What's new

Caught India, Pakistan players tampering with ball but could do little: Former umpire John Holder

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
John Holder, one of the umpires for India’s 1989 tour of Pakistan, claims players from both sides blatantly scraped and scratched the ball but got away with just a caution.

IN LONDON The Indian cricket team that visited Pakistan in 1989 tampered with the ball and were cautioned for it by the umpires, claims John Holder, one of the umpires in the four-Test series.

It was the first time in the history of the game that neutral umpires had officiated in international cricket – the other umpire being the late John Hampshire, also of England. Speaking exclusively to this correspondent, Holder, 73 and now retired, said: “Both Pakistan and India did it (tampering with the ball) in the series.” He named “Imran (Khan, the then Pakistani captain), Wasim (Akram), Kapil Dev, I think (Manoj) Prabhakar” as “doing it.”

He added that the ball tampering was quite blatant. “A wicket would fall – and in those days the umpires didn’t necessarily get hold of the ball after every over – and the players would just stand there scratching it. And it got to a point where despite what we had to say on the field, we had to get the two captains and the two managers together. We said this is illegal.”

Holder said Imran, the Pakistani manager Intikhab Alam, and the Indian captain and manager Krishnamachari Srikkanth and Chandu Borde were summoned by the umpires after the day’s play.

He said this happened during the third Test of the series at Lahore. “The pitch at Lahore was such a dead, lifeless thing, it had no grass. It would have been a timeless Test match. There were just big totals. The bowlers in desperation were scratching the ball to try and get something (out of it).”Records show India compiled 509 and Pakistan replied with 699 for five in the only two innings played in the match.

Holder, who umpired in eleven Tests and nineteen one-day internationals in a career as a first-class umpire spanning 27 years, said: “The problem was we were powerless, because there were no sanctions we could apply. All the umpires could do was to change the ball for one of similar condition. Later, there was a re-write of the laws and they decided to bring penalty runs in for ball tampering. And then they decided you could ban the bowler from bowling for the rest of the innings.”


Under scrutiny

Referring to the Australian tourists in South Africa getting caught tampering with the ball, Holder said: “With the improvement in TV technology now you are less likely to get away with nonsense like that. So, you really have to be aware of the fact that you’re under intense scrutiny now and so you can easily root it (ball tampering) out in international cricket, because there are so many cameras.”

The 1989 series witnessed the then 16-year-old prodigy Sachin Tendulkar’s debut in Tests and is remembered for Sanjay Manjrekar’s magnificent batting performance. India acquitted themselves adequately by holding the more fancied Pakistanis – that too away – to a draw.

Holder said the “Pakistanis have got the worst reputation without a doubt (about ball tampering).” t flummoxed many as to what occurred during India’s 1982-83 visit to Pakistan, when the likes of Imran and Sarfraz Nawaz were bending the old ball prodigiously.

In the second Test at Karachi, the former clean bowled Gundappa Viswanath with an in-swinging delivery that curved in from almost the edge of the pitch. India lost the series 3-1; and with it Sunil Gavaskar the Indian captaincy.

The ousted skipper, generally a prolific run-getter, experienced abelow average series and admitted to this writer at the time that he could not put a finger on what might have been going on with the ball. Kapil Dev, who succeeded him, expressed puzzlement over how Imran and Sarfraz could be doing so much with worn out leather in seemingly unhelpful conditions.


Amarnath masterclass

Mohinder Amarnath, though, in the form of his life, weathered the storm with three remarkable hundreds in the six-Test encounter.

A few months later, when continuing in the same vein in the West Indies, he was convivially approached by Vivian Richards one evening at a cocktail party in Port of Spain. The redoubtable Antiguan batsman remarked to the effect: “I take my hats off to you maan for the runs you got in Pakistan.” Amarnath bashfully acknowledged the compliment.

The West Indian maestro, conspicuously, recorded a solitary century in nine Test appearances in Pakistan and narrated that in one instance he asked to see the state of the ball after being unexpectedly beaten by its movement. None of the players and officials mentioned above responded to calls and text messages sent seeking their reaction to Holder’s claims.

The Barbados born former Hampshire cricketer, Holder, made another startling disclosure. “I had a Test match in ’91at The Oval, England-West Indies, where on the Saturday morning of the Test match I caught the England boys scratching the ball again; and I had a chat with the captain (Graham Gooch) about it and reported it to the (England & Wales Cricket) Board and nothing happened.

A month later, the season had ended and we got our letters and so on and I was told I was removed from the Test panel. No explanation, just removed from the Test panel. In fact, after that Test match I didn’t umpire a Test match for 10 years.”

Holder accused the English authorities of a “cover-up” for denying he had reported England for ball tampering. He maintained he had written it down in the “top column of the (umpire’s) match report” to Tony Brown, the umpires’ manager.

