What's new

Curfew in Maharashtra’s Nagpur after clashes over reports of Quran burning

@uppercut
Interesting priorities, you’re unbothered by human lives lost but deeply concerned about cows. Guess it’s easier to have moral outrage from the comfort of a country where steak is on every menu.

You mean those "humans" Who have zero respect for Hindu beliefs in India ? Yeah they arent humans and deserve to be treated like Animals.


Dont give a crap what you think about cows. Our country our rules. This is one of the major reasons for partition and it was made explicitly clear that the Cows would be protected in India.

Now Why don't you tell us reasons for supporting these despicable animals who go on to deliberately and openly trample hindu beliefs?

Note: not one single Pakistani has so far touched that question. Not one. So if you want a serious discussion start by answering that question instead of indulging in Whataboutery.
 
Start Fresh now and this time, it should be on-topic posts....

NO more Personal remarks

FINAL WARNING
 
Hindutva and Zionist are same. Both are anti-Islam and Muslims.

Its about time 200million plus muslims in India stand up and demand their rights as citizens of the country.

Rights don't include glorification of tyrants and having Islamic rules.
 
Let alone 1000 year history, here are some 21st century incidents....You always make bold claims that get falsified later.
===

2001 Amritsar Incident: Hindu nationalists from the All India Hindu Protection Committee burned Qurans and desecrated a mosque in Amritsar, Punjab, in retaliation for Taliban actions in Afghanistan. Police deployed commandos to quell tensions.

2017 Nationwide Protests: Hindu extremists burned Qurans in response to the Taliban’s destruction of Bamiyan Buddhas. Riots erupted in Kanpur, Punjab, and Jammu-Kashmir, killing over 13 people. Authorities imposed curfews and deployed paramilitary forces.

2025 Nagpur Violence: Rumors of Quran burning during a Hindu protest against Aurangzeb’s tomb sparked riots. Over 30 injured, vehicles torched, and police used tear gas. Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis urged calm, while Bajrang Dal denied Quran desecration

Post some source. Not just copy paste material.
 

Post some source. Not just copy paste material.
 
@uppercut
Interesting priorities, you’re unbothered by human lives lost but deeply concerned about cows. Guess it’s easier to have moral outrage from the comfort of a country where steak is on every menu.
how you feel about cartoons? :inti
 
Last edited by a moderator:
But I didn't mention cartoons either. You did, and you brought panties into it, which makes people wonder just what was going on in your head
Funny. I was wondering what goes in Muslims head when they commit terrorism over cartoons
 
Funny. I was wondering what goes in Muslims head when they commit terrorism over cartoons

I think everyone knows that, just it was kind of weird that you threw panties into the mix out of nowhere, it sort of threw a new tangent on whatever point it was you were trying to make.
 
Just curious, has the Indian government ever bulldozed the house of a politician who openly calls for slaughtering people? Or is that kind of 'bold speech' perfectly fine as long as it comes wrapped in saffron and targets minorities?
Let me share, now you can ignore and wiggle to something else :P

 
Let me share, now you can ignore and wiggle to something else :P

That's not good enough, they didn't make him homeless. If that's considered a standard punishment, then shouldn't every politician who abuses minorities face the same consequence? Don’t you think?
 
That's not good enough, they didn't make him homeless. If that's considered a standard punishment, then shouldn't every politician who abuses minorities face the same consequence? Don’t you think?
As i said wiggle wiggle !! :P
When you ask for something be specific on your acceptance criteria. Your query was answered.
 
As i said wiggle wiggle !! :P
When you ask for something be specific on your acceptance criteria. Your query was answered.
Oh, so your replies are based on technicalities of the question, it's just your way of dodging the discussion when you can't provide an answer. Got it.
 
It was a fair question, but if you’d rather not answer, that’s okay.
Be specific, when you ask something. Your mind is made up and will not accept anything that goes against your pre conceived notion.
Is every fanatic Muslim nutjob, who calls for killing of innocents, getting his house demolished in India??
You want to parade a narrative and got handed an absolute rejection of your blanket statement. Just deal with it and move on. You are not going to win in a factual discussion with me.
 
