What's new

Fashion giant faces 'slavery' investigation

Cpt. Rishwat

T20I Captain
Joined
May 8, 2010
Runs
43,403
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/boohoo-fashion-giant-faces-slavery-investigation-57s3hxcth


Workers in Leicester making clothes destined for the fashion giant Boohoo are being paid as little as £3.50 an hour, an undercover Sunday Times investigation has found.

The factory, which displayed the sign Jaswal Fashions, was also operating last week during the localised coronavirus lockdown without additional hygiene or social distancing measures in place. The undercover reporter spent two days working in the factory where he was told to expect £3.50 an hour, despite the minimum wage in Britain for those aged 25 and over being £8.72.

He obtained covert video footage of himself packing garments made in the factory under the label of Nasty Gal, which is owned by the fast-fashion brand Boohoo whose boss, Mahmud Kamani, is set to scoop a £50m bonus.
 
After four hours of back-breaking work, humping rolls of fabric and boxes of clothes bearing high street fashion labels such as Boohoo and Nasty Gal, a foreman took me aside.

“You don’t need to drain yourself like this,” he advised me in Hindi. “These motherf***ers know how to exploit people like us. They make profits like hell and pay us in peanuts.”

From yet another Indian worker, I learnt that I could expect to be paid £3.50 to £4 an hour. The national minimum wage for those aged 25 and over is £8.72.

No wonder these clothes are so cheap, those wages are a disgrace. Coronavirus aside, this has been going on for decades, doesn't reflect well on the immigrant community from the subcontinent.
 
No wonder these clothes are so cheap, those wages are a disgrace. Coronavirus aside, this has been going on for decades, doesn't reflect well on the immigrant community from the subcontinent.

No different to some of the larger chains which import from developing nations where conditions are definitely slave like.

That being said, this occurence in Leicester needs to be dealt with a heavy hand and publicised to ensure others are put off this modern form of slavery.

I'm guessing a lot of the labour used are illegal migrants who would take this over being sent back.
 
Matt Hancock has said he is concerned about poor social distancing in clothing factories in Leicester as some were confirmed as having outbreaks.

Speaking on the BBC's Andrew Marr Show, the health secretary said he was "very worried about the employment practices in some factories" in the city.

Leicester was put on local lockdown on Monday after a spike in Covid-19 cases.

Mr Hancock told Sky's Sophy Ridge he was "very worried" about the number of infections in Leicester.

He confirmed the government has already shut down businesses during the coronavirus pandemic.

Asked if there was a link between employment practices in Leicester and the outbreak there, Mr Hancock described guidance for employers as "statutory guidance" backed up by fines.

"There are clearly some problems that have been under the radar in Leicester that need action," he told the BBC.

Speaking on Sophy Ridge on Sunday, Mr Hancock said: "We've seen outbreaks in clothing factories and in food factories and there are some quite significant concerns about some of the employment practices in some of the clothing factories in Leicester, they are important problems to deal with.

"We also have the authority to shut down the business if it doesn't follow the guidance."

On Thursday, online fashion retailer Boohoo defended its business practices after a workers' rights group said staff at Leicester factories that supply the group were at risk of coronavirus.

Labour Behind the Label said workers were "being forced to come into work while sick with COVID-19".

Boohoo said it had "terminated relationships" with factories over the treatment of workers.

In a statement, the group said: "The Boohoo group will not tolerate any incidence of non-compliance especially in relation to the treatment of workers within our supply chain."

The group said it would investigate the allegations and take any necessary action.

A HSE spokesperson previously said: "In Leicester we are actively investigating three textile businesses, have recently contacted 17 and undertaken three site visits.

"Enforcement action is being taken at one of these sites and further spot inspections will take place in the area in the coming days and weeks."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-53297782
 
The online fashion retailer Boohoo has pledged to investigate how its clothes came to be made by a Leicester garment factory where workers were paid just £3.50 an hour in conditions that allegedly put them at greater risk of catching Covid-19.

Shares in the company slumped by 9% on Monday morning, the first day since revelations about its supply chain came to light.

