What's new

Boult voluntarily coming off a central contract - Will we ever see a Pakistan cricketer do this?

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
218,136
Summary of the issue (covered in Boult's own thread):

New Zealand Cricket has agreed to release Trent Boult from his central contract so that he can spend more time with his family, while also making himself available for domestic leagues.

The 33 year-old fast bowler requested the release after several conversations with NZC, which today agreed to the arrangements.

==

So which active, frontline Pakistan cricketer will do this?

In our culture, the idea is to string along the Board and their career for as long as possible.
 
I think current bunch of Pakistani players are quite sensible/patriotic. They seem enthusiastic about representing Pakistan. So, I don't expect them to do this. But, you never know.
 
Can't say for sure, but I think central contracts for top end Pakistani cricketers are probably bigger than NZC's.

For the upcoming season the Black Caps' annual retainers will be $236,000 for the top-ranked player - understood to be Williamson - dropping in increments to $100,000 for those ranked 18 to 20. Match fees will be $9000 per test, $4000 per one-day international and $2500 per Twenty20 international.

It means a potential $181,500 in match fees if someone was to play all the Black Caps scheduled eight tests, 23 ODIs (including nine World Cup preliminary matches) and seven T20s in the next year.

With top earner Williamson's $50,000 captain's bonus thrown in, he will bank close to $450,000 from NZC, depending on injuries and how many home limited overs matches he sits out.

$450,000 NZD (if he plays all games, which he wont and his $50,000 captain's bonus) is $283,000 USD.

Kane's Central contract without match fees
$236,000 NZC (148,475 USD)

This is for Kane's central contract, Boult is on less. Makes sense for him to not opt into central contact and pick and choose when to play when he can make a lot more for a few months of cricket.
 
Last edited:
Can't say for sure, but I think central contracts for top end Pakistani cricketers are probably bigger than NZC's.



$450,000 NZD (if he plays all games, which he wont and his $50,000 captain's bonus) is $283,000 USD.

Kane's Central contract without match fees
$236,000 NZC (148,475 USD)

This is for Kane's central contract, Boult is on less. Makes sense for him to not opt into central contact and pick and choose when to play when he can make a lot more for a few months of cricket.

That's too low for a top player luckily his current ipl contract is worth more than 1.6 million USD.


For comparisons even newly launched UAE ILT20 gonna offer wages slots 340,000 USD, 260,000 USD and 220,000 USD for it's top 3 players plus additional loyalty bonus to make that income 4,50,000 USD for top player for just appearing for 1 month tournament.

Boult's decision is no brainer considering his age and being fast bowler he must need to cash in on every opportunity now. I hope he plays 2022 & 2023 worldcup at least.
 
Summary of the issue (covered in Boult's own thread):

New Zealand Cricket has agreed to release Trent Boult from his central contract so that he can spend more time with his family, while also making himself available for domestic leagues.

The 33 year-old fast bowler requested the release after several conversations with NZC, which today agreed to the arrangements.

==

So which active, frontline Pakistan cricketer will do this?

In our culture, the idea is to string along the Board and their career for as long as possible.

Was M. Hafeez case same?
 
Sarfarz ahmed maybe. He is probably on his last legs in international cricket. If I am not wrong his central contract worth only 37,455 USD now. From PSL he is getting little more than 100,000 USD. He could have easily got similar money or even double of that from upcoming UAE t20 league.
 
Imad Wasim should be one. He's not in central contracts I guess.

One of fast bowlers from Hasnain, Naseem, Dahani who's out of favour can go this route, given demand for pacy bowlers in T20s
 
I think current bunch of Pakistani players are quite sensible/patriotic. They seem enthusiastic about representing Pakistan. So, I don't expect them to do this. But, you never know.

Don’t think it’s as much a patriotism thing in his case. Like he said, at his age (34) and as a fast bowler, it makes sense to maximize earnings for himself and his family. He’s not likely to get any better or more valuable and is closer to the end of his playing career. He’s still keeping himself up for international selection—which means he’s can still play for NZ at cup events and such if he stays good enough.

Would make sense and be understandable for a Pakistani cricketer in the same situation to want something similar too.
 
