What's new

Geoffrey Boycott apologises for ‘unacceptable’ West Indies remark

karthikc

Tape Ball Star
Joined
Aug 27, 2013
Runs
787
Geoffrey Boycott has been branded a “dinosaur” after saying he would stand a better chance of getting knighted if he “blacked up”.

The England cricket legend, 76, made the comment to VIP guests at the day-night Test against the West Indies.

At a Q&A session during a break in play at Edgbaston on Saturday, the BBC Test Match Special commentator said knighthoods were handed out like “confetti” to West Indies greats.

He told Sky Sports presenter Gary Newbon, hosting the session: “Mine’s been turned down twice. I’d better black me face.”

It was met by an uneasy silence at the Birmingham venue where diners, including several black guests, had paid nearly £300 each for a luxury hospitality package.

A source said: “It was a crass comment. It was intended to get a laugh but it went down like a lead balloon. People were offended.”

Among the 11 West Indian cricketers knighted are Sir Curtly Ambrose, Sir Garfield Sobers and Sir Viv Richards.

The source said: “Is Boycott suggesting these great West Indians got knighthoods merely because of the colour of their skin? Birmingham is celebrated for its ethnic diversity and racial tolerance.

“We can do without dinosaurs like him spouting rubbish.”

Desmond Jaddoo, an activist in the city, said Boycott’s comments were “like something from the dark ages”.

He added: “They were ill-advised and ill-conceived.

“The West Indian cricketers received knighthoods because they excelled on the cricket field.

“He should take a long, hard look at why he doesn’t have a knighthood rather than offending those who do have one.”

The last England star to get a knighthood for services to cricket was Sir Ian Botham in 2007. Before that it was Sir Alec Bedser in 1997.

Boycott, who scored 151 centuries and played 108 Tests for England, says he is being blocked from the honour because he was convicted in France of beating ex Margaret Moore in 1996. He fought the conviction but it was upheld.

Boycott of Boston Spa, West Yorks, retired from international cricket in 1982 – two years after being awarded an OBE.

In 2002 he beat throat cancer and went on to land a BBC commentating role in 2004.

He did not respond to the Mirror’s requests for a comment.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/cricket/geoffrey-boycott-racism-blacking-up-11028576
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's right. Even Richie Richardson who was nowhere near the top batsmen of his time has a knighthood but Geoffrey Boycott - one of the most iconic opening batsmen of his country doesn't. Seems like Knighthoods were being given away like White Repentance badges at that time.
 
He's right. Even Richie Richardson who was nowhere near the top batsmen of his time has a knighthood but Geoffrey Boycott - one of the most iconic opening batsmen of his country doesn't. Seems like Knighthoods were being given away like White Repentance badges at that time.

True..what he said may not be politically correct but he has a point
 
Although the comment seems to have quite the racial undertone, it was made in a jestful, manner or so I believe it was. I would be the first to point out racism had I felt that any malicious intent via these and I think progressive societies should be able to identify humor (jokes) from someone who might actually be practicing bigtory.

As far as I am concerned their pulling Boycott's leg for no apparent reason on this one.
 
Sounds like a storm in a teacup. The quote isn't as bad as I thought.
 
He's right. Even Richie Richardson who was nowhere near the top batsmen of his time has a knighthood but Geoffrey Boycott - one of the most iconic opening batsmen of his country doesn't. Seems like Knighthoods were being given away like White Repentance badges at that time.
White Repentance?

Ambrose, Richards, Richardson and Roberts were knighted at the request of the Government of Antigua and Barbuda.

TBH, all apart from Richardson had a legitimate claim to a knighthood.

Boycs is old school. His comments are not exactly surprising.
 
Perhaps if he didn't like to beat up women he'd have a better chance. I like Boycott but at the end of the day he's a convicted wife beater and that's why he isn't being given a knighthood.
 
Apologised now on Twitter.

Stick to the punditry Geoff, leave the jokes to the comedians.
 
He's right. Even Richie Richardson who was nowhere near the top batsmen of his time has a knighthood but Geoffrey Boycott - one of the most iconic opening batsmen of his country doesn't. Seems like Knighthoods were being given away like White Repentance badges at that time.

Richie Richardson is from Antigua. He got a knighthood due to the request of the Antiguan government.

