Beyond the Boundary: “ICC T20 World Cup 2022: Time to walk the walk"

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,479
Many thanks to [MENTION=2016]Rana[/MENTION] for this excellent and comprehensive review of the Tri-series and a look ahead to the upcoming ICC T20 World Cup from a Pakistan perspective.


FfAiBQfX0AEmCkW


They say lightning doesn’t strike twice. Well, in the case of Pakistan’s T20I side, it seems to be striking a little too often in recent history. This depends on how you interpret the word ‘lightning’ in this context. Some may consider this to be the consistent let downs of the middle order. Others may consider this to be the repetitive nature of the top order not matching the requirements of setting the tone for the team with an aggressive intent and a demonstration of bravery, which then leaves the lower order with far too much to do (considering their limitations).

With that being said, the New Zealand Tri-series must be viewed alongside the series that is taking place between England and Australia on the venues of this year’s T20i world cup. Whilst the England side that comfortably walked past Pakistan in Karachi and Lahore have beefed up their side to contest with the favorites and defending champions in their own den. Pakistan on the other hand have stuck to their guns and have travelled to the Southern Hemisphere with pretty much the same squad and strategy they have employed through the Asia cup and the England home series. This could well be due to a strict plan which the team management feels will deliver the championship, or it is most likely due to the limited resources which are available to the management for one reason or another.


Positives

Talking about the plan itself. The positive elements that can be highlighted from the 7 victories we have seen since the Asia cup defeat, four of which were achieved in this tri series are as follows:

1. Rotation of pacers: Pakistan have rotated its pace bowlers perfectly and have found at least three first team choices in case their premier bowler (Shaheen Afridi) is not fit and available to start.

Haris Rauf, Mohammad Wasim Jr and Naseem Shah have shown great maturity and belief in order to peg back the Kiwi’s twice on their home deck. The emergence of Naseem and Wasim is highly important considering the decline of Hassan Ali and the injury to Shaheen Shah Afridi. These two bowlers will not be going into this World Cup as if they are just being fed to the wolves without enough experience as the management have given them plenty of game time and overs.

2. Pakistani spinners offer variety and confidence: Pakistan have three reliable options in Shadab Khan’s leg spin, Mohammad Nawaz’s left-arm off-spin and ability to bowl bravely to the best batsmen in the world, and Iftikhar Ahmed’s experience in getting through overs against left-handers with his flat trajectory. The spin department is a base that is covered and all three are useful batsmen to add to it. To top it off, Shadab and Nawaz are both capable of providing vital breakthroughs against good batsmen.

3. The potential of Babar Azam or Mohammad Rizwan: If not one then both can give the team a respectable start chasing or setting up a total, and at least providing the opportunity for others to bat around them. I use the word ‘potential’ because the ‘consistency’ in doing so was not as such considering only Babar scored a meaningful score in the first T20I against New Zealand, whereas Rizwan has showed consistency in scoring well against the lesser in comparison attack of Bangladesh. However, the consistency and good numbers these two have put in the past helps with the potential to do well in the future.

4. Nawaz making the no.4 position his own: This has to be one of the most delightful positives of this tour. Nawaz has now played 3 blinders at the number 4 position within a space of a few weeks, and it is probably correct now to let him keep this position for the entirety of the World Cup campaign. Nawaz should no longer be treated as a ‘match up’ for left-arm off-spinners, because he has shown class and determination against spin and pace. His urgency at the crease to score runs or up the run-rate is also a huge positive.

It is also good to see Haider Ali and Iftikhar score runs in the Final of the Tri-series considering how much criticism they have copped in the build-up to this day. Haider’s innings in particular was a breath of fresh air and brought memories of Inzamam’s breakaway innings against New Zealand in the 1992 World Cup Semi-Final. This could finally be the push that gets him going and make the World Cup his grand stage to announce himself.


Negatives

Whilst Pakistan may be jubilant over their victory against New Zealand, and the management finding another solid excuse to justify their tactics/selection, the fact of the matter remains that the Pakistan side does not seem to be playing cricket the way Australia and England (the two favorites) are playing at the same time they are competing with the likes of New Zealand. What are those visible negatives that differentiate Pakistan from those who are considered contenders for the trophy?

