What's new

In what order would you rank David Gower, Kevin Pietersen and Inzamam-ul-Haq?

Harsh Thakor

First Class Star
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Runs
3,519
Post of the Week
2
Although all 3 batted in different eras they were amongst the most flamboyant ,gifted and impactful batsmen of their times.At their best they were all close to no 1.Even a photo-finish may not properly seperate these 3 stalwarts.

David Gower was elegance personified taking batting grace to regions of divinty.No batsmen of his era negotiated the most lethal deliveries with such remorseless ease .He possed the wizardry of a magician in his batting,arguably posessing more natural talent than any left hander before him,including Sobers and Pollock.Gower was above all prolific on the fast Australian tracks as well as the turning sub0continent track sin Pakistan.He also scored an unbeaten 154 in West Indies against the 4 pronged pace battery.Sadly he never did complete justice to his talent often being dismissed by reckless strokes.Averaged more away than at home which is creditable.The likes oif Lillee and Holding ranked Gower with the very best.To me average of 44.25,18 centuries and aggregate of 8231 runs did not do true justice to Gower's phenomenal talent.


Inzamam ul Haq at his best could pulverize the best of bowling attacks.No batsmen of his era had better reflexes against genuine pace.Inzy was also the best match-winner of his era as a batsmen averaging over 78 in wins .In his peak era he averaged over 60 and twice remained unbeaten in run chases to pull of Houdini acts to win tests for Pakistan.Inzy was very prolific in West Indies and England but not much so in Australia and South Africa.Still he could give better finishing touches in ODI'S than even Tendulkar and more impactful in wins than even Lara.What went against him being classed with Lara,Ponting or Tendulkar was his relatively poor overseas record .Still his batting won tests for Pakistan in England,West Indies and India.Morally Inzamam averaged around 50 and scored 25 centuries which is still remarkable,


Kevin Pieterson was very much like the equivalent of Viv Richards for his times.Arguably since Viv only Inzamam had such sharp reflexes facing genuine pace .Pieterson championed England's cause in Ashes series at home and away and his best batting in the Ashes compared with that of the all-time greats.At their best few batsmen have been more dynamic or explosive.Kevin could simply tear the flesh of oponents from word go as he did in the 2005 Ashes and 2010-11 version.He also was very successful in India in 2012.Sadly his career fell out due to team politics and his disillusionment with the administrators.Still averaging over 47 and scoring over 8000 runs is a creditable achievement.


If I had a gun on my head I may just plump for David Gower even if he was statistically overshadowed by Kevin and Inzy in terms of average.I feel Gower revealed creativity or artistry in metaphysical depths and the game is not only about mere stats but also has an aesthetic element.He also faced some of the most lethal pace bowling attacks of Australia and West Indies and averaged more overseas than at home.Pieterson and Inzamam propelled their team sto more victories but they played in different eras where scoring rate was greatly accelerated.Pieterson would just edge Inzamam by a whisker because he was more sucessful against the best teams of his day and in Australia and South Africa.
 
If I had to choose....

1. KP
2. Inzaman
3. Gower

The latter was not that successful against WI, but he was brilliant against spin. Averaged fifty away and forty at home IIRC.
 
If I had to choose....

1. KP
2. Inzaman
3. Gower

The latter was not that successful against WI, but he was brilliant against spin. Averaged fifty away and forty at home IIRC.

Did not Gower face great bowling attacks of Australia and West Indies and average more overseas than at home?Remember how he faced Lillee and Holding.Inzamam was not as successful as Gower in Australia or against great attacks.
 
Gower was the best of the three. A very elegant and stylish left hander who on his day was as good as any during his time facing vintage fast bowlers that played then. Second I would put Inzi, a big match player but perhaps not as easy on the eye as David. Kevin blew hot and cold, he was inconsistent playing brilliantly one day and nothing the next.

1) David Gower
2) Inzamam Ul Haq
3) Kevin Pietersen.
 
KP
Inzy
Gower

Inzy and KP are close and can be interchanged.
 
Gower was the best of the three. A very elegant and stylish left hander who on his day was as good as any during his time facing vintage fast bowlers that played then. Second I would put Inzi, a big match player but perhaps not as easy on the eye as David. Kevin blew hot and cold, he was inconsistent playing brilliantly one day and nothing the next.

1) David Gower
2) Inzamam Ul Haq
3) Kevin Pietersen.

Very fine assessment
 
Why not Gower with his great record in all conditions?

He averages 45+ only in one country, i.e. Pak. SL were minnows back. How can you say that is great record in all conditions? A middle order batsmen with a 44 avg clearly is not that great record.
 
Last edited:
1) Inzamam ul Haq
2) Kevin Pietersen
3) David Gower

All three were great players though, no shame getting the bronze medal here.
 
Did not Gower face great bowling attacks of Australia and West Indies and average more overseas than at home?Remember how he faced Lillee and Holding.Inzamam was not as successful as Gower in Australia or against great attacks.

Averaged 30 against WI.

Don’t think he faced Lillee much - three tests in 1980, then in Botham’s Ashes he was dropped. Didn’t score a century against Lillee.

Brilliant against spin though - and very good against Pakistan, even W&W when he was at the end of his career.
 
He averages 45+ only in one country, i.e. Pak. SL were minnows back. How can you say that is great record in all conditions? A middle order batsmen with a 44 avg clearly is not that great record.


It was pretty good in a very strong bowling era, especially given that he had to play half his matches in the home of swing and seam. By comparison Greenidge averaged 44, Lloyd 46, Crowe 44.

Still Gower frustrated the watcher - he got out for brilliant-looking 70s when he should have gone on to hit 150s.
 
Back
Top