Random Aussie
Senior Test Player
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2007
- Runs
- 28,699
India 3/296 overnight now 3/303
The Aussie ship is going down....
The Aussie ship is going down....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
itduzz said:Is this the same Aussie team which won 16 tests on a trot![]()
deathstreak said:actually only people missing are gilchrist and symonds from last year's team right?
and Hogg, I can't believe this but Hogg would have been better than White
Nah he's not captaining so he'll fall cheaply! :miandadtmac4real said:I predict a sexy knock from Dhoni as well. This is the type of situation he was built for. He's going to put the nail in the coffin (hopefully) on the Aussies with a lightning quick 50-60 runs.
genghis81 said:Nah he's not captaining so he'll fall cheaply! :miandad
bones20 said:IMO they should have taken Kreja instead of S clark. I expect Clark to go wicketless in this match unless it is a giveaway by Indians.
I remember reading the insights of the Indian team after seconf test in Australia tour that Indians had figured out a game against Clarke and to my surprise he was impotent thereafter. The plan was simple. He got nothing. so dont give him wickets!
S Clark. the mcgrath bowler with mighty averagestmac4real said:huh are u talking about stuart clark or michael clarke lol?
I don't think it really matters who comes in next. The Aussies just don't look like getting a wicket from anywhere. Johnson was probably the best bowler yesterday and he's bowling lollipops. And Lee still keeps getting carter all over the place. I think Bhaji, ZK, Amit and Kumble should come in next and up their averages against Australia!tmac4real said:lol maybe. I know he was captaining he'd have sent himself next now, but since it's Kumble we migh see Ganguly as expected.
To be fair on Clark he is carrying an injury into this game and bowling of a shortened runup. Otherwise he's a decent test match bowler. Of course the reference the McGrath is a bit over the top. Kreja should really have come in in place of either Watson or White!bones20 said:IMO they should have taken Kreja instead of S clark. I expect Clark to go wicketless in this match unless it is a giveaway by Indians.
I remember reading the insights of the Indian team after seconf test in Australia tour that Indians had figured out a game against Clarke and to my surprise he was impotent thereafter. The plan was simple. He got nothing. so dont give him wickets!
genghis81 said:To be fair on Clark he is carrying an injury into this game and bowling of a shortened runup. Otherwise he's a decent test match bowler. Of course the reference the McGrath is a bit over the top. Kreja should really have come in in place of either Watson or White!
genghis81 said:I don't think it really matters who comes in next. The Aussies just don't look like getting a wicket from anywhere. Johnson was probably the best bowler yesterday and he's bowling lollipops. And Lee still keeps getting carter all over the place. I think Bhaji, ZK, Amit and Kumble should come in next and up their averages against Australia!
No-one is saying he would have been the difference. Unfortunately there isn't many other options in domestic cricket. It just would have been a more attacking option to go with a specialist spinner than a part-timer.Random Aussie said:Man with FC bowling average of 50 is going to be the difference?
aabbasi said:This is turning out to be a real one sided affair....
RIP Australian dominance..
Agreed! Their best chance was probably bringing someone like Tate along, but it was probably too soon.aabbasi said:Point is that to succeed in subcontinent conditions you either need to have the variety of Wasim, some extra ordinary pace, or you need to be a really good spinner. Unfortunately, for Aussies, their lineup does not have any one of these...
Random Aussie said:Yes the last time we were heavily beaten in India ushered in an era of Australian hopelessness....
The idea here is that, I dont believe in S Clark. So who to replace him with? The pitch is a totally spinners wicket. Why not play an extra spinner?Random Aussie said:Man with FC bowling average of 50 is going to be the difference?
when has Lee ever done well outside AUS?.. may be 1 or 2 tours in WI/NZ?alexjohn_tcr said:Lee is one of the best in the business.He is having a bad series.Thats all.
bones20 said:As much as the hype there is about the Indian pacers, Kumble has to win this one for us I believe.
Now coming to Australian batting, if I were Australia, I would play humbly. Katich and Hussey are your men for this match. Indians will have a hard time gettign them.
yeah may be. Cant believe a spinner catching a toe injury in nets! Its pathetic to see that so many Indian bowlers have lately caught injuries in nets.tmac4real said:Ponting might do well to, no bajji to torment himm. Well Ishant will have to do then![]()
that gave it away Nikhil Reddynikred said:Laxman......Hyderabad ki Shaan![]()
you will have to wait till January.bones20 said:Come on, give us some contest! This is boring.
bones20 said:Come on, give us some contest! This is boring.
Its not fun or valor, hunting if the prey is defenseless or submissive.nikred said:you got to be joking......watching the aussies in frustration is fun. Crush them i say![]()
bones20 said:The idea here is that, I dont believe in S Clark. So who to replace him with? The pitch is a totally spinners wicket. Why not play an extra spinner?
If you think Kreza is that hopeless that you cant play him on this one, why bring him here, just as a substitute? Anyways, if thats the case, I would play Siddle.
But on this wicket, I would want to play atleast 2 spinners. May be Kreza could have come in for Watson?
Man you guys are so hopelessRandom Aussie said:We do not have 2 spinners. We do not even have one spinner.
3/393
*man overboard*
nikred said:you got to be joking......watching the aussies in frustration is fun. Crush them i say![]()
if there ever was a chance to propel Shaun Tait's career then that is it.Random Aussie said:In great news for Australia, the next team we play is.....New Zealand![]()
And if the Aussies lose that one ... well at least we still got rugby, swimming, football.Random Aussie said:In great news for Australia, the next team we play is.....New Zealand
![]()
![]()
genghis81 said:And if the Aussies lose that one ... well at least we still got rugby, swimming, football.
HuZi said:india is gud ! now I can say i think that india is maybe better then the aussies NOW come on man lookk at this partnership
Oh yes of course ... I forgot FISHING!!!Random Aussie said:If we lose to New Zealand at home the entire team will be "retiring to play IPL"
3/399
Brett Lee concedes 6 runs off his first 3 balls, onya Brett you are a superstar
Random Aussie said:India are better than Australia in India yes
deathstreak said:I think Symonds would have made a huge difference to the sides.
Maybe he wants to be in India ... or maybe fishing!Random Aussie said:Has been moping around the field for Queensland, not scoring runs and looking like he does not want to be there....
genghis81 said:Maybe he wants to be in India ... or maybe fishing!
Seriously though I heard Tom Moody say yesterday that he thought it was a pretty harsh and extended punishment for going fishing instead of a meeting. I think they are missing him. His bowling would have given them another option and these wickets would suite his batting.