What's new

Huawei and the US-China trade war

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
Google has suspended Huawei’s access to updates of its Android operating system and chipmakers have reportedly cut off supplies to the Chinese telecoms company, complying with orders from the US government as it seeks to blacklist Huawei around the world.

Google said it was complying with Donald Trump’s executive order and was reviewing the “implications”, after Reuters initially reported the story.

It later said Google Play and the security features of Google Play Protect would continue on existing Huawei devices but the next version of its smartphones outside China would lose access to popular applications and services including the Google Play store, Maps and the Gmail app.

Chipmakers such as Intel, Qualcomm, Xilinx, and Broadcom have told employees they will not supply chips to Huawei until further notice, Bloomberg reported on Monday, citing people familiar with the matter.

Huawei will continue to have access to the version of the Android operating system available through the open source licence that is free to anyone who wishes to use it. But, according to the Reuters source, Google will stop providing technical support and collaboration for Android and Google services.

Huawei promised on Monday to continue providing security updates and after-sale services for its smartphones and tablets.

“Huawei has made substantial contributions to the development and growth of Android around the world,” it said. “As one of Android’s key global partners, we have worked closely with their open-source platform to develop an ecosystem that has benefited both users and the industry.”

The spokesman for China’s ministry of foreign affairs, Lu Kang, said Beijing would “support Chinese enterprises in defending their legitimate rights through legal methods”.

The company previously said it was developing its own backup operating system in case it was blocked from using US software.

In an interview in March with the German publication Die Welt, Richard Yu, the head of the company’s consumer division, said the company had a “plan B”. He said: “We have prepared our own operating system. Should it ever happen that we can no longer use these systems, we would be prepared.”

Huawei, which relies on chips from the US, has reportedly been stockpiling the chips and other components in anticipation of the ban. In an interview on Saturday, the Huawei chief executive, Ren Zhengfei, said the company would be “fine” without US chips.

Google’s move comes after the Trump administration officially added the telecoms manufacturer to a trade blacklist on Thursday, declaring a national economic emergency to ban the technology and services of “foreign adversaries”. The blacklist immediately led to restrictions that will make it extremely difficult for the firm to do business with US companies.

In another development in the growing trade war between the two countries, Trump claimed in an interview on Fox on Sunday night that his policy of imposing tariffs on Chinese goods was already bearing fruit by encouraging companies to move manufacturing to other countries.

The latest restrictions are likely to hit Huawei’s European business, its second-biggest market, because it licenses many of its mobile phone services from Google in Europe.

Geoff Blaber, the vice-president of research at the market research firm CCS Insight, told Reuters: “Having those apps is critical for smartphone makers to stay competitive in regions like Europe.”

Google’s suspension follows a report last week calling for Huawei to be prevented from supplying 5G mobile networks in the UK, because its operations are “subject to influence by the Chinese state”.

The research, by a Conservative MP and two academics, said a decision announced by Theresa May last month, after a fraught meeting of the national security council (NSC), to allow the company to supply “non-core” equipment should be overturned because using the company’s technology presents “risks”.

In the report by the Henry Jackson Society thinktank, the authors claimed Huawei “has long been accused of espionage” – a claim repeatedly denied by the firm – and noted that “while there are no definitely proven cases”, a precautionary principle should be adopted.

The British government has been pressured by partner intelligence agencies in the US and Australia to reconsider letting the Shenzhen-based multinational participate in the UK’s 5G network.

In April, May provisionally approved the use of Huawei technology for parts of the networks after a meeting of the NSC. A leaked account of the meeting said five cabinet ministers had raised concerns about the company.

Robert Strayer, a deputy assistant secretary at the US state department, warned last month that the UK’s proposal to adopt Huawei technology risked affecting intelligence cooperation with the US. He claimed the Chinese firm “was not a trusted vendor” and any use of its technology for 5G was a risk.

Australia, which also shares intelligence with the UK, has already moved to ban Huawei as a supplier for its future 5G network.

Huawei has always insisted it is a privately held company, independent of the Chinese state, owned largely by its employees, and has worked supplying phone technology in the UK for 15 years without problems.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/may/19/google-huawei-trump-blacklist-report
 
It's a irony that US is accusing others of espionage through technology. They had the biggest network, spying on world leaders and people around the world. They still do despite being being exposed by former CIA worker.

USA is just afraid of China growing as a technological giant. This is mordern warfare
 
Huawei is a pretty major manufacturer of phones, they have had a stellar reputation in Europe for their products, if this is a sign of things to come I guess international trade is going into it's shell in the near future. Most people would look for another brand.
 
Huawei is in The game the p30 pro is actually One of The best Phone out there. Huawei batteri somehow last longer than Samsung and IPhone. I Hope Huawei somehow wins this battle
 
Huawei is a pretty major manufacturer of phones, they have had a stellar reputation in Europe for their products, if this is a sign of things to come I guess international trade is going into it's shell in the near future. Most people would look for another brand.

Huaewi is doing very well in Europe. In Germany they have the third largest share. These are american threat tactics; they will reach an agreement soon just like ZTE.
 
China should just ban Apple and other US manufacturing in China.

Hit the US company where it hurts most - the margins!
 
The buffon Trump needs to turn over his Iphone and read the fine print where it says "Made in China".... I have a top of the line Google Pixel phone, its made in China. Samsung is Korean company, its phones are made in China. As the saying goes "God created heaven and earth, the rest is all made in China". Heck even US flags that these patriotic Americans fly on 4th of July are also made in China.


What is preventing China from stopping production of US products? All hell will break lose and world economy will plummet.
 
US showing just how important it is to own the IP rights. US is economically hitting China, now lets see how will China react.

Thing is US companies can shift manufacturing to India,Malaysia,Philippines etc where the cost of manufacturing is still low but China cant replace world wide IP rights of something like Android.

Will users around the world dump Android for some chinese software? I doubt.
 
It's a irony that US is accusing others of espionage through technology. They had the biggest network, spying on world leaders and people around the world. They still do despite being being exposed by former CIA worker.

USA is just afraid of China growing as a technological giant. This is mordern warfare

This
 
Some Google apps may stop working on Huawei phones amid US-China trade war

US internet giant Google, whose Android mobile operating system powers most of the world's smartphones, said it was beginning to cut ties with China's Huawei, which Washington considers a national security threat.

The move could have dramatic implications for Huawei smartphone users, as the telecoms giant will no longer have access to Google's proprietary services — which include the Gmail and Google Maps apps — a source close to the matter told AFP.

In the midst of a trade war with Beijing, President Donald Trump has barred US companies from engaging in telecommunications trade with foreign companies said to threaten American national security.

The measure targets Huawei, the world's second-biggest smartphone maker, which has been listed by the US Commerce Department among firms that American companies can only engage with in trade after obtaining the green light from the authorities.

The ban includes technology sharing.

"We are complying with the order and reviewing the implications," a Google spokesperson told AFP.

"For users of our services, Google Play and the security protections from Google Play Protect will continue to function on existing Huawei devices."

Google, like all tech companies, collaborates directly with smartphone makers to ensure its systems are compatible with their devices.

Due to the ban, Google will now have to halt business activities with Huawei that involve direct transfer of hardware, software and technical services that are not publicly available — meaning Huawei will only be able to use the open source version of Android, the source told AFP.

