What's new

"Ben Stokes is a better cricketer than myself, Ian Botham" : Andrew Flintoff

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
The old Andrew Flintoff is talking about The New Andrew Flintoff. ‘I genuinely don’t think there is a comparison. He’s better than me. I’m not being humble here or playing myself down. I was decent, yes. But Ben Stokes can be another level. He needs to set his sights higher.’

Set his sights where? ‘Don’t call him an all-rounder, for a start. He’s better than that! I always thought being an all-rounder suggested you can do a bit of everything but you’re not a master of any of it. Ben Stokes can bat. He’s a batter.

‘We look for this mythical all-rounder in our country, a player who is Superman. And then when he’s not, we like to pick faults.

‘Stokes is more than that. He could bat at three for England. He could be the best pick at No 3 for any country in the world.

‘He can be another Joe Root. He’s a proper batsman. You see his technique, shot selection, aggression.

‘Oh, he can bowl too. We’ve seen that. Ask the South Africans. Trust me, he’s better than me, better than Ian Botham too. Beefy was a hero of mine, but Stokes is a better cricketer. Better than all of us.’

They’ve only met a handful of times, they are not agency stablemates or friends, so this joy in Stokes’s growing status is genuine. Flintoff’s kids ‘love watching Stokes play’ and he was at The Oval where Stokes was man of the match for his all-round display to help England to a 2-1 series lead. He will go to Old Trafford for the final Test starting on Friday too.

This debate, comparing Flintoff with Stokes, came about because Stuart Broad was dazzled by a spell of hostile fast bowling from the Durham man. ‘Ben had the wind behind him and his bouncer that hurt Dean Elgar really fired him up,’ said Broad. ‘I was fielding at mid-on and it felt quick. It felt like one of those intimidating spells Andrew Flintoff used to bowl, heavy and at the batsman. He dragged the team with him.’

Flintoff accepts the compliment with a smile. These days he is doing a lot of smiling.

He’s lost weight, looks well, is taking acting and singing lessons and is soon to appear in the musical of Fat Friends. But before that, he is happy to eulogise about Stokes and this present England team, of whom he says: ‘It’s not about if they will win The Ashes, but by how much?’

He continues: ‘People won’t agree with this — because we like to talk down our teams — but this can be the best England team of all time.

‘Think about it. We’ve got the best batsman ever, Alastair Cook, England’s best bowler in Jimmy Anderson, the captain, Root, who can be whatever he wants to be, Stuart Broad’s figures are excellent. Jonny Bairstow at seven. Stop talking about why he should bat up the order. Moeen Ali batting at No 8. And Ben Stokes!

‘England will win the Ashes this winter. I just want them to stop concentrating on what they can’t do and think about what they can.’

Stokes is one of the players who has helped Flintoff fall back in love with the game. ‘You look at the games Ben Stokes is playing. When I was playing, there were a few teams that weren’t up to much. Sri Lanka were average. India were average, New Zealand (screws up face) . . . now every team can beat everyone else. You don’t get five or six wickets and go through a team. As a bowler it’s harder.

‘As a batsman, it’s not just about facing raw pace. The bowlers you face are more skilful. So Ben is emerging at a time when it’s a lot harder. I’m glad we are sitting here excited about him. So we should be.

‘I saw him at Old Trafford a few years back and Steve Harmison said, “This lad is going to be the next thing, even better than we’ve seen”. For some people it takes longer to adapt to international cricket and Ben has a little bit. And now . . . his bowling is getting better. I was better at the end of my career than I was when I was young because you start to figure it out.

‘I never bowled as quick or as well as when I was 31. He’s getting better all the time. We were there at The Oval last week. We saw it. When he played in the Big Bash a couple of years ago, they didn’t even bowl him. Now? He’s your go-to guy.’

Unsurprisingly, Flintoff, a swashbuckling star of his time, insists we have to accept Stokes warts and all.

‘He’ll get a ban some time. Of course he will. He’s two demerit points away, isn’t he? It’s going to happen. But you can’t have all that fire, match-winning performances with the bat and the ball and ask him to change.

‘The game has changed. I got called in once by Clive Lloyd and he said, “Don’t do that again”. I said, “OK, I won’t . . . ” That was it. Now Kagiso Rabada gets a one-game ban for totting up points for indiscipline. That’s harsh. It will happen to Ben too.

‘He’s a better cricketer in a battle. On the big stage. He loves it. Don’t change him. Accept him. Enjoy every game he plays.

‘He’ll get injuries. I hope he doesn’t but I fear it’s inevitable the way he plays. You watch him on the field, diving about into advertising hoardings, chasing every ball down. He will get injured but he’s going to have an exciting career.’