Similarly

The source said: “Is Boycott suggesting these great West Indians got knighthoods merely because of the colour of their skin? Birmingham is celebrated for its ethnic diversity and racial tolerance.

This source is looking for an issue that isn't there. Those great West Indians did get their knighthoods because of their nationality.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Tweet 1 of 3: Speaking at an informal gathering I was asked a question and I realise my answer was unacceptable...</p>— Geoffrey Boycott (@GeoffreyBoycott) <a href="https://twitter.com/GeoffreyBoycott/status/899928440874426369">August 22, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Tweet 2/3: I meant no offence but what I said was clearly wrong and I apologise unreservedly..</p>— Geoffrey Boycott (@GeoffreyBoycott) <a href="https://twitter.com/GeoffreyBoycott/status/899928610982723585">August 22, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Tweet 3/3: I have loved West Indian cricket my whole life and have the utmost respect for its players.</p>— Geoffrey Boycott (@GeoffreyBoycott) <a href="https://twitter.com/GeoffreyBoycott/status/899928676355256320">August 22, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
If anyone has listened to Boycott he's one of the most unbiased radio commentators out there.

Sure he supports England but he always credits the opposition and always showed affection towards the West Indies and Pakistan cricket.

He's hurt at the way West Indies have gone down recently.

This joke was out of place but not racist nor is he a racist.
 
Awful comment. Apology accepted. But this is exactly why the old fool does not have a knighthood.
 
Richie Richardson is from Antigua. He got a knighthood due to the request of the Antiguan government.

Similarly



This source is looking for an issue that isn't there. Those great West Indians did get their knighthoods because of their nationality.

Request or not, why was it obligatory to give Richardson knighthood anyway? I don't get it. I'm pretty sure that if the Indian Government forwards the name of Ajit Agarkar for knighthood because he has scored a 100 at lords, it would be denied in a jiffy. What criteria does Richie Richardson fulfil in that regard?
 
Request or not, why was it obligatory to give Richardson knighthood anyway? I don't get it. I'm pretty sure that if the Indian Government forwards the name of Ajit Agarkar for knighthood because he has scored a 100 at lords, it would be denied in a jiffy. What criteria does Richie Richardson fulfil in that regard?

There was a big scandal regarding knighthoods in the Uk a few years back.

Basically if you had the right connections to the right politicians you could pay yourself to get a knighthood.
 
It's similar to Sardar jokes in India. They are not meant to be offensive. Even Supreme Court of India agrees
 
Request or not, why was it obligatory to give Richardson knighthood anyway? I don't get it. I'm pretty sure that if the Indian Government forwards the name of Ajit Agarkar for knighthood because he has scored a 100 at lords, it would be denied in a jiffy. What criteria does Richie Richardson fulfil in that regard?

Because knighthoods are awarded by the Prime Minister. Richardson is a knight of Antigua (Queen Elizabeth is the Queen of Antigua) and in this case he got his knighthood at the request of the Antiguan government. He is not a knight of the United Kingdom even if convention means he is still called Sir.

India is a republic and does not have knighthoods so the Indian government can't make anyone a knighthood. India can however give out its own honours and looking at wikipedia Sachin Tendulkar has the highest Indian civilian order.

Of course there are some monarchies like Australia which have not had knighthoods for decades (apart from a brief period under Abbott) so no Australian cricketers have had knighthoods in a long time. Though most of notable cricketers are inducted into the Order of Australia or what not.
 
He's right. Even Richie Richardson who was nowhere near the top batsmen of his time has a knighthood but Geoffrey Boycott - one of the most iconic opening batsmen of his country doesn't. Seems like Knighthoods were being given away like White Repentance badges at that time.

Those guys are Knights of their Islands, not Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire. The last West Indian to be awarded KBE was Everton Weekes 22 years ago.

Boycott played on a rebel tour of SA and has a conviction in a French court for battering a woman. That's why he isn't a KBE.

Even Sir Ian Botham didn't get his Knighthood for cricket, but for his charity work.
 
Last edited:
Because knighthoods are awarded by the Prime Minister. Richardson is a knight of Antigua (Queen Elizabeth is the Queen of Antigua) and in this case he got his knighthood at the request of the Antiguan government. He is not a knight of the United Kingdom even if convention means he is still called Sir.

