ads101
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2009
- Runs
- 15,526
- Post of the Week
- 4
With Hafeez in good form, it's certain he's getting an ODI place. So it's between these four to who gets the remaining batting place and I'm pretty sure only one of these will play.
Haris
- Increases batting stability, probably the most well rounded batsman out of the four. Struggles hitting extra gear and accelerating, and finds it hard getting into the team with Imam and Hafeez in. Also is likely to make the top 4 have 3 left handers which might not be ideal. Offers good part time bowling. If Haris plays, Sarfraz will probably play at 7 who struggles to hit/perform there.
Faheem
- Only pace option out of the four. Questions with the bat, but can hit. If he plays, probably will be at 8. IMO the weakest addition due to the brittle state of Pakistan's batting line up, and think the 4th pacer option is unnecessary. Good fielder.
Asif - Best hitter in the team. If he plays now, think he'll slot in at 7. No bowling provided which makes Hafeez and Malik handle the fifth lot of overs which is risky with Hafeez's remodelled action. Might make our batting line up too fragile, and concerns are whether he's just a T20 player.
Imad
- Second spin option. A worse bat than Asif and Haris probably, but he's quite inventive in his batting, goes for a lot of smart shots. I'd personally rate him ahead of Faheem batting wise. Strengthens our spin attack, taking pressure off Shadab. Again concerns whether our batting line up is strong enough, or whether the 2nd spinner will be needed in England. Lacks power game a bit, isn't a genuine hitter like Asif or Faheem.
I'd personally go for Imad or Haris, leaning towards Imad, hoping that what he brings with the ball will outweigh making the batting slightly weaker.
Who would would you choose?
Haris

Faheem

Asif - Best hitter in the team. If he plays now, think he'll slot in at 7. No bowling provided which makes Hafeez and Malik handle the fifth lot of overs which is risky with Hafeez's remodelled action. Might make our batting line up too fragile, and concerns are whether he's just a T20 player.
Imad

I'd personally go for Imad or Haris, leaning towards Imad, hoping that what he brings with the ball will outweigh making the batting slightly weaker.
Who would would you choose?