What's new

"I pay close attention to batsmen's strike-rates even in Test matches" : Inzamam-ul-Haq

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
This Inzi interview with Ramiz was conducted after the 2nd ODI against NZ but couldn't find a recording initially so left it, but got back to it today.... here are the quotes:


"Watching the batsmen, there is a sign that we are weak on the short balls so teams can attack us on that aspect. Coaches will work on that aspect definitely. We have experienced players but when Hafeez and Malik were batting, I was thinking that it's unfair for them to be facing so much short bowling.... they will have to work on it as we have to go to South Africa and then the World Cup is in England"

"I don't think that being weak against short bowling means that you are scared. But you have to do a lot of practice on it, I don't think this is a matter that can't be resolved. It requires practice for a few days. Imran bhai used to say that if your practice is tough, the match will be easy, and vice versa. In my view, short balls on such pitches should be looked at as a scoring opportunity"

"All the boys are very talented and the important thing is that aggression has to be there for the team to win. If we look at the fast bowlers, they weren't striking well in the past couple of months but their aggression was still there. No cricketer can perform in every series but I am happy that the aggression and the intention is there. I am also happy to see the team playing as a unit, even if they lose the team is one and that is very good for the team"

"I have no two opinions on this - Sarfaraz should be captain in all three formats. His performances has been improving and I want to tell everyone that most of our ODI team is inexperienced, only the senior players have played a lot of matches. In the days when I was playing, players who had played 50 ODIs wouldn't be given any importance. Sarfaraz has given good performances as a captain and no one has any doubt that he should be the captain"

"All batsmen don't perform well in all conditions. When Fakhar tries to score all over the ground, then the chances of him being dismissed increase. For example, Mohammad Yousuf hit excellent cover drives while I didn't. I was good against short-bowling, straight driving and on the on-side. So I would focus on my strong points. Fakhar's weak point is that he tries to play towards mid-on and now the bowlers have started to try to attack him. In his weak areas, he should try to take singles rather than hit boundaries, no player can hit all over the park. If he takes singles in his weak areas, I don't think there is any problem for him"

"We are considering playing Mohammad Abbas in ODIs because his domestic one-day record is very good as well. We are just wary that he may be attacked in ODIs due to the lack of pace but he is definitely in consideration after his recent performances. No other pacer could perform against Australia but he made the difference on his own"

"The likes of Abid Ali and Saad Ali are here because I saw them play. The good thing is that our bench strength is very strong. Shan has done well, Abid Ali has made runs. Shan Masood and Abid Ali both play the short ball well. So our bench strength is becoming strong which will raise the standards for the Test team as well. We can also gauge how the domestic performers perform against international level opposition. Some fast bowlers have also done well like Waqas Maqsood. If we get any spots then these players can be included in the team"

"We look at players' techniques and see where they are suited to playing. I pay close attention to batsmen's strike-rates even in Test matches. If a player hits a 100 off 300 balls then it's difficult for me to select him and I have told the first-class coaches and players about this as well"

"We are trying to improve pitches at the domestic level. Everything is slowly improving. In the past, we had told the groundsmen to make faster pitches as we struggle against swing but that swing has become so much that.... If we haven't brought up our FC cricket to international standard then that is a major shortcoming. We are trying to have PCB curators make good pitches at 8 top stadiums where the top level of domestic cricket is held. There should be a variety of pitches including faster pitches and spinning tracks as well, playing spin is an art too. We are a bit late to do this, the overall standards have to be raised"

"I lost quite a bit of weight due to the Asia Cup"

"We had a discussion about what went wrong at the Asia Cup but we realise that the team is young, the players are talented and they need to be given confidence and more chances to improve. They were playing well before that but then they did badly in a tournament, it happens. The good thing is that this tournament displayed our weak points and showed which aspects we have to improve on"

"In the days when we used to play, there was a lot of emphasis on skills and the level was high. Now, the level of fitness has gone very high due to the amount of cricket being played. All teams have high fitness standards now"
 
yes, let's not take any blame for the crappy selections you made.

same excuses
....team is young
.....senior players will help


Just accept you need to move on from your favorite and base it on merit
 
Let's hope their averages and SR's are at least marginally better than him against Aus and SA, if not worse :P
 
Think the interview was done at a time when things were good!
 
Is that why Imam is in the team. :afridi

Precisely - this guy is all talk.

One should ask him who would he choose between Imam and Fakhar. For those who don't know the former averages 35-40 with a SR in the low 40s while the latter is averaging 42 at a SR of 60 in domestics.

