What's new

India (400) thrash Australia (177 & 91) to win the 1st Test by an innings and 132 runs

Wow didn't expect this, the Aussie side in me is sad and disappointed, wanted them to do well. The end is near for Australia

When I predicted all this would happen in the pre build up thread and it has exactly happened as I said it would all of you Indians weren’t agreeing. As if Australia are world beaters of the early 2000s. This is a pathetic Australian team and the biggest home bullies if there were any. Australia will lose 3-0 or 4-0 for sure there is no way these guys can play jadeja even forget about Ashwin and axar.
 
Damn no ball save smith otherwise in a test match jaddu got out labu and Smith twice .
 
Had a sub continent team performed like this in Australia or England there would have been discussions about reducing the number of tests, spectators not getting roi on their tickets, etc. Instead Oz and Pak experts will discuss how the pitch was at fault and some Pak fans will tell you how they no longer like watching cricket due to evil BCCI
 
When I predicted all this would happen in the pre build up thread and it has exactly happened as I said it would all of you Indians weren’t agreeing. As if Australia are world beaters of the early 2000s. This is a pathetic Australian team and the biggest home bullies if there were any. Australia will lose 3-0 or 4-0 for sure there is no way these guys can play jadeja even forget about Ashwin and axar.
They are beneficiary of an extremely weak mediocre era in test history(the weakest probably) where there is no true great test team left. Only India & to an extent England are decent /good sides. Rest of them are pathetic HTB. In case of Pak,Sri & WI even that's not true as these three are so pathetic & hopeless, that they can't even win at home. How could people even term this team "great" & have the audacity to compare them with Ponting & Waugh's team is beyond my understanding. They will be rightfully massacred in India & England.
 
Had a sub continent team performed like this in Australia or England there would have been discussions about reducing the number of tests, spectators not getting roi on their tickets, etc. Instead Oz and Pak experts will discuss how the pitch was at fault and some Pak fans will tell you how they no longer like watching cricket due to evil BCCI

Yup. Sooks are hypocrites as well.
 
Very poor stuff from Aussies. There has been no real demon on the pitch. Just poor cricket from Australia.

Matthew Hayden, who scored bulk of runs in India, should be in Aussie dressing room as batting consultant instead of wasting his time in comm box.
 
Soon Babar will be no. 1 batter in test cricket as labu and Smith will not score much in this series
 
ForIbvgWcAAbJnt
 
India took 20 Australian wickets for 268 runs overall.

Apart from Todd Murphy, OZ bowlers took 3 wickets and conceded 270 odd runs.
 
This is not good for test cricket and doesn't prove anything we already didn't know.
 
They are beneficiary of an extremely weak mediocre era in test history(the weakest probably) where there is no true great test team left. Only India & to an extent England are decent /good sides….

Of course. Test cricket has lost its charm. Bring back the 90s :ik
 
Indian fans enjoy the days till Ashwin &Jadeja there. After their requirements i don't think india wil dominate in home test series with this ease.Indian last decade test victories are hugely contributed from Ashwin &Jadeja. Truly mystery spinners once in a generation.We are lucky to witness two greats of the game in same time.
 
rohit, gill, pujara, kohli, iyer, pant

vs

ashwin, jadeja, axar

in india with red ball. how do you think it will go?
 
rohit, gill, pujara, kohli, iyer, pant

vs

ashwin, jadeja, axar

in india with red ball. how do you think it will go?

Iyer and Gill have actually played domestic cricket in India recently. They will be ok. Pant is a phenom. Rohit has the temperament and form.

Pujara unfortunately is losing battle against biology.

Our former Kaptaan is worst major Indian batter against spin. They will eat him up raw.
 
Australians plan should be keep crying keep losing and try to win in the final :)

But India what an amazing performance :14:
 
rohit, gill, pujara, kohli, iyer, pant

vs

ashwin, jadeja, axar

in india with red ball. how do you think it will go?

ATM Gill will lose the battle.

Kohli has always been weak against spin, could be the reason he stays away from domestics.

Pujara currently is a gone case.

Pant, Iyer will dominate them and every now and then could lose wickets as well, but only due to that attacking approach.

Rohit is currently the classical test match batsman against spin.
 
Australia captain Pat Cummins rued his team’s poor start with the bat against India as a major factor in its massive innings and 132-run defeat in the first Border-Gavaskar Trophy Test on Saturday.