Google apps such as Gmail and Maps should remain functional on Huawei phones at least initially, another source told AFP.

But while the ban on technology sharing is in place, Huawei will be required to manually access any updates or software patches from Android Open Source Project — the code accessible to all outside programmers — and also to distribute the updates to users itself.

A person familiar with the matter who requested anonymity told Bloomberg News that Huawei will be unable to offer Google's proprietary apps and services in the future.

Huawei did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1483469/s...king-on-huawei-phones-amid-us-china-trade-war
 
Huaewi is doing very well in Europe. In Germany they have the third largest share. These are american threat tactics; they will reach an agreement soon just like ZTE.

I don't know about Germany, but in the UK the major headlines are focusing on the spy threat from Chinese products. UK govt is reluctant to roll back agreements with Huaewi for 5G rollout, but ultimately they are usually more fearful of upsetting America. Perhaps this is just Trump barking, and he may consider it all 'the art of the deal', but I can't imagine big corporations want to run their business like this.
 
The buffon Trump needs to turn over his Iphone and read the fine print where it says "Made in China".... I have a top of the line Google Pixel phone, its made in China. Samsung is Korean company, its phones are made in China. As the saying goes "God created heaven and earth, the rest is all made in China". Heck even US flags that these patriotic Americans fly on 4th of July are also made in China.


What is preventing China from stopping production of US products? All hell will break lose and world economy will plummet.

Spoken like a true "poodle" of China. :yk
 
I don't know about Germany, but in the UK the major headlines are focusing on the spy threat from Chinese products. UK govt is reluctant to roll back agreements with Huaewi for 5G rollout, but ultimately they are usually more fearful of upsetting America. Perhaps this is just Trump barking, and he may consider it all 'the art of the deal', but I can't imagine big corporations want to run their business like this.

They are concerned about China spying but are not concerned about their own spying which they have been doing for years. Its only when someone's else is foot on their own, it hurts.

Trump is just barking and they will eventually back track. Huawei is too big to fail. Its the biggest hardware manufacturer in the world.
 
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/DZbSHXSxch0" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>.
 
China is sadly a wimp here.

China should do 2 things -

1. Ban Apple from manufacturing in China.
2. Dump US treasuries.

Sure China will take a hit, but the actions above will hurt the USA more.
 
China is sadly a wimp here.

China should do 2 things -

1. Ban Apple from manufacturing in China.
2. Dump US treasuries.

Sure China will take a hit, but the actions above will hurt the USA more.

That would be stupid, huawei are reliant on american chips for their phones, watch this video:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/qZGpmWrVSaU" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
That would be stupid, huawei are reliant on american chips for their phones, watch this video:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/qZGpmWrVSaU" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Like I said, China would take a hit, but USA would be hurt more. Dumping Treasuries would mean result in yields rising. Cost of Apple hardware would rise, hitting the bottom line, and sending one of the biggest tech companies into a downfall. Apple share price has been hit hard because of the trade war between China and USA.
 
This isn't about "some Google apps", this affects their whole existence as a tech company. They won't be able to run android on any of their devices anywhere, not just the USA and no windows for the laptops. How do you survive without Android and Windows? Unless of course if you're Apple. I really hope for the sake of tech advancement and freedom of choice for consumers, Huawei finds a way out of this. Otherwise consumers are the biggest losers here, apple and co will keep dashing out mediocre tech at extortionate prices without being challenged.
 
This isn't about "some Google apps", this affects their whole existence as a tech company. They won't be able to run android on any of their devices anywhere, not just the USA and no windows for the laptops. How do you survive without Android and Windows? Unless of course if you're Apple. I really hope for the sake of tech advancement and freedom of choice for consumers, Huawei finds a way out of this. Otherwise consumers are the biggest losers here, apple and co will keep dashing out mediocre tech at extortionate prices without being challenged.

That's a bit wrong info. They can use android as it is open source. What they can't use is, play services.
 
Chinese phone giant Huawei said on Sunday it was ready to roll out 5G infrastructure across Southeast Asia, dismissing the United States' warnings its tech could be used to hoover up data for Beijing.

The firm has emerged as a key protagonist in the wider US-China trade war that has seen ***-for-tat tariffs imposed on hundreds of billions of dollars worth of goods.

US President Donald Trump's administration has warned Huawei's equipment could allow China to spy on other countries and has effectively blocked American companies from selling US technology to the firm. But the company has repeatedly denied the accusations, saying it is the victim of tech envy.

Thailand and the Philippines have shrugged off the cybersecurity warnings in a rush to exploit the ultra-fast 5G network promised by the China's biggest smartphone maker, while Vietnam has edged away from Huawei.

“China and the US now are in the trade war and also there is some kind of technology war (which) Huawei is very focused on at the moment,” said Huawei vice-president Edward Zhou at the Association of Southeast Asian (ASEAN) summit on Sunday.

“We are here to support the ASEAN [in] the development for the 5G.”

Encompassing hundreds of millions of people, the 10-member bloc wants the next-level technology to help businesses, infrastructure and transport compete globally.

Host country Thailand has welcomed Huawei with open arms, allowing it to set up a test bed at a major university near the Thai capital.

A Huawei spokesperson previously told AFP it had invested $5 billion in the trials and has been invited to conduct similar tests in other Southeast Asian markets.

Elsewhere the Philippines' Globe Telecom said this summer it was launching Southeast Asia's first 5G broadband service using Huawei technology. Both Thailand and the Philippines are historic US allies and some see the tangle over 5G as a challenge of influence between the two powers.

But not all countries have been eager to sign up.

Vietnam has quietly sided with the US on the issue, shunning the Chinese firm in favour of alternative providers for 5G technology, including Ericsson and Nokia.

The country's military-owned telecoms giant Viettel hopes to be the first to roll out 5G in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City, and has said it plans to to do so without Huawei, citing security concerns. Zhou reiterated past statements by the company brushing aside the US claims.

“There is not any cyber security issues for us. There is no evidence for the US to say that,” he said.

Source: https://www.dawn.com/news/1514643/huawei-pushes-5g-in-seasia-brushing-off-tech-war-with-us.
 
US telecommunications regulators have declared Huawei and ZTE national security threats in the latest action by the US government against the Chinese tech giants.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has also proposed forcing US customers to replace equipment previously purchased from the firms.

Huawei called the decision "profoundly mistaken".

It said it was based on "innuendo, and mistaken assumptions".

Huawei had made inroads in the US market, winning customers among rural telecommunications operators with relatively inexpensive network equipment.

But US officials have increasingly raised concerns about ties between Chinese tech firms and their government in Beijing.

In declaring Huawei and ZTE threats, the FCC on Friday cited the companies' "close ties to the Chinese government and military apparatus" and "Chinese laws requiring them to assist with espionage".

The agency ordered that money from an $8.5bn aid programme to improve mobile and internet coverage in poor and underserved areas could not be used to buy equipment from firms deemed national security threats.

'Cautiously optimistic'
Lobby group Rural Wireless Association said it was "cautiously optimistic" that members with Huawei or ZTE equipment will be able to comply with the order without disrupting service.

The FCC has estimated that replacing the equipment would cost about $2bn.

Huawei criticised the FCC's actions, saying they would have "profound negative effects on connectivity for Americans in rural and underserved areas across the United States."