It means Stokes is hot property. He cost £1.4m in the last Indian Premier League auction and there is a risk he could earn a fortune from the game taking his talents around the world to the detriment of England. But Flintoff is not buying that view.

‘Look at him playing for our country. Do you think he looks like a man chasing the money or a man who is happiest out there in his England kit?

‘I’m sure with the money they pay him, he’s got a lovely house and a nice new car but he wants to perform for his team-mates, for England.

‘I learnt the hard way. I started earning a few quid when I was about 20. You get all the trappings. But if the cricket isn’t right, the money soon goes. With him, you can see he is focused — and the money will come to him. Playing well for England, being a match- winner, winning the Ashes. The rest, the IPL, the Big Bash, they will come.

‘And who remembers who wins the IPL? You remember who wins the Ashes.’

The man who was an all-action all-rounder for England, but lost an Ashes series as captain 5-0, has one piece of advice for Stokes.

‘Stay as vice-captain. Stay there. He might have aspirations to be England captain but don’t do it!

‘I can’t speak for him, but if I am relating it to my career, I found it one job too many. I found it so hard. Bowling, batting, captain. You had to go back to your room and switch off but I couldn’t. It was draining. I didn’t know when to bowl myself. I ended up, “I’ll bowl” or if something needed doing, “I’ll do it”.

‘For him to play in the way in which he does, he doesn’t need that.

‘But who knows? He keeps on amazing us. He could take over after Joe Root’s had enough and be the best England captain ever. And I hope he does. All I am saying about that is, “Be careful”.

‘I want him to enjoy his cricket, as he is now.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/cr...w-Flintoff-insists-Ben-Stokes-better-was.html
 
Maybe in batting is he comparable but Botham was also arguably a better bowler than any English pacer since Willis, what makes Stokes comparable?
 
In cricket, you are only as good as as you perform on the given day. And that given day is always now and today.
 
Botham and Flintoff were better bowlers.

Flintoff himself had a good peak as a bowler, shame he underachieved due to booze, psychological issues and poor fitness.
 
Botham and Flintoff were a million miles better as bowlers. Stokes will never be anything more than a 4th seamer unlike Botham n Flintoff who were genuine spearheads of their teams.

As a batsman Stokes can overtake them. Hes a better bat than Flintoff. And will become better than Botham if he carries on.
 
classic English hyperbole from Flintoff. Why does this always happen once england gets a decent cricketer amongst its ranks
 
Stokes and Flintoff is a valid comparison. Flintoff a high class bowler, and a merely useful batsman who was sizzling on his day; Stokes a merely useful bowler who was highly impactful on his day, but always a genuinely good batsman.

Botham is in a different league compared to these two though, one of the few ATGs ever from England and arguably their best ever player.
 
Stokes and Flintoff is a valid comparison. Flintoff a high class bowler, and a merely useful batsman who was sizzling on his day; Stokes a merely useful bowler who was highly impactful on his day, but always a genuinely good batsman.

Botham is in a different league compared to these two though, one of the few ATGs ever from England and arguably their best ever player.

Largely agree with this- although i'm not convinced that Stokes is always a good batsmen. I agree with Nasser when he said Stokes is not a consistent performer but he will be able to win you matches with moments of excellence.

Botham was better than both by a long way. At present, I would still take Flintoff over Stokes but lets see how Stokes develops.
 
Stokes is a good a batter and fielder as Botham after 35 tests, but nowhere near as good a bowler.

He's better than Flintoff was after 35 tests with bat and ball.
 
Flintoff is getting carried away. :danish

Stokes can potentially surpass him and Botham with the bat, but his bowling needs further improvement.
 
Last edited:
Flintoff should have buried Stokes like some other retired players do. This is conduct unbecoming of a disgruntled former sportsman.
 
Think Stokes will end up better than Flintoff for sure despite the latter being a very good player. Botham not sure.

I think the debate with stokes is whether to bat him at 7 or 8, and which out of him and Moeen to put at 8. Bairstow is more consistent and should be batting above Stokes. I think Stokes needs to develop into a consistent bowler, his fourth seamer job is important, especially when England have no amazing Spinner (Moeen is just decent). Despite Ben Stokes being far more talented and frankly exciting, Moeen is the more valuable of the two just because he holds down a place bowling alone. England have other more consistent batsmen to rely on, like Moeen a strength is providing a bowling option without sacrificing the strength of the batting. Feel this is negated somewhat though if a better batsman is batting 7 because of him and he's not dependent with the ball enough. I'm not hating on Stokes or anything, he's probably my favourite player to watch in the England team (and one of my favourite in general).
 
I think Freddie's comments are reasonable in the respect that Stokes is already a better batsman than both Freddie & Botham & will likely get even better (he's still improving from what I can see) & may end up a world class batsman. All 3 were aggressive stroke makers as batsmen- far more similar in batting style & approach than their very different bowling roles.