Oh, so your replies are based on technicalities of the question, it's just your way of dodging the discussion when you can't provide an answer. Got it.
Your question was a very blanket assessment of a country of 1.4 billion people! It requires quite an expertise to be such an authority of such large section of humanity.
 
Be specific, when you ask something. Your mind is made up and will not accept anything that goes against your pre conceived notion.
Is every fanatic Muslim nutjob, who calls for killing of innocents, getting his house demolished in India??
You want to parade a narrative and got handed an absolute rejection of your blanket statement. Just deal with it and move on. You are not going to win in a factual discussion with me.
I asked a fact-based question. You mentioned a structure that was removed from outside the person’s house, but that doesn't mean he was made homeless.

Of course, I have a preconceived notion about Hindutva, and rightly so. It’s Hindutva that should be held accountable, not its victims.
 
I asked a fact-based question. You mentioned a structure that was removed from outside the person’s house, but that doesn't mean he was made homeless.

Of course, I have a preconceived notion about Hindutva, and rightly so. It’s Hindutva that should be held accountable, not its victims.
I hear actual super dumb Islamophobic comments in discussions with some lazy VHP/RSS uncles. Bigots are bigots on all sides. They makes the same pre-conceived lazy stereotypes about the "others". You are no different. Carry on!
They also say the same things about Muslims and justify their hate with utter confidence!
Want to see a Hindutva bigot? just look in the mirror and imagine wearing saffron :salute
 
I hear actual super dumb Islamophobic comments in discussions with some lazy VHP/RSS uncles. Bigots are bigots on all sides. They makes the same pre-conceived lazy stereotypes about the "others". You are no different. Carry on!
They also say the same things about Muslims and justify their hate with utter confidence!
Want to see a Hindutva bigot? just look in the mirror and imagine wearing saffron :salute

It seems I may have hurt your feelings, and perhaps you're expressing that unconsciously without fully realizing it. If you believe that Hindutva supporters exhibit bigotry, then it shouldn't be surprising or upsetting when someone calls out Hindutva as a bigoted ideology, just as I would also call out Muslims who commit violence in the name of Islam, or groups like the EDL who promote white supremacy.

I’m not voting for any politician who supports mass murder, nor am I justifying genocide anywhere. That sort of extremism appears to be something Hindutva ideologues have been associated with in India. And yet, you seem more upset at those who speak out against it than at those who actually promote such actions.

Could it be that you're distancing yourself from these views outwardly, while still reacting defensively as if they're being directed at you? That kind of projection can happen when there's an internal conflict.

As for preconceived stereotypes, don’t you think those stereotypes would start to fade if the broader Hindutva aligned community didn’t so often defend those promoting bigotry? It’s hard to blame outsiders for forming such views when the patterns are so consistent.
 
It seems I may have hurt your feelings, and perhaps you're expressing that unconsciously without fully realizing it. If you believe that Hindutva supporters exhibit bigotry, then it shouldn't be surprising or upsetting when someone calls out Hindutva as a bigoted ideology, just as I would also call out Muslims who commit violence in the name of Islam, or groups like the EDL who promote white supremacy.

I’m not voting for any politician who supports mass murder, nor am I justifying genocide anywhere. That sort of extremism appears to be something Hindutva ideologues have been associated with in India. And yet, you seem more upset at those who speak out against it than at those who actually promote such actions.

Could it be that you're distancing yourself from these views outwardly, while still reacting defensively as if they're being directed at you? That kind of projection can happen when there's an internal conflict.

As for preconceived stereotypes, don’t you think those stereotypes would start to fade if the broader Hindutva aligned community didn’t so often defend those promoting bigotry? It’s hard to blame outsiders for forming such views when the patterns are so consistent.
Shaant raho, apni bigotry apne paas rakho.
Not reading your long essays!
 
Shaant raho, apni bigotry apne paas rakho.
Not reading your long essays!
It’s alright, you don’t have to read or respond if you don’t want to. You chose to engage with me, and I’m simply addressing your accusations. If you’d rather step away from the conversation because you’re unable to substantiate your claims or recognize the projection, that’s entirely your choice.
 
