Flat_Track_Bully
T20I Debutant
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2015
- Runs
- 6,521
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Keeps scoring in uae and can average 40 plus in Australia and South Africa why not? But in my honest opnion I don't think he will end up as atg.
Certainly will finish as one of Pakistans great test match batsmen.
That's for sure
That's for sure
It would be a travesty if he doesn't play 100 tests and score 20 plus centuries.
I have faith he will, at the very least I expect him to be averaging around 43-45 by then. But there's a high probability it could be 50
Needs 350+ across the upcoming 5 Tests to make himself work towards that status, though there's a long long way to go.
Will need close to 10k runs by the end of his career.
What?
![]()
![]()
He's on 11 centuries now,
1 century in Australia
1 in NZ
1/2 in West Indies next year
1/2 vs Bangladesh away next year
So should be on 16 centuries by the age of 32. Needs to average 40 plus in Australia and South Africa for atg status.
He can surpass Saeed Anwar, it'll take some consistency, but he can do it.
In terms of stats at least. On ability Anwar would remain superior unless Azhar continues to improve.
Pujara has centuries in seamer friendly conditions in SA and the one he had in SL..
Against spin, he is a beast averaging 60+.
He averages 50 in tests playing his home games in tough conditions while Azhar bats on UAE pattas with assistance to spin as the game progresses.
It makes no sense to claim Azhar is a role model to Pujara.
He is talking about succeeding in places like England.
He is talking about succeeding in places like England.
Pujara has his limitations and needs to figure out a way to score in Eng, Aus with those limitations.
In Asia, he is one of the best ever.
Not like Azhar has been exceedingly successful in England tbh.
On topic, I think he's very good, but not quite ATG level. I think he has the potential to end up at the Saeed Anwar-Damien Martyn-VVS Laxman level. World class but not ATG. He still has a way to go before he reaches even that level.
He no ATG.
Personally I don't think he will be a ATG due to the fact he ain't got much runs to show for it. You see as Pakistan's No.3 he needs to be scoring a lot of runs and needs to be consistent. The next two tours are going to be massive for him as he has never played in those respective countries and I feel he will be under a lot of pressure. Hopefully he will do well and prove to people why he is Pakistan's next ATG. (Him and Asad Shafiq personally)
After the tours of New Zealand and Australia, his average will come down to 40 or below.
He will have to score less than zero runs in 10 innings for that to happen.![]()
I don't think Pakistan play too often enough in places like Australia, England and South Africa for Azhar to become an ATG in Tests. For example, Pakistan last played in SA in January 2013, Azhar did poorly there, however he has clearly got better since then but yet because Pakistan don't play often enough in these places he will still be chided for his poor return in places where Pakistan play 6 Tests in a decade which is unfair. However to earn the mantle of ATG, as one of the best batsmen of in your era you have to perform in almost all countries and until Azhar conclusively does that with suitable longevity he won't ever be classified as a top bracket batsman.
India have played 8 tests in SA in the last 10 years as well. That isn't a valid excuse.
I don't think Pakistan play too often enough in places like Australia, England and South Africa for Azhar to become an ATG in Tests. For example, Pakistan last played in SA in January 2013, Azhar did poorly there, however he has clearly got better since then but yet because Pakistan don't play often enough in these places he will still be chided for his poor return in places where Pakistan play 6 Tests in a decade which is unfair. However to earn the mantle of ATG, as one of the best batsmen of in your era you have to perform in almost all countries and until Azhar conclusively does that with suitable longevity he won't ever be classified as a top bracket batsman.
I believe he will end up way below the likes of Miandad, Younis, Inzimam, Anwar, and Hanif.
He will be more in the ranks of Ijazz Ahmed.
He is much more reliable than the Ijaz, who was great on fast pitches but struggled a lot in the SC where he played most of our cricket.
Just played one of the worst innings I've ever seen... seems appropriate
![]()
No chance in hell, he'd do well to finish a Pakistani great.
Simply isn't talented enough to finish an ATG.
IMO he is Pak's best opener of all time. Best I have seen in a Pak helmet.![]()
IMO he is Pak's best opener of all time. Best I have seen in a Pak helmet.![]()
Relax. Anwar leagues above.
I believe he will end up way below the likes of Miandad, Younis, Inzimam, Anwar, and Hanif.
He will be more in the ranks of Ijazz Ahmed.
Azhar is under appreciated in Pakistan ���� a whole lot more. My respect for Azhar multiplied many folds this year. He is not as versatile as Tendular, Lara, Viv type of players but definitely has talent to be Gavaskar, Dravid like players. His defense, patients and standing up to tough bowling is right up there.
Ex so called Pakistani greats never had courage to go up the order to face new ball. When Pakistan was in trouble in England, Azhar put his hand up and open, never seen that kind of courage from any ex great at any phase of their career. He has been playing in toughest conditions (NZ really wet and green wickets, day and night in GABBA Australia, facing Anderson, Broad, Woaks in England), and he grind it out and not slog it through. He has been superb this year, when we had very tough calendar.
When people compare Pakistani batsmen with Indians, one fundamental thing they left out is opportunity, Pakistanis don't get enough tour to develop or stamp their authority in west. Imagine Pakistan was playing 5/4 test series in Australia rather then 3, guys like Azhar and Shafiq would milk more runs, can score couple of more centuries. Batting gets better when you play more not less. Also it's not fair when they get next opportunity to play in Australia after 5 years. Dravid, Tendulkar, Kohli used to get series in Australia, England after every 2/3 years, we get 5/6, how we can possibly compare stats?? - same is true for Pakistan bowlers, we play way less test to compete in these meangless discussions of who is great and who is not. ������
Even in this year in NZ, second test we almost draw, if we had one more test, we would have gone for draw and would have definitely perform better in third. Pakistan team is much better than to be handed over half series, here and there, same was true for batting greats from SL(Sanga, MJ), it's just politics and money side that screw our players and team growth. Something Indian, Australian and English fans can never understand... problem of poor kids infrint of rich kids. I just don't like all these non sense our players are better than your threads, these comparisons does not make sense, give them same opportunity then talk ������
Anwar has a great test record against quality bowling. Only thing lacking is longevity.He has better stats than Anwar. And I haven't seen Anwar bat. Grew up on the likes of Farhat, Butt and Taufeeq.
I seem to have forgotten that Azhar has played mostly at 3.
Azhar as a Test Player is under appreciated by Pakistani fans.
Gun Top Order Batsmen.
Azhar as a LOI player still has to establish himself.
When Misbah and Khan go, opposition might start focusing on Ali harder and his average might drop.
He is much more reliable than the Ijaz, who was great on fast pitches but struggled a lot in the SC where he played most of our cricket.
When Misbah and Khan go, opposition might start focusing on Ali harder and his average might drop.