1. Pakistan’s clear lack of intent in the power play and lack of setting the correct tempo: This cannot be denied or ignored anymore. Both openers, Babar and Rizwan have come out of this series with a strike rate of 122 and a total of 2 sixes in their 5 outings. This is extremely poor considering they have the advantage of the power play! Hitting a six results in two more runs than a lesser risk shot on the ground, but the intent and bravery involved in wanting to hit a six and dominating the opposition’s bowling gives the team a major boost in confidence. In contrast to this, the opening pair of Finn Allen and Devon Conway scored a total of 15 sixes!

2. Pakistan going into the tournament with an unrecognized No.3 batsman: Regardless of whatever format, the no.3 position is still the most important batting position and should be occupied by the best technical batsman of the side according to my understanding of this game. The plan to demote Fakhar to No.3 failed with Fakhar unsuited to this position due to his technical deficiencies. On the other hand, Shan Masood’s inability to translate domestic form into international belonging is even more concerning. Shan’s elevated promotion into the team has not borne the fruit as envisioned by the Chief Selector. Babar Azam needs to make a strong decision on this as to whether he wants to continue with the ‘hope’ that the third batsman comes in and sets the tone, because the ‘middle order slope’ begins right at the failure of a reliable No.3 player.

3. Asif Ali’s struggle at the back end of an innings: Whilst Asif Ali has earned the right to be carried as of now due to his heroics in crucial stages of last year’s World Cup and the recent Asia Cup, the confidence in him is clearly starting to diminish with the fans and the management to some extent. This is indeed concerning because Asif Ali has abilities much admired by Pakistan fans and fans around the world for his raw ability to muscle the ball for 6 against good pace. For him to be axed for a more conventional batter or an all-rounder would significantly dent an already weak power-hitting outfit. Hence, Asif must understand the demands from him and what he is delivering in return.

5. Pakistan’s reserve wicket keeper going into the tournament with 1 T20I cap to his name: Whether it is a deliberate ploy or coincidence, Pakistan are taking Mohammad Haris as a reserve keeper who has only played 1 T20I since his inclusion in the Pakistan side. With the potential of an injury looming for any keeper, it is criminal for the young keeper-batter not to have played more games since the England series and not even a single game against a depleted Bangladesh side reeks of mismanagement. This in particular considering the continuous battles we are witnessing between Mohammad Rizwan and his will to keep him upright or not hobble along due to a groin injury.

5. Mohammad Rizwan’s dip in form and fluency against the stronger bowling outfit: Whilst his partner Babar may have avoided this criticism with his 79* against New Zealand in the first T20I, Rizwan on the other hand has not been as impressive against New Zealand (the greater challenge and last year’s runner up) with total scores of 54 in 58 (strike rate of 93) deliveries at an average of 19.33! The Pakistan No.1 batsman who has broken all sorts of records since his elevation to the opening spot was not as fluent as he would like to be and his lack of off-side game has become very much clear to see, with teams now looking to block off his main scoring areas. Rizwan will have to work hard to not be bogged down or not be able to improvise his game through the off-side in order to avoid the difficult starts for him and his team.

6. Pakistan’s poor catching: The dropping of easy catches is a concern for some international teams right now and Pakistan are equally guilty with its own howlers in this facet at the moment. The casual approach to catching is a real cause of concern for Babar himself before he can lay the blame on the rest of his team. This casual approach has already cost them two finals and luckily it has not cost them a third one, but this cannot be taken for granted and improvements must be made.


What needs to happen for Pakistan to do well in the upcoming ICC T20 World Cup?

Pakistan traditionally has relied on their ability to produce an unstoppable run against the odds in world tournaments in order to win them. Pakistan in its three ICC silverware outings have never actually looked the strongest team or even in the top 3 of strong teams in the world. So in this regard, Pakistan are on the right track to cause the upset or magic and go on to win another ICC tournament. However, if there were some tweaks I could make for them to actually stand a better chance than hope, they would be:

1. Positive intent by the openers and everyone to follow with the worry of a batting collapse. Pakistan learned that fortune will favor them as long as they are willing to be brave and play as if their life depends on it the way Haider and Nawaz did in the final

2. A proper No.3 batsman. For me that’s Babar Azam and ideally, I would like him to realize that the partnership with Rizwan can still happen if he comes in at three and anchors us through to the end. Fakhar Zaman is a total waste at the number three slot.

3. More trust in Nawaz as your key player. He can also be considered for number 3 in order to set the right tone instead of him having to take drastic measures at number 4.

4. Fakhar Zaman to be better utilized. If not as an opener, he should be batting at 5 or 6 after or before Asif Ali to add more depth in Pakistan’s firepower at the back end.