But all is well because he is the best Chief selector in Pakistan's cricketing history.
 
Inzy the analysis is all well and good but you need to ask how are we to expect consistency from a batting lineup where only one player has a Test average above 40 - that too being Azhar Ali whose form has nosedived for the last 18 months.

In Tests these pretty 30s and 40s mean nothing. SR cannot be the only criteria. We need to select batsmen who have a proven record of converting starts to hundreds above all else, and you can start with a guy who's scored 30 FC hundreds in Fawad Alam.
 
The problem is UAE pitches. Make Pakistan play on fast Indian pitches and you will see the difference in Strike Rates.
 
More or less, I have followed IuH more than most here - I actually own a cap autographed by him. One thing I can say is - guy never talks his mind. He knows almost everything of cricket, particularly batting, no doubt about that (otherwise he won’t have been such clinical chaser) - he always talks politically correct staffs, ideal case scenarios ...... then he’ll do exactly what is going through his mind - not necessarily that always makes sense.

For example, if anyone asks him about the perfect No. 3, he’ll describe it better than most; he’ll explain the finer things of fast bowling (how to counter it), even I am sure he can predict what’s the possible next ball coming on ball by ball analysis ...... then he’ll select Azhar as No. 3 and perfectly explain why he is best fit there.

Probably still he holds the record of highest ODI run scorer in UAE - guy knows that country/grounds like his own palm ..... then he picked 6 pacers for Asia Cup, 5 for NZ series, and 1.5 spinner!!!!!!


Extremely loyalist, rigid & self centred personality, who loves “me” first at all cost, and won’t listen much - not the best guy for CS role. I often get frustrated with him because, unlike recent other clueless CSs of PCB, this guy knows what he is saying & doing, yet .....
 
More or less, I have followed IuH more than most here - I actually own a cap autographed by him. One thing I can say is - guy never talks his mind. He knows almost everything of cricket, particularly batting, no doubt about that (otherwise he won’t have been such clinical chaser) - he always talks politically correct staffs, ideal case scenarios ...... then he’ll do exactly what is going through his mind - not necessarily that always makes sense.

For example, if anyone asks him about the perfect No. 3, he’ll describe it better than most; he’ll explain the finer things of fast bowling (how to counter it), even I am sure he can predict what’s the possible next ball coming on ball by ball analysis ...... then he’ll select Azhar as No. 3 and perfectly explain why he is best fit there.

Probably still he holds the record of highest ODI run scorer in UAE - guy knows that country/grounds like his own palm ..... then he picked 6 pacers for Asia Cup, 5 for NZ series, and 1.5 spinner!!!!!!


Extremely loyalist, rigid & self centred personality, who loves “me” first at all cost, and won’t listen much - not the best guy for CS role. I often get frustrated with him because, unlike recent other clueless CSs of PCB, this guy knows what he is saying & doing, yet .....

Inzamam is a very calm personality, he rarely lets his emotions get the better off him and he believes in a collaborative approach and believes in giving the captain and coach his full support as he recalled from his captaincy days where he demanded full support from the selectors.

However Mickey and Sarfaraz have really tested his patience with their selection decisions and the only time Inzi stamped his authority on team selection was when he flew to UAE during the Asia Cup and demanded that Junaid Khan be played against Bangladesh much to Arthur's annoyance and Junaid rewarded with 4 wickets straight away. He then demanded Hafeez's inclusion in the playing eleven much to Arthur's annoyance and Hafeez responded with a century on his come back and good form against NZ in the T-20's and ODI's.
 
He has two main roles

1. Select his nephew and anyone blood related to him.
2. Collect a pay cheque.
 
Inzamam is a very calm personality, he rarely lets his emotions get the better off him and he believes in a collaborative approach and believes in giving the captain and coach his full support as he recalled from his captaincy days where he demanded full support from the selectors.

However Mickey and Sarfaraz have really tested his patience with their selection decisions and the only time Inzi stamped his authority on team selection was when he flew to UAE during the Asia Cup and demanded that Junaid Khan be played against Bangladesh much to Arthur's annoyance and Junaid rewarded with 4 wickets straight away. He then demanded Hafeez's inclusion in the playing eleven much to Arthur's annoyance and Hafeez responded with a century on his come back and good form against NZ in the T-20's and ODI's.
And Hafeez scored a century on one of the flattest pitches ever where Aus were able to draw a match playing out 140 overs but Mr.Blessed will play all the year for that century, very nice logic but it does not take the thing away that this CS is cunning and selfish CS ever.
 