Boohoo, which owns brands such as Pretty Little Thing and Nasty Gal, said conditions at the Jaswal Fashions factory in Leicester were “totally unacceptable and fall woefully short of any standards acceptable in any workplace”.

Sales of clothes made by suppliers in Leicester have helped fuel rapid growth that could put its bosses in line for bonuses worth £150m as part of a three-year bonus scheme.

But Boohoo, which had a surge sales during the pandemic, said it was not sure who was supplying its garments.

“Our early investigations have revealed that Jaswal Fashions is not a declared supplier and is also no longer trading as a garment manufacturer,” it said in a statement to investors in the company, which floated on the stock market in 2014.

“It therefore appears that a different company is using Jaswal’s former premises and we are currently trying to establish the identity of this company.

“We are taking immediate action to thoroughly investigate how our garments were in their hands, will ensure that our suppliers immediately cease working with this company, and we will urgently review our relationship with any suppliers who have subcontracted work to the manufacturer in question.”

It comes after an undercover reporter for the Sunday Times found staff being paid as little as £3.50 an hour in the factory, even though the minimum wage in Britain for those aged 25 and over is £8.72.

Priti Patel, the home secretary, asked the National Crime Agency to investigate modern slavery in Leicester’s clothing factories last week, after whistleblowers raised the alarm about conditions.

Leicester has been the site of a localised coronavirus outbreak, with cramped conditions and lax safety measures in some garment factories thought to have played a role in transmission of the virus.

Boohoo had previously said none of its suppliers had been affected.

On Monday, the company said: “We are keen and willing to work with local officials to raise standards because we are absolutely committed to eradicating any instance of non-compliance and to ensuring the actions of a few do not continue to undermine the excellent work of many of our suppliers in the area, who provide good jobs and good working conditions.”

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/jul/06/boohoo-leicester-factory-conditions-covid-19
 
Asos and Next have dropped the fast-fashion brand Boohoo after claims that some factories supplying its clothes paid less than minimum wage and failed to protect workers from coronavirus.

The company had more than £1.5bn wiped off its stock market value since Monday in response to the allegations.

Asos and Next were joined by very.co.uk later on Tuesday, which issued a statement saying it had temporarily suspended sales.

A spokesman for Next said the company had dropped Boohoo clothes from its websites last week in response to a report from the campaign group Labour Behind the Label which first detailed the allegations. “Next concluded there is a case for Boohoo Group to answer,” he said.

Next said its approach was “based on trust” but that the allegations could not be ignored, and had launched its own investigation. It said it was “not pre-judging the outcome of this process and no final decision has been made” but that the items would be suspended in the meantime.

Zalando, a Berlin-based online retailer which had €6.4bn sales in 2019, joined Next and Asos in dropping Boohoo, and all references to the company had been removed from their websites.

Zalando said: “We expect our partners to apply similar fundamental priorities and will distance ourselves from those who don’t.”

It is understood that Asos’s move is a temporary measure while the company awaits the outcome of investigations into Boohoo’s supply chain. Zalando said it would consider restoring Boohoo items “only once all corrective actions have been satisfactorily addressed”.

The news will come as a further blow to Boohoo after it was forced to announce an investigation into claims that workers at one of its Leicester suppliers were being paid as little as £3.50 an hour. Other factories are alleged to have forced people to work throughout lockdown despite others on site having symptoms of coronavirus.

The claims have revived long-held concerns over working conditions in Leicester’s garment industry, where around 1,000 factories and small workshops make clothes, mostly for UK fast-fashion brands. An estimated 75%–80% of clothes produced in the city are for Boohoo.

Boohoo, which also owns the Nasty Gal and PrettyLittleThing brands, has strongly denied any responsibility for the alleged bad practices of its Leicester suppliers. It told the Guardian on Friday: “We are working with our third-party compliance partner to further investigate the claims raised and are working with suppliers to ensure compliance.”

On Tuesday, Umar Kamani, the son of the company’s billionaire owner, Mahmud Kamani, and founder of PrettyLittleThing with his brother Adam, tweeted “the truth will always come out” but then deleted the message.