Electing to bat first after winning the toss on Thursday in Nagpur, Australia was dismissed for a below-par 177 by India. Australia’s performance came on the back of a lot of criticism from the Australian media about India’s preparations of a “doctored” surface for the series opener.

Left-arm spinner Ravindra Jadeja razed through the Australia middle-order with figures of five for 47. The home side then put up a massive 400 on the board with a century from captain Rohit Sharma and valuable lower-order contributions. India then dismantled Australia for 92 in the second innings - the visitor’s lowest score against India in India.

“The game moves pretty quickly here at times in India. The spinners are always going to be hard work when it’s spinning. Rohit played very well. The wicket spun (in the first innings) but wasn’t unplayable. Should’ve scored 100 more runs. Starting here is tough but 3-4 of our guys got in. When you do get in, got to score big scores,” Cummins remarked at the post-match interaction.

Sportstar
 
STAT: Biggest innings wins for India vs Australia

Inngs & 219 runs Kolkata 1997/98
Inngs & 135 runs Hyderabad 2012/13
Inngs & 132 runs Nagpur 2022/23 *
 
Merely two sessions of play were needed to achieve a result on the third day of the first Test as India took a 1-0 lead in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy in Nagpur.

After stretching their lead to over 200 runs, India bowled out Australia for 91 in about a session to win the Test by an innings and 132 runs. Ravindra Jadeja was declared the Player of the Match for bowling figures of 7-81 and 70 runs with the willow.

The win shortens the gap between the two sides in the World Test Championship Standings with India's point percentage rising to 61.67% while Australia's dropped to 70.83%.

While Ashwin had played his role on the first two days of the Test, picking 3/42 in the first innings and scoring a sturdy 23 with the bat, the experienced off-spinner took the centre stage during Australia’s second innings.

He accounted for Australia opener Usman Khawaja in his very first over, luring the left-hander into a drive through a tossed-up delivery. All Khawaja could manage was an outside edge off a turning ball to the first slip.

Ashwin then put his guile and tactical acumen to best use and accounted for four other Australia batters, to finish with 5/37. This included David Warner, whose horrid run in India continues. The batter averages 22.16 in the country.

Ashwin is now the third-most successful India bowler against Australia at home, with 58 wickets to his name at an average of 21.32. He is closing in on second-placed Anil Kumble, who has 62 wickets against Australia at home.

With this five-wicket haul, Ashwin now has six five-fors against Australia. He has 25 five-wicket hauls at home, which equals him to India record-holder Kumble.

Ashwin has picked 320 Test wickets at home and went past Australia’s Shane Warne who had 319 scalps in his backyard, to become the fifth-most successful bowler at home.

Australia fail against tweakers yet again

As it was in the first innings, eight Australian batters fell to spin. Ashwin picked five, Jadeja got rid of Marnus Labuschagne and skipper Pat Cummins, while Axar Patel picked one wicket.

With eight and seven wickets respectively, Ashwin and Jadeja are the leading wicket-takers after the first Test.

The duo have dominated Australia over the years in home encounters. Ashwin and Jadeja were the leading wicket-takers of the last two home editions of the Border-Gavaskar.

Ashwin took the pole position in the 2013 series with 29 wickets, while Jadeja was second placed with 24 wickets. In the 2017 series they switched places, Jadeja led the bowling charts with 25 wickets while Ashwin was second with 21 scalps.

Resounding victory for India

The day began with India looking to extend their lead. They lost Jadeja quite early to Todd Murphy, but after that Axar and Mohammad Shami added 52 runs for the ninth wicket. While Axar followed a level-headed approach, Shami played the aggressor, connecting some lusty blows against the young Murphy.

India were finally bowled out for 400, extending their advantage to 223 runs. In their second innings, Australia's batting had no answers to India’s spin attack.

This was India’s third-biggest win over Australia when with regards to victories by an innings.

The second Test begins on 17 February in Delhi.

ICC
 
Australia's top order is real suspect, both the openers are sitting ducks in India. I would drop Khawaja and open with Travis head instead.
 
Australia's top order is real suspect, both the openers are sitting ducks in India. I would drop Khawaja and open with Travis head instead.

Axar Patel is a better batsman than all Australian batters except Smith on turning wickets.
 
Aus was scoring runs for fun in their home conditions. So, how do they go from scoring 400/500 to 91? This is why test cricket will always remain a pathetic format.
 