It added that the FCC had presented "no evidence that Huawei poses a security risk. Instead, the FCC simply assumes, based on a mistaken view of Chinese law, that Huawei might come under Chinese government control."

The US has alleged that Huawei's equipment could be abused for spying and urged other countries to bar Huawei from 5G networks,

The White House placed Huawei on a trade blacklist in May citing national security fears. The move barred US firms from doing business without special approval.

The Commerce Department had offered waivers, including for telecommunications firms in rural areas that relied on Huawei's equipment to continue to receive service.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-50524402.
 
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Trump administration on Friday moved to block global chip supplies to blacklisted telecoms equipment giant Huawei Technologies [HWT.UL], spurring fears of Chinese retaliation and hammering shares of U.S. producers of chipmaking equipment.

A new rule, unveiled by the Commerce Department and first reported by Reuters, expands U.S. authority to require licenses for sales to Huawei of semiconductors made abroad with U.S. technology, vastly expanding its reach to halt exports to the world’s No. 2 smartphone maker.

“This action puts America first, American companies first, and American national security first,” a senior Commerce Department official told reporters in a telephone briefing on Friday.

Huawei, the world’s top telecoms equipment maker, did not respond to a request for comment.

News of the move against the firm hit European stocks as traders sold into the day’s gains, while shares of chip equipment makers like Lam Research (LRCX.O) and KLA Corp (KLAC.O) fell around 5 and 3 percent, respectively, in U.S. trading.

The reaction from China was swift, with a report on Friday by China’s Global Times saying Beijing was ready to put U.S. companies on an “unreliable entity list,” as part of countermeasures in response to the new limits on Huawei.

The measures include launching investigations and imposing restrictions on U.S. companies such as Apple Inc (AAPL.O), Cisco Systems Inc (CSCO.O) and Qualcomm Inc (QCOM.O), as well as suspending purchase of Boeing Co (BA.N) airplanes, the report said here citing a source.

The Commerce Department’s rule, effective Friday but with a 120-day grace period, also hits Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd (2330.TW), the biggest contract chipmaker and key Huawei supplier, which announced plans to build a U.S.-based plant on Thursday.

TSMC said on Friday it is “following the U.S. export rule change closely” and working with outside counsel to “conduct legal analysis and ensure a comprehensive examination and interpretation of these rules.”

The department said the rule is aimed at preventing Huawei from continuing to “undermine” its status as a blacklisted company, meaning suppliers of U.S.-made sophisticated technology must seek a U.S. government license before selling to it.

“There has been a very highly technical loophole through which Huawei has been in able, in effect, to use U.S. technology with foreign fab producers,” Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross told Fox Business News on Friday, calling the rule change a “highly tailored thing to try to correct that loophole.”

The company was added to the Commerce Department’s “entity list” last year due to national security concerns, amid accusations from Washington that it violated U.S. sanctions on Iran and can spy on customers. Huawei has denied the allegations.

Frustration among China hawks in the administration that Huawei’s entity listing was not doing enough to curb its access to supplies prompted an effort, first reported by Reuters in November, to crack down on the company that culminated in Friday’s rule.

Washington lawyer Kevin Wolf, a former Commerce Department official, said the rule appeared to be a “novel, complex expansion of U.S. export controls” for chip-related items made with U.S. technology abroad and sent to Huawei. But he stressed that chips designed by companies other than Huawei and manufactured with U.S. technology could still be sold to the company without the license requirement.

While the new rules will apply to chips regardless of their level of sophistication, a senior U.S. State Department official who also briefed reporters Friday opened the door to some flexibility for company, echoing reprieves granted to Huawei by the Trump administration previously.

“This is a licensing requirement. It does not necessarily mean that things are denied,” the official said, adding that the rule gives the U.S. government greater “visibility” into the shipments. “What are done with those applications, we’ll have to see ... Each application will be judged on its merits.”

After essentially barring Huawei from buying from U.S. suppliers, the Commerce Department granted licenses to some of Huawei’s biggest U.S. partners to continue to sell to the company, while also allowing smaller rural telecoms to continue to purchase Huawei equipment to keep their networks up and running.

Huawei, which needs semiconductors for its smartphones and telecoms equipment, has found itself at the heart of a battle for global technological dominance between the United States and China, whose relationship has soured in recent months over the origins of the deadly coronavirus.

While the rule change is aimed at squeezing Huawei and will hit the chip foundries it relies on, U.S. manufacturers of chipmaking equipment could face long-term pain, if chipmakers develop new equipment sources beyond the reach of U.S. rules.

But for now, most chipmakers rely on equipment produced by U.S. companies like KLA, Lam Research and Applied Materials (AMAT.O), which did not respond to requests for comment.

While some of the complex tools required to make chips come from companies outside the United States, such as Japan’s Tokyo Electron (8035.T) and Hitachi (6501.T) and the Netherlands’ ASML (ASML.AS), analysts say it would be difficult to put together an entire toolchain for making advanced semiconductors without at least some American equipment.
 
Like I said, China would take a hit, but USA would be hurt more. Dumping Treasuries would mean result in yields rising. Cost of Apple hardware would rise, hitting the bottom line, and sending one of the biggest tech companies into a downfall. Apple share price has been hit hard because of the trade war between China and USA.

Apple should and I feel will eventually move to India. Like Motorola and other companies.
 
China is sadly a wimp here.

China should do 2 things -

1. Ban Apple from manufacturing in China.
2. Dump US treasuries.

Sure China will take a hit, but the actions above will hurt the USA more.

The world of low cost manufacturing is huge, apple and others will just relocate.

Dumping US tresuries will hurt China not US, its the treasuries that allow China to devalue it currency and sell cheap to the US, if they do this it will be the end of manufacturing in China and the end of China. Infact US is already considering doing this.
 
If apple and others move it will probably be to vietnam and other far east countries and south american ones not india,

Which country can manufacture like China? China has already upped its innovation in manufacturing its much more skilled and high tech, even if they lose manufacturing it will be specific to healthcare and things that can easily be made, the time when Developed world could had pulled out of China was during Tinamen square and no one did it, China is gone far ahead, all USA can do now is make China open up for its services and make it buy more products.
 
Which country can manufacture like China? China has already upped its innovation in manufacturing its much more skilled and high tech, even if they lose manufacturing it will be specific to healthcare and things that can easily be made, the time when Developed world could had pulled out of China was during Tinamen square and no one did it, China is gone far ahead, all USA can do now is make China open up for its services and make it buy more products.

manufacturing there is still low skilled, yes they have upped there game in engineering but thats not innovation, the innovation is done in USA as thats were all products are designed and then sent to china to manufacture and assemble.

assembling products based on design sheets sent from silicon valley is not Chinese innovation.

the innovation you see from chinese products like huewai and others are stolen from these factories that assemble for americans.

China is well behind in high skilled manufactering like germany.

which means if US does relocate they will take a small hit from relocating and getting new manufacters in other countries up to standard, but they will be fine after a year or two. This seems like where its heading as Trump is already looking at cancelling chinas t-bills and companies like huawei from using chips and software from US.
 
If apple and others move it will probably be to vietnam and other far east countries and south american ones not india,

Why? Apple assembles Iphones in 4 different factories in India via its contractual assemblers Foxconn and Wistron. So why will apple not move further ops here.
 