Zalando said in a statement: “In response to the allegations against Boohoo regarding worker rights during Covid-19 in factories in Leicester, Zalando has made the decision to delist all products by Boohoo Group and subsidiaries and pause all new business with Boohoo effective 7 July.”

It added that “only once all corrective actions have been satisfactorily addressed by Boohoo, can a conversation be revisited to discuss the commercial relationship between Zalando and the Boohoo group moving forward”.

A spokesperson for The Very Group said: “We have temporarily suspended the sale of brands operated by Boohoo Group while the company conducts its investigation” except those where stock predated Boohoo’s acquisition of the brands, including Oasis and Warehouse. The spokesperson added: “We await the outcome of Boohoo’s investigation and its subsequent operational response.”

Boohoo did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

https://www.theguardian.com/busines...-boohoo-amid-leicester-garment-factory-claims
 
Fast fashion brand Boohoo has ordered an independent review of its UK supply chain following reports that workers at a factory in Leicester were not being allowed to socially distance.

It comes after retailers Next and Asos dropped Boohoo goods from their stores and shares in the firm dropped by a third.

The factory at the centre of the allegations was also said to be operating during a localised lockdown.

Leicester and surrounding suburbs became the subject to the UK's first local lockdown last week after a spike in Covid-19 cases.

Boohoo said it was "shocked and appalled" by the allegations.

Labour Behind the Label, a workers' rights group, has separately claimed that some employees at factories in Leicester, which supply Boohoo, were "forced to come into work while sick with Covid-19".

Boohoo said it would spend an initial £10m "to eradicate supply chain malpractice" and was accelerating its independent third party supply chain review.
 
Almost every major fashion brand in the world is guilty of this, it's really a very dirty industry behind the scenes. Workers all around the world making their clothes getting paid barely enough to survive.
 
One of Boohoo's largest shareholders is dumping stock in the fashion firm after it said the company had failed to address concerns about working conditions at a supplier in Leicester.

Standard Life Aberdeen (SLA) criticised Boohoo's response to exploitation claims as "inadequate in scope, timeliness and gravity".

Allegations of poor pay and conditions at a factory emerged last weekend.

Boohoo has since announced an independent review of its supply chain.

The fast fashion retailer's share price fell 2% to 279.7p each.

A Sunday Times report claimed workers at a factory in Leicester - currently in local lockdown following a spike in Covid-19 cases - were paid just £3.50 an hour, while being offered no protection from coronavirus. It was making clothes for Boohoo's Nasty Gal brand.

Lesley Duncan, deputy head of UK equities at Aberdeen Standard Investments, SLA's fund management arm, said it had invested in Boohoo since its flotation in 2014.

SLA holds a 3.3% stake in Boohoo, according to data provider Morningstar.

Ms Duncan said it had lobbied the company over a number of years on issues such as supply chain transparency.

"While we would have liked progress to have been quicker we did feel that progress was being made," Ms Duncan said.

But she said that concerns had been growing in recent weeks "which even before recent developments, had negatively impacted our conviction levels in the company".

"Having spoken to Boohoo's management team a number of times this week in light of recent concerning allegations, we view their response as inadequate in scope, timeliness and gravity."

The company, which also owns the PrettyLittleThing brand, said it was "appalled" by the allegations and that it had asked a senior barrister to lead a review.

However, other retailers have distanced themselves from Boohoo.

Next, Asos and Zalando all announced on Tuesday that they had stopped selling Boohoo clothes on their websites.

The retailers said they were pausing relationships with Boohoo's brands, pending the outcome of the company's investigation.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-53365829
 
A co-founder of fashion giant Boohoo has links to the Leicester factory accused of paying less than the minimum wage and failing to protect staff from coronavirus, the Guardian can reveal.

Boohoo has confirmed that the factory at the heart of the allegations is run by Morefray Ltd, a Manchester-owned firm with ties to the separate I Saw It First fashion brand. The I Saw It First business was set up by Jalal Kamani, 60, who jointly founded Boohoo with his brother Mahmud, 55.