5. Squad rotation throughout the tournament and making sure that the lesser players are given game time in the easier matches. No player should be undercooked if called upon as an injury replacement in a crunch game.

6. Match-ups are very much real and totally matter. Do not switch off and make sure to use your options of left-arm and right-arm spinner against those dangerous middle-order players in the opposition. Also, understand that the opposition prepare their match-ups for your team and innovative strokes are an ideal way out of the difficult angles you are being challenged with.

7. Playing innovative strokes of difficult bowling lengths at the death is also a brand of fearless cricket. The execution of these shots is lacking, but the will to play them frequently at the death is also lacking. Toying with the field is far more conducive than trying to muscle everything out of the park at the death.

8. Lastly, on personal note, I would argue that Shaheen Shah Afridi should not be rushed into the side even if he is 80% fit against India and Pakistan should back the trio of Rauf, Naseem and Waseem as their three seamers. Shaheen can be brought back against the lesser teams building up to the South Africa clash with the hope that it is virtually a quarter final for Pakistan.
 
Last edited:
Very detailed review, agree with the bulk of that.

The openers need to seriously reevaluate their tentative approach in the PP - you cannot start a chase with RRR at 8 and be dismissed with RRR at 10.59 !

The promotions of Shadab and Nawaz was overdue, and now with Haider playing an excellent knock, suddenly the middle order has gamechanging options which can be deployed differently based on the matchups.

The bowling seems okay, the big question is over Shaheen's fitness and specifically his lack of gametime. Hopefully he'll be sharp after the warmups.
 
Great write up [MENTION=2016]Rana[/MENTION] agree with everything mostly. On Shaheen, I doubt if he plays a game, I feel the PCB/BallSaq are playing some mind games :afridi
 
On Fakhar, ideally he should open and if not, it has to be no.3 and not no.5/6

While the wicket may suit him, I just feel he may take some time to get going and that may prove disastrous with a smaller number of overs left
 
A good read.

We have sort of stumbled upon a decent XI now for the World Cup, with the promotion of Shadab and Nawaz up the order after repeated flops by the likes of Khushdil.

The bowling is as good as any attack in the tournament.
 
Very detailed review Rizwan was the forefront in all negatives :13:
 
Like the lads here have said, I agree with the bulk of it, specially with Nawaz and Haider performances with the bat. Very timely for Pakistan.
 
Good write up Rana, not much to disagree on based on facts in front of us.
 
Really good write up making it a worthy read.

I agree on most accounts. Pace bowling rotation in the series as well as in the Eng aeries was a real plus and move in the right direction.
 
Great piece Rana. This was a pleasure to read.
 
Excellent analysis and detailed explanations - thank you [MENTION=2016]Rana[/MENTION]!
 
Good analysis with well structured points.

A few customary digs at Rizwan :)) but overall can't disagree with much.
 
Nailed it. Good post [MENTION=2016]Rana[/MENTION]. Great prep for Pak team. With Fakhar coming in, Pak seems to be the best prepared team other than Eng for the WC.
 
Good article and a balanced analysis overall. Agree with most of the points made.
 
Usually don't agree with most of your opinions but this was a good read.

I'd argue that Babar is a better suit for opening because of his range of shots and his ability to pierce the field. If he is in form, he will enjoy batting on the faster pitches of Australia where playing the field is extremely important.

Another thing is that with larger boundaries mean more space between the fielders. Babar and Rizwan are both strike rotators primarily which would suit their batting. The concerning thing for Rizwan will be his struggle against short pitches deliveries on the off side. He has been very good with his pull shot but his relatively shorter height will create a little problem for himself.

The last thing is Fakhar has been called an aggressive opener on PP quite often. But since 2019, he has become a batter who takes some time to get settled before upping the ante. Earlier on in his career, he was not studied much and he would go hard at the ball from the word go. But as soon as he started playing more, the opposition has started to study his weaknesses more and that has resulted in him tweaking his batting style.
 
[MENTION=2016]Rana[/MENTION] eats so much humble pie he must be diabetic by now #hatersgonnahate
 
Amazing analysis and I can't believe Rana has written such a rational, unbiased analysis. Agreed with almost all the points.

The only thing I'd say is that the Negative # 6 (Poor catching) is actually negative # 1 for me. A BIG area of improvement for the team.