Which country can manufacture like China? China has already upped its innovation in manufacturing its much more skilled and high tech, even if they lose manufacturing it will be specific to healthcare and things that can easily be made, the time when Developed world could had pulled out of China was during Tinamen square and no one did it, China is gone far ahead, all USA can do now is make China open up for its services and make it buy more products.
I would rather go to India, Bangladesh because of the western legal system I think in long it'll be a good thing for everyone including the companies
 
Huawei and their phones need foreign chips and operating systems to operate. Start to innovate if you need to taken at face value Just all they do is bulk up phones with high ram and memory without optimisation and which masks the obvious deficiencies.
 
China asks US to stop 'unreasonable suppression' of Huawei

China's foreign ministry said on Saturday the United States needed to stop the "unreasonable suppression" of Chinese companies like Huawei, and a Chinese newspaper said the government was ready to retaliate against Washington.

The Trump administration on Friday moved to block global chip supplies to blacklisted telecoms equipment company Huawei Technologies, spurring fears of Chinese retaliation and hammering shares of US producers of chipmaking equipment.

China will firmly defend its companies' legal rights, the foreign ministry said in a statement in response to Reuters' questions on whether Beijing would take retaliatory measures against the US.

China's Global Times newspaper on Saturday quoted a source close to the Chinese government as saying that Beijing was ready to take a series of countermeasures against the US, such as putting US companies on an "unreliable entity list" and imposing restrictions on US companies such as Apple Inc, Cisco Systems Inc and Qualcomm Inc.

The newspaper, published by the People's Daily, the official newspaper of China's ruling Communist Party, said the source also mentioned halting the purchase of Boeing Co aeroplanes.

"China will take forceful countermeasures to protect its own legitimate rights" if the US moves forward with the plan to change rules and bar essential suppliers of chips, including Taiwan-based TSMC, from selling chips to Huawei, the Global Times quoted the source as saying.

Tensions between the world's two largest economies have spiked in recent weeks, with officials on both sides suggesting a hard-won deal that defused a bitter 18-month trade war could be abandoned months after it was signed in January.

In addition to the move on Huawei, the US Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board, which oversees billions in federal retirement dollars, this week also said it would indefinitely delay plans to invest in some Chinese companies that are under scrutiny in Washington.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...nable-suppression-huawei-200516191623640.html
 
U.K. ban looms over Huawei as revenue growth lags amid U.S. pressure

China’s Huawei reported a sharp slowdown in revenue growth on Monday, ahead of Britain’s expected decision to ban the company from its 5G telecom networks - a move likely to add momentum to a U.S. campaign against it and threatening its global prospects.

The world’s biggest telecoms equipment vendor and No.2 smartphone maker said revenue rose a relatively modest 13.1% in the first half of the year, after more than a year of pressure from the U.S. and months of disruptions from the coronavirus pandemic.

Privately held Huawei Technologies released the numbers earlier than it has in the past ahead of the anticipated U.K. ban, a landmark move expected to anger Beijing and win plaudits from U.S. President Trump.

U.S. officials in May announced new rules aimed at constricting Huawei’s ability to procure crucial chips that it designs for 5G networking gear and smartphones. Those restrictions, coupled with pressure from the Trump administration and a domestic political backlash over China’s actions in Hong Kong and elsewhere, have pushed U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson to change course on Huawei.

The U.K. decision comes as Germany and other European countries finalize their policies on Huawei and 5G.

“Whatever the U.K. does is going to have quite a symbolic impact on Huawei’s position in Europe,” said Nicole Peng, an analyst at research firm Canalys. “I believe what Huawei is hoping for right now is to delay these countries’ decisions as long as possible, at least as long as up to the U.S. elections.”

The German government is expected to made a decision in September. Deutsche Telekom, Huawei’s largest customer in Europe, has argued strongly against any blanket bans on individual foreign vendors.

In Italy, Telecom Italia has excluded Huawei from a tender for 5G equipment for the core network it is preparing to build in Italy and Brazil, two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters last week.

The head of French cybersecurity agency ANSSI ruled out a total ban on Huawei equipment for 5G networks in a newspaper interview on Sunday, but said French telcos were being encouraged to avoid switching to the Chinese company.

Last month, the Asian city-state of Singapore selected Nokia and Ericsson over Huawei to build its main 5G networks.

The campaign against Huawei began in 2018 in Australia when the government effectively banned it after finding it could be exploited for spying here Since then U.S. allies including Canada, Japan and New Zealand have excluded Huawei from 5G projects, but most European governments declined until recently to follow suit.

SLOWING REVENUE

Huawei, which prior to the coronavirus pandemic had already forecast a “difficult” 2020, said revenue rose 13.1% to 454 billion yuan ($64.90 billion) in the first half of the year. The growth rate was down from 23.2% in the first half 2019. Net profit margins were 9.2%, up from 8.7% in the first half 2019.

Huawei did not publish data on how many smartphones it had shipped during the period, as it has in the past. Research firm IDC reported Huawei was the second-largest phone maker in the first quarter of 2020, with a 17.8% market share, behind Samsung Electronics Co Ltd and ahead of Apple Inc.

American officials placed Huawei on a blacklist in May of last year, restricting sales of U.S.-made goods such as semiconductors and blocking Huawei from using Google’s smartphone services. The U.S. says Huawei is an agent of the Chinese Communist State and cannot be trusted, allegations that Huawei denies.

The daughter of Huawei’s chairman is under house arrest in Canada as the U.S. attempts to extradite her for alleged sanctions violations by the company.
https://www.brecorder.com/news/4000...uawei-as-revenue-growth-lags-amid-us-pressure
 
The Chinese brands all rely on qualcomm snapdragon or taiwan helio processors. that is the core of a smart phone and power lies. All they do is wrap this with 40mp camera and large rams goodies to attract the gullible crowd.
With this now they are forced to comply or invest in their own research to develop chips and processors.
it will take years to achieve that.
The Chinese realise this risk and will be planning their next move.
 
Huawei 5G kit must be removed from UK by 2027

The UK's mobile providers are being banned from buying new Huawei 5G equipment after 31 December, and they must also remove all the Chinese firm's 5G kit from their networks by 2027.

Digital Secretary Oliver Dowden told the House of Commons of the decision.

It follows sanctions imposed by Washington, which claims the firm poses a national security threat - something Huawei denies.

Mr Dowden said the move would delay the country's 5G rollout by a year.

He added that the cumulative cost of this, and earlier restrictions announced against Huawei earlier in the year, would be up to £2bn.

"This has not been an easy decision, but it is the right one for the UK telecoms networks, for our national security and our economy, both now and indeed in the long run," he said.

Because the US sanctions only affect future equipment, the government does not believe there is a security justification for removing 2G, 3G and 4G equipment supplied by Huawei.

Huawei said the move was: "bad news for anyone in the UK with a mobile phone" and threatened to "move Britain into the digital slow lane, push up bills and deepen the digital divide".

New restrictions are also being applied to use of the company's broadband kit.

The government wants operators to "transition away" from purchasing new Huawei equipment for use in the full-fibre network.

Mr Dowden said he expected this to happen within two years.

He explained that additional time was being provided for broadband to avoid the UK becoming dependent on Nokia as the single supplier of some equipment.

Read more: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-53403793
 
So Once India Bans Huawei:

China lose the biggest market.