The public filings raise further questions of Boohoo after a report in the Sunday Times that claimed staff at one of the fashion company’s suppliers were paid less than minimum wage and did not have masks to protect against coronavirus. An undercover reporter working at the Morefray factory was told to expect pay of £3.50 an hour, compared with the national minimum wage of £8.72 for over-25s.

Boohoo launched an urgent investigation into its supply chain this week, saying conditions at the Leicester warehouse were “totally unacceptable and fall woefully short of any standards acceptable in any workplace”.

The company added that it was trying to identify the company at the centre of the allegations. After being approached by the Guardian, Boohoo confirmed that the supplier was Morefray,

Companies House filings suggest that Morefray is linked to Jalal Kamani, a founding director of Boohoo, who still has a small shareholding in the £3.6bn company, which is led by his brother, Mahmud. According to Companies House, Morefray is 50% owned by a Manchester-based firm called I5 Holdings, which is in turn owned by Shahzad Irshad, a director of I Saw It First.

Filings also show that Irshad became the owner of I5 Holdings on 10 June, when he took control from Zogan Limited, a company that shares three current or former directors with I Saw It First, including Irshad himself. One of Zogan’s directors describes themselves on professional social media network LinkedIn as “head of tax” at Kamani Group. Jalal Kamani is a co-director of several other companies with Irshad and other directors of Zogan.

The complex ownership structure establishes ties between Morefray and I Saw It First, which Jalal Kamani founded in 2017 after helping establish Boohoo.com along with Mahmud. Jalal still owns a 0.65% stake in Boohoo, according to stock market filings, after giving stock worth £63m to his adult children in 2018.

A spokesman for I Saw It First said: “I5 Holdings Limited owns a non-controlling shareholding in Morefray Limited.” The spokesman declined to answer further questions about the company. Someone who answered a telephone number for Morefray declined to comment.

A Boohoo spokesman confirmed that Morefray was the Boohoo supplier at the centre of the allegations but said that Mahmud Kamani had no involvement in the business.

“Morefray is a recognised supplier to Boohoo and we have never previously been aware of any allegations of paying below the minimum wage until the media report,” said Boohoo. “As a result of that report and subsequent discovery that it was Morefray and not the company in the media report, we are immediately visiting the Morefray site to investigate further.”

On Wednesday, Boohoo announced an independent review of its UK supply chain. The review, led by Alison Levitt QC, will be accompanied by a £10m investment in “eradicating malpractice” in its supply chain.

https://www.theguardian.com/busines...al-kamani-linked-to-leicester-garment-factory
 
When the garment factory where Anil worked learned that the risk of coronavirus meant it couldn’t do business as usual, it didn’t shut up shop. Instead, it locked the doors.

“It was always going,” said Anil, not his real name. “They wrote on pieces of paper: ‘The factory is closed because of coronavirus.’ But they locked the doors, and inside, people were working.”

When Leicester’s new lockdown was announced, and fears surfaced that factory conditions had played a part in the city’s second wave of infections, production demands did not seem to dip. According to Anil, the factory ran overnight. “They finish at six o’clock in the morning for many days. Even [last] Sunday,” he said. “People don’t want to work overnight, but they say you must.”

The owners of this factory were eventually cowed as word spread of a sharp increase in activity by bodies such as the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority (GLAA). This week, Anil said, the overnight shifts came to an end, and hand sanitiser stations and social-distancing measures were put in place for the first time.

The Guardian has heard accounts from dozens of interviews with workers, family members, factory bosses, community figures and pressure groups.

Workers and those with relatives in factories made claims of part-time hours being logged while full-time hours were worked, giving the impression of legal wages being paid that were in fact far lower.

Some even told the Guardian they were aware of cases where workers’ employment or identity documents were held by factory bosses, leaving them unable to seek employment elsewhere. It was not clear which companies these factories supply.

On Wednesday evening, as about 20 women left shifts at the anonymous building where Anil works, they shook their heads and waved away attempts to ask questions, mostly explaining that they only spoke Gujarati. A supervisor who answered the door denied problems at the factory but said he had been told not to speak to journalists. “We are busy and have to work now. I’m not allowed to discuss any matter about it.”