Summary of the issue (covered in Boult's own thread):

New Zealand Cricket has agreed to release Trent Boult from his central contract so that he can spend more time with his family, while also making himself available for domestic leagues.

The 33 year-old fast bowler requested the release after several conversations with NZC, which today agreed to the arrangements.

==

So which active, frontline Pakistan cricketer will do this?

In our culture, the idea is to string along the Board and their career for as long as possible.

This is changing.

I think Central contracts have far less value now than 10 years ago due to T20 leagues.

A player makes up all of his year's central contract value of a Central Contract in one IPL (sometimes 3-4 times that) or 2 other T20 franchise tournaments.

Then he has the rest of the year to play other leagues and make several times that.

So I can see many Pakistani players doing that. Someone like Aamir has already done it. Maybe in a couple of years, players like Haris Rauf, Haider Ali, M Haris, Usman Qadir, Hassnain and others can go this way - the moment they have any assurance their T20 skills will be in demand for a few years. They may stick to Pakistan team only if it adds to their franchise value.

Players sticking to central contract will be Azhar, Shafiq, Abbas, Abid type players whose skills are not in demand in T20s.
 
Now his number one priority will be the Rajasthan Royals. They do pay him $1+ million/year.

NZC is priority two.
 
So I can see many Pakistani players doing that. Someone like Aamir has already done it. Maybe in a couple of years, players like Haris Rauf, Haider Ali, M Haris, Usman Qadir, Hassnain and others can go this way - the moment they have any assurance their T20 skills will be in demand for a few years. They may stick to Pakistan team only if it adds to their franchise value.

The fact is that the demand in leagues comes with an international reputation. Amir was able to opt for that route because he had a reputation behind him, London Spirits drafted him based upon that same reason and dropped him this season as the reality of him struggling came into way.

When you have left international cricket then unless you do something exceptional in a quality league, there is not much of an opportunity to regather that reputation.

95% of the biggest league earners are international stars. You have to be a top performer at international level to make your name big enough for those big bucks.

Most of the players who fully retired from international cricket, only survived for 2-3 years at max in league circuit with exceptions aside. When you are not training as an international player, have that kind of optimal fitness you are going to struggle maintaining the same intensity in leagues as well unless you are an extreme professional which have been handful.

Also many dont realize, international cricket actually complements league cricket. League's value is highly dependent upon the international stars they have including their local ones. Reduction in international stars and increase in mercenaries before they become international stars is not going to be good for either parties.
 
Just to add to my previous post;

Amir will not be an icon, top category or platinum etc player in any league (Has been the case for well over a year now) as there is nothing to support that and the name is just fading away as there is nothing to show for in international circuit as well. In the end he could have made more as a top international player (Ofcourse if he would have been performing) who could have been considered in highest brackets of leagues alongside playing international cricket.

Couple of years ago Amir and Shaheen could have been in same bracket earning big bucks in the leagues or rather Amir slightly ahead. At the moment Amir is nowhere near to Shaheen's status who is an international star, T20 league number alone could not provide that reputation and thats another fact that Amir is even struggling in that aspect.

Boult has played his card much better then Amir (Not surprising considering how badly Amir has managed himself and his career by being too self absorbed sometimes). Boult has much better reputation which unless he does extremely poor will remain for at least couple of years and at the same time he has kept the door of international cricket open for if he needs to add to or maintain to that reputation if necessary.
 
Difference with Amir is that he did it on his own.

NZC are essentially saying its ok without any misgivings
 
With pakistan, it will always be the players who don't have proper opportunities for the team.

For example, our of Imad Wasim and M Nawaz, Wasim is more likely to go down the two mercenary route as he is not in the picture for international selection.
 
Now his number one priority will be the Rajasthan Royals. They do pay him $1+ million/year.

NZC is priority two.

He has played for NZ for a long time and has given them everything. Fast bowlers generally have a short shelf life and his career is getting close to an end. It makes sense to limit his workload and cash in as much as possible before retirement.

I guess Amir has sort of done this already but there was also writing on the wall in that situation with him being phased out and Amir himself understanding his skills & pace had quickly declined to the point where strictly sticking to T20 was made to preserve his shelf life a bit longer.
 