US Banned Huawei:

China lose the most lucrative market:

UK Banned Huawei:

Hopefully rest of the Europe or most of it will follow.

This is a huge blow for tomato and just about terminate Huawei.. Lol What did China expect ? Did they really feel they can be the next global police like US, Oh Pahhleassee :))....
 
Romalli is right, China ambitions were too big, would have been better off going the India route of being a pliant servant partner to the big boys like US. America does not want to see genuine rivals, India has always understood this and and thus continues to plod along nicely.
 
So Once India Bans Huawei:

China lose the biggest market.

Any update on that? Since Huawei has recorded steady growth in recent years...

Huawei India Revenue Jumps 56%

October 22, 2019

A crisis that began with American investigating agencies warning against purchasing Huawei products two years ago has turned into a storm with full sanctions on the firm by the US government.

But nothing has dented its business in the world’s second-largest telecom market — India.

Amid a global trade war, which has the potential to severely threaten its future, Chinese telecom gear maker Huawei has, so far, managed to keep its business here on the upswing.

According to the data at the Registrar of Companies (RoC), revenue from its telecom gear business jumped by 56 per cent during the financial year ended March 31, 2019.

During 2018-19, the revenue of Huawei Telecommunications (India) — the group entity that manufactures and markets telecommunication equipment — grew to Rs 12,884 crore, from Rs 8,282 crore in the previous financial year.

Its net profit jumped by 213 percent to Rs 623 crore, from Rs 199 crore in 2017-18.

The firm’s business has grown significantly in the past five years. Since 2014-15, its revenue has grown six times — from Rs 1,844 crore.

Its profit, however, dwindled during the intervening years. From Rs 430 crore in 2014-15, it fell to Rs 199 crore in 2017-18.

The RoC data shows another group firm, Huawei Technologies, which is involved in software services, posted 10.5 percent growth in net revenue during the year — from Rs 892 crore in 2017-18 to Rs 986 crore in 2018-19.

Its net profit, though, fell year-on-year by 10 percent to Rs 49.5 crore, from Rs 54.6 crore.

https://www.communicationstoday.co.in/huawei-india-revenue-jumps-56/
 
Huawei reports 13.1 percent sales rise in first half

PARIS: Chinese telecom giant Huawei on Monday reported a first-half revenue rise of 13.1 percent year-on-year as it appeared to emerge from a sales slump seen at the start of the year. Also reporting a net profit margin of 9.2 percent, Huawei said communications technologies were both a tool for combatting the coronavirus and an engine for economic recovery.

Huawei is the world's top supplier of telecom networking equipment and number-two smartphone maker behind Samsung. The 454 billion yuan ($64.9 billion) first half revenue figure points to a sharp uptick in sales for the second quarter, after first-quarter revenue came in at just 182.2 billion yuan, a mere 1.4 percent increase year-on-year.

Analysts blamed the downturn in the three months to end-March on the coronavirus and international efforts to contain the company's involvement in foreign telecom networks.

The pandemic emerged in China in December before spreading globally. The second-quarter net profit margin also marked an improvement over the first, when it had been 7.3 percent.

Washington has lobbied allies to shun Huawei over suspicions that its telecoms gear could contain security loopholes that allow China to spy on global communications traffic.

https://www.brecorder.com/news/40004851/huawei-reports-131-percent-sales-rise-in-first-half
 
Huawei 5G kit must be removed from UK by 2027

The UK's mobile providers are being banned from buying new Huawei 5G equipment after 31 December, and they must also remove all the Chinese firm's 5G kit from their networks by 2027.

Digital Secretary Oliver Dowden told the House of Commons of the decision.

It follows sanctions imposed by Washington, which claims the firm poses a national security threat - something Huawei denies.

Mr Dowden said the move would delay the country's 5G rollout by a year.

The technology promises faster internet speeds and the capacity to support more wireless devices, which should be a boon to everything from mobile gaming to higher-quality video streams, and even in time driverless cars that talk to each other. 5G connections are already available in dozens of UK cities and towns, but coverage can be sparse.

Mr Dowden added that the cumulative cost of the moves when coupled with earlier restrictions announced against Huawei would be up to £2bn.

"This has not been an easy decision, but it is the right one for the UK telecoms networks, for our national security and our economy, both now and indeed in the long run," he said.

Because the US sanctions only affect future equipment, the government has been advised there is no security justification for removing 2G, 3G and 4G equipment supplied by Huawei.

However, when swapping out the company's masts, networks are likely to switch to a different vendor to provide the earlier-generation services.

Huawei said the move was: "Bad news for anyone in the UK with a mobile phone" and threatened to "move Britain into the digital slow lane, push up bills and deepen the digital divide."

The action, however, does not affect Huawei's ability to sell its smartphones to consumers or how they will run.

Broadband switch
New restrictions will also apply to use of the company's broadband kit.

Operators are being told they should "transition away" from purchasing new Huawei equipment for use in full-fibre networks, ideally within the next two years.

Mr Dowden said the government would "embark on a short technical consultation" with industry leaders about this.

He explained that the UK needed to avoid becoming dependent on Nokia - which is currently the only other supplier used for some equipment - and he wanted to avoid "unnecessary delays" to the government's gigabit-for-all by 2025 pledge.

BT's Openreach division told the BBC it had in fact recently struck a deal to buy full-fibre network kit from a new supplier - the US firm Adtran - but first deliveries would only start in 2021.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-53403793
 
Apple is already looking to tap in to the budget smart phone sector and will probably wipe india as its targeting it quite aggressively with new cheap units, manufactured there.

However chiense phones will probably still rule most of the the world outside US/Europe.
 
China's ambassador to the UK has called Britain's decision to ban telecoms giant Huawei from its 5G network "disappointing and wrong".

The UK government has ordered companies to strip equipment from Huawei out of the system by 2027.

It follows sanctions imposed by the US, which claims the Chinese firm poses a national security threat - something Huawei denies.

US President Trump welcomed the UK decision, calling Huawei "unsafe".

"We convinced many countries, many countries - and I did this myself for the most part - not to use Huawei because we think it's an unsafe security risk, it's a big security risk," he said.

Mr Trump made the comments as he attempted to increase pressure on Beijing by announcing an executive order ending preferential treatment for Hong Kong in response to a new security law brought in by China.

In response to the 5G network ban, Chinese ambassador Liu Xiaoming questioned whether the UK can provide a "fair" business environment for foreign firms.

"Disappointing and wrong decision by the UK on Huawei," he tweeted.

"It has become questionable whether the UK can provide an open, fair and non-discriminatory business environment for companies from other countries."

Huawei's chief security officer in the US, Andy Purdy, said the move was "very bad news for Huawei" but that the UK would suffer an "even greater negative impact" both financially and on the "equality of service between rural Britain and urban Britain".

He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that Huawei hopes the UK government will reconsider its decision, and offered "additional information" to give ministers "the level of confidence that has been shaken" by the US government's sanctions.

Huawei's UK communications director Ed Brewster told BBC's Newsnight the ban had been announced "because of the pressure from the US".

"I think this is clear this is not about security, this is about trade. This is a US campaign focused on attacking our business and attacking the technology and that is because the US is behind on the technology," he said.

"We are in a long-term... trade dispute escalation from the US around how it wants to retain technology leadership."

Mr Brewster also moved to distance the company from the perception that it is an arm of the Chinese state, adding: "We don't work for governments, we work for the telecoms networks."