Anil had also been reluctant to speak, saying he feared for his family’s safety. But he agreed because he was so angered by the treatment of workers. While his wife looks after their two children, he has been working about 40 hours a week for £200, about £5 an hour.

There was no canteen, and rats and mice were visible on the factory floor, Anil claimed. There was no hand sanitiser until last week, and the single men’s toilet had no soap. “They have put us in danger,” he said. “If I feel sick, I make my family sick. I put them in danger too.”

Since the second lockdown began, though, the pattern in Leicester has shifted. If the North Evington area where many of the city’s factories are based was previously beset with risky working practices and almost no scrutiny, this week an abundance of attention has come just as many workshops went dark.

The HSE, GLAA and other bodies have visited more than 20 factories and related businesses, while national politicians declared their determination to tackle the problem. Despite years of media coverage and major parliamentary reports, the health secretary, Matt Hancock, said the issues had been “under the radar” and vowed that the government would act.

In the face of all that activity, workers, industry insiders and community groups say many factories are simply hoping to ride out the storm. “You’ve got people exploiting people, thinking: give this a couple of weeks and it’ll blow over,” said a GLAA official. “The message will be: ‘Keep your heads down.’”

Meanwhile, the fast fashion company Boohoo was fighting to protect a £5bn business. More than £1.5bn was wiped off its valuation in two days following claims that the company’s suppliers were among those paying low wages and breaching coronavirus safety guidelines. In the days that followed, as commentators accused it of turning a blind eye to the crisis, Boohoo launched an investigation and sought to emphasise that it was not responsible for issues in supply factories.

On Friday, the company told the Guardian it was “a customer of some of the garment manufacturers in the area and each of those has a strict code of conduct in place”. Boohoo, which is estimated to buy 75%-80% of the garments produced in Leicester, said it would “not condone any incidence of poor practice” and noted that additional auditing and compliance teams had been deployed this week “to support both our in-house and third-party auditing specialists that are already on the ground”.

Major retailers including Next, Asos and Very all suspended their relationships with the brand this week pending the outcome of investigations.

Despite Boohoo’s promise and renewed attention on the wider problems in Leicester, some were doubtful about change. “We’ve had people saying there’s nothing major amiss, missing the much larger longstanding issues of working conditions, the lack of support, the pay rates,” said Priya Thamotheram, the head of the Highfields community centre. “I’m not sure what it’ll do other than continue with matters as they’ve been for the last 30 years or more.”

In minutes, seen by the Guardian, of an October 2019 meeting between local community groups and major brands – not including Boohoo – a detailed plan is set out for a “workable” but modest proposal to bring about change.

If you have been affected or have any information, we'd like to hear from you. You can get in touch by filling in the form below, anonymously if you wish or contact us via WhatsApp by clicking here or adding the contact +44(0)7867825056. Only the Guardian can see your contributions and one of our journalists may contact you to discuss further.

Tell us
At an estimated initial cost of £100,000, it was hoped that the group could hire two experienced outreach workers in Leicester to help vulnerable workers. The community groups came away from the meeting thinking they had secured the funding. Nine months later, they say they have received none of it.

Labour Behind the Label, the group that first raised concerns over a coronavirus outbreak in factories, welcomed the independent Boohoo inquiry but said it was sceptical of the value of the company’s auditing process. It noted: “Unannounced audits are the ABC of audits and are not something to be proud of but are taken as a basic requirement.” A vital step, the group added, would be to introduce a whistleblowing hotline for workers.

There were similar concerns in Leicester, where one worker who claimed that their factory produced Boohoo clothing described visits from the brand – which until late 2019 ran in-house audits rather than using a third-party company – that appeared to be limited in scope.

“[Supervisors] seemed to know when they were going to come,” suggested the worker. “They would select people in advance and say: ‘You will talk to them and this is what you are going to say to them.’”

There are also claims that there have been times when workers have been rushed out of factories through back doors when Boohoo staff have arrived in the company’s highly visible branded cars, which it has previously described on Twitter as a “perk” for “business or personal use. From dashing to meetings … or even away for a long weekend with friends!”

