Beijing could interfere in Kashmir, says Chinese media after Dalai Lama visits Arunachal

[Zak_Fan]

Ok Mr.Illiterate, here is Economy 101 for you:

Per Capita Income = GDP of country / Population of country




Try to wrap your head around this basic concept and then we will move to lesson number 2.

Thanks for something irrelvant and obvious. Let's move on to lesson 2. Answer my question above.

 

[Specialisttailender]

I don't mind Pakistanis acting like illiterates, but fellow Indians doing the same breaks my heart.

India's GDP is $2.6 trillion. Pakistani GDP is $284 billion. Do your maths again before countering me with such nonsense.

Says the illiterate that doesn't know the difference between GDP and GDP Per Capita.

Lets go with your way, Pakistan's population is 200 million while Indian's population is 1.2 Billion. We have way more poor people. 44% of our people make less than a $1 a day while Pakistan's rate is 31%. Pakistan is smaller while India is bigger in land size and we have problem allocating resources and building infrastructure through out the country evenly. We have so much problems, but that is none of your problem your problem is to look cool so you can stroke your ego. This is the most pathetic behavior of my countrymen. I'm disgusted by the existence of people like you. You are probably the ones that question people's patriotism if they were to say anything against the state. You are better of in North Korea. I don't know if you have gone outside of India, if you can and are able to you should. Look how far other countries have progressed. We are still here fighting about who is less poor and less backward than the other. You can argue with someone that lacks knowledge but can never argue with an ignorant person.

 

[Zak_Fan]

Says the illiterate that doesn't know the difference between GDP and GDP Per Capita.

Lets go with your way, Pakistan's population is 200 million while Indian's population is 1.2 Billion. We have way more poor people. 44% of our people make less than a $1 a day while Pakistan's rate is 31%. Pakistan is smaller while India is bigger in land size and we have problem allocating resources and building infrastructure through out the country evenly. We have so much problems, but that is none of your problem your problem is to look cool so you can stroke your ego. This is the most pathetic behavior of my countrymen. I'm disgusted by the existence of people like you. You are probably the ones that question people's patriotism if they were to say anything against the state. You are better of in North Korea. I don't know if you have gone outside of India, if you can and are able to you should. Look how far other countries have progressed. We are still here fighting about who is less poor and less backward than the other. You can argue with someone that lacks knowledge but can never argue with an ignorant person.

Gosh, this will be my last attempt at making you realize where you are wrong.

China's per capita income is nearly twice Sri Lanka's.

Would you extend your logic and say that China should be spending twice as much as it's military expenditure?

If your answer is yes, then its a hopeless case, believe what you want. But if your answer is no, then try to figure out why it is so, and once you figure it out, extend that logic to our argument above.

 

[Saeed]

Teach me why a country's defense budget should be a reflection of it's per capita income. I am all ears.

Post #75 was referring to GDP so we are talking about GDP here. The D in GDP has nothing to do with defense. It means Gross Domestic Product. Google what how GDP is calculated and what per capita is. Your post about "population is irrelevant to GDP" proves you have no idea what you're talking about.

 

[Zak_Fan]

Post #75 was referring to GDP so we are talking about GDP here. The D in GDP has nothing to do with defense. It means Gross Domestic Product. Google what how GDP is calculated and what per capita is. Your post about "population is irrelevant to GDP" proves you have no idea what you're talking about.

The debate that guys started is how India spending 10 times as much as Pakistan does or does not make sense. Population doesn't count for anything here as the idea of exploring Per Capita to ascertain that purchasing power is stupid.

Things would be clear if you stop pretending like you are not getting the context of this debate started by [MENTION=143248]Specialisttailender[/MENTION].

 

[Saeed]

The debate that guys started is how India spending 10 times as much as Pakistan does or does not make sense. Population doesn't count for anything here as the idea of exploring Per Capita to ascertain that purchasing power is stupid.

Things would be clear if you stop pretending like you are not getting the context of this debate started by [MENTION=143248]Specialisttailender[/MENTION].

I am. I didn't start anything. You called other people ignorant so as "you guys" say, it was necessary to show you mirror.

 

[Zak_Fan]

I am. I didn't start anything. You called other people ignorant so as "you guys" say, it was necessary to show you mirror.

Well, the post was ignorant, so I called it ignorant. Read it and tell me if you have a different opinion.

India should do the same. If Pakistan's GDP per capital is only about $150 less than us, why are we spending 10X more than Pakistan ? Can't afford to spend 75 Billion on military, like wth ? We only need $10B dollars to protect our border or maybe even $20B. The day our leaders get their health treatment done in our government hospitals and send their kids to government schools is the day we can afford to spend lavishly on war materials. We are still a 3rd world country.

 

[Saeed]

Well, the post was ignorant, so I called it ignorant. Read it and tell me if you have a different opinion.

What's ignorant about it? Just because you have bigger GDP it doesn't mean you must spend more on defense. Rest of his post is right on the target. Per capita wise your population isn't doing much better than Pakistan. So instead of spending 10x on defense focus on health and education.