And Hafeez scored a century on one of the flattest pitches ever where Aus were able to draw a match playing out 140 overs but Mr.Blessed will play all the year for that century, very nice logic but it does not take the thing away that this CS is cunning and selfish CS ever.

Hafeez is a class player, be patient
 
More or less, I have followed IuH more than most here - I actually own a cap autographed by him. One thing I can say is - guy never talks his mind. He knows almost everything of cricket, particularly batting, no doubt about that (otherwise he won’t have been such clinical chaser) - he always talks politically correct staffs, ideal case scenarios ...... then he’ll do exactly what is going through his mind - not necessarily that always makes sense.

For example, if anyone asks him about the perfect No. 3, he’ll describe it better than most; he’ll explain the finer things of fast bowling (how to counter it), even I am sure he can predict what’s the possible next ball coming on ball by ball analysis ...... then he’ll select Azhar as No. 3 and perfectly explain why he is best fit there.

Probably still he holds the record of highest ODI run scorer in UAE - guy knows that country/grounds like his own palm ..... then he picked 6 pacers for Asia Cup, 5 for NZ series, and 1.5 spinner!!!!!!


Extremely loyalist, rigid & self centred personality, who loves “me” first at all cost, and won’t listen much - not the best guy for CS role. I often get frustrated with him because, unlike recent other clueless CSs of PCB, this guy knows what he is saying & doing, yet .....

Couldn't agree more.

On top of the selection blunders you've listed he's made a fair few including:

2016 ODI series v England:

- Sami Aslam (on the basis of test form). Picks the most defensive player in the team yet cites the importance of strike rates

- Umar Gul - the guy was finished after his injury 5 years ago

After that series:

- Ahmed Shehzad during the 2017 WI series

- Shehzad retains his place after a poor showing in WI and then instructs Mickey Arthur to select him ahead of Fakhar in the CT. After the humiliating loss in the opening game against India, common sense finally prevails and is replaced by the best batsmen in the tournament.

- Imam ul Haq - wasn't selected on merit and shouldn't be in any playing XI for Pakistan. Nepotism at its finest

- Drops Fakhar due to a mysterious "knee injury" even though he was perfectly fine and in good touch against Australia in the test and ODI series he had played very recently because he knows he's a threat to Imam's place in the side. Fakhar and Azhar should be opening the test batting.

- Recalls Hafeez in tests on the basis of some form in ODIs - shows he clearly hasn't progressed since his mistake with Sami Aslam 2 years ago. He was actually required in the Asia Cup instead but as you mentioned he preferred picking pace bowlers as if he wants the team to screw up.

PSL has proven to be a great aid for selectors when it comes to LOI selections. Without it he would have been a lost selector and perhaps booted out by now.
 
Last edited:
Precisely - this guy is all talk.

One should ask him who would he choose between Imam and Fakhar. For those who don't know the former averages 35-40 with a SR in the low 40s while the latter is averaging 42 at a SR of 60 in domestics.

But all is well because he is the best Chief selector in Pakistan's cricketing history.

Don't forget, Azhar continuously fails and he bats with a SR of 10 or 20 most of the times these days. And he is recognized as the main star of the batting, what does that tell other players? And what does that say about Inzy?

Inzy just seems like a fool when he says these things.
 
SR has become extremely important in the modern game. in ODI's, you can argue SR is more important than the Average.

It unfortunately that cricket statistics haven't matured like a lot of other sports, there are no advanced metrics in cricket. Some combination of a Average + SR is required to measure batsmen

Inzi is clearly a hypocrite. In Tests, Pakistani top order is one of the slowest in the world. Azhar batting the ball around at SR of less than 35 is criminal

Even is ODI, how many batsmen play their entire innings at a SR of above 75+.. Fakhar is the only one that comes to mind, maybe Sarfraz and Malik. Imam, Hafeez, Babar all start their innings at SR around 50
 
Why is our excuses for defeats the team is young ? In ODIs we have Hafeez ,Sarfraz ,Malik,Hasan Ali,and Babar who have played enough international cricket. Whilst in tests the only inexperienced players really is Imam and Hasan Ali due to the amount of games he has played in tests. If they used it as a reason for 1 defeat I could understand. But whenever we lose it's due to that. At what point will they learn ?
 
I think Imam strikes at an ok rate in tests. It is the seniors like Azhar Ali and Asad Shafiq who need to be put more under the scanner.
 