On Thursday, three of the vibrantly patterned Fiat 500s – in turquoise, pink and peach – were parked outside the company’s Leicester office. Two had number plates ending ‘8OO HOO’.

For the authorities in Leicester, there are challenges to taking action against a problem that they broadly accept is serious. “There are issues for our agency, certainly,” said the GLAA source. “It’s quite difficult. We need to have evidence of a crime to get through the door.” Every one of the site visits conducted by the body since the story broke had been with the consent of the factory owner, the source said.

Factory owners, for their part, seem optimistic. Sixty-eight clothing companies have been registered in Leicester since the first lockdown began, many of which appear to have links to existing or defunct manufacturing firms in the city. “Things are normal,” said Anil. “Everybody carries on.”

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...ng-coronavirus-lockdown-claims-garment-worker
 
'Fear of being called racist' stopped police from tackling Leicester's 'slave' sweatshops, Priti Patel believes



The Home Secretary is understood to think that 'cultural sensitivities' prevented the police from tackling Leicester's 'slave' sweatshops.

Priti Patel is said to have raised concerns behind closed doors that government agencies turned a blind eye to the factories where staff were paid less than the minimum wage and worked in poor conditions, as reported by The Sunday Times.

Ms Patel is thought to now be considering new laws on modern slavery after fears the current legislation is no 'fit for purpose'.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...tackling-sweatshops-Priti-Patel-believes.html


Seems like the Pakistani grooming scandal, that the police were stopped from doing their duty to save British jobs for fear of being called racist.

I think this might also have some cross correlation with the BLM threads and also the Pak Lives Matter thread which followed. :13:
 
As many as 10,000 people could be working in slave-like conditions in textile factories in Leicester.

Leicestershire MP Andrew Bridgen has told Sky News a "conspiracy of silence" has allowed factories in the city to continue to exploit workers over many years.

"You've got a systemic failure of all the protections in Leicester that would prevent this from happening," Mr Bridgen said.

"I've estimated it's around 10,000 individuals who are effectively in modern slavery providing garments for internet retailers."

The claim comes on the same day a report based on police records found that across Britain there are at least 100,000 slaves.

The study by the Centre for Social Justice think tank and the anti-slavery charity Justice and Care claims the issue is likely to intensify in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic.

Justice Secretary Robert Buckland told Sky News' Kay Burley @ Breakfast show that "a light is now being shone on an appalling litany of abuse" as he welcomed a National Crime Agency investigation in allegations about factories in Leicester.

"Modern day slavery is all around us, it's in every town and city in Britain and, indeed, in our rural areas as well," he added.

"It takes many forms.

"But this type of exploitation - people being paid well under the minimum wage, having to work in unacceptable conditions - that sort of abuse has to be stamped out, it has to be examined, we have to follow the evidence and prosecute wherever possible."

A spike in COVID-19 cases in Leicester that led to the first local lockdown has drawn attention to the city and claims of widespread exploitation.

Leicester City Council estimates there are around 1,500 textile factories across the city.

Most are small businesses - workshops housed in crumbling buildings that are in desperate need of repair.

Smashed windows are patched up with cardboard. Fabric is draped so it's impossible to see inside.

For decades there have been claims some factories pay workers well below £8.72 per hour, the national minimum wage.

The government's Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is investigating allegations some factories forced people to work in unsafe conditions during lockdown.

"The internet retailers have flourished during the COVID crisis because their competition has been shut down. So we've seen a huge extra demand for the products," said Mr Bridgen.

Many of the factories lie within the Leicester East constituency of MP Claudia Webbe.

She says she has been contacted by anonymous workers who are too scared to speak out publicly because many are in the country illegally.

"Machinists are being paid £3 an hour, packers are being paid £2 an hour. That is what seems to be the standard," she said.

Outside one factory a worker who asked not to be named told Sky News she is paid between £5 and £6 an hour.

"Very little money," she said, in broken English.

Immigration officers patrol the streets outside the factories and a multi-agency investigation is under way.

Many feel it is long overdue.