 

[Zak_Fan]

What's ignorant about it?

Using GDP per capita to arrive at that conclusion.

Just because you have bigger GDP it doesn't mean you must spend more on defense. Rest of his post is right on the target. Per capita wise your population isn't doing much better than Pakistan. So instead of spending 10x on defense focus on health and education.

Doesn't mean that we must, but it does mean that we can. Besides, India spends 2.3% of it's GDP on military, Pakistan spends 3.4%. So even on that count, the brother's logic fails. In equivalent terms, India isn't spending 10 times but, 2/3rd.

I am done explaining now.

 

[Saeed]

Using GDP per capita to arrive at that conclusion.




Doesn't mean that we must, but it does mean that we can. Besides, India spends 2.3% of it's GDP on military, Pakistan spends 3.4%. So even on that count, the brother's logic fails. In equivalent terms, India isn't spending 10X but, 2/3rd.

I am done explaining now.

I am sure he was just taking a wild guess with 10x, you're nitpicking to prove him ignorant just because he challenged you. He was right about spending more on defense when your average guy isn't doing much better than Pakistan.

 

[Specialisttailender]

The debate that guys started is how India spending 10 times as much as Pakistan does or does not make sense. Population doesn't count for anything here as the idea of exploring Per Capita to ascertain that purchasing power is stupid.

Things would be clear if you stop pretending like you are not getting the context of this debate started by [MENTION=143248]Specialisttailender[/MENTION].

There are people that don't know and then there are people that don't know that they don't know. Never quote me ever again. Not going to waste my time and energy anymore on you. On the positive side Mr.Clean India needs people like you. You are the perfect Indian our leaders need.

 

[Specialisttailender]

Gosh, this will be my last attempt at making you realize where you are wrong.

China's per capita income is nearly twice Sri Lanka's.

Would you extend your logic and say that China should be spending twice as much as it's military expenditure?

If your answer is yes, then its a hopeless case, believe what you want. But if your answer is no, then try to figure out why it is so, and once you figure it out, extend that logic to our argument above.

Nobody said we should allocate military budget based on population. You don't get the point. We are too poor to have that military budget. That was the point. Again, don't quote me ever again.

 

[Enigma_]

Says the illiterate that doesn't know the difference between GDP and GDP Per Capita.

Lets go with your way, Pakistan's population is 200 million while Indian's population is 1.2 Billion. We have way more poor people. 44% of our people make less than a $1 a day while Pakistan's rate is 31%. Pakistan is smaller while India is bigger in land size and we have problem allocating resources and building infrastructure through out the country evenly. We have so much problems, but that is none of your problem your problem is to look cool so you can stroke your ego. This is the most pathetic behavior of my countrymen. I'm disgusted by the existence of people like you. You are probably the ones that question people's patriotism if they were to say anything against the state. You are better of in North Korea. I don't know if you have gone outside of India, if you can and are able to you should. Look how far other countries have progressed. We are still here fighting about who is less poor and less backward than the other. You can argue with someone that lacks knowledge but can never argue with an ignorant person.

Lots of respect to you. Calling it like it is. People here are deluded and ignorant without understanding a fraction of what's happening.

 

[PakLFC]

I see the China-Pak v India-USA war has already started on the www. I am putting my money on Sino-Pak here. By the way as much as it hurts India, Pak is indeed a major player on the global table. India may be much bigger in size but as they say the bigger they are the harder they fall. So what is the problem here? If India upsets China by inviting the Lama then China can speak about Kashmir as well.

 

[Zak_Fan]

Nobody said we should allocate military budget based on population. You don't get the point. We are too poor to have that military budget. That was the point. Again, don't quote me ever again.

I am not arguing against your sentiment, any person with a functional brain would want to see excess military budget going to education and infrastructure.

I am arguing against is the ridiculous logic and mathematical nonsense you applied to counter me. Don't make it an ego thing. I corrected you, showed you how things work, so be thankful and move on. But no, I guess me calling you ignorant hurt you so much that you are not even willing to correct yourself.

 

[Saeed]

I see the China-Pak v India-USA war has already started on the www. I am putting my money on Sino-Pak here. By the way as much as it hurts India, Pak is indeed a major player on the global table. India may be much bigger in size but as they say the bigger they are the harder they fall. So what is the problem here? If India upsets China by inviting the Lama then China can speak about Kashmir as well.

Sino-Pak? China and U.S. have no right to interfere in an issue between Pakistan and India. Do you really think they care about Kashmiris? It's amazing how so many people want them to interfere. No wonder Britain ruled us and we deserved it because of our behavior.

 

[Dr_Bassim]

All this because Beijing said something?

And let's be honest.

China has enough on its plate with Japan, Taiwan and other problems than to really attack India.

But one thing is certain.

People who think India is bigger superpower than China, militarily or economically, are living in a buffoon's land.
China has enough stock (a valid source of my personal friend in the government) to destroy not just India but India and Pakistan together.