India is a republic and does not have knighthoods so the Indian government can't make anyone a knighthood. India can however give out its own honours and looking at wikipedia Sachin Tendulkar has the highest Indian civilian order.

Of course there are some monarchies like Australia which have not had knighthoods for decades (apart from a brief period under Abbott) so no Australian cricketers have had knighthoods in a long time. Though most of notable cricketers are inducted into the Order of Australia or what not.

I know. My point was regarding the legitimacy of the honour with respect to the criteria that the said individual must fulfil to attain the said honour in their field of work. I don't think Richie Richardson is known and appreciated for reasons other than his cricketing exploits which quite frankly were nowhere near as impressive as some of his contemporaries. Still, he attained the honour.. albeit at the request of the Antiguan cricket. Still, it doesn't make much sense to me how these honours work when a cricketer like Richie Richardson can have it but someone like a Geoffrey Boycott or a Bob Willis can't.
 
Poor Boycott has apologized for his remarks. Best to move on.

My only comment would be why does Boycott feel he deserves a knighthood? He was a very limited player who bored spectators and bowlers to death with his style of batting.
 
Poor Boycott has apologized for his remarks. Best to move on.

My only comment would be why does Boycott feel he deserves a knighthood? He was a very limited player who bored spectators and bowlers to death with his style of batting.

Probably believes the hype of his fan club that he was as great as his Yorkshire forebear Sir Len Hutton.
 
In the various Caribbean countries the PMs there don't really have a massive pot to pick from when it comes to knighthoods for sport and the other categories too - the population in some of these countries is tiny. You could seat every single Antiguen into the Melbourne Cricket Ground and still have plenty space left.

It follows then that cricketers in the WIs are overrepresented in this respect. The Antiguan government even gave Allen Stanford one.
 
disrespectful yes, racist definitely not. he is from an old school generation similar to Prince Phillip (the queens husband) has a string of gaffes over the years. he has apologized lets move on.
 
He's right. Even Richie Richardson who was nowhere near the top batsmen of his time has a knighthood but Geoffrey Boycott - one of the most iconic opening batsmen of his country doesn't. Seems like Knighthoods were being given away like White Repentance badges at that time.

Richardson and Ambrose were knighted by Antigua, an independent island, for services to Antigua, not England or by/to the Queen. Boycott is applicable for a different type of knighting.
 
A conviction for assaulting his girlfriend (wife?) a few years ago, may be another reason.

To be fair, it is an unsound conviction which he would appeal, but French Law considers it to be a minor misdemeanour rather than a felony and he can't.

The "victim" has a subsequent conviction for giving false evidence.

Mind you, his comments here were stupid. I was surprised he didn't do the same thing about Apartheid when Aggers pranked him a fortnight ago. He came awfully close.

Forty one years after Tony Greig's grovel comment we are still in kindergarten as far as casual racism in cricket is concerned.
 
many people under 40/35 can be a bit smug about judging older people. people who don't have the luxury of being savvy to contemporary anti-racist awareness.

Criticising this stuff is important, but Boycott learned how not to be a racist decades ago. Someone posted here last week about Boycott defending Imran being targeted for ball tampering because he's not white.

That's no small thing. And it's a graceful apology. One can't ask for more.
 
Criticising this stuff is important, but Boycott learned how not to be a racist decades ago. Someone posted here last week about Boycott defending Imran being targeted for ball tampering because he's not white.

Yes, he did.

He also came close to contempt of court, by using his appearance to publicise some product or other!

A complex and perplexing man.....
 
dont think Boycs is a racist just an ill judged comment on his part. He has apologised and we should move on.
 
Never short of something interesting to say!

9b9ed6c6-e515-4d50-aed8-157104c994e9 (1).jpg
 
its politically incorrect but its spot on. hes a world class commentator, one of the few i know a lot of ppl all over the world enjoy listening to, and one of the few that doesnt pretend to be a neutral, especially against aus, which is hilarious. had more attitude in a few one liners than some commentators have had in their careers.


the old school commentators are being replaced one by one and apart from a handful of a few english commentators, most nowadays are just hypemen or women.

could easily replace most modern panels with benaud, blowers, boycott, bill lawry, tony greig and gower and could listen all day long.
 