When asked if claims of widespread exploitation in the city are an "open secret", deputy mayor Adam Clarke replied: "You call it an open secret. It's just open.

"There are doubtless workplaces in the city that are unsuitable.

"We've been aware of this for a very long time and have been working with enforcement agencies to try to ensure that there is effective regulation enforcement.

"The network of agencies that have responsibilities is just too complex.

"There are just too many organisations, HMRC [HM Revenue & Customs], the GLAA [Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority], the HSE and others have enforcement responsibilities. There needs to be one enforcement body and that needs to be set up as quickly as possible.

"This is a systemic issue that is borne out of poor regulation, poor legislation and exploitation at every level.

"You have to ask yourself who actually has the power to change this? And that buck stops with government."

A Home Office spokesperson said: "We take all allegations of modern slavery extremely seriously and are determined to ensure ruthless criminals who exploit vulnerable people face the full force of the law.

"The National Crime Agency and others are looking into the appalling allegations about sweatshops in Leicester and the home secretary has been clear that anyone profiting from slave labour will have nowhere to hide."

Immigration vans patrol the streets. The atmosphere is tense

Becky Johnson, Midlands correspondent

On East Park Road in Leicester among a row of shops, cafes, a bank and a police station stands the imposing Imperial Typewriter building.

At first glance it looks like a run-down relic of a bygone era.

But as you walk into the courtyard behind the building, it's like entering a land that time has forgotten.

Many of the windows have been smashed and patched up from the inside with cardboard. Fabric is draped across any windows that still have panes of glass. It's impossible to see in.

There's rubbish everywhere. The fact it's raining doesn't help.

Some people appear on a staircase, only to see me and run back inside.

There are several doors into the building, each with multiple names of clothing manufacturers above them.

I venture through one of the doorways and find myself on a rickety metal staircase.

I go up several floors before I find a door to knock on. When a man answers and I tell him I'm from Sky News, he doesn't want to talk to me.

Other doorways lead to a maze of corridors. It's not clear which doorway belongs to which business.

It's the same story at the other factory buildings.

People are on edge as soon as they see we have a TV camera. They start to film us on their phones.

"The workers are all frightened," a delivery driver told me.

When I try to ask workers what they're paid, most simply reply that they don't speak English.

A Home Office immigration van patrols the streets. A police officer in plain clothes and an inspector from the city council leave a factory. The atmosphere is tense.

A man stops me and tells me he has information for me, then darts a look over his shoulder, sees something and runs off.

https://news.sky.com/story/leiceste...-modern-slavery-in-textile-factories-12027289
 
Exploited workers in textile factories in Leicester have been denied over £27m in lost earnings in the last three months, according to the British Retail Consortium.

It wrote to the home secretary in July to urge the government to implement a licensing scheme to tackle illegally low paid and unsafe conditions in some garment factories.

https://news.sky.com/story/exploited-workers-in-leicester-textile-factories-denied-millions-every-week-in-unpaid-wages-12100941[/url]
 
Exploited workers in textile factories in Leicester have been denied over £27m in lost earnings in the last three months, according to the British Retail Consortium.

It wrote to the home secretary in July to urge the government to implement a licensing scheme to tackle illegally low paid and unsafe conditions in some garment factories.

https://news.sky.com/story/exploited-workers-in-leicester-textile-factories-denied-millions-every-week-in-unpaid-wages-12100941[/url]

How can textile workers have been exploited? There isn't an immediate shortage of cloth that is why they aren't seen as key workers. Unsafe factories should have been shut down regardless of Coronavirus.
 
Workers are still being exploited in Leicester's textile industry, according to new evidence seen by Sky News.

The anti-slavery charity Hope of Justice says the audit and enforcement approach to clamping down on workforce exploitation is not working "because factory bosses are getting really creative and innovative" in how they hide it.

Since last summer's claims that some workers in the factories were being paid as little as £3.50 an hour, a joint investigation by government agencies, police and the council has led to inspections of almost 300 factories.

Boohoo, a major buyer from the Leicester factories, launched its own independent investigation.