I think posters go overboard with comments about strike rate. If you compare NZ to Pak batsmen you’ll find the strike rates are very similar, we lost because of lack of runs not SR. Seldom do test get to the 5th day for strike rate to have any relevance on the outcome and more often then not the pitch will dictate the SR anyway. Reading all these comments about it is starting to get boring, for most it’s something to moan about without any theory.

Batting’s averages will always hold greater value in both test and ODI as runs and wickets win you games. More than SR it is about having variety in the batting and batting combinations that can counter any situation, something we have lacked for awhile.
 
To be frank Pakistan seems to be having criteria's which isn't the primary need for a particular format. Having a good SR is important but that should accompany the average as well. No point in scoring 30 runs a game at a SR of 60.
 
Hafeez is a class player, be patient

your forgot to write "third". For the patient part i concur with your assessment, we should be patient for at least next 2 decades, thereafter, hafeez will be the mighty world-class player (only in EA Sports with cheat codes on)
 
Great interview. Unlike the lowest-common denominator of Pakistan "fans" and self-proclaimed "experts", Inzamam knows what he is doing and has a vision in place, which is very important. There are bound to be growing pains with such a young side but the important thing is that the side keeps improving, which they are.
 
Great interview. Unlike the lowest-common denominator of Pakistan "fans" and self-proclaimed "experts", Inzamam knows what he is doing and has a vision in place, which is very important. There are bound to be growing pains with such a young side but the important thing is that the side keeps improving, which they are.

You must have a unique definition of improvement. After the CT, the team has lost 90% of it's ODIs against the top 5 sides (and lost against Bangladesh in the Asia Cup) and lost 5 out of 6 home UAE tests since then. In what world are they improving?

At for the "self-proclaimed experts" jibe, I would suggest grasping the concept of progress first, so you can at least be a self proclaimed expert yourself.
 
CS must be sleeping now - he can't watch this batting!!!!!!
 
Harris SR is dangerously low. He'll even make Misbah look aggressive.
 
You must have a unique definition of improvement. After the CT, the team has lost 90% of it's ODIs against the top 5 sides (and lost against Bangladesh in the Asia Cup) and lost 5 out of 6 home UAE tests since then. In what world are they improving?

At for the "self-proclaimed experts" jibe, I would suggest grasping the concept of progress first, so you can at least be a self proclaimed expert yourself.

The team lost 5 out of 6 home UAE tests since the CT? Which ones? 90% of ODIs? How many such ODIs have we played since then? Since you obviously didn't read properly, I already conceded that a young side will have growing pains and some of our recent losses are the result.

That "jibe" was not aimed at you. I generally don't care to read any of your posts unless I absolutely have to so I don't know or care what you refer to yourself as.
 
Inzamam is a very calm personality, he rarely lets his emotions get the better off him and he believes in a collaborative approach and believes in giving the captain and coach his full support as he recalled from his captaincy days where he demanded full support from the selectors.

However Mickey and Sarfaraz have really tested his patience with their selection decisions and the only time Inzi stamped his authority on team selection was when he flew to UAE during the Asia Cup and demanded that Junaid Khan be played against Bangladesh much to Arthur's annoyance and Junaid rewarded with 4 wickets straight away. He then demanded Hafeez's inclusion in the playing eleven much to Arthur's annoyance and Hafeez responded with a century on his come back and good form against NZ in the T-20's and ODI's.

Inzi ran up into the crowd to beat up a spectator who was calling him Aloo. He also got into a fight with YK in a warm up soccer game. These aren't exactly indicative of a guy who doesn't let his emotions get the better of him.

Regarding the stuff about team selection - Hafeez and Junaid - how do you know that? I haven't seen that reported anywhere.
 
focusing on strike rates in test is the worst thing one can do.
 
Poor Selections by team management

Pakistan has been struggling in test cricket post Mis-You retirements. One of the biggest factor in all these struggles has been poor team selections. We should not have selected just one regular spinner in UAE. In pitches like SA's spinner was not needed at all. In batting we keep selecting the non performers. If we have had better team selections we must have had better results.
 
focusing on strike rates in test is the worst thing one can do.

Wrong - RR in Test cricket is the ultimate key.

Since there is no over limit, common sense tells that RR doesn't matter in Test, even in time less Tests. But, batsman won't ever survive for long, no matter how defensive he bats; therefore the trick in Test cricket is you bat by phases with multiple gears. Also, there are multiple factors unlike T20 - new/old ball, session/day duration, bowlers fitness, partner .... but in general, once batsman is set, he must increase scoring rate so that quick runs can be put.