Give me Geoffrey Boycott over most of these new age, modern, commentators any day of the week.
 
its politically incorrect but its spot on. hes a world class commentator, one of the few i know a lot of ppl all over the world enjoy listening to, and one of the few that doesnt pretend to be a neutral, especially against aus, which is hilarious. had more attitude in a few one liners than some commentators have had in their careers.


the old school commentators are being replaced one by one and apart from a handful of a few english commentators, most nowadays are just hypemen or women.

could easily replace most modern panels with benaud, blowers, boycott, bill lawry, tony greig and gower and could listen all day long.

Add tony cozier in there too.
 
Brilliant commentator
Loved his one liners
Especially Salim Malik bowling, anyone remember that’s floating rubbish from Malik in his Yorkshire accent.
 
Seems to be this desperation to have certain types of commentators these days. Most of whom are terrible.
 
Never short of something interesting to say!

View attachment 103958

I'm sorry but Geoffrey is once again crossing a line here. These comments are targeted at one person only - Isa Guha. Who else can he be talking about when he says quality is being sacrificed for equality?

Whatever you think of Isa Guha, to suggest that the only reason she was picked was because of the colour of her skin is utterly unacceptable. Frankly Guha is easily one of the better commentators in comparison to the ridiculously boring Cook and Anderson. I mean those two could put you to sleep they are so dull. So rather than make these causally bigoted comments, why doesn't Geoffrey have the guts to make these comments about Cook and Anderson? Why target Guha? There can be no reason other than the fact that he has a problem with her coloured face and the fact that she is a woman.

Even if Guha isn't your cup of tea, no one can doubt she is smart and articulate. That's more than can be said for Geoffrey to be honest. All he ever did was moan constantly to the point he'd put you off the game.

His knighthood was a joke especially given his past as a domestic abuser - sorry Geoffrey, I don't buy your lame excuse that you were repeatedly mistreated by the French justice system. If anything, you were let go too easily and should have served time behind bars for what you did to that poor woman. And please, don't use this court case to some how justify your decision to back Brexit. It's perfectly obvious why you backed that.
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry but Geoffrey is once again crossing a line here. These comments are targeted at one person only - Isa Guha. Who else can he be talking about when he says quality is being sacrificed for equality?

Whatever you think of Isa Guha, to suggest that the only reason she was picked was because of the colour of her skin is utterly unacceptable. Frankly Guha is easily one of the better commentators in comparison to the ridiculously boring Cook and Anderson. I mean those two could put you to sleep they are so dull. So rather than make these causally bigoted comments, why doesn't Geoffrey have the guts to make these comments about Cook and Anderson? Why target Guha? There can be no reason other than the fact that he has a problem with her coloured face and the fact that she is a woman.

Even if Guha isn't your cup of tea, no one can doubt she is smart and articulate. That's more than can be said for Geoffrey to be honest. All he ever did was moan constantly to the point he'd put you off the game.

His knighthood was a joke especially given his past as a domestic abuser - sorry Geoffrey, I don't buy your lame excuse that you were repeatedly mistreated by the French justice system. If anything, you were let go too easily and should have served time behind bars for what you did to that poor woman. And please, don't use this court case to some how justify your decision to back Brexit. It's perfectly obvious why you backed that.

I think his comments echo sentiments across all sports at the moment, women and especially women of colour are being elevated into roles they may not be ready for just yet, to fulfill certain quotas. I am all for equality, but i am also for letting the best person do the job, Isa may be doing a good job however there are a lot who are not that great i am afraid.
 
What has Isha Guha done to be publicity targeted like this? I thought she was pretty decent.Surprised to see so many backing his bigoted comments.
 
I think his comments echo sentiments across all sports at the moment, women and especially women of colour are being elevated into roles they may not be ready for just yet, to fulfill certain quotas. I am all for equality, but i am also for letting the best person do the job, Isa may be doing a good job however there are a lot who are not that great i am afraid.

I look at some of the sports coverage at the moment, whether it's football or cricket and wonder why some of the presenters and commentators have been picked, because they are terrible.

In my opinion it shouldn't be about quotas, it should be about the best people for the job.
 
Last edited:
He is my favourite commentator of all time !!

He is un bias and tells your the truth , use to also love his show on ESPN bowl at boycsss
 
Back
Top