Congrats and well done Rana 🎉 #respect
 
Great stuff man [MENTION=2016]Rana[/MENTION]

Look forward to see more of this from you!
 
Impressed you were able to keep out your own bias! Good stuff
 
Nailed it. Good post [MENTION=2016]Rana[/MENTION]. Great prep for Pak team. With Fakhar coming in, Pak seems to be the best prepared team other than Eng for the WC.

I think they are very well prepared in their plan

I’m not sure there plan is the correct one. For that we will have to wait and see
 
On Fakhar, ideally he should open and if not, it has to be no.3 and not no.5/6

While the wicket may suit him, I just feel he may take some time to get going and that may prove disastrous with a smaller number of overs left

Bro, I’m not sure Fakhar knows what to do at no.3,

He is too confused because there are so many overs to go and 5 fielders on the boundary. His aerial options are pretty much blocked off and any captain can just bring on his 6th bowler to get through a few overs of economical off-spin to him. Fakhar doesn’t have a release shot against right arm off spin around the wicket, especially with cow, deep square leg and deep mid on.

If he isn’t going to have the powerplay with only 2 out, it’s better to just let him come in at the 14th over mark where captains will probably not bowling a spin option and let him tee off. That’s what Khushdil is actually supposed to do but he feels entitled to play 10-15 deliveries at the death before he can put the foot down
 
Amazing analysis and I can't believe Rana has written such a rational, unbiased analysis. Agreed with almost all the points.

The only thing I'd say is that the Negative # 6 (Poor catching) is actually negative # 1 for me. A BIG area of improvement for the team.

Congrats and well done Rana 🎉 #respect

I personally don’t think any issue is less important than others, but it does come down to what you view as the most important attributes for a successful cricket outing.

Even if we put aside Sharjeel’s shady past (which everyone loves to bring in to discredit him), the biggest argument against his inclusion in the side is his poor fitness and potential to cost Pakistan in the field. For them, Shan Masood ticks those boxes of fitness and reliability. However, in recent memory I can recall at least two simple catches dropped by Masood since his inclusion. Babar Azam as the captain and premier batsman has dropped 3 catches in a space of a week between two finals.

You then ask the question, how then is it correct to not include Sharjeel who is a far more destructive and impactful batsman than both Babar and Shan Masood (at least). I’m not happy with these double standards.
 
Bro, I’m not sure Fakhar knows what to do at no.3,

He is too confused because there are so many overs to go and 5 fielders on the boundary. His aerial options are pretty much blocked off and any captain can just bring on his 6th bowler to get through a few overs of economical off-spin to him. Fakhar doesn’t have a release shot against right arm off spin around the wicket, especially with cow, deep square leg and deep mid on.

If he isn’t going to have the powerplay with only 2 out, it’s better to just let him come in at the 14th over mark where captains will probably not bowling a spin option and let him tee off. That’s what Khushdil is actually supposed to do but he feels entitled to play 10-15 deliveries at the death before he can put the foot down

There were still 10 overs left in the WC semi against Australia and he gave pak something to defend, had he came on towards the end, against some good death bowling it may not be easy. But at the same time your theory is sound.

Assuming they have him at no.5/no.6 permanently, who would be your number 3?
 
Great post....very in-depth analysis and nicely explained.

Agree with most of your points.
 
Nailed it. Good post [MENTION=2016]Rana[/MENTION]. Great prep for Pak team. With Fakhar coming in, Pak seems to be the best prepared team other than Eng for the WC.

This. England is the only side Pakistan will have trouble beating.
 
Geoff Laswon:

Serious pace matters, 140km/h and beyond will play. A serious difference in pace will also matter. Pakistan unveiled the “Punkha”, Sohail Tanvir in 2007 and his whirring swingers and dipping back-of-the-hand slower balls were crucial in them making the final.

In 2022, they will have another leftie with swing and genuine speed in Shaheen Shah Afridi. He boasts a Mitchell Starc-like yorker, a threatening bouncer and a knuckleball.

Throw in the hurrying Haris Rauf and put wristie Shadab Khan on at the other end and the combination can bear fruit.

If Babar Azam and Mohammad Rizwan continue their opening onslaughts Pakistan will be in the frame.

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricke...ght-up-the-t20-world-cup-20221014-p5bpux.html
 
There were still 10 overs left in the WC semi against Australia and he gave pak something to defend, had he came on towards the end, against some good death bowling it may not be easy. But at the same time your theory is sound.