Earlier this year, it cut ties with a number of manufacturers it said were unable to demonstrate the high standard of transparency required.

In May, it updated a list of suppliers it would continue to work with. The list includes more than 50 factories in Leicester.

Now, a worker at one of the approved factories claims her boss has found a new way to avoid paying staff the legal minimum wage of £8.91 per hour.

The woman, who we are not naming because she is afraid of the consequences of speaking out, showed us her payslips.

They detail the correct number of hours worked and show she was paid the minimum wage.

She also showed us the slip of paper she is given with each payslip with a handwritten number - and tells us that is the amount her boss says she has to withdraw in cash and return to the factory.

So far she has repaid hundreds of pounds.

"They say that you have to give this money back," she says.

"They said, you know, 'I can't give you minimum wage, I can't afford to pay you minimum wage because prices are very low in our product.'

"I'm worrying that if they find out that I'm not giving money back they might sack me."

"It's very stressing, you can't even sleep, and you keep thinking that they're taking so much money back from you," her husband says.

There is no suggestion Boohoo know about this practice.

The couple say before Boohoo inspected the factory she was earning £5.50 an hour and this new system began after Boohoo insisted that staff were paid the minimum wage.

Anti-slavery charity Hope for Justice has been working within communities in Leicester to try to understand what is going on.

Paul McAnulty from the charity has spent time at a food bank where hundreds queue three times a week to get food for their families. Many of them are factory workers.

"We know from speaking to people here who are reliant upon the food bank, who aren't being paid a fair wage, that there are methods in place where they have to pay that money back to the employer, where they've been given multiple workers cards so that not all their hours appear on their payslips," he said.

"So we know that the audit approach, the enforcement approach, it hasn't really given us any results in identifying evidence of slavery because factory owners are getting really creative and innovative in how they deal with that and how they hide it."

Last summer a multi-agency investigation, called Operation Tacit, was launched into the textile industry in Leicester.

The operation involves police, HMRC, the Department for Work and Pensions and the Health and Safety Executive among others and has so far inspected almost 300 textile factories in Leicester.

Between July 2020 and January 2021, HMRC opened 110 new cases into Leicester textile business that remain ongoing.

Daniel Scully, from the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority, who leads Operation Tacit, says the main challenge is encouraging workers to speak out.

"We really need people to reach out through one of the confidential routes to just help us understand if we've still got those sorts of problems going on because that's not acceptable, none of the brands would find that acceptable and we don't find that acceptable," he said.

"I think there's a fear of getting involved with the authorities. I think people are perhaps genuinely worried that by sharing information the factory that they work in will be shut down the next day.

"It may be through no fault of their own they've become part of a difficult process where they've perhaps been told to return money and they feel somehow involved in criminality now.

"What we say to anyone is that the most important thing is that you are being treated fairly and equitably and if you are being exploited that is our first concern."

A man who wanted to be known only as Bashir is an agent for a building in the city that is leased out to several factory owners.

He says fast fashion is to blame, not the factory owners.

"These guys are squeezing and squeezing them all the time," he said.

"Giving them pennies per garment and they sell for £30-£40 items they bought for £2-3. That's really unfair."

A Boohoo Group plc spokesperson said: "As part of our commitment to transparency, we published our list of approved UK manufacturers on 25 March 2021.

"We continually monitor our suppliers and have updated the list twice since initial publication, removing some suppliers who have failed to demonstrate the high standards required and also adding new ones.

"The rights of garment workers are central to our Agenda for Change programme. We require all of our suppliers to display the details of our UK whistle-blower helpline and we ensure that every concern raised is thoroughly investigated.

"In addition to the auditing work that we continue to do with suppliers every day in Leicester, we are transitioning all of our suppliers to Fast Forward, widely recognised as the leading auditing model in the UK.

"As part of our broader commitment to Leicester, we are investing £1 million in a Garment and Textile Workers Community Trust to fund outreach and advocacy programmes and will also be opening a manufacturing facility of our own, which will be operational before the end of the year."

https://news.sky.com/story/how-work...e-industry-are-still-being-exploited-12364671
 
Back
Top