Also - is this another Ben Stokes (lite) type thing?
 
Will he get the McCleneghan treatment by NZC and not get picked for international cricket at all? If it's not the case, then it will be hypocritical of NZC.

Apart from WI players (they have a big set of problems different to those faced by other countries), I haven't seen any player who decided to take the franchise cricket route in his prime and retained his value for more than 2-3 years.

McCleneghan, Tom Cooper, Amir, Lynn, Corey Anderson, Abbott, Viljoen etc all faded away from the franchise cricket scene quickly. Others had their worth decrease significantly. Only De Villiers and Watson retained their worth but Watson retired at 35 which is an actual age for retirement.

Narine is one person who is still going strong despite his absence from international cricket for a long time.
 
In a way we have seen this already with Mohammad Amir, albeit he has said that he has totally retired from international cricket.

It will be interesting to see if Boult is picked again by NZC in future.
 
Summary of the issue (covered in Boult's own thread):

New Zealand Cricket has agreed to release Trent Boult from his central contract so that he can spend more time with his family, while also making himself available for domestic leagues.

The 33 year-old fast bowler requested the release after several conversations with NZC, which today agreed to the arrangements.

==

So which active, frontline Pakistan cricketer will do this?

In our culture, the idea is to string along the Board and their career for as long as possible.

Haven't Amir/Wahab done this already ? First leaving Test Cricket and then eventually picking leagues over PK games.

The thing is, in sub continent the administrators have a lot of ego and they will not let players be available for selection and them pick and choose. They will straightway ban them from selection. So, I suppose no active, front line cricketer in India/Pakistan/Bangladesh would do this and if he does that, he will no longer be an active cricketer.
 
No I don't see any Pak player do this. They love their money too much moreover compared to other international players I don't think they get paid that highly.
 
Haven't Amir/Wahab done this already ? First leaving Test Cricket and then eventually picking leagues over PK games.

Just Amir, as Wahab was available and is still available but Pak have decent enough pace bowling resources. Yes Wahab did take test retirement at around 35 but, again became available when team requested him to stay for Eng tests during Covid times although he was not picked in the playing XI. This is how as a professional you gain respect.

Also the decision of Amir in terms of financial aspects turned out to be an ordinary one as per my understanding. Amir is struggling to maintain his performance and reputation in leagues as well. Either he is not being considered for leagues and if he is its just the mid tier bracket. If I am not wrong the biggest contract he currently has is with KK in PSL itself (Out of currently operating leagues) which I believe will and should go down in the upcoming season. At 30 years of age if he would have worked on fitness and playing/performing at international level he would have earned more in 2-3 leagues he would have gotten time to play then he is earning as a mercenary.
 
Last edited:
Since there will be no NOC involved in Boult's case, will the IPL still continue to pay NZC a % of the his contract?
 
Like others said, Boult is already 33 years old. As a fast bowler his days are numbered given that he's an all format player. Boult has played nearly 80 tests and 140 LOIs, and has taken 550 international wickets. NZ does not pay enough and Boult doesn't have a lot of time to waste playing international cricket.
 
Trent Boult's decision to pull out of a national contract with New Zealand Cricket to spend more time with family has intensified the debate on players preferring to play franchise cricket over international cricket. Iconic Australian pacer Jason Gillespie, however, backed Boult's decision, however, while also saying that the "cricketing landscape" has been changing. "Whether we like/agree or not, the cricketing landscape has been changing for a while now," Gillespie tweeted in response to the news on Boult being released from his contract.

"The absolute vast majority of players want to play for their country first and foremost. There will come a time however when priorities shift," Gillespie went on to write.

"A 33 yr old seamer wanting to maximise his earning potential whilst he has currency AND get to spend more time with his young family? Hard to argue with that imho," he wrote in his series of tweets.

"We need to explore ways to make sure international cricket stays at the forefront of everyone's thinking going forward," Gillespie concluded.

New Zealand Cricket on Wednesday confirmed that it had agreed to release pacer Trent Boult from his central contract so that he can spend more time with his family, while also making himself available for domestic leagues.