The Islamist terrorist’s house has been taken down. Great job by police 💪🏻

Seems like a trend in India supported by the (biased, anti-muslim) Indian police force. Celebrating knocking down a house of an Indian Muslim. Way to go? Is that what hindutva ideology is about? So what has his house got to with any crimes if he committed? Don’t you have legal system in place? You have used this lame excuse to bulldoze many innocent muslims homes last many years. #SaveIndianMuslims

Lastly. don’t try associating terrorism with Islam. There is no Islamist terrorists. Terrorist is just that a terrorist, note assigned to any religion.
 
That's not good enough, they didn't make him homeless. If that's considered a standard punishment, then shouldn't every politician who abuses minorities face the same consequence? Don’t you think?
If you actually read the article, it clearly says the illegal encroachment was torn down.

don't break the law. you'll have no issues. As usual muslims want special treatment
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lastly. don’t try associating terrorism with Islam. There is no Islamist terrorists. Terrorist is just that a terrorist, note assigned to any religion.
:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: Try saying that again with a straight face. Okay, try reading this and repeat the above again with a straight face -


Have you ever wondered why Islamophobia exists?
 
Seems like a trend in India supported by the (biased, anti-muslim) Indian police force. Celebrating knocking down a house of an Indian Muslim. Way to go? Is that what hindutva ideology is about? So what has his house got to with any crimes if he committed? Don’t you have legal system in place? You have used this lame excuse to bulldoze many innocent muslims homes last many years. #SaveIndianMuslims

Lastly. don’t try associating terrorism with Islam. There is no Islamist terrorists. Terrorist is just that a terrorist, note assigned to any religion.

These BJP cockroaches are only tough inside Indian border. Outside of India, they can't do this anywhere. :inti

These vegetarians can only become tough when they gang up (that too in India only).
 
These BJP cockroaches are only tough inside Indian border. Outside of India, they can't do this anywhere. :inti

These vegetarians can only become tough when they gang up (that too in India only).

Petty of you to attack vegetarians. Besides, all that meat and yet your athletes are barely much taller than Peter Dinklage. :yk
 
PLEASE tag me if you EVER EVER get a response to that epic burnage from you !!!
Can anyone explain why no such phobia exists for people from other communities like Christians, Hindus, Jews, Buddhists, Sikhs, Parsis, etc?
 
Normal people with normal brains: We should focus on important things. We should learn from past and focus on present and future.

BJP Indians: Let's waste our time on Mughals/Aurungzeb and cows.

:inti :inti
 
Normal people with normal brains: We should focus on important things.

I' am Absolutely with you on that ( Disclaimer: I might totally regret that after this post lol but hey What the fudge !! )

We should learn from past

past such as like 1971 ???

and focus on present and future.



BJP Indians: Let's waste our time on Mughals/Aurungzeb and cows.


why do you think its a waste of anybody's time discussing Mughals/Aurungzeb lol ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: Try saying that again with a straight face. Okay, try reading this and repeat the above again with a straight face -


Have you ever wondered why Islamophobia exists?

When you are specifically citing a western source titled "Islamic Terrorism" then you should hardly be surprised if the material is going to be exactly what it claims to be. If someone writes an article on Hindu terrorism, then what do you think that would consist of?
 
Normal people with normal brains: We should focus on important things. We should learn from past and focus on present and future.

BJP Indians: Let's waste our time on Mughals/Aurungzeb and cows.

:inti :inti
I agree with you that it is a waste of time to cry about past.

However, we can quickly end the topic by just saying that Mughals were Grade-A Dirtbags. Right from Babar, all the way to Aurangzeb. The 200 year period of darkness.
For a big chunk of subcontinent Muslims, these people were heroes just because they now share those people's religion. For Non-Mulsims, these people were no better than British.
 
I agree with you that it is a waste of time to cry about past.

However, we can quickly end the topic by just saying that Mughals were Grade-A Dirtbags. Right from Babar, all the way to Aurangzeb. The 200 year period of darkness.
For a big chunk of subcontinent Muslims, these people were heroes just because they now share those people's religion. For Non-Mulsims, these people were no better than British.

Didn't the British take a lot of wealth out of India and leave it in poverty? Britain certainly became rich thousands of miles away as a result of their rule, how come India didn't?
 
Back
Top