Savak
World Star
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2006
- Runs
- 50,179
- Post of the Week
- 3
There was a lot of criticism early on when Shahryar Khan was appointed PCB Chairman in 2014 while Sethi went on the back foot and became the chairman of the PCB Executive Committee.
There was a lot of criticism that Shahryar Khan is a dummy chairman while Sethi is the one calling the shots. I personally felt this was a smart decision at the time because Zaka Ashraf was wasting so much PCB's time and effort with constant judicial interference and this was seriously hurting long term decision making inside the PCB, the ability to represent Pakistan outside in ICC meetings.
However its been 3 years now. You can't really say that Shahryar has been a dummy chairman. He has a consistent presence in front of the media. He has taken independent decisions like the decision to fire Moin Khan, the decision to appoint Azhar Ali as captain, the decision to not renew Waqar's contract as coach. The decision to appoint Mickey Arthur as coach. The decision to appoint Sarfaraz as captain, to remove Azhar Ali, to force Misbah to announce his retirement.
The decision to let Sethi be responsible for the PSL worked well in the end where he was allowed to work independently, freely without any judicial interference from Zaka Ashraf.
Also there is plenty of proof that Shahryar and Sethi have been on the same page on many key decisions like what to do with Amir, Asif and Butt. What to do with the PSL Spot fixers. They are both on the same page when it comes to suing BCCI.
Anyways my point is that the reports of there being a power struggle is unfounded. If you look at the larger scheme of things, both these guys have been able to deliver what the likes of Zaka Ashraf, Ijaz Butt, Nasim Ashraf failed to deliver in Pakistan Cricket.
There was a lot of criticism that Shahryar Khan is a dummy chairman while Sethi is the one calling the shots. I personally felt this was a smart decision at the time because Zaka Ashraf was wasting so much PCB's time and effort with constant judicial interference and this was seriously hurting long term decision making inside the PCB, the ability to represent Pakistan outside in ICC meetings.
However its been 3 years now. You can't really say that Shahryar has been a dummy chairman. He has a consistent presence in front of the media. He has taken independent decisions like the decision to fire Moin Khan, the decision to appoint Azhar Ali as captain, the decision to not renew Waqar's contract as coach. The decision to appoint Mickey Arthur as coach. The decision to appoint Sarfaraz as captain, to remove Azhar Ali, to force Misbah to announce his retirement.
The decision to let Sethi be responsible for the PSL worked well in the end where he was allowed to work independently, freely without any judicial interference from Zaka Ashraf.
Also there is plenty of proof that Shahryar and Sethi have been on the same page on many key decisions like what to do with Amir, Asif and Butt. What to do with the PSL Spot fixers. They are both on the same page when it comes to suing BCCI.
Anyways my point is that the reports of there being a power struggle is unfounded. If you look at the larger scheme of things, both these guys have been able to deliver what the likes of Zaka Ashraf, Ijaz Butt, Nasim Ashraf failed to deliver in Pakistan Cricket.