"The move means Boult, who has taken 317 Test wickets, 169 at ODI level, and 62 in T20I cricket, will have a significantly reduced role with the BLACKCAPS during his final years in the game, while still being eligible for selection if and when available," stated the official release issued by NZC.

The pacer said that it was a difficult decision to make, and also said that as a fast bowler, he understands he has a limited time span.

NDTV
 
Haven't Amir/Wahab done this already ? First leaving Test Cricket and then eventually picking leagues over PK games.

The thing is, in sub continent the administrators have a lot of ego and they will not let players be available for selection and them pick and choose. They will straightway ban them from selection. So, I suppose no active, front line cricketer in India/Pakistan/Bangladesh would do this and if he does that, he will no longer be an active cricketer.

Both amir and wahab want to comeback into the intl pakistan team

Both have done nothing exceptional in the t20 leagues , no team in uk will buy wahab riaz now because he is over the hill

Amirs plans of denouncing pakistan get British citizenship and then hope he would get an ipl contract and make millions backfired spectacularly.
 
This is a sign of things to come, and it shouldn't be looked like Boult kick-started it. WI did it a long ago during early IPL days.

Back then they were berated for not being patriotic and chasing money - they were called mercenaries for hire and what not. Now it's more acceptable since Australian, Kiwi and England players too are doing it.
 
Last edited:
This is a sign of things to come, and it shouldn't be looked like Boult kick-started it. WI did it a long ago during early IPL days.

Back then they were berated for not being patriotic and chasing money - they were called mercenaries for hire and what not. Now it's more acceptable since Australian, Kiwi and England players too are doing it.

I don't think it's all that doom & gloom like people think.

Boult is old and soon to be retired anyways and not some sort of case of players not wanting to play International matches anymore.

There also needs to be an understanding that these International tours are incredibly hard and demanding where these players are away from their families months at a time and constantly playing Cricket throughout the year without a proper break. I think every player still has the hunger and desire to do International tours but there is a reckoning coming with its schedule and it may be best for players to limit formats so its not as incredibly demanding as it is right now.
 
So in practice, these are the repercussions of the "Boult style" semi-retirement:

==

Pacer Trent Boult is unlikely to be part of the New Zealand squad for Pakistan tour, scheduled in December 2022/January 2023.

The Blackcaps will feature in three ODIs and two Tests in Pakistan, however, Boult will be in action for MI Emirates in UAE International T20 League (ILT20) during the same time.

MI Emirates confirmed their squad ahead of the inaugural edition. The squad based in Abu Dhabi includes a bunch of star players, including the likes of renowned West Indies players Kieron Pollard, Dwayne Bravo, Nicholas Pooran, and Trent Boult. ILT20 is scheduled to take place from January 6 to February 12, 2023.

Other international players picked by the MI Emirates, include the likes of veteran South African spinner Imran Tahir, the Afghanistan trio of Najibullah Zadran, Fazalhaq Farooqui, and Zahir Khan, among others.

Remember, the 33-year-old had asked New Zealand Cricket (NZC) to be released from his central contract as he wants to spend more time with his family and make himself available to play in the domestic leagues.

After giving up on the contract, Boult will have a significantly reduced role for New Zealand.
 
So in practice, these are the repercussions of the "Boult style" semi-retirement:

==

Pacer Trent Boult is unlikely to be part of the New Zealand squad for Pakistan tour, scheduled in December 2022/January 2023.

The Blackcaps will feature in three ODIs and two Tests in Pakistan, however, Boult will be in action for MI Emirates in UAE International T20 League (ILT20) during the same time.

MI Emirates confirmed their squad ahead of the inaugural edition. The squad based in Abu Dhabi includes a bunch of star players, including the likes of renowned West Indies players Kieron Pollard, Dwayne Bravo, Nicholas Pooran, and Trent Boult. ILT20 is scheduled to take place from January 6 to February 12, 2023.

Other international players picked by the MI Emirates, include the likes of veteran South African spinner Imran Tahir, the Afghanistan trio of Najibullah Zadran, Fazalhaq Farooqui, and Zahir Khan, among others.