Huawei has repeatedly said it would not cause harm to any country.

What does the ban involve?

The UK's mobile providers are being banned from buying new Huawei 5G equipment after 31 December, and they must also remove all the Chinese firm's 5G kit from their networks by 2027.

The decision came after the UK's National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) warned that highly restrictive US sanctions meant the security of Huawei's equipment could not be guaranteed.

Announcing the ban to the House of Commons on Tuesday, Digital Secretary Oliver Dowden said it had not been an easy decision but was the right one for UK telecoms networks, national security and the UK economy.

He said the move would delay the country's 5G rollout by a year and the cumulative cost, when coupled with earlier restrictions announced against Huawei, would be up to £2bn.

5G technology promises faster internet speeds and the capacity to support more wireless devices, which should be a boon to everything from mobile gaming to higher-quality video streams. 5G connections are already available in dozens of UK cities and towns, but coverage can be sparse.

The UK last reviewed Huawei's role in its telecoms infrastructure in January, when it was decided to let the company remain a supplier but introduced a cap on its market share.

But in May the US introduced new sanctions designed to disrupt Huawei's ability to get its own chips manufactured.

The Trump administration claims that Huawei provides a gateway for China to spy on and potentially attack countries that use its equipment, suggestions the company strongly rejects.

The US has called for members of the Five Eyes alliance - which also includes the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand - to avoid Huawei kit.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-53412678
 
Donald Trump has welcomed Britain's decision to block Huawei from its 5G network - while China's ambassador to the UK said it was "disappointing and wrong".

Yesterday, Boris Johnson also banned the purchase of any new 5G equipment from the Chinese tech giant from the end of this year.

The US president praised the UK's decision, saying: "We convinced many countries, many countries - and I did this myself for the most part - not to use Huawei, because we think it's an unsafe security risk.

Matt Hancock says the decision to drop Huawei was a technical one

'We all know Donald Trump, don't we?'
"It's a big security risk and I talked many countries out of using it. If they want to do business with us, they can't use it."

Asked about Mr Trump's assertion that he "convinced many countries" to ban Huawei, Health Secretary Matt Hancock stressed the UK government had made a "technical decision" to block the Chinese company.

He told Sky News' Kay Burley @ Breakfast show: "We all know Donald Trump, don't we?"

"All sorts of people can try to claim credit for the decision," Mr Hancock added.

"But this was based on a technical assessment by the National Cyber Security Centre about how we can have the highest-quality 5G systems in the future."

Condemning the UK's ban on Huawei, Chinese ambassador Liu Xiaoming tweeted: "Disappointing and wrong decision by the UK on #Huawei.

"It has become questionable whether the UK can provide an open, fair and non-discriminatory business environment for companies from other countries."

The US is continuing to increase pressure on China, with Mr Trump signing an executive order that ends the special status of Hong Kong, citing the "oppressive actions" of Beijing.

Mr Trump said that the order would mean "no special privileges, no special economic treatment and no export of sensitive technologies" for Hong Kong.

"Hong Kong will now be treated the same as mainland China," he said.

The president also signed a sanctions bill, approved by the US Congress, which could penalise banks doing business with Chinese officials implementing the controversial new security law in Hong Kong.

Supporters of the law say it is necessary to bring stability to Hong Kong but critics worry it is being used to crush Hong Kong's traditional freedoms.

This week Hong Kong's chief executive, Carrie Lam, said that primary elections held by pro-democratic parties last weekend, in which 600,000 people are estimated to have voted, could violate the new national security law.

According to state media, the Chinese government said it strongly opposed the latest US actions and would apply its own sanctions to US individuals and entities in response.

US-China relations have sunk to new lows but this week there has been a flurry of formal measures announced by both sides.

On Monday, US secretary of state Mike Pompeo declared in an official statement that China's claims to the South China Sea were "completely unlawful".

The Chinese foreign ministry said the US was "a troublemaker" and also announced sanctions on US defence contractor Lockheed Martin, which is helping to upgrade Taiwan's Patriot surface-to-air missile system.

It had earlier announced sanctions on US officials, including senators Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, in response to previous sanctions applied by the US to senior Chinese officials because of China's treatment of minorities in Xinjiang.

Sanctions are flying back and forth across the Pacific but they will certainly hurt China more than the US.

Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz were unlikely to be planning a summer holiday to Xinjiang but many wealthy Chinese have substantial assets in the US and routinely send their children there to be educated: Chinese President Xi Jinping's daughter studied at Harvard.

And Mr Trump's comments on the UK's ban of Huawei show how all-encompassing the US approach is. Yesterday a Huawei spokesperson said that the British decision was "about US trade policy and not security".

Mr Trump added some substance to that, saying: "If [countries] want to do business with us, they can't use it".

Trade and security, though, are now two sides of the same coin. China itself has often been happy to conflate the two.

Mr Trump also said the US "convinced" other countries to ban Huawei. In truth, he cajoled them. Washington had long lobbied the British government to reject Huawei, a campaign which London successfully resisted.

But US sanctions on Huawei changed that calculation, both technically, as the UK government noted its new security concerns, but also politically: the sanctions gave British politicians another opportunity (or cover) to respond to a harder attitude from backbenchers and the public on China in 2020, and to change its position.

The UK ban on Huawei is proof of the US's enduring hard power.

https://news.sky.com/story/uks-decision-to-ban-huawei-from-5g-networks-disappointing-12028776
 
After the Huawei Ban, UK now does this:


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/X7DiDkjnmOo" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

This is disappointing by UK.
 
China vows 'necessary' measures in response to UK's Huawei ban

BEIJING (Reuters) - China will take necessary measures in response to Britain’s “discriminatory” ban on Huawei Technologies Co Ltd, which has severely damaged China’s investment confidence in the country, China’s Commerce Ministry said on Thursday.

“China is evaluating the UK actions that have betrayed free trade principles and will take necessary measures to resolutely defend Chinese firms’ legal rights,” ministry spokesman Gao Feng said during a weekly briefing, without giving details.

Earlier on Wednesday, China warned British Prime Minister Boris Johnson that his decision to ban Huawei from the 5G network would cost Britain dearly in investment.

Johnson on Tuesday ordered Huawei equipment to be purged completely from Britain’s 5G network by the end of 2027, a decision that China sees as a result of politicised pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump.

Britain has lost its independence on the matter of Huawei, China’s foreign ministry said, adding that the British government should make responsible decisions in line with its long-term interests.

Gao urged Britain to “correct its wrong behaviour” and protect its good trade ties with China.

Trump said this week he was responsible for Johnson’s Huawei decision, but Britain denied that and said it was motivated by its own security concerns and worries that supplies of Huawei gear could be interrupted by U.S. sanctions.

Britain had in January granted Huawei a limited role in its 5G rollout.

The United States says Huawei, the world’s biggest producer of telecoms equipment, is an agent of the Chinese Communist State and cannot be trusted.

Huawei denies it spies for China and has said the United States wants to frustrate its growth because no U.S. company could offer the same technology at a competitive price.

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-b...s-in-response-to-uks-huawei-ban-idUKKCN24H0XM
 
Brazil may face 'consequences' if it gives Huawei 5G access, says U.S. ambassador

The top U.S. diplomat in Brazil said in a newspaper interview that the country may face “consequences” if it allows China’s Huawei Technologies into its 5G network, referring to U.S. warnings that China fails to protect intellectual property.

The U.S. government has stepped up efforts to limit Huawei’s role in rolling out high-speed, fifth-generation technology in Latin America’s largest economy. It believes Huawei would hand over data to the Chinese government for spying. Huawei denies it spies for China.

U.S. Ambassador Todd Chapman told O Globo that Brazil would not face reprisals for picking Huawei, but could face consequences.

“Each country is responsible for its decisions,” Chapman was quoted as saying. “The consequences we are seeing in the world are that firms involved in intellectual property are scared to make investments in countries where that intellectual property is not protected.”

Chapman added that the U.S. International Development Finance Corp, an agency created by U.S. President Donald Trump to boost U.S. overseas development financing efforts to counter China’s influence, has $60 billion (46 billion pounds) in its coffers. He said the U.S. government has agreed to make money available from the fund to help support allies who choose to buy their telecoms infrastructure from “trustworthy suppliers.”

Brazil’s far-right President Jair Bolsonaro said last month that 5G deployment would have to meet national sovereignty, information and data security requirements. A longtime China skeptic, Bolsonaro has adopted a less abrasive stance toward Beijing since taking office in 2019, although he remains a close Trump ally.

China is the top market for Brazilian exports.

Earlier this month, a Huawei executive warned that Brazil could suffer years of delay in deploying a 5G telecoms network and higher costs if it succumbs to mounting U.S. pressure to snub the Chinese equipment supplier.

Brazilian operators have built significant parts of their infrastructure using Huawei’s equipment.

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-h...access-says-u-s-ambassador-idUKKCN24U21X?il=0
 
Huawei no doubt has back doors built in for the Communist Party (speculative since nothing has been proven, but tons of anecdotal evidence and history suggests so). Also the CCP has a office inside Huawei HQ

The challenge is, other than Huawei and ZTE (also a Chinese company), no one else has the same level of 5G technology. Ericsson and Nokia have promising tech, but still not close to Huawei. So the rest of the world either implements Chinese tech, or falls significantly behind.

Nonetheless. Bold decision by the UK, imo the better one
 
US imposes further sanctions on China’s Huawei

US President Donald Trump’s administration on Monday expanded restrictions on Chinese telecom company Huawei over the company’s alleged ties with the Chinese Communist Party.

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross told Fox Business that Huawei’s access to semiconductor chips is banned, and new limitations will further prevent it from getting around the bar.

“On May 20, we issued an order that prevented American technology from being used in Huawei-designed chips. That led them to do some evasive measures. They were going through third parties,” Ross said.

“The new rule makes it clear that any use of American software or American fabrication equipment to produce things for Huawei is banned and requires a license.”

“It’s really a question of closing loopholes to prevent a bad actor from access to US technology,” he added.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called the move on Twitter “a direct blow to Huawei and the repressive Chinese Communist Party,” saying it is further limiting “Huawei’s ability to acquire US technology and compromise the integrity of the world’s networks and Americans’ private information.”

Instagram kept deleted photos and messages on its servers for more than a year

“The Department of State strongly supports the Commerce Department’s expansion today of its Foreign Direct Product Rule, which will prevent Huawei from circumventing US law through alternative chip production and provision of off-the-shelf (OTS) chips produced with tools acquired from the United States,” he said in a State Dept. statement.

Meanwhile, 38 Huawei affiliates have been added to the Commerce Department’s Entity List, which identifies foreign parties prohibited from receiving certain sensitive technologies.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2260074/us-imposes-further-sanctions-on-chinas-huawei
 
Huawei no doubt has back doors built in for the Communist Party (speculative since nothing has been proven, but tons of anecdotal evidence and history suggests so). Also the CCP has a office inside Huawei HQ

The challenge is, other than Huawei and ZTE (also a Chinese company), no one else has the same level of 5G technology. Ericsson and Nokia have promising tech, but still not close to Huawei. So the rest of the world either implements Chinese tech, or falls significantly behind.

Nonetheless. Bold decision by the UK, imo the better one

Agreed. If there are going to be back doors built in for spying on foreign nations, should be us or trusted allies like the US who are doing the spying.
 
They are concerned about China spying but are not concerned about their own spying which they have been doing for years. Its only when someone's else is foot on their own, it hurts.

Trump is just barking and they will eventually back track. Huawei is too big to fail. Its the biggest hardware manufacturer in the world.

So i wasnt right, didnt see that coming tbh. Sucks for Huawei.
 
US says $1.8bn needed to replace Huawei, ZTE parts

SAN FRANCISCO: US regulators estimated Friday that it could cost small telecoms firms more than $1.8 billion to remove and replace Huawei and ZTE gear flagged over security concerns.

The Federal Communications Commission has classified the Chinese tech giants as national security threats and carriers are barred from using the Universal Service Fund to buy their equipment.

An FCC assessment of how much networks supported by the federal fund rely on hardware and services from Huawei and ZTE estimated that a purge could cost $1.84 billion in total.

“I once again strongly urge Congress to appropriate funding to reimburse carriers for replacing any equipment or services determined to be a national security threat so that we can protect our networks and the myriad parts of our economy and society that rely upon them,” FCC Chairman Ajit Pai said in a statement.

Huawei is one of the few companies capable of building 5G networks and is widely viewed as providing the most advanced option for the super-fast data transfers behind technologies such as self-driving cars.

Verizon, which was among the examples listed in the FCC assessment, is spending $1.9 billion to speed up its deployment 5G telecom services as a top bidder for licenses to valuable spectrum useful for 5G.

Mid-bandwidth made available by the FCC strikes a balance between how far signals reach and how fast data travels, with low-bandwidth sacrificing speed for distance and high-bandwidth quick but short-ranged.

5G networks are touted as promising an exponential leap in the amount and speed of wireless data, enabling advances in self-driving vehicles, virtual reality, connected health and more as sensors and servers communicate instantly.

The US is behind other countries such as China and South Korea when it comes to deploying the potentially transformative technology.

https://www.brecorder.com/news/40016523/us-says-18bn-needed-to-replace-huawei-zte-parts
 
India is likely to block its mobile carriers from using telecom equipment made by China’s Huawei under procurement rules due to come into force in June, two government officials told Reuters news agency.

New Delhi is wary about awarding new technology business to Chinese firms both because of security fears and a desire to get Indian manufacturers to produce more telecoms equipment.

A United States campaign to curb Huawei has triggered bans or limits on the use of its equipment around the world, but the situation in India has been amplified by strained relations between New Delhi and Beijing over their shared border.

India’s telecoms department said on Wednesday that after June 15 carriers can only buy certain types of equipment from government-approved “trusted sources” and said New Delhi could also create a “no procurement” blacklist. Huawei is likely to feature on this embargoed list, the two officials, who declined to be named, told Reuters news agency.

“We cannot prioritise economic gains if an investment poses [a] national security risk,” one of the officials said.

The telecoms department, which did not comment on Thursday about Huawei, has yet to provide further details on the plans for trusted sources or a procurement blacklist.

However, a third official, who also declined to be named, told Reuters news that ZTE Corp, another Chinese firm that has a smaller presence in India, could also be excluded.

Huawei and ZTE are under scrutiny for allegedly installing “backdoor” vulnerabilities to spy for the Chinese government.

