What's new

Going Back to Pakistan: 70 Years After Partition - Al Jazeera Witness

Gabbar Singh

Test Debutant
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Runs
15,550
Nonagenarian Mr Khanna finally gets to fulfil one of his dreams.

Published on Aug 7, 2017
"Before I die, I want to go back to where I was born."

Krishan Kumar Khanna grew up just outside Lahore, Pakistan's second-largest city. After a childhood he remembers fondly, his life changed dramatically in August 1947.

As Britain left the Indian subcontinent, colonial planners hastily split it into Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan.

Khanna was forced to join one of the largest migrations in human history, as sectarian violence erupted and millions fled in both directions to save their lives.

He has dreamed of going back ever since and, after trying for several years, Khanna finally obtained a visa to return to Pakistan.

Despite deep tensions, he's determined to show that people in the neighbouring nations still have much more in common than that which divides them.


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/zjZXrMmWDTo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Glad that he will have a closure to his life, and also glad that this will be the last generation which will have nostalgia for the other country.
 
Glad that he will have a closure to his life, and also glad that this will be the last generation which will have nostalgia for the other country.

Seems not, British desis seem determined to keep that flame burning, even those born generations later.
My Family, Partition And Me: India 1947

624.jpg

Anita Rani explores the human impact of the Partition of India through the intimate stories of four British families, including her own, in a new two-part landmark BBC One series. Using compelling first-hand testimony from British Partition survivors, their children and grandchildren retrace the dramatic journeys they were forced to make during Partition.
Representing the different communities caught up in the violence - Muslim, Hindu, Sikh and British colonial - they travel for the first time to the homes in Pakistan, India and Bangladesh that their families fled in terror. Their journeys include emotional meetings with long-lost family friends, encounters with neighbours of other religions who shielded their family at huge personal risk, and extraordinary stories of courage and fortitude among the horrors of the communal violence that had erupted.

Anita Rani and her mother become the first members of their family to return to the small village in Pakistan where her grandfather lived until 1947. Anita investigates the shocking and distressing events that happened there when her grandfather's first wife, children and her great grandfather lost their lives.

See 70 Years On: The Partition Story

http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/proginfo/2017/32/my-family-partition-and-me
 
That was a really nice documentary! Upsetting to see that Indian children are led to believe that terrorists roam the streets of Pakistan. Equally, upsetting to see Pakistani children feel that Indians hate them. The old man was lovely and very reasonable.
 
Such programmes are just made to criticise so called partition and make Pakistanis feel guilty. There is always a great price to pay for freedom and independence. Those who witnessed those terrible events have passed on anyway. Time to move on from those days instead of carrying this needless burden.
 
These programmes reflect the shift in historical research on partition in the last 20 years or so, which has moved from studies on the causes of partition and elite level quarrels to an analysis of the consequences and human and social impact of partition.

Nevertheless, some of the popular history programmes still tend to present an undifferentiated picture across the subcontinent based on the Punjab experience, whereas research has revealed a more complex picture. Of course the archetypal images are usually drawn from the Punjab. Think of the vast refugee foot columns with bullock carts or the packed trains.

Yet a comparison of the Punjab, with the other province partitioned - Bengal - suggest some important differences that tend still to be erased by popular history programmes. Firstly on violence, in the Punjab, there is no denying the brutality and intensity of the violence which occurred over a short time span. Far from being acts of temporary madness, there is in fact much evidence that the violence was highly organised and carried out with military precision. Due to colonial recruitment practices, there were a large number of demobilised soldiers in Punjab and that is likely to have shaped some the violence. Secondly on migration, the two way flow in the Punjab was in condensed time frame with the movement being largely en masse. After November 1947, there was very little movement with both sides of Punjab largely emptied of the religious minority populations. The state and the army actively intervened to assist with evacuation on both sides of the Punjab aiming for an exchange of populations. Thirdly, on rehabilitation, both states invested significant resources on the Punjab with most of the rehabilitation efforts concluded by early 1950s. Migrants were resettled across the Punjab and allotted land on a permanent basis following the exchange of land records. Fourthly, it should be noted that a ‘hard’ border emerged between East and West Punjab.