It's just that they will never attack and these are just ants in pants sort of remarks to just balance the political power struggle.

I am sure my Indian friends will be indignant and now claim after this that India can beat China easily but sorry that will NEVER be true if it ever came to war.

 

[Slog]

Well if you believe the stupid logic that is being provided to you of if it being disputed then in same accord India has claim for Baluchistan , it is a disputed territory as well . Bring that to the table and talk

no you simpleton

Kashmir is disputed territory because international independant organizations such as the UN call it so

 

[LastManstanding]

I am sure he was just taking a wild guess with 10x, you're nitpicking to prove him ignorant just because he challenged you. He was right about spending more on defense when your average guy isn't doing much better than Pakistan.

Not that I disagree with spending less on military and more on the welfare of common people but you have to protect the sovereignty of the country too. India has been attacked 5 times by its neighbors in the last 70 years. And unlike Pakistan India doesn't get freebies from US.

 

[Zak_Fan]

All this because Beijing said something?

And let's be honest.

China has enough on its plate with Japan, Taiwan and other problems than to really attack India.

But one thing is certain.

People who think India is bigger superpower than China, militarily or economically, are living in a buffoon's land.
China has enough stock (a valid source of my personal friend in the government) to destroy not just India but India and Pakistan together.

It's just that they will never attack and these are just ants in pants sort of remarks to just balance the political power struggle.

I am sure my Indian friends will be indignant and now claim after this that India can beat China easily but sorry that will NEVER be true if it ever came to war.

Who are you talking to here? I don't see one person here with such views.

 

[Kaptan]

All this because Beijing said something?

And let's be honest.

China has enough on its plate with Japan, Taiwan and other problems than to really attack India.

But one thing is certain.

People who think India is bigger superpower than China, militarily or economically, are living in a buffoon's land.
China has enough stock (a valid source of my personal friend in the government) to destroy not just India but India and Pakistan together.

It's just that they will never attack and these are just ants in pants sort of remarks to just balance the political power struggle.

I am sure my Indian friends will be indignant and now claim after this that India can beat China easily but sorry that will NEVER be true if it ever came to war.

The same can be said about Pakistan ?
People who think Pakistan is bigger superpower than India, militarily or economically, are living in a buffoon's land.
+ China and India will NEVER go to war. There is too much to lose but very less to gain. So, China destroying India will always remain a wet dream for some Pakistanis.

 

[Saeed]

Not that I disagree with spending less on military and more on the welfare of common people but you have to protect the sovereignty of the country too. India has been attacked 5 times by its neighbors in the last 70 years. And unlike Pakistan India doesn't get freebies from US.

Someone has to break the cycle. Both nations don't even want to approach each other for peace so nothing will change.

 

[LastManstanding]

Someone has to break the cycle. Both nations don't even want to approach each other for peace so nothing will change.

Do we have the common sense to realize that the ones profiting from this ongoing conflict are the western nations who have a huge market to sell their weapons whereas our people are struggling to get two meals per day.

 

[PakLFC]

Sino-Pak? China and U.S. have no right to interfere in an issue between Pakistan and India. Do you really think they care about Kashmiris? It's amazing how so many people want them to interfere. No wonder Britain ruled us and we deserved it because of our behavior.

Who said anything about the American's interfering? I am saying if the Bharatis interfere in China's affairs then they in return will also do the same for sure. Britain did not rule us because of the Chinese or Americans at all. As for Kashmir the Muslim world has to unite if it is to ever be liberated. There is no reason why any western country would side with Muslim Pakistan. The UK is firstly responsible for this mess in the first place.

 

[FearlessRoar]

Dalai Lama gets Z-category security from government after threat intel: Sources​

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) on Thursday provided a Z-category security to Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, based on intelligence threat assessments, sources told India Today TV. Dalai Lama's security has been upgraded based on the threat assessment report given by the Intellegence Bureau.

Under this enhanced security arrangement, the 89-year-old spiritual leader will get a total of 33 security personnel, including armed static guards stationed at his residence in Himachal Pradesh's Dharamshala, personal security officers providing round-the-clock protection, and commandos forming an armed escort in shifts.

Additionally, trained drivers and surveillance personnel will be on duty at all times to ensure his safety.

The revered Tibetan spiritual leader has been living in India since 1959 after fleeing Chinese rule in Tibet. In view of his global influence and the sensitive geopolitical tensions surrounding Tibet, the Indian government provides him with high-level security cover.

Over the years, intelligence reports have indicated potential threats to Dalai Lama's life from various entities, including China-backed actors, making his protection a top priority for Indian authorities.

Dalai Lama gets Z-category security from government after threat intel: Sources

Under the Z-category security arrangement, the 89-year-old spiritual leader, Dalai Lama, will get a total of 33 security personnel, including armed static guards stationed at his residence in Himachal Pradesh's Dharamshala.

www.indiatoday.in