India captain Rohit Sharma feels there were no demons in the Vidarbha Cricket Association Stadium pitch and said that application and planning are important for succeeding on spin-friendly sub-continent wickets. Before the start of the opening Test, which India won by an innings and 132 runs on Saturday, the Australian media had started debating the pitch, stating that the hosts had prepared a rank-turner to unsettle the left-handed batters in the touring side.

But Rohit, who scored 120 runs in India's 400 all out in reply to Australia's 177 in the first innings, said a batter needs to adopt a few unorthodox ways to score on such surfaces.

"The last few years, the kind of pitches we are playing in India, you need to have application and some sort of plan to score runs," said Rohit after India's win inside three days, which gave them a 1-0 lead in the four-match series.

"I've grown up playing a lot in Mumbai on surfaces that turns a lot. You need to be slightly unorthodox as well, use your feet. Need to put pressure on bowlers as well by doing something different. And that different could be whatever suits you -- using your feet, sweeping, reverse-sweeping." Rohit was delighted with his century after missing a few Tests in recent past.

"Yeah, it was (a special hundred), considering a lot of things. Start of the series, very important where we stand in the (World Test) championship table, important for us to start well.

"We know playing a series like this, it's important to start well. Happy I could put up a performance which could help the team. I was unfortunate I had to miss a few Test matches but happy to be back," he said.

"Since I was appointed Test captain, (I) have played just two Tests. Got Covid in England, missed South Africa, got a freak injury against Bangladesh. Was ready for this one. Things can happen when you play for a long time, but I've had injuries in the past, so I know how to come back from them." Even though Ravindra Jadeja and Ravichandran Ashwin sparkled in the spin department, Rohit also credited his opening pace pair -- Mohammed Shami and Mohammed Siraj -- for providing the perfect start.

"It was the first two overs from the seamers. 2/2 -- starting a game like that, you're in the ascendancy. Opposition is under pressure from there," he said.

"We know we have quality in our spin department. But the seamers can be threatening as well on a pitch like that." Australia captain Pat Cummins opined that even though the pitch turned in the first innings, it was not unplayable.

"The game moves pretty quickly here at times in India. They (India) played very well. The spinners are always going to be hard work when it's spinning. Rohit played very well," he said.

"The wicket spun (in the first innings) but wasn't unplayable. (We) should've scored 100 more runs. Starting here is tough." "(Todd) Murphy was fantastic on debut. He's been very impressive. Bowled plenty of overs," said Cummins about the debutant off-spinner, who returned with match figures of 7 for 124.

All-rounder Ravindra Jadeja, who was named "Player of the Match" for his match haul of 7/81 and a vital 70, said it was dream return to cricket after sitting out for nearly five months following a knee surgery.

"It feels amazing... after five months, give 100 per cent, taking wickets and scoring runs. Feels amazing. I've been working hard when I was at NCA, also doing my rehab," he said.

"(I) would like to thank all the NCA staff, physios, trainers, they have been working hard with me." The spinner said that, with the ball in hand, he concentrated on hitting the right areas and while batting he kept things simple.

"I looked to bowl in good areas, the ball was spinning, the ball was going straight and also keeping low," Jadeja said.

"I know the Australians will look to play sweep and reverse sweep. Generally, I look to keep things very simple (with the bat) and not change too much. I focus more on my batting now because it's crucial number, 5, 6, 7, so have to put myself in a pressure situation."

NDTV
 
Aus was scoring runs for fun in their home conditions. So, how do they go from scoring 400/500 to 91? This is why test cricket will always remain a pathetic format.

On the contrary, this is what makes test cricket great, you need the skill to play on different conditions, unlike dumb pajama cricket that is played these days.
 
Aus was scoring runs for fun in their home conditions. So, how do they go from scoring 400/500 to 91? This is why test cricket will always remain a pathetic format.

Even in home conditions moment they faced a challenging condition at the Gabba they got out for 218. But Travis head they were looking at a sub 200 total. Even while chasing 34 they lost 4 wickets. Don't blame the format. You cannot fluke test win like you fluke ODI or T20.
 
different techniques in this match. but yeah, right hander rohit can't risk going on the back foot as the ball will spin onto his stumps with low bounce too.

