Hassan Nawaz, the young Pakistani batsman, has indeed shown that adaptability and intent can make batting positions somewhat irrelevant in T20 cricket. While traditional roles (anchor, finisher, powerplay aggressor) still exist, modern T20s—especially in leagues like the PSL—reward flexibility. Here’s why Hassan’s performances suggest that position may not always matter:
1. Versatility Across Positions
Hassan has batted in multiple spots (opener, No. 3, middle order) for teams like
Islamabad United and Quetta Gladiators, scoring quickly regardless of when he arrives. His ability to adjust his game—attacking from Ball 1 in the middle overs or building slightly as an opener—shows that
skill > fixed role.
2. Matchups > Fixed Roles
Modern T20s prioritize
matchup-based batting (e.g., targeting weaker bowlers). Hassan’s aggressive approach (high strike rate) means he can exploit favorable bowling regardless of phase, proving that
pre-defined positions aren’t always necessary.
3. Data Backs Flexibility
Analytics show that
middle-order batsmen now face more spin early, while openers attack pace. Hassan’s ability to handle both (evident in his PSL performances) supports the idea that
position matters less than adaptability.
Counterpoint: Context Matters
While Hassan’s success suggests flexibility works,
some roles still matter (e.g., finishers like Russell or anchors like Kohli in tough chases). However, for aggressive batsmen like him,
intent often trumps position.
Conclusion
Hassan Nawaz exemplifies how modern T20 batsmen can succeed
without being tied to a specific position, as long as they have the game to exploit conditions. While traditional roles persist, his performances reinforce that
matchups, adaptability, and intent are becoming bigger factors than rigid batting orders.