Compare this with the Bengal, where a sense of unfinished business persisted for many years after the event. The border in Bengal was far more porous. Willem van Schendel has drawn attention to the fact that in Bengal it was not unknown for state employees, including policemen and members of the armed forces to serve one state but live in another. He also shows that despite Partition many continued to send their children to schools that were now in ‘foreign territory’. Violence was more contained but spread over a greater number of years. Migrations were unassisted and unregulated by army and state. Indeed migration was actively discouraged by central and provincial governments. Unlike the Punjab, migration across the Bengal border continued for years and years after 1947. Rehabilitation was offered on a far more limited scale, although there is more research on West Bengal than East Pakistan on this topic. Despite the fact that by 1951 the number of West Bengal refugees exceeded the East Punjab number, rehabilitation was a long drawn out affair for those in West Bengal and not that successful. Squatter communities, especially around Calcutta arose, as refugees sought to self-rehabilitate themselves. Unlike the situation in the Punjab, Muslim evacuee property was not to be provided in incoming Hindu refugees and was there compensation for loss of properties. There is also evidence of ghettoisation of minority communities in the aftermath of partition.
 
Glad that he will have a closure to his life, and also glad that this will be the last generation which will have nostalgia for the other country.

We need people who have experienced both sides to cool the rise of rabid nationalism on either side of the border. I found this generation to be far more tolerant of the other side than the latter ones.

We need less hatred in South Asia and this generation played it's part in doing so.
 
We need people who have experienced both sides to cool the rise of rabid nationalism on either side of the border. I found this generation to be far more tolerant of the other side than the latter ones.

We need less hatred in South Asia and this generation played it's part in doing so.

Musharraf was born in Delhi and Advani in Karachi. Two of my icons who have played their part for peace.
 
Musharraf was born in Delhi and Advani in Karachi. Two of my icons who have played their part for peace.

To weaken Nawaz Sharif, Musharraf started the Kargil War in which over a thousand soldiers died. How did he play any part for peace?
 
To weaken Nawaz Sharif, Musharraf started the Kargil War in which over a thousand soldiers died. How did he play any part for peace?

thats untrue. You indian's need to stop listening to bias accounts of incidents like this. NS was fully briefed and was totally on board until he lost his nerve. That was one of the reasons why he was overthrown. The brass felt he had betrayed them and also shown cowardice. Nearly killing the COAS was the last straw. Musharref had no idea he was going to be president until he landed on the tarmac. A significant number of the general populace also believed he had betrayed the nation.

coming onto these partition stories, well I really hope the BBC doesnt let its anti-pakistan bias flow through. With their Asian network under a racism cloud for anti pakistan racial slurs and their pathetic documentaries from the 60th anniversary fresh in my mind, I hope this is better. I wont hold my breath though.
 
Beautiful documentary. Reminded me of my grandad with his pleasant disposition. Thanks for sharing [MENTION=7898]Gabbar Singh[/MENTION]
 
To weaken Nawaz Sharif, Musharraf started the Kargil War in which over a thousand soldiers died. How did he play any part for peace?

every time i read your post, it remind of Indian media, scary background music, cautious loud tone reminding every Indian every second of the day that every Pakistani is trying to kill an Indian. it is hilarious.
 
just watched the documentary and I had tears in my eyes. His story reminded me of the stories my dad tells me of partition and the people who left and arrived. So sad that 70 years later we cant get to a point where people can cross the border without a problem. What was interesting was the reaction of his grand children. There seems to be a hunger to elarn more about Pakistan especially since it is demonised so much.

From a pakistani point of view there is jingoism I admit that but I would say most of us just want to get along.
 
just watched the documentary and I had tears in my eyes. His story reminded me of the stories my dad tells me of partition and the people who left and arrived. So sad that 70 years later we cant get to a point where people can cross the border without a problem. What was interesting was the reaction of his grand children. There seems to be a hunger to elarn more about Pakistan especially since it is demonised so much.

From a pakistani point of view there is jingoism I admit that but I would say most of us just want to get along.