Assuming they have him at no.5/no.6 permanently, who would be your number 3?

I think you have nothing to lose with Nawaz at 3. He has a good technique against pace and spin, and right now is very confident in his batting. Much more suited to bat at 3 instead of Fakhar.
 
Stunning India to start the last tournament, before being beaten in thrilling fashion at the semi-final stages, Pakistan still have a point to prove a year later in Australia.

Squad

Pakistan: Babar Azam (c), Shadab Khan, Asif Ali, Haider Ali, Haris Rauf, Iftikhar Ahmed, Khushdil Shah, Mohammad Hasnain, Mohammad Nawaz, Mohammad Rizwan, Mohammad Wasim, Naseem Shah, Shaheen Shah Afridi, Shan Masood, Fakhar Zaman. Standby Players: Mohammad Haris, Shahnawaz Dahani, Usman Qadir.

Best Finish at Tournament

Champions (2009)

Coming back from a final defeat to India in the inaugural edition, Pakistan stuck with their vastly experienced side for the 2009 tournament, falling to England in Group Stage action, but progressing through to the Super 8s by virtue of a big win over the Netherlands.

Pakistan fell to Sri Lanka in the next stage, though defeated New Zealand and Ireland to make the semi-finals, where they overcame South Africa.

Fittingly, Pakistan had to overcome Sri Lanka in their second meeting for the trophy. After holding their opponents to 138 at Lord’s, Shahid Afridi’s 54* (40) powered Pakistan to an eight wicket win with eight balls to spare


Results in the last 10 games

W W L W W L L W W L


T20 World Cup 2021 performance

Semi-finalists

For most of the 2021 campaign, Pakistan looked the form side, with their 10-wicket win over India propelling them to favouritism. Strong performances across the Super 12 stage ensure they kept the tag, though a stunning individual batting effort by Matthew Wade in the dying stages stole the semi-final from Babar Azam's men.


Fixtures

v India (October 23) - Melbourne
v Winner Group B (October 27) - Perth
v Runner-up Group A (October 29) - Perth
v South Africa (November 3) - Sydney
v Bangladesh (November 6) - Adelaide


Key match

v India - A historic rivalry that needs no explanation, this fixture was sold out at a ground fitting 100,000 people in five minutes, and the result will likely dictate both sides’ campaigns.

In ICC global tournaments, history may be against Pakistan, though the last meeting at a T20 World Cup was a heavy win in their favour.

For Pakistan to win, it would likely take a similar effort from the opening pair with the bat, capping off a solid platform made from the bowling group.


Key Player

Babar Azam - In the top three on the men’s MRF Tyres batting rankings in every format, Babar would have to be the most complete batter in the game in 2022. Languid and aesthetically pleasing to the cricket tragic, Babar can also pivot into a more pragmatic, attacking role.

While blessed with a dearth of bowling talent, his changes and field placements will be vital in Pakistan's quest for tournament supremacy.


Summary

After the run to the semi-finals in UAE, 2022 in T20I cricket has only proved that Pakistan are inching towards being the finished product. Reaching the final of the Asia Cup only to fall to the less-fancied Sri Lanka, and losing home T20I series to Australia and England, Pakistan do come into the tournament with a tri-series win in New Zealand alongside Bangladesh.

Pakistan’s constant in the upcoming campaign should come through the bowling line-up, with an attack that will challenge all-comers in Australia. All reports point to Shaheen Shah Afridi being fit and firing after his treatment in London, and should be complemented by speedster Haris Rauf, who has enjoyed domestic success in Australia. The likes of Mohammad Wasim, Naseem Shah and Mohammad Hasnain, with Shadab Khan and Mohammad Nawaz shouldering the spin workload.

A late shuffle has meant fellow spinner Usman Qadir sits as a travelling reserve for the time being, with Pakistan opting to include the batting experience of Fakhar Zaman. The move only fuels the discussions surrounding Pakistan’s Modus Operandi with the aggressive left-hander seemingly needed to give the side an added impetus.

The opening pairing of Babar and Mohammad Rizwan has provided the team stability, though the pace of the pair asks more questions. The strike rates of both players has led to discussions on team balance, and it’s within the realms of possibility that they both know one of them must bat all the way through. Fakhar’s selection would theoretically beef up the top order after the concerning performances of Shan Masood and Haider Ali at three, but Fakhar himself strikes at just 107, and averaging under 20.

ICC
 
Back
Top