Yes, there are few specific roles - like openers, I don't mind openers going to first lunch at 45-0, and 60-0 at drinks after lunch (that means they have faced at least 35 overs of the 3 pacers with new ball), as long as next 48 overs of the day goes @4+. 256-3 after Day 1 is brilliant start, even on a batting belter, survive next morning collapse to reach lunch at 333-4, 500+ is on the card. Or take the bottom 4 - if there is a set batsman at other end, don't mind them dead bat 2-3 dots every over; but if both ends are open, just go after the ball and get whatever can be slogged. No. 9 & No. 10 wasting an hour for 23 runs is the worst tactics - it's draining out bowler's energy for little. Match saving situations are different, but otherwise every batsman must look for quick scoring.

If you analyze Azhar's innings - most of his bigger innings ended in losses, because guy kills momentum and then eventual collapse ends the innings prematurely. Best example is last years' (2017) SRL series - PAK batted longer than SRL in 1st Test, yet lost that close Test. NZ batted much longer than PAK in 1st Test and should have lost as well, but won only because after 10+ years of experience Azhar made exactly the same mistake you are suggesting here.
 
We all saw our overhyped Sauds, Saads, Farhan and other team A players get manhandled by a bunch of Indian nobodies. Yasir definitely shouldn't have been picked on this pitch but with our batting, to think we have the likes of Javed Miandad in the waiting is just day dreaming. Our batting is hopeless and will stay hopeless for at least next 5 years. Heard there is some talent in the U 12s but that will require some waiting.
 
Our opening pair are a disaster
Fakhar is not test material and should have been replaced with a fahim

Azhar should be opening or playing 1 down

We could have also tried opening with Masood

We dont need Yasir in South Africa we could have done with shadab
 
Wahab would have been the ideal hit the deck pacy option which was needed for this tour. Did the team management and selectors miss a trick by not playing him this series?
 
Wahab would have been the ideal hit the deck pacy option which was needed for this tour. Did the team management and selectors miss a trick by not playing him this series?

Oh god please no. Its better to recall Shoaib akhtar than wahab riaz.
 
Poor selection is what keeps costing Pakistan. A 1-0 win vs 2-0 win vs Australia. A series win vs NZ (for a terrible selection in Bilal Asif). Lost 2-0 to Sri Lanka due to playing just one spinner. The batting selections speak for themselves.

Lost Asia Cup due to Asif playing at 6 and relying on Malik at 4.

There is really no criteria for selection, its definitely not selection based on conditions, domestic performance is sometimes or sometimes not considered and players are routinely dropped in and out of squads without even playing any matches.

For selecting Test players, how about selecting players that have great FC average so they might actually succeed? Is this really such a hard concept? Imam for example has a FC average of 34.53 but is somehow become a staple batsmen on this team. Shan Masood has shockingly not been terrible but even his FC average is just 33.94.

You select mediocre batsmen well, then expect mediocre results.
 
Poor selection is what keeps costing Pakistan. A 1-0 win vs 2-0 win vs Australia. A series win vs NZ (for a terrible selection in Bilal Asif). Lost 2-0 to Sri Lanka due to playing just one spinner. The batting selections speak for themselves.

Lost Asia Cup due to Asif playing at 6 and relying on Malik at 4.

There is really no criteria for selection, its definitely not selection based on conditions, domestic performance is sometimes or sometimes not considered and players are routinely dropped in and out of squads without even playing any matches.

For selecting Test players, how about selecting players that have great FC average so they might actually succeed? Is this really such a hard concept? Imam for example has a FC average of 34.53 but is somehow become a staple batsmen on this team. Shan Masood has shockingly not been terrible but even his FC average is just 33.94.

You select mediocre batsmen well, then expect mediocre results.

I second you. We are not giving domestic performers any weight in selections. When we select mediocre players then our team will stay mediocre.
 
Wrong - RR in Test cricket is the ultimate key.

Since there is no over limit, common sense tells that RR doesn't matter in Test, even in time less Tests. But, batsman won't ever survive for long, no matter how defensive he bats; therefore the trick in Test cricket is you bat by phases with multiple gears. Also, there are multiple factors unlike T20 - new/old ball, session/day duration, bowlers fitness, partner .... but in general, once batsman is set, he must increase scoring rate so that quick runs can be put.