Freddie & Beefy were both handy & dangerous on their day but no more than that perhaps more had more batting talent than their results showed as neither always took their batting so seriously & were often too exhausted as spearhead bowlers to spend time on it.

As a bowler Stokes is a different kettle of fish. Botham was a world class swing bowler, almost worthy of atg category in swing bowling alone. He had a self-belief and ability to stamp himself on a game or takes wickets with bad balls through force of will in an almost Warne-like way (according to my old man!- I only caught the very end of Botham's career)

Freddie didn't rack up the stats he could have as he didn't look after himself & really only had 3-4 good years as a bowler (from about 2003-2006), but during those years he was top class- a truly intimidating presence with 150k pace and a real skill at reverse swing (only pace bowler I can remember who made Gilchrist his bunny). Capable of captivating spells but tended to only get up for big moments & not pad his figures with minnow bashing he seemed less interested in.

Stokes has neither the swing, nor the top-line pace. He could be an effective bowler, he's sharp, 90mph at his best and can swing it a bit. At his best though he's a 3rd seamer at present but those 2 traits- sharp pace + decent swing/seam could be used to forge a very respectable bowling career. If he stays fit & keeps concentrating on his bowling he could a very under-rated Kallis type bowling contributor over his career.

That is where I think Freddie was going with his comments- Kallis racked up stats that put him far above Freddie (thrilling as Freddie was) and on the balance of his batting + bowling Kallis vs Beefy is an arguable case either way. I think Freddie thinks Stokes could end up as a class batsman with slightly more to offer than Kallis with the ball + be as exciting & game changing as a Botham or Freddie (where Kallis was a more a grinder & reliable regular contributor). It's a huge call and will take a miraculous career to get anywhere near that but not beyond Stokes ability if he keeps improving.
 
Stokes is certainly one of the best all-rounders to be produced by New Zealand for a while. LOL
 
I think Freddie's comments are reasonable in the respect that Stokes is already a better batsman than both Freddie & Botham & will likely get even better (he's still improving from what I can see) & may end up a world class batsman. All 3 were aggressive stroke makers as batsmen- far more similar in batting style & approach than their very different bowling roles.

Freddie & Beefy were both handy & dangerous on their day but no more than that perhaps more had more batting talent than their results showed as neither always took their batting so seriously & were often too exhausted as spearhead bowlers to spend time on it.

As a bowler Stokes is a different kettle of fish. Botham was a world class swing bowler, almost worthy of atg category in swing bowling alone. He had a self-belief and ability to stamp himself on a game or takes wickets with bad balls through force of will in an almost Warne-like way (according to my old man!- I only caught the very end of Botham's career)

Perhaps you only saw the overweight and injury-ridden shadow of the man who hit fourteen test hundreds, then. Hooking the great Lillee off his eyebrows for six in 1981. The double century against India. Hadlee armed with the new ball and every man back on the boundary. Peak Botham was a proper test batter, as good as Gatting and Lamb and much faster scoring, yet with the best defensive technique in the England side.

Stokes is already that good against pace but has to learn to play spinners as well as Botham did.
 
Last edited:
I absolutely detest with the norm of comparing today's players with the past legends just on the basis of one performance in one test/odi series. The twitterati cricket experts are to blame for this a lot.

Just two weeks back, flintoff and vaughn were lambasting england eam that they were appaling, had no grit and held no respect for test cricket. These two are big drama queens especially vaughn. Now just after two victories, Flintoff wants to compare stokes with beefy??

Beefy played cricket for almost 15 years at international level. His county career is even longer. I don't care how brilliant stokes is in one series or a particular match. He has not reached that stage yet to be compared to an ATG whose career spanned two decades & played thrice as much test cricket.. Let him play 100 tests and then we can talk about it.
 
Botham at his peak could get into the england team on either discipline alone

A genuine opening strike bowler who hit ferocious test match hundreds regularly

Yes he fell away in his last few years alarmingly but that shouldnt be how hes remembered

Stokes is nowhere near his level at the moment Esp with the ball
 
Ian Bottam is a legend , Stokes has to win more games before any comparisions can be made.
 
In Freddie Flintoff: Living With Bulimia - to be broadcast on Monday at 21:00 BST - he asks whether he needs professional help for the first time.

"I don't want to be a statistic," he said.

"I don't want it to be read that something has happened to me."

Experts estimate that at least 1.5 million people in the UK - of which 25% are male - have an eating disorder like bulimia.

Flintoff, who now presents Top Gear, played 79 Tests during an England career that spanned 11 years before his retirement in 2009.

He describes how his struggle with bulimia began when focus was put on his weight during the early part of his international playing days.

"I became known as a fat cricketer," said Flintoff. "That was horrible. That was when I started doing it.