A spokesman for the ECB said: “We can’t offer a meaningful comment on this. It pre-dates the formation of the organisation (meaning it happened in the ECB’s previous incarnation of Test and County Cricket Board).”

https://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com...-but-could-do-little/articleshow/63662263.cms
 
That is why I rate M Amarnath very highly as a batsman. It was reversing big time and he was the only Indian batsman who stood strong against the likes of I Khan.
 
Bottle caps are no secret... apart from stuff that still is. :najam
 
What is cheating now was also cheating then. So let us not be too critical of Smith and Warner.

We don't have enough evidence - lack of good coverage ..no HD cameras back then. So genuine bowlers of old time also will be painted with same brush if we start speculations.

Just leave it there, like chucking before ICC got serious, no point retrospectively seeing past things...:ajmal ended so many careers. ICC was late in clamping down chucking, so it's not :ajmal fault :19:
 
Last edited:
What is cheating now was also cheating then. So let us not be too critical of Smith and Warner.

Every court in the world will punish culprits only on evidence, no point in taking seriously such reactions of these oldies why bring these things now ?

Could have faught back then with system for ball tampering removal from game, how can we believe this guy John Holder is not lying, or biased ...or someother motive to degrade India, Pak players of 1989 tour ?
 
Last edited:
What a legend. In one interview, he's called India, Pakistan and England players as cheats.
 
I wonder if Mr. Holder ever found any non-desi team doing anything wrong. I am sure he could have seen nothing wrong with them because they were all saints.
 
I wonder if Mr. Holder ever found any non-desi team doing anything wrong. I am sure he could have seen nothing wrong with them because they were all saints.

He already mentioned English players tampering with the ball.
 
Jimmy Amarnath was a phenomenal batsman. It's sad his stats overall don't draw attention of the kids. People should know of his heroics. He stood up to the West Indies and Pakistani quicks like a true warrior.
 
Many bowlers of that era lifted the seam, scratched the ball, etc...

It is well known. Imran admitted to it in an interview, Geoffrey Boycott was in the audience of that interview and backed up Imran saying many bowlers from many different countries (including England, etc...) used the same tactics to ball tamper. The only difference was Pakistani bowlers got it to reverse swing when others couldnt.

Imran made a good point saying while he was playing for counties, and the ball was tampered by him or his team mates, why was it only him who was getting reverse swing?

It means simply ball tampering doesnt get you reverse swing, you have to be skilled at it as an art form. Sarfraz, Imran, Wasim, Waqar were pioneers of reverse swing.

They got called cheats, when many other bowlers of their era also ball tampered. But they were in the spot light because they got deadly reverse swing out of it.

Also, tbf at that time these guys didnt think a lot of what they did was considered illegal, because all of their contemporaries were doing it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Give this India-Pak bashing a break guys. Not every thread is a place for chest thumping and assigning blame to each other. Have deleted several posts already.
 
Last edited:
Should get the same treat as Warner and smith
Ban anyone involved in tampering in that series with demerit points and 1 year ban 😂
 
It used to be pretty widespread back then. I remember seeing even a bowler rubbing the ball on the ground sometime in the 1980s. Can't remember which game it was.
 
Tampering can never be completely stopped. It is easy to rub vaseline on your lips then follow it up by rubbing it on the ball. Such forms of ball tampering will continue.
 
I wonder if Mr. Holder ever found any non-desi team doing anything wrong. I am sure he could have seen nothing wrong with them because they were all saints.

Please read the article and not just the headline :)

The Barbados born former Hampshire cricketer, Holder, made another startling disclosure. “I had a Test match in ’91at The Oval, England-West Indies, where on the Saturday morning of the Test match I caught the England boys scratching the ball again; and I had a chat with the captain (Graham Gooch) about it and reported it to the (England & Wales Cricket) Board and nothing happened.
 
If u r skillfull than why resort to cheating.....means they were not good enough to get reverse swing naturally.Reality is the true skill of any great which you fantesise would have exposed badly in modern time and we would have known true worth of them.
 
Well there you go. Ball tampering is something which most teams took part in. Now waiting for those Pakistani fans who said ball tampering is worse than fixing to come onto this thread.
 
You mean ball tampering does not help reverse swing ? Funny , why the bowlers did that then ? Were they punishing the ball?

It helps but it won' mt automatically start reversing. You still need the skill level which very few possess

Can guarantee that even if players are given free rein to tamper the ball only a handful will effectively reverse.

Even in that SA-Aus match where the Aussies were caught tampering if someone saw the match they would have seen that very little reverse swing was on offer despite the tampering. F anything Saffers like Rabada were more effective in it
 
Which means our bowlers couldn't do anything despite tampering the ball
 
Bcci was too powerful while PCB was good at playing the race card..
 
Kapil barely averaged 30 despite the ball tampering ??
India really do have a pretty poor bowling legacy
 
Back
Top