the stick acknowledge every stakeholder in the game loves test cricket. How do you balance that programme, is important.

"You have to be careful about branding of test match cricket. This is what I think Australia and England have done particularly well, and South Africa, to a degree. They have protected the tradition of the game. Test match cricket is our bluechip property. There has to be a careful balance between T20 and One-day cricket," said Hayden, who is here as a commentator for the Tamil Nadu Premier League (TNPL).

Asked to compare the styles of India captain Virat Kohli and Australian skipper Steven Smith, Hayden, who played for Chennai Super Kings in the IPL, said, "I don't think it can be done. They are very different personalities. I will say Virat is part of the modern face of India.

"A bold personality. He is a resilient personality as well and is prepared to take a stand. His natural game as is Smith's natural game are almost similar. They are incredibly skilled and are the best players in their respective teams.

"They have a very different style of captaincy. One is a little here, kind of, while Smith is slightly laidback. Both have got extremely strong personalities."

On CSK's return to the IPL fold in 2018, the Australian said, "I don't think you can get a bigger fan of CSK than Hayden. I really missed CSK in the last two years. I was very disappointed that they were not there in the last two editions of IPL.

"The team's success has been incredible and their fan base is massive. Importantly, it has been primarily focused on the key asset, cricket."

About Pakistan's triumph in the recent Champions Trophy in England, he said, "Pakistan is such an enigma. I would have lost my life's savings on Pakistan if I had said they would win the Champions Trophy and that too over India!

"They're such a dangerous side and they're fantastic front-runners. That was a perfect set-up for them, get a big score in a big match and get India to chase it down. It would have had to been a perfect run-chase for India to win.

"I can't help but think for a tournament I don't believe in, it is such an unnecessary ICC tournament. But I couldn't help but think if you're going to play it, at least the right number of people are going to watch it when Pakistan and India play together.

http://www.business-standard.com/ar...olving-pay-dispute-hayden-117071801495_1.html
 
Back
Top