Titan24
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2016
- Runs
- 25,094
- Post of the Week
- 6
When you are playing with
Amir who has taken 3 wickets in last 12 matches
Imad who has taken 30 wickets in 37 matches
Abbas who was debuting and conditions dont suit his style of bowling
Yasir Shah who has played 20 matches with 19 wickets @45
Faheem was probably the most attacking option out of these however he is still learning and isnt that experienced
Cant blame Imad as he is an all rounder, who was never an attacking spinner. He can do a holding job as he has been doing most of his career.
Wont blame Abbas as well, with conditions were not suiting him at all he still managed decent line and length and bowled economically.
But the question is how this bowling attack could have taken 10 wickets? There was no chance of that unless bowl started to reverse or there was some assitance from the pitch or Pak scoring 320+. There was almost mo bowler who could have forced the things and make something happen.
Assuming Yasir and Amir as attacking options when their stats show otherwise was a blunder from management. A good bowling attack comprises of attacking as well as defensive options however in these conditions this bowling attack was full on defensive.
Only two bowlers in the squad who are attacking options in these conditions are Hasnain and Shinwari (I know how he goes for runs but unfortunately he is the only other guy in the squad who might be an attacking option and take wickets like he did in that 1 off occasion against SA and Srl).
We dont have any attacking spinner or pacer in the squad and that can be problematic in future games as well.
I wont be surprised if sometimes in the series Mickey plays a 4 man pace attack with Imad as spinner agianst Aussies and that too in UAE as there is no other spin option than Yasir. Have seen a lot of such tricks from Mickey to be surprised anymore.
Amir who has taken 3 wickets in last 12 matches
Imad who has taken 30 wickets in 37 matches
Abbas who was debuting and conditions dont suit his style of bowling
Yasir Shah who has played 20 matches with 19 wickets @45
Faheem was probably the most attacking option out of these however he is still learning and isnt that experienced
Cant blame Imad as he is an all rounder, who was never an attacking spinner. He can do a holding job as he has been doing most of his career.
Wont blame Abbas as well, with conditions were not suiting him at all he still managed decent line and length and bowled economically.
But the question is how this bowling attack could have taken 10 wickets? There was no chance of that unless bowl started to reverse or there was some assitance from the pitch or Pak scoring 320+. There was almost mo bowler who could have forced the things and make something happen.
Assuming Yasir and Amir as attacking options when their stats show otherwise was a blunder from management. A good bowling attack comprises of attacking as well as defensive options however in these conditions this bowling attack was full on defensive.
Only two bowlers in the squad who are attacking options in these conditions are Hasnain and Shinwari (I know how he goes for runs but unfortunately he is the only other guy in the squad who might be an attacking option and take wickets like he did in that 1 off occasion against SA and Srl).
We dont have any attacking spinner or pacer in the squad and that can be problematic in future games as well.
I wont be surprised if sometimes in the series Mickey plays a 4 man pace attack with Imad as spinner agianst Aussies and that too in UAE as there is no other spin option than Yasir. Have seen a lot of such tricks from Mickey to be surprised anymore.
Last edited: