What's new

Emergence of associate nations could make the ICC T20 World Cup a truly prestigious global event sooner than you think

Bhaijaan

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Runs
71,532
Post of the Week
1
For years, international cricket has been dominated by a familiar inner circle. The traditional heavyweights dictated the tempo, while associate nations were often treated as warm-up fixtures rather than genuine contenders.

That script is quietly being rewritten.

The current T20 World Cup has showcased something far more compelling than predictable hierarchies. Associate teams have not merely participated, they have competed, challenged, and in many cases outperformed established sides. Matches that once seemed routine have turned into edge-of-the-seat thrillers. Scorecards that used to be one-sided are now balanced contests decided in the final over.

This shift is significant.

T20 cricket, by design, compresses the gap between giants and newcomers. Shorter formats reward fearlessness, athleticism, and tactical clarity over legacy and reputation. Associate nations have embraced this reality. They play with nothing to lose and everything to prove. That hunger has translated into sharper fielding, smarter bowling changes, and aggressive batting approaches that often catch traditional powers off guard.

The result is a tournament that feels less predictable and far more global.

When teams like the USA, Scotland, Namibia, Netherlands, Afghanistan, or Nepal step onto the field and genuinely threaten elite sides, the competition transforms. Fans from new regions engage. Local heroes emerge. Broadcasters find new markets. Sponsors see fresh audiences. The World Cup stops being a closed contest between ten familiar teams and starts resembling what its name promises: a world event.

This evolution could elevate the ICC T20 World Cup’s prestige faster than many expect.

Prestige in sport is not built only on history. It is built on uncertainty, diversity, and drama. Football’s World Cup is revered because any nation can dream. Upsets are not anomalies; they are part of the narrative. Cricket is beginning to taste that same magic.

If associate nations continue to rise, backed by better infrastructure, franchise league exposure, and ICC support, the talent gap will shrink even further. More competitive games will mean fewer dead rubbers, higher viewership, and deeper emotional investment from fans across continents.

In short, the tournament becomes richer, louder, and far more alive.

The future of the T20 World Cup may not belong solely to the traditional powerhouses. It may belong to the fearless newcomers who refuse to play the role of spectators.

And when every match feels like a possible upset, every group feels dangerous, and every nation believes it has a shot, that is when a tournament stops being just another championship and becomes something grander.

A true global spectacle.

The kind the world watches, not out of habit, but out of anticipation.

And that future may arrive sooner than we think.
 
Give associates a chance!

They can be good teams if they just get a little more exposure. Why can't test playing nations send their A teams to play white-ball or four-day series with these associates? All these countries deserve better than what they are getting. And I'm not even talking about just money. These A tours alone could make a big impact on their cricket.
 
Give associates a chance!

They can be good teams if they just get a little more exposure. Why can't test playing nations send their A teams to play white-ball or four-day series with these associates? All these countries deserve better than what they are getting. And I'm not even talking about just money. These A tours alone could make a big impact on their cricket.

To be honest; it seems like some of the major nations fear that cricket might spread globally and they may fall behinds
 
absolutely. Expect T20 world cups in mid 30s to be very competitive with true global level involvement. USA, Namibia, Netherlands, Scotland, Nepal all can go to next level and be very competitive teams. AFG can truly be a mid tier team. I am kind of disappointed with Ireland, but they have access to county circuit. Overall cricket's future is great in T20. I think this scares some of the existing mid tier teams.
 
Give associates a chance!

They can be good teams if they just get a little more exposure. Why can't test playing nations send their A teams to play white-ball or four-day series with these associates? All these countries deserve better than what they are getting. And I'm not even talking about just money. These A tours alone could make a big impact on their cricket.
India should make second and third teams and play with them every quarter. Let A teams go to Ireland, AFG, Zim. Choose B teams to go to Netherland, Scotland, USA, Nepal. Let C teams travel to Italy, Namibia, etc. This will provide chance to all fringe players while allowing the others to excel
 
What exactly has Associates achieved, nothing infact the bigger nation are so scared they didn't gave them opportunity to train under lights
 
You have to realize these teams will use beginner's luck for a while. Moment they start playing more they will be getting phainty from big teams from the get go. Even though this is a very very fickle format where you can pull off magic, not easy to do over a period of time.
 
Finally, the first real upset of the tournament after a lot of close calls.

Zimbabwe have beaten Australia!
 
Best thing ICC did was give everyone T20 international status. It made T20 cricket open and accessible. It's a much easier sport to sustain and develop.

Back in the day the requirement to have test status or strong first class culture probably killed off some teams. Because it's just so damn difficult to have long term success in first class cricket without a strong legacy behind it.

Even Afghanistan and Ireland only really got it for formalities. They can't even afford to play it.

T20 is a great equaliser. 2 year world cup with qualifiers in between has also helped big time. If associates get a good batch of players they can get 2-3 world cups out of them. Whereas before in ODI 4 year gap could finish off their cricket before the next big event.
 
T20 is a great equaliser. 2 year world cup with qualifiers in between has also helped big time. If associates get a good batch of players they can get 2-3 world cups out of them. Whereas before in ODI 4 year gap could finish off their cricket before the next big event.

Interesting point.
Although i hope that once the event becomes too big and prestigious, they make it once in 4 years.

They can add a Champions Trophy T20 or T20 Champions Knock out kind of trophy as a filler maybe.
 
Best thing ICC did was give everyone T20 international status. It made T20 cricket open and accessible. It's a much easier sport to sustain and develop.

Back in the day the requirement to have test status or strong first class culture probably killed off some teams. Because it's just so damn difficult to have long term success in first class cricket without a strong legacy behind it.

Even Afghanistan and Ireland only really got it for formalities. They can't even afford to play it.

T20 is a great equaliser. 2 year world cup with qualifiers in between has also helped big time. If associates get a good batch of players they can get 2-3 world cups out of them. Whereas before in ODI 4 year gap could finish off their cricket before the next big event.
They need to filter out teams like US, Canada, Oman, UAE where not even 0.1% of the local population play the sport, and the teams are full of desi immigrants. ICC should promote teams like NL and ITA that are mostly comprised of locals.
 
As the game got shorter, the excellence gap reduced. Easier to compete over 40 overs than 100 or 400.

This is a deeper democratisation of the sport.

With more money and attention, it can only get more competitive.

Absolutely India should send their second, third and fourth teams to play the Associates.
 
They need to filter out teams like US, Canada, Oman, UAE where not even 0.1% of the local population play the sport, and the teams are full of desi immigrants. ICC should promote teams like NL and ITA that are mostly comprised of locals.

I know where youre coming from but thats not how it works. Every nation that ebenfits from immigrants deploy them wherever they are useful. Indian and Chinese techies make the backbone of American tech companies and they also represent them in Chess, Table Tennis etc. French football team is full of black athletes.
 
They need to filter out teams like US, Canada, Oman, UAE where not even 0.1% of the local population play the sport, and the teams are full of desi immigrants. ICC should promote teams like NL and ITA that are mostly comprised of locals.
NL and ITA are probably same as Canada but coz the immigrants are white we don't notice it.

Oman UAE etc could be filtered yeah because the players don't have passports or nationality.
 
Interesting point.
Although i hope that once the event becomes too big and prestigious, they make it once in 4 years.

They can add a Champions Trophy T20 or T20 Champions Knock out kind of trophy as a filler maybe.
Yeah ultimately it should become a big prestigious 4 year event.

Imagine the days where it becomes a proper event and in between we get European Cup, Asia Cup, African Cup of nations like we have in football.


2 years is ok in interim.
 
Yeah ultimately it should become a big prestigious 4 year event.

Imagine the days where it becomes a proper event and in between we get European Cup, Asia Cup, African Cup of nations like we have in football.


2 years is ok in interim.

Thgen we could have a real Champions Trophy between top 2 teams from all continents (1 from Australia/NZ/Samoa, PPG)).
 
Major nations must remain serious about the game especially the mid tier nations because a storm is coming as the associates shake up the old world order in future T20 World Cups. Can't afford to be complacent anymore. Many associates are bringing with them Western athleticism, professionalism and a general high IQ. Only a matter of time the stars align and they take a big leap and turn from occassional threats to a constant pain in the Salman Butt, bro.
 
T20 WC is the best format to include as much associates possible. ICC has done tremendous job to include total of 20 teams this time in the WC.

ODI format is looking very useless now infront of WT20 and WTC. I hope it will be discarded soon as it does not offer much purpose now.
 
Too many threads are cropping up by Indians to defend the tournament and take spotlight away from re-filled black water.

Associates have been winning games and causing upsets at previous tournaments also- don't know what is special in this one. Apart from Zim beating Aus, there hasn't been any other upset anyway.
 
T20 is not a serious format. World T20 doesn't have the same prestige as ODI WC or Test series. :inti
Odi world cup might not even exist after some years.

Its time to move on, t20 will be played at the olympics in 2028, so its gonna become a global game.


I understand your frustration now that Bangladesh has been kicked out, but t20 is the way forward.
 
They need to filter out teams like US, Canada, Oman, UAE where not even 0.1% of the local population play the sport, and the teams are full of desi immigrants. ICC should promote teams like NL and ITA that are mostly comprised of locals.
lol Italy has a player who has never visited Italy playing for them.
 
T20 WC is the best format to include as much associates possible. ICC has done tremendous job to include total of 20 teams this time in the WC.

ODI format is looking very useless now infront of WT20 and WTC. I hope it will be discarded soon as it does not offer much purpose now.
Odi will never be this big as it is too long for most of the world. Tests will be primarily between teams with tests legacy. Even among them expect NZ, Pak and SA to play fewer tests in future. Basically they will only play bare minimum to keep the tradition going.

Pathetic teams like BD already has no legacy and no future. So they may even drop off from ODI and again play only bare minimum

AFG and Ireland already don’t play much tests at all and will reduce even further in future. Just occasional match to remind themselves that they can play that format too
 
They need to filter out teams like US, Canada, Oman, UAE where not even 0.1% of the local population play the sport, and the teams are full of desi immigrants. ICC should promote teams like NL and ITA that are mostly comprised of locals.
Canada has local population playing.. thats racism if you dont consider a desi person with nationality as a canadian. Native indians are the real canadians, if you want to use the native logic

Only UAE is an issue where there is no nationality and i think same as oman.

Meanwhile, Italy team is also made up of Australians.

It seems like you are ok if Whites are playing, but have an issue with desis
 
You have to realize these teams will use beginner's luck for a while. Moment they start playing more they will be getting phainty from big teams from the get go. Even though this is a very very fickle format where you can pull off magic, not easy to do over a period of time.
Yeah , and thats why they need more opportunities and A team games vs the one off WC tournaments. T20 is bridging the gap and thats only good for the game..
 
They need to filter out teams like US, Canada, Oman, UAE where not even 0.1% of the local population play the sport, and the teams are full of desi immigrants. ICC should promote teams like NL and ITA that are mostly comprised of locals.
Why ??? Even 1% of USAs pop would be more than other countries and there are more homegrown players now. Ban has 100% of the local pop playing cricket , but they are so useless.. These teams have been way better with such limited infrastructure, financial support, and exposure.
 
Canada has local population playing.. thats racism if you dont consider a desi person with nationality as a canadian. Native indians are the real canadians, if you want to use the native logic

Only UAE is an issue where there is no nationality and i think same as oman.

Meanwhile, Italy team is also made up of Australians.

It seems like you are ok if Whites are playing, but have an issue with desis
Bud , the best 11 has to play period.. If all 11 are white, so be it.. All are balck , so be it.. All are brown, so be it.. The best 11 should be on the field..
 
Finally, the first real upset of the tournament after a lot of close calls.

Zimbabwe have beaten Australia!
Not an upset. Australlia lost badly in Pakistan too. So it is a reflection of their team without a few resources. Hazlewood would have eaten these guys alive.
 
T20 is about to be what cricket means to the rest of the world.

Test cricket in future is going to be an elite only event between high income legacy cricket nations like India, Australia, England, South Africa and maybe NZ also.

They will play test cricket not to prove a point but simply to show off to the rest of the cricketing world.

It will be a loss making venture. Only winners will be event management companies. But the rich cricket boards will still play them because it’s about tradition and culture. And they can simply afford them.
 
Canada has local population playing.. thats racism if you dont consider a desi person with nationality as a canadian. Native indians are the real canadians, if you want to use the native logic

Only UAE is an issue where there is no nationality and i think same as oman.

Meanwhile, Italy team is also made up of Australians.

It seems like you are ok if Whites are playing, but have an issue with desis
Bajwa the president and Bajwa captain for Canada. The overriding theme for all associates is most have at least one Indian born player.
 
I just don't think any team should be playing a World Cup if it doesn't field its own citizens. UAE, Oman should not participate if all their eleven are citizens.

Otherwise might as well hire ABD and Sachin to play for them.
 
Hats off to ICC bro.
===

THE BEST T20 WORLD CUP IN THE HISTORY 🥹

- 20 Teams.
- Great pitches.
- Associate teams fighting hard.
- Super 8 Qualification is still 50-50 for teams like England, Australia.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Once it becomes an Olympic sport, More teams will start taking cricket seriously. Subcontinent, SENA countries and even WI, Zim have cricket at the school level. USA and some of these associate countries don’t. Even the recent USA u-19 men’s and women’s team most kids were 2nd gen kids who grow up here and coached out of passion by their dads who maybe got them special coaching from independent coaches (I know a couple of these kids/parents on the USA cricket circuit) .

If cricket becomes an Olympic sport, it will get more funding and support at school level. To some extent shining in such WC tournaments will help them. Unless school level programme cricket is not introduced, we will see flash in the pan performances from minnows.
 
Ok. If you say so. Sanghi propaganda. Most useless boring world cup t20 ever. Not even following it probably.not one decenr match up yet. Upsets happened since 2007 nothing new. Will boycott 15th but will make dua Pakistan wins against the enemy nation India.
 
Ok. If you say so. Sanghi propaganda. Most useless boring world cup t20 ever. Not even following it probably.not one decenr match up yet. Upsets happened since 2007 nothing new. Will boycott 15th but will make dua Pakistan wins against the enemy nation India.
How can you say its the most useless T20 World Cup ever if you aren't even following it?
 
ICC should promote teams like NL and ITA that are mostly comprised of locals.

Not true. Around half of the italian team are aussies who played club cricket in Sydney. Netherlands are majority south african immigrants iirc.
 
Odi world cup might not even exist after some years.

Its time to move on, t20 will be played at the olympics in 2028, so its gonna become a global game.


I understand your frustration now that Bangladesh has been kicked out, but t20 is the way forward.
BD is mediocre even in Odi.. doesn’t matter the format.
 
Ok. If you say so. Sanghi propaganda. Most useless boring world cup t20 ever. Not even following it probably.not one decenr match up yet. Upsets happened since 2007 nothing new. Will boycott 15th but will make dua Pakistan wins against the enemy nation India.
It’s only a sport , stop treating it like a toy that was taken away from you.
 
What we have learned is that ICC cricket is actually even more competitive without Bangladesh playing.

And nobody misses watching Bangladesh playing including Bangladeshis, if they were being honest .
 
What we have learned is that ICC cricket is actually even more competitive without Bangladesh playing.

And nobody misses watching Bangladesh playing including Bangladeshis, if they were being honest .

Nope, given that they’re not here and we don’t know how they would have done, we haven’t learnt anything.

Also, given the local population’s interest in cricket, they miss being at the World Cup. Try for once to see it from a non-Indian perspective
 
Nope, given that they’re not here and we don’t know how they would have done, we haven’t learnt anything.