"That was when I started being sick after meals. Then things started happening for me as a player."

He also details how he would make himself sick during the iconic 2005 Ashes series against Australia, when his starring role helped England recapture the urn for the first time in 18 years and earned him the BBC's Sports Personality of the Year award.

"Everyone was happy with me," he said. "My weight was coming down. It was like: 'I'm bossing this.' It just carried on and I was doing it all the time."

Flintoff describes how the infamous pedalo incident, when he had to be hauled from the sea after a drinking session during the 2007 World Cup, forced him to evaluate all aspects of his life, including the bulimia.

He also considers the possibility that the eating disorder contributed to the early end to his career - he was only 31 when he played his last Test for England.

Flintoff made a comeback in 2016, playing Twenty20 cricket for Lancashire and Australian side Brisbane Heat.

He also had one fight as a professional boxer before turning his attention to his TV career.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/54281217
 
I am totally in his corner for bulimia - but in my VERY humble and UNINFORMED opinion, this is very sudden and given recent history does Freddy needs more help than just that?
 
I remember hearing a few years ago about Flintoff's battle with bulimia. He spoke about how during lunch breaks in the middle of a game after eating, he'd go to the toilet to stick two fingers down his throat in order to regurgitate.

Thankfully Flintoff appeared to have recovered from it.

I'd like to think the game has moved on since then and support is readily available for players who have such issues.
 

Andrew Flintoff's Hundred head coach role audition for England job: Stuart Broad​


England legend Stuart Broad suggests that Andrew Flintoff's position as the Northern Superchargers coach could be a potential audition for the England head coach role as the iconic all-rounder is set to join forces with Ben Stokes in The Hundred. Flintoff has re-engaged with cricket after a severe crash during the filming of BBC's Top Gear in December 2022, now playing a growing role in England's white-ball setup. Flintoff's new team, the Northern Superchargers, will kick off their campaign against Trent Rockets on Friday. Stokes is expected to join the Superchargers once England's ongoing Test series against the West Indies concludes.

The former England captain and iconic figure from the 2005 Ashes has recently been part of the backroom staff for the T20 World Cup. Flintoff has been considered a potential replacement for the under-pressure Matthew Mott, following England's recent losses of both limited-overs global titles. England's Test captain, Stokes, will be available for four matches, reuniting two of the greatest all-rounders in England's cricket history. Broad is enthusiastic about the impact of their collaboration.

"The players I've spoken to, when Freddie (Flintoff) has been involved in the coaching stuff, have loved him," said Broad. "He's at that great age where the players he's now coaching probably saw him as a hero. Hearing him talk about the style of play he envisions is really exciting. We know he has a brilliant cricket brain, he's a true fan of the game, and he brings a lot of energy.

"The way the cricket community has rallied around Fred after his accident has been incredible and highlights the supportive nature of our sport. It's heartening to see how the game can embrace one of its stars and help him reconnect with the sport he loves. His role as a coach for The Hundred franchises seems like a step toward building him into a future international coach. Having someone like Freddie Flintoff involved in the game can only inspire the next generation."

Source: India Today
 
Naah. Recency bias.
Botham is still the greatest English allrounder as he was equally good with bat and ball.

Flintoff is better bowler, Stokes is better batsman. But, I will chose Flintoff in my team over Stokes due to his superior bowling.

I'll l chose Botham in my All time England XI over both Stokes and Flintoff
 
Naah. Recency bias.
Botham is still the greatest English allrounder as he was equally good with bat and ball.

Flintoff is better bowler, Stokes is better batsman. But, I will chose Flintoff in my team over Stokes due to his superior bowling.

I'll l chose Botham in my All time England XI over both Stokes and Flintoff

What did Botham win?

Stokes won 2 world titles. He also contributed in those 2 finals. Without Stokes, England might not have won either trophy.
 
In the format that matters, Test cricket, Ben Stokes is well behind both Ian Botham and Andrew Flintoff.

He has poor record everywhere outside England and South Africa.
 
Botham has been the greatest allrounder England has produced, a true match winner, Stokes doesn't come even close. When was the last time Stroke ran through a batting line up, Botham had done many times.
 
What did Botham win?

Stokes won 2 world titles. He also contributed in those 2 finals. Without Stokes, England might not have won either trophy.
this is like saying Mohammad Aamir has won two world titles what has Waqar Younis won? Does not make sense. World Titles are won by team, individuals can assist in winning, they themselves cannot win it. This is not Tennis.
 
Botham is head and shoulders above this HTB Stokes.
Stokes can’t buy a run in Asia in test cricket and hardly bowls.
 
Stokes is a better batter than other 2 but overall, Botham, Flintoff and then stokes will be my pick.
 
Back
Top