Remember, the 33-year-old had asked New Zealand Cricket (NZC) to be released from his central contract as he wants to spend more time with his family and make himself available to play in the domestic leagues.

After giving up on the contract, Boult will have a significantly reduced role for New Zealand.

"Spend more time with my family" is an uncriticisable reason in the media. No one can fault that.

"Make more money playing in forgettable league cricket around the world". Is what everyone suspects but cannot say because of the former.

I guess after he makes his money in the t20 leagues he might spend more time with his family after that, since he never has to work again if he doesn't want to?
 
Australia great Ricky Ponting thinks players will follow the recent lead of New Zealand veteran Trent Boult and turn their back on contracts with their country in favour of playing in domestic leagues, but says it can still prove to be a positive move for all parties if is handled well.

Boult dropped a bombshell recently when he announced he would not take up a central contract with New Zealand Cricket, with the experienced quick instead opting to spend more time with his family and have the ability to participate in domestic T20 leagues around the world.

Boult shock: New Zealand pacer turns back on central contract
While the decision doesn't officially end Boult's international career, New Zealand Cricket indicated they would favour contracted players when selecting squads in the future.

Ponting discussed Boult’s recent decision with host Sanjana Ganesan on the most recent episode of The ICC Review and indicated the New Zealander’s defection would likely be the tip of the iceberg as more players follow suit.

"I think it's inevitable now with the amount of T20 domestic tournaments that are popping up all around the world now," Ponting said on The ICC Review.

"It's just getting harder and harder for these guys to maintain the full schedule of international cricket.

"And for someone like Trent Boult, and no disrespect to New Zealand at all, but I'm sure their national contracts are probably only reflective of maybe what he would make in one of these T20 domestic tournaments.

"He's coming towards the end of his career and he's got to think about his family and the financial side of the game now, probably more than ever."

Ponting is well aware of the amount of money available to players in domestic T20 leagues, with the former Australia captain currently the coach of Delhi Capitals in the IPL and head of strategy with the Hobart Hurricanes in Australia's local Big Bash League.

Part of Ponting's role with both teams is to attract the best players to his side and the Australian expects Boult to prove a hot commodity for domestic competitions around the world.

"He's right on top of his game as well in all formats, so wherever he goes and chooses to play, if it's T20 stuff that he's talking about, then he'll be in very high demand. There's no doubt about it," Ponting noted.

"With the Big Bash draft coming up, I reckon pretty much every franchise or every team in Australia would have been reaching out to Trent Boult to make sure that he got his name into that player draft because he would be in high demand.

"The West Indians, I think are probably the ones that started this years ago with their preference for the T20 game and their ability to make big money and other tournaments. I think we'll read and hear more about this in the coming years."

But Ponting thinks both player and country can prosper going forward, when further cases similar to Boult’s arise in the future.

"I think it depends on how the national teams are going to handle a situation like this with Trent...he said that he feels that that could jeopardise how much he plays for New Zealand, but I don't think it will," Ponting said.

"He's too important to New Zealand and if he doesn't miss a lot of domestic cricket and he's still available for selection, as long as they manage that well and maybe just pick him in the series that, the bigger type Test series that they play, then I think the that the national teams and the national selectors and the individual player can make it work to a certain degree.

"Trent will have to give up something or he wouldn't have made the decision that he's made. But I think if it's handled well, then there's no reason why they can't both co-exist in a reasonable manner."

https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/2747106
 
Yes. It is only a matter of time.

More than big players it will be the second stringers and fringe players who will be most tempted. Today PCB is stopping Pak cricketers from participating in ILT20 and BBL.

If ILT20 is somehow sustainable, how long before fringe Pak players decide an average ILT20 and T10 salary plus UAE visa is better than just an avg PSL salary and no/low end central contract
 
In our culture, the idea is to string along the Board and their career for as long as possible.

And its a cancerous culture which really holds the team back. Although the board need to get more strict with this sort of thing, more funding is needed.

More money for players currently and post playing being it retirement, through injury or voluntarily would really help.

This way we don't have to see so many expired players still clinging on and torturing the rest of us.
 
Back
Top