If BLA are freedom fighters, than why do Indians get traumatized when Ajmal Kasab or Burhan Wani are labelled as freedom fighters than?

[Major]

On social media and around here on PP, i am seeing Indian posters call the BLA as freedom fighters. Infact, they are are freely using this term.

Interestingly, the same posters find it a big issue if Burhan Wani or even Ajmal Kasab is labelled as freedom fighters around here. Even though Ajmal Kasab was doing the same thing as what BLA is doing.

 

[straighttalk]

On social media and around here on PP, i am seeing Indian posters call the BLA as freedom fighters. Infact, they are are freely using this term.

Interestingly, the same posters find it a big issue if Burhan Wani or even Ajmal Kasab is labelled as freedom fighters around here. Even though Ajmal Kasab was doing the same thing as what BLA is doing.

Is ajnal kasab Indian or Pakistani? How will Paksitani national fight for independence against India ? There you go...

 

[straighttalk]

On social media and around here on PP, i am seeing Indian posters call the BLA as freedom fighters. Infact, they are are freely using this term.

Interestingly, the same posters find it a big issue if Burhan Wani or even Ajmal Kasab is labelled as freedom fighters around here. Even though Ajmal Kasab was doing the same thing as what BLA is doing.

Paksitan wants Kashmir ...partition happened between India and Pakistan..no other state became independent ..so what independence are they fighting for. On the other hand .in 1947..Paksitan promised that balochistan will be independent

 

[Major]

Is ajnal kasab Indian or Pakistani? How will Paksitani national fight for independence against India ? There you go...

Than does that make Burhan Wani a freedom fighter, wasnt he a kashmiri?

 

[Major]

Paksitan wants Kashmir ...partition happened between India and Pakistan..no other state became independent ..so what independence are they fighting for. On the other hand .in 1947..Paksitan promised that balochistan will be independent

Pakistan promise that Balochistan will be indepedent? What? WHere do you come up with such stuff?

 

[sweep_shot]

BLA are terrorists.

Any group that targets innocent civilians is a terrorist group.

 

[DeadlyVenom]

Who is Ajmal Kasab again?

Don't wanna Google

 

[Major]

Who is Ajmal Kasab again?

Don't wanna Google

guy who got caught carrying out Mumbai attacks. Was given the death sentence and hanged in India

 

[DeadlyVenom]

guy who got caught carrying out Mumbai attacks. Was given the death sentence and hanged in India

Cant make comparison between him and Baloch but can definitely make comparisons between indigenous Kashmiris some Baloch.

 

[Major]

Cant make comparison between him and Baloch but can definitely make comparisons between indigenous Kashmiris some Baloch.

but than thats my second question. How come a group (BLA) that is anti state be labelledd as freedom fighters when they are killing civilians, especially punjabis

 

[Major]

@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @Devadwal @uppercut @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @RexRex @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti @kron @globetrotter @Hitman @jnaveen1980 @Local.Dada @CrIc_Mystique @Van_Sri @nish_mate @SportsWarrior @kaayal @saimayubera

 

[finalfantasy7]

Paksitan wants Kashmir ...partition happened between India and Pakistan..no other state became independent ..so what independence are they fighting for. On the other hand .in 1947..Paksitan promised that balochistan will be independent

your making no sense - yet again

 

[straighttalk]

your making no sense - yet again

Kahsmir is a dispute between India and Pakistan .where is freedom coming in. Pak wants Kashmir whereas the ruler of Kahsmir and a vast majority of people wanted to be part of India. The question of kashmiri independence does not arise as Pakistan occupies a part of Kashmir and did not give it independence.bbalcohsitan...india does not want to rule it...the Baloch people want independence.

 

[straighttalk]

but than thats my second question. How come a group (BLA) that is anti state be labelledd as freedom fighters when they are killing civilians, especially punjabis

Doesn't military kill civilians .the atrocities of pak army in Bangladesh and now balochistan is well documented...so much so that the women are forced to take up arms to avenge the rape and extra judicial murders carried out. So killing civilians and commiting crimes goes both ways...baloch rebels and state security force. The British ruled India and labelled our freedom fighters terrorists who carried out assassinations etc.. so the definition depends on which side you are in. State labels them as anti state..the people of Baloch who wants to get rid of paksitanis or Punjabi Paksitanis to be clear . consider them freedom fighters.

 

[straighttalk]

BLA are terrorists.

Any group that targets innocent civilians is a terrorist group.

By that definition do you agree Pakistan army is a terrorist group for the crimes committed in bangladesh in 1971. If no please explain why not

 

[straighttalk]

Pakistan promise that Balochistan will be indepedent? What? WHere do you come up with such stuff?

Not whole balochistan but kalat ...read article 1 of the agreement signed between kalat king mountbatten and jinnah.. later it was promised full autonomy except defense and external affairs and then forced to accede to Pakistan.

 

[straighttalk]

Than does that make Burhan Wani a freedom fighter, wasnt he a kashmiri?

In a way yes but for the kashmiri struggle to be classified an independence movement ..few things are not clear. Maybe you can answer each of these points below.

1. Pakistan has to declare that Kashmir is and will never be part of Paksitan

2. Pakistan has to give up it's occupied Kahsmir and they can declare independence or decide to join Paksitan as an independent country

3. Indian part of Kashmir has to declare that it's never going to join Pakistan.

Then it's a freedom struggle from Indian rule..else its a dispute between two Nations and not a freedom struggle.

Now in Baloch case...India doesn't want to occupy balochistan...the Baloch people don't want to join India...hence it's a struggle against the atrocities of Pakistan.

 

[sweep_shot]

By that definition do you agree Pakistan army is a terrorist group for the crimes committed in bangladesh in 1971. If no please explain why not

The definition is only applicable to groups like BLA, Bajrang Dal etc. Not formal military forces.

Would you call Indian army terrorist group too since they have done bad things in Kashmir?

Also, 1971 happened a long time ago. Everybody moved on. Only sanghis (like you) bring up 1971.

USA literally nuked Japan in WW2. They are now on good terms. Countries eventually move on for greater good.

 

[straighttalk]

The definition is only applicable to groups like BLA, Bajrang Dal etc. Not formal military forces.

Would you call Indian army terrorist group too since they have done bad things in Kashmir?

Also, 1971 happened a long time ago. Everybody moved on. Only sanghis (like you) bring up 1971.

USA literally nuked Japan in WW2. They are now on good terms. Countries eventually move on for greater good.

You said any group..Pak army is a group. For all military forces do not get a pass..otherwise nazis would be good guys by your definition.
Sure Indian army committed excesses..on an individual basis..can you show me how Indian army did a systemic mas rape or killing in Kashmir.

I am not asking whether Pak or Bangaldesh can have good relationship or not..I m saying. By your definition pak army is a terrorist group as they targer Baloch civilian