Yes, there are few specific roles - like openers, I don't mind openers going to first lunch at 45-0, and 60-0 at drinks after lunch (that means they have faced at least 35 overs of the 3 pacers with new ball), as long as next 48 overs of the day goes @4+. 256-3 after Day 1 is brilliant start, even on a batting belter, survive next morning collapse to reach lunch at 333-4, 500+ is on the card. Or take the bottom 4 - if there is a set batsman at other end, don't mind them dead bat 2-3 dots every over; but if both ends are open, just go after the ball and get whatever can be slogged. No. 9 & No. 10 wasting an hour for 23 runs is the worst tactics - it's draining out bowler's energy for little. Match saving situations are different, but otherwise every batsman must look for quick scoring.

If you analyze Azhar's innings - most of his bigger innings ended in losses, because guy kills momentum and then eventual collapse ends the innings prematurely. Best example is last years' (2017) SRL series - PAK batted longer than SRL in 1st Test, yet lost that close Test. NZ batted much longer than PAK in 1st Test and should have lost as well, but won only because after 10+ years of experience Azhar made exactly the same mistake you are suggesting here.

And how will you get set? By not focusing on run rate, if you focus on run rate then you're already preparing your down fall and you won't be scoring runs if in the back of your mind you have the run rate in TEST matches on your mind.
 
Thank god, he's not an Indian selector - else Pujara will struggle to get a Test innings!
 
Inzamam still silent on sending replacement of Haris Sohail. 4 days have passed. One needs time for documentation and visa process of atleast 5-7 days. Next test match starts at 11 Jan.

No word from the PCB, now media also questioning PCB chairman Ehsan Mani on his selectors' role.
 
Inzamam still silent on sending replacement of Haris Sohail. 4 days have passed. One needs time for documentation and visa process of atleast 5-7 days. Next test match starts at 11 Jan.

No word from the PCB, now media also questioning PCB chairman Ehsan Mani on his selectors' role.

I think they have decided that Rizwan will be that replacement who is already there. In any case the selectors will announce the squad for the ODI and T-20 squad in any case so they probably thought not worth it sending a player to just unnecessarily warm the bench and come back.
 
Thank god, he's not an Indian selector - else Pujara will struggle to get a Test innings!

Pujara's SR is decent in Aus, there was a time where Kohli publically criticized him and said he needs to improve his strike rate rather than bat like a night watchman Azhar Ali style.
 
Dropping Asad Shafiq will be the litmus test for Inzimam

Inzimam has lost a lot of goodwill by making bad decisions for test team: like selecting Hafeez in test squad, dropping Saad from test squad, selecting injured Haris Sohail in test squad, selecting Shadab & Faheem in test squad, dropping Mir Hamza from test squad.

But he can gain lot of respect back if he drop Asad Shafiq from the test squad for the next test series. As expected Asad Shafiq has performed again in an inning when his position in the team is in danger. He has the habit to not perform when the team needs him most, but perform when the match is already lost. He has done this numerous times in the past and continue to save himself in the team at the expense of young promising batsmen. Its a mockery of the whole selection system. Inzimam needs to take a principle stand and drop Asad from the test squad. The nation will be grateful to Inzimam if he does this.
 
Last edited:
Although I have no issue if Asad Shafiq will be dropped next test but do you really believe that he is such a good player that he can score runs whenever he want. I believe that every batsman wants to score 100 every time they go to bat. Most of the times they don't and sometimes they do. Good ones do more then average ones. Unfortunately our current team has no good one and at best have some average decent players.
 
His iman is on the line, and his Imam is on the line as well.
 
Pujara's SR is decent in Aus, there was a time where Kohli publically criticized him and said he needs to improve his strike rate rather than bat like a night watchman Azhar Ali style.

Kohli criticizing Pujara for his strike rate and dropping him for a Test in England was wrong - we all saw what happened then. Pujara's career strike rate is about 46 (his Strike rate in current Aus series is 41) and Azhar Ali's career strike rate is about 41 - same as Pujara's current strike rate.

I think your batting woes go a lot deeper than just strike rates - it's more or less a pathetic batting lineup overall, barring one or two players who cannot be successful every innings. You could blame Azhar Ali for a lower strike rate if every one else was scoring consistently and faster and you were only drawing matches because his lower strike rate. But the issue is that you are losing Test matches quite consistently, and in foreign conditions within 3 days, so lower strike rates are the least of your worries. Just my $0.02.
 
Strike rate in tests is the least of our worries. Batting time is something we seriously lack as a team.
 
Sometimes a low S/R is a great thing. Vihari has a strike rate of 12% in the first innings of the third Test, and that was a very good innings because he lasted for 66 balls as an opener and made it much easier for batsmen who followed him.
 
Back
Top