Both have denied the allegations and Huawei has previously told Reuters news it is ready to enter into a “no backdoor” deal with India to allay security concerns.

Huawei and ZTE did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Two of India’s three big telecoms carriers, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea, use Huawei gear. Any restriction on Huawei gear is likely to push up costs, industry analysts say.

The Chinese firm’s equipment and network maintenance contracts are typically cheaper than European competitors such as Ericsson and Nokia and there is limited availability of such gear in India.

India has begun to fast-track approvals of some of the more than 150 Chinese investment proposals worth over $2bn that it had put on hold after a June standoff between the two neighbours on the disputed Himalayan border.

“We have started giving some approvals to investment proposals even from China, but we will not give any approvals in sectors like telecom infrastructure and financials,” a senior government official told Reuters.

The officials also said that India is unlikely to overturn last year’s ban on more than 100 Chinese mobile apps or allow Chinese companies to bid for stakes in state-run firms such as Air India and refiner Bharat Petroleum Corp Ltd.

India plans to raise $23.57bn in the 12 months from April 1 by selling state-run companies.

India’s finance ministry did not respond to a request for comment.

The India-China border clash, the worst in nearly four decades, had soured already-fragile relations and “regaining trust would be a long road from here”, one of the sources said.

India’s technology ministry did not respond to a request for comment on app bans.

https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2...k-chinas-huawei-over-security-fears-officials
 
US bans Chinese telecom devices, citing ‘national security’
US Federal Communications Commission decision includes devices from Huawei, ZTE and other manufacturers.

The United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has announced it is banning telecommunications and video surveillance equipment from prominent Chinese brands, including Huawei and ZTE, citing an “unacceptable risk to national security”.

The five-member FCC said on Friday it had voted unanimously to adopt new rules that will block the importation or sale of the targeted products.

“Our unanimous decision represents the first time in the FCC’s history that we have voted to prohibit the authorization of communications and electronic equipment based on national security considerations,” FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr said in a statement on Friday.

He added that the move had “broad, bipartisan backing” among the US congressional leadership.

US security officials have warned that equipment from Chinese brands such as Huawei could be used to interfere with fifth-generation (5G) wireless networks and collect sensitive information.

The ban is the latest move in a years-long push “to keep US networks secure” by identifying and prohibiting devices deemed to be security threats, the FCC said.

Friday’s initiative also includes a ban on Hytera Communications, the Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company and the Dahua Technology Company.

Huawei declined to provide comment to the Reuters news agency. ZTE, Dahua, Hikvision and Hytera did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Huawei and the Chinese government have long denied allegations of espionage and denounced US sanctions against Chinese technologies.

But in 2019, then-US President Donald Trump signed into law the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act, which established criteria to identify communications services Washington deemed could pose a risk to national security.

The services that were designated threats under that law were then subject to the Secure Equipment Act of 2021, signed by President Joe Biden.

That act created the groundwork for Friday’s announcement. It directed the FCC to “adopt rules clarifying that it will no longer review or issue new equipment licenses” to those companies.

At the time, Florida Senator Marco Rubio hailed Biden’s decision.

“The Chinese Communist Party will stop at nothing to exploit our laws and undermine our national security,” he said in a statement. “This legislation fixes a dangerous loophole in our law, curtailing their efforts to worm their way into our telecommunications networks.”

One of the largest manufacturers of telecommunications equipment in the world, Huawei has had an embattled relationship with the US and its allies, facing some of the heaviest sanctions ever placed on a single company in the US.

Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou was arrested and detained for nearly three years in Canada following allegations by the US Justice Department that she attempted to violate sanctions by trying to conduct business dealings with Iran.

She was indicted on bank and wire fraud charges and faced US extradition proceedings in a Canadian court, sparking a diplomatic crisis between Canada, the US and China. Meng was released and returned to China in 2021.

Earlier this year, Canada joined the US in banning Huawei from 5G wireless networks.

Another FCC commissioner, Geoffrey Starks, described Friday’s ban as a preventive measure that would pay dividends in the future.

“By stopping equipment identified as a threat to the United States from entering our markets, we significantly decrease the risk that it can be used against us,” Starks said in a statement. “We also lower the possibility that we’ll need to rip and replace that equipment in the future. Ultimately, if it can’t get authorized, it can’t be deployed.”

Al-Jazeera
 
US Blacklists China's Chipmaker Firm, Crackdowns On AI Chip Sector

The Biden administration on Thursday added Chinese memory chipmaker YMTC and 21 "major" Chinese players in the artificial intelligence chip industry to a trade blacklist, broadening its crackdown on China's chip industry.

YMTC, long in the crosshairs of the U.S. government, was added to the list over fears it could divert U.S. technology to previously blacklisted Chinese tech giants Huawei and Hikvision. The move, laid out in the Federal Register, will bar YMTC's suppliers from shipping U.S. goods to it without a difficult-to-obtain license.

The 21 Chinese AI chip entities being added to the trade blacklist, which include Cambricon Technologies Corp and CETC, face an even tougher penalty, with the U.S. government effectively blocking their access to technology made anywhere in the world with U.S. equipment.

As the Chinese government seeks to remove barriers between its military and civilian sectors, "U.S. national security interests require that we act decisively to deny access to advanced technologies," Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Administration Thea Kendler said in a statement.

YMTC, Cambricon, CETC and the Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The move builds on sweeping export controls imposed on Beijing in October to slow Beijing's technological and military advances, including measures to curb China's access to U.S. chipmaking tools and cut it off from certain chips made anywhere in the world with U.S. equipment.

It also comes as Congress prepares to finalize legislation to bar the U.S. government from buying products that contain semiconductors made by YMTC, Chinese memory chipmaker CXMT or China's top chip manufacturer SMIC.

The Commerce Department on Thursday also targetted nine Chinese entities for allegedly seeking to support China's military modernization, including Shanghai Micro Electronics Equipment Group Co Ltd (SMEE), China's only lithography company. A total of 35 Chinese entities were added to the U.S. trade blacklist, known as the entity list, as well as YMTC's Japan-based subsidiary.

Thursday's announcements weren't all bad news for Beijing. The Biden administration removed Wuxi Biologics, a company that makes ingredients for AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine, and 25 other Chinese entities from the so-called unverified list thanks to successful site visits.

Reuters reported on Wednesday that such a move was in the works and reported earlier this year that U.S officials were able to conduct a site visit at Wuxi Biologics.

Wuxi did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Companies are added to the unverified list if the United States cannot complete on-site visits to determine if they can be trusted to receive sensitive U.S. technology exports, inspections which in China require approval from the commerce ministry.

Being added to the unverified list forces U.S. suppliers to perform greater due diligence before shipping to the targeted companies.

Commerce Department officials have attributed greater cooperation from Beijing in site checks to a new rule announced in October. Under that rule, if a government prevents U.S. officials from conducting site checks at companies on the unverified list, Washington may add them to the entity list after sixty days.

Under that new policy, the Commerce Department on Thursday removed nine Russian entities from the unverified list and added them to the entity list because the U.S. has been unable to conduct site visits.

Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer heralded the imposition of new penalties on YMTC.

"YMTC poses an immediate threat to our national security, so the Biden Administration needed to act swiftly to prevent YMTC from gaining even an inch of a military or economic advantage," he said in a statement.

NDTV
 
Back
Top