Scoring shots v spin by foot movement in this innings:

ROHIT SHARMA
Front foot/Down the track: 91.9%
Back foot: 8.1%

RAVINDRA JADEJA & AXAR PATEL
Front foot: 45.6%
Back foot: 55.4%
 
I am a big fan of Cummins. But if ther something i have to nit pick that is his adaptability. That is when he will attain the level of Mcgrath Lack of bouncers against Axar was showed that
 
India destroyed Australia in the first test

We prepare slow dull tracks with little or no grass on the pitch which help neither spinners nor pacers (even when pace was our strength during the 80s 90s and early 2000s)

India know how to make full use of home advantage by preparing proper spinning wickets
 
Don’t know what Ashwin’s figures are outside India but his overall record is right up with the best spinners
 
India destroyed Australia in the first test

We prepare slow dull tracks with little or no grass on the pitch which help neither spinners nor pacers (even when pace was our strength during the 80s 90s and early 2000s)

India know how to make full use of home advantage by preparing proper spinning wickets

Pakistan does not have faith in their batting. So they play it safe by preparing dull pitches where everyone gets to score centuries.
 
Some stats

==


91 - Australia's second-innings total in Nagpur was their lowest in Tests in India. Australia's previous lowest total in India was 93 all out in Mumbai in 2004.

The 91 was also Australia's second-lowest Test total against India, behind the 83 all out in Melbourne in 1981.

268 - Australia's match aggregate in the Nagpur Test was their lowest in a Test against India when bowled out twice. Their previous lowest aggregate was 296 in Mumbai in 2004, when they bowled out for 203 and 93.

The aggregate of 268 was also the second-lowest by Australia in a Test match in Asia, behind the 267 against Pakistan in Karachi in 1956.

5 - Number of innings wins for India in Test cricket against Australia, including the latest win in Nagpur. The last of their previous four innings wins came during the 2013 home series against Australia in Hyderabad.

25 - Five-wicket hauls for R Ashwin in Test cricket in India, the joint-highest with Anil Kumble. Only two players have claimed more five-wicket hauls at home in Tests: 45 by Muthiah Muralidaran and 26 by Rangana Herath.

6.7 - Batting average of Australia's left-hand batters in Nagpur. It's the second-lowest average recorded by a team's left-hand batters in a Test match (minimum ten dismissals). The lowest is 5.8 for New Zealand against Australia in the 2019 Perth Test.

The five left-hand batters in Australia's playing XI scored 67 runs across both innings, while the two India left-hand batters totalled 154 runs, with two fifties.

10 - The total lbw dismissals for Australia in Nagpur, the most for them in a Test match. Australia's previous highest was nine - against India in Kolkata in 2001 and against Sri Lanka in last year's Galle Test.

These are also the joint-highest lbw dismissals effected by India in a Test match. Six of the ten dismissals came in the second innings, the joint-highest for Australia and the joint-highest for any team against India in a Test innings.

49 - Marnus Labuschagne's score in the first innings, the highest individual score for Australia in this Test match. It was the first instance when no batter scored a fifty for Australia in a Test match in India. It was also only the second completed Test where India did not concede an individual fifty against Australia.
 
Aus was scoring runs for fun in their home conditions. So, how do they go from scoring 400/500 to 91? This is why test cricket will always remain a pathetic format.

You think mindlessly getting about the same score every time is more interesting?

Others might say the difference highlights the true challenges of Test cricket and look to see if Oz can improve next Test, like a good team would.
 
A good perfomance by India but the sries is far from over and Aussies will come back strongly in the next Test .
 
Aus was scoring runs for fun in their home conditions. So, how do they go from scoring 400/500 to 91? This is why test cricket will always remain a pathetic format.

On the contrary, and as already pointed out by other posters, this is a great example of how test cricket balances out things across different types of pitches and conditions.

The thing is, Indians learnt to play Australian pace attack on their bouncy pitches and thrashed them back to back at their own home. It’s about time Australia showed a master class in batting on a typical spinning pitch in the subcontinent.
 
Defending him during the English commentary, former Australia batter Matthew Hayden pointed out that the shade of the stand on the side of the ground played a key role in making the catch difficult for Boland.

"You have got that shaded area. Ball goes high through that and drops into that shaded area. The contrast (puts) some difficulty in the eyelines," said Hayden.

Reacting to it, former India cricketer and ex-coach Ravi Shastri said: "Is that an excuse Haydos? For a catch like that at this level."

"No way," said Hayden in reply.

The dropped catch proved costly for Australia as Shami, who was then batting on 6, went on to score 37 runs off 47 balls, playing a crucial role in helping India post a big total in their only innings in the match.

https://sports.ndtv.com/india-vs-au...-shamis-catch-ravi-shastris-response-is-gold-
 
Lol NDTV. a dropped catch of a number 10 was the crucial difference between an innings defeat and a win.
 
Back
Top