It was emotional. I love the response from his granddaughter of how she'll go to America, get a green card and take her grandad again. It's unlikely the guy will be alive to see that.

I think these exchange trips should happen more often for the elderly in the safer areas of both countries. It will go a long way into changing perceptions for the descendants of those who travel. That moment when he sat at his desk, that had my eyes moisten up a bit.
 
I actually had the honor of visiting my grand mothers villiage and meeting her family in India.

I also visited the area where my grandad lived, though it was completely changed.

These stories are interesting. Just think about it. THe school you attended the area you lived in and all, you were forced to leave all that behind to move to a new place. Many people have that nostalgic feeling.
 
Last edited:
It was emotional. I love the response from his granddaughter of how she'll go to America, get a green card and take her grandad again. It's unlikely the guy will be alive to see that.

I think these exchange trips should happen more often for the elderly in the safer areas of both countries. It will go a long way into changing perceptions for the descendants of those who travel. That moment when he sat at his desk, that had my eyes moisten up a bit.

yeah that bit was emotional. I think we do need some kind of truth and reconciliation committee that can be tasked with bringing the stories of partition to the fore and thus helping people achieve closure. Its a pity that there are so few survivors left and that we have not done this.

the new generation is being poisoned quickly and there is a need to bring people together. I have my anti India moments but overall I think living in peace trumps most of those.
 
Same people split based on religion and all the violence and millions massacred.



We need more religion. :salute
 
The BBC are going to have some programmes to be released next week to mark 70 years since partion.

They made a fantastic documentary marking the 60th anniversary of the partion 10 years ago that honestly brought me to tears. If it's still available to watch and find it i will post the link for it - highly recommended it.
 
These partition stories do my nut in! So we broke British India and loved every minute off it. All three communities killed each other however according to the BBC programme I watched earlier on today Hindu's started the violence by attacking Muslim's in 1946, Calcutta. From then it snowballed in to an all out war between Muslim's v Hindu's/Sikh's. Today, many Sikh's will tell you that Quaid Jinnah was a genius and how they wish they had a leader like him who could see through Gandhi and Nehru. I hate and despise the word "partition", call it independence. We wanted a country where Muslims were the majority for which non Muslim's had to leave. I don't regret independence at all but do so that so many innocent people had to lose their lives in the process.
 
yeah that bit was emotional. I think we do need some kind of truth and reconciliation committee that can be tasked with bringing the stories of partition to the fore and thus helping people achieve closure. Its a pity that there are so few survivors left and that we have not done this.

the new generation is being poisoned quickly and there is a need to bring people together. I have my anti India moments but overall I think living in peace trumps most of those.

A point of no return soon if Modi continues to use jingoism to get elected.

The questions from the young ones summed up the attitudes for me. The granddaughter of the old man and his family ask "Did you witness any terrorists or terrorist attacks?", whereas the Pakistani students ask "Why does India hate us?"
 
The BBC are going to have some programmes to be released next week to mark 70 years since partion.

They made a fantastic documentary marking the 60th anniversary of the partion 10 years ago that honestly brought me to tears. If it's still available to watch and find it i will post the link for it - highly recommended it.

Please do. I'd love to watch it.
 
A point of no return soon if Modi continues to use jingoism to get elected.

The questions from the young ones summed up the attitudes for me. The granddaughter of the old man and his family ask "Did you witness any terrorists or terrorist attacks?", whereas the Pakistani students ask "Why does India hate us?"

dd you notice something else? In Ambala the old man's tone was very revelaing. As if Assads dad was to blame for getting targetted due to his political views.

Also the strategic non focus on any Hindu mobs committing crimes was interesting or perhaps just coincidental.
 
Great documentary. Reminded me of my grandparents and how they use to tell us about pre, post/partition.