Also, given the local population’s interest in cricket, they miss being at the World Cup. Try for once to see it from a non-Indian perspective
The history of Bangladesh in T20 World Cups is beyond pathetic. And they are ranked what - 9th?

Their own fans on PP have made it clear that they are happy it's a tension free World Cup for them
 
The history of Bangladesh in T20 World Cups is beyond pathetic. And they are ranked what - 9th?

Their own fans on PP have made it clear that they are happy it's a tension free World Cup for them

“Just because things happened a certain way means they’ll continue to happen that way”.

Tell that to Zimbabwe.

The whole point of professional sport is that anything can happen on the day. I’m not making revelations here.
 
Yes they would had won the WC now that they are not playing it.

They would have been competitive on SL pitches. Unless you can 100% predict an alternative scenario, you can’t really speak w/ any certainty on how they would have done. Love the sarcasm though, the story of the world is littered with/ hubristic people and what happened to them.
 
They would have been competitive on SL pitches. Unless you can 100% predict an alternative scenario, you can’t really speak w/ any certainty on how they would have done. Love the sarcasm though, the story of the world is littered with/ hubristic people and what happened to them.
Very true I can’t tell how Nepal would do if BCCI allows them as a team to play in Indian domestics, don’t know anything called 100% prediction but you can always enlighten us.

The only thing for certain is BD is not winning this world cup, call it hubris if you want better than castles that sink.
 
For years, international cricket has been dominated by a familiar inner circle. The traditional heavyweights dictated the tempo, while associate nations were often treated as warm-up fixtures rather than genuine contenders.

That script is quietly being rewritten.

The current T20 World Cup has showcased something far more compelling than predictable hierarchies. Associate teams have not merely participated, they have competed, challenged, and in many cases outperformed established sides. Matches that once seemed routine have turned into edge-of-the-seat thrillers. Scorecards that used to be one-sided are now balanced contests decided in the final over.

This shift is significant.

T20 cricket, by design, compresses the gap between giants and newcomers. Shorter formats reward fearlessness, athleticism, and tactical clarity over legacy and reputation. Associate nations have embraced this reality. They play with nothing to lose and everything to prove. That hunger has translated into sharper fielding, smarter bowling changes, and aggressive batting approaches that often catch traditional powers off guard.

The result is a tournament that feels less predictable and far more global.

When teams like the USA, Scotland, Namibia, Netherlands, Afghanistan, or Nepal step onto the field and genuinely threaten elite sides, the competition transforms. Fans from new regions engage. Local heroes emerge. Broadcasters find new markets. Sponsors see fresh audiences. The World Cup stops being a closed contest between ten familiar teams and starts resembling what its name promises: a world event.

This evolution could elevate the ICC T20 World Cup’s prestige faster than many expect.

Prestige in sport is not built only on history. It is built on uncertainty, diversity, and drama. Football’s World Cup is revered because any nation can dream. Upsets are not anomalies; they are part of the narrative. Cricket is beginning to taste that same magic.

If associate nations continue to rise, backed by better infrastructure, franchise league exposure, and ICC support, the talent gap will shrink even further. More competitive games will mean fewer dead rubbers, higher viewership, and deeper emotional investment from fans across continents.

In short, the tournament becomes richer, louder, and far more alive.

The future of the T20 World Cup may not belong solely to the traditional powerhouses. It may belong to the fearless newcomers who refuse to play the role of spectators.

And when every match feels like a possible upset, every group feels dangerous, and every nation believes it has a shot, that is when a tournament stops being just another championship and becomes something grander.

A true global spectacle.

The kind the world watches, not out of habit, but out of anticipation.

And that future may arrive sooner than we think.
True that. Something v new for cricket fans to see associate nations and underdog teams giving tough competition as if they are here not just to partake but to actually play
 
Associate nations ki performance ek taraf, Pakistan ki performance aik taraf
 
Back
Top