It's sad to think in the next 10-20 years we probably won't have anyone living to tell such stories. I mean people who witnessed it first hand.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en-gb"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">How the borders between India and Pakistan evolved <a href="https://t.co/7h2jA85NV6">https://t.co/7h2jA85NV6</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/PartitionAt70?src=hash">#PartitionAt70</a> <a href="https://t.co/pbphceqMuj">pic.twitter.com/pbphceqMuj</a></p>— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) <a href="https://twitter.com/AJEnglish/status/897276806017032192">15 August 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Watched it now. Very heartwarming, great to see the man welcomed back so warmly. I yearn for a day where there is peace on the subcontinent.
 
Now is a good moment to bump this video, I hope everyone watches it #NoToWar
 
Indian, Pakistani siblings reunite 75 years after partition
Sikh labourer Sika was just six-month-old when he and his elder brother Sadiq Khan were torn apart as Britain split the subcontinent

BHATINDA, India: Tears of joy rolled down his wizened cheeks when Indian Sika Khan met his Pakistani brother for the first time since being separated by the partition in 1947.

Sikh labourer Sika was just six-month-old when he and his elder brother Sadiq Khan were torn apart as Britain split the subcontinent at the end of colonial rule. This year marks the 75th anniversary of the partition, during which sectarian bloodshed killed possibly more than one million people. Families like Sika’s were cut apart and two independent nations, Pakistan and India, were created.

Sika’s father and sister were killed in communal massacres but Sadiq, just 10 years old, managed to flee to Pakistan. “My mother could not bear the trauma and jumped into the river and killed herself,” Sika said at his simple brick house in Bhatinda, a district in Indian Punjab, which bore the brunt of partition violence. “I was left at the mercy of villagers and some relatives who brought me up.”

Since childhood, Sika yearned to find out about his brother, the only surviving member of his family. But he failed to make headway until a doctor in the neighbourhood offered to help three years ago. After numerous phone calls and the assistance of Pakistani YouTuber Nasir Dhillon, Sika was able to be reunited with Sadiq. The brothers finally met in January at the Kartarpur Corridor, a rare, visa-free crossing that allows Indian Sikh pilgrims to visit a temple in Pakistan.

The corridor, which opened in 2019, has become a symbol of unity and reconciliation for separated families. “I am from India and he is from Pakistan, but we have so much love for each other,” said Sika, clutching a faded and framed family photograph. “We hugged and cried so much when we met for the first time. The countries can keep on fighting. We don’t care about politics.”

Pakistani farmer and real estate agent Dhillon, 38, a Muslim, says he has helped reunite about 300 families through his YouTube channel together with his friend Bhupinder Singh, a Pakistani Sikh. “This is not my source of income. It’s my inner affection and passion,” Dhillon said. “I feel these stories are my own stories or stories of my grandparents, so helping these elders I feel like I am fulfilling the wishes of my grandparents.”

He said he was deeply moved by the Khan brothers and did everything to ensure their reunion. “When they were reunited at the Kartarpur, not only me but some 600 people at the compound wept so much seeing the brothers being reunited,” he told AFP in Faisalabad.

The legacy of partition has endured to this day, resulting in a bitter rivalry between the nuclear-armed neighbours despite their cultural and linguistic links. However, there is the hope of love transcending boundaries.

For Sikhs Baldev and Gurmukh Singh, there was no hesitation in embracing their half-sister Mumtaz Bibi, who was raised Muslim in Pakistan. As an infant, she was found alongside her dead mother during the riots and was adopted by a Muslim couple. Their father, assuming his wife and daughter were dead, married his wife’s sister, as was the norm.

The Singh brothers learned their sister was alive with the help of Dhillon’s channel and a chance phone call to a shopkeeper in Pakistan. The siblings finally met in the Kartarpur Corridor earlier this year, breaking down at being able to see each other for the first time in their lives.

“Our happiness knew no bounds when we saw her for the first time,” Baldev Singh, 65, said. “So what if our sister is a Muslim? The same blood flows through her veins.” Mumtaz Bibi was equally ecstatic when contacted in the city of Sheikhupura in Pakistan. “When I heard (about my brothers), I thought God is willing and it is God’s will, and one has to bow before His will and then He blessed me, I found my brothers,” she said. “Finding those separated brings happiness. My separation has ended, so I am so content.”

The News PK
 
Back
Top