UN talkz
First Class Star
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2016
- Runs
- 4,138
Views??
I think he should have been selected
I think he should have been selected
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Justified. You have four middle order spots, 5 players make the cut.
1. Babar must be supported and persisted with, you risk Umar Akmal 2.0 if you drop him from the test side now (that was the catalyst for Umar's decline if anyone remembers)
2. Haris is our best player of pace and our best batsman alongside Azhar in my book
3. Usman has been waiting for his well deserved chance for over a year with the main team, would be absolutely ridiculous to shunt him, his call up was on merit in the first place and that hasn't changed
4. Shafiq, although so much about him infuriates me, scored a ton in his last innings and still has proven foreign pedigree, albeit his ridiculous inconsistencies
5. Saad EASILY outperformed Fawad in the QeA trophy last time and without a shadow of a doubt earned his spot ahead of him, anyone thinking otherwise is guilty of not believing the same numbers they use to revere Fawad as our shunted dark knight
I genuinely think there's no argument for Fawad in the 16 man team ahead of these players, playing in English conditions. None.
We need Azhar opening, Imam/Sami is a form based call and both will learn valuable lessons from such a tour, while Fakhar represents a completely different gameplan, so while Inzi may get flak for it, I can defend the 4 openers, so I won't buy the argument of dropping Imam/Sami for Fawad.
Sadly it is too late for Fawad. He is getting older and his FC average has been in decline for the past few years. Mickey wants to build a team for the future.
Fakhar Zaman is not being considered as an opener but as a middle order bat.
Fawad was competing with Babar for the slot, not Saad. Umar Akmal had a decent average when he was unjustly dropped from tests. Babar's is nowhere close to that. If you go on a tour with the mentality of accommodating certain players and not with that of winning the series, then that is the result you will get.
Even in domestics, Umar is a mile ahead of Babar as far as FC is concerned so please research before stating your assumptions as facts.
Babar endured some of the toughest tours a Pakistani batsman can get, NZ and Australia. If you think not investing in your most promising batsman is a good idea on a sample size of 10 matches, I can't say much. Keep your research and data spreedsheet accountant analysis to yourself thanks.
Spreadsheet over your "a good fisherman can be a good test cricketer because both are good at catching" mentality any day.
On what basis is Fawad competing with Babar instead of Saad exactly? Did the selectors state where exactly in the middle order he is considered viable or is that another data quirk your intricate research has discovered?v
A new entrant replaces a ttf. That is a given. Moreover, since you have mentioned Babar at number 1 in a post titled "Is Fawad Alam's exclusion from Test squad for Ireland and England tours justified?", I hope we are not getting to the point of contradicting ourselves are we?
A word of advice: read your own posts before posting dross.
No, a slot that is open is competed for by players trying to outperform each other in domestics. Saad Ali outperformed Fawad Alam. Moreover, I mentioned at the top of my post that 5 spots in the middle order are up for grabs in the 16 man squad and arbitrarily listed arguments for each of the 5 players that made the cut regardless of order of precedence.
A word of advice: understand someone's post and come prepared with content instead of condescension before posting dross.
Fawad was competing with Babar for the slot, not Saad. Umar Akmal had a decent average when he was unjustly dropped from tests. Babar's is nowhere close to that. If you go on a tour with the mentality of accommodating certain players and not with that of winning the series, then that is the result you will get.
Even in domestics, Umar is a mile ahead of Babar as far as FC is concerned so please research before stating your assumptions as facts.
Not surprised. To be honest, he hasn't been that good in domestics recently anyway and he would have been made the scapegoat had we performed badly.
Babar endured some of the toughest tours a Pakistani batsman can get, NZ and Australia. If you think not investing in your most promising batsman is a good idea on a sample size of 10 matches, I can't say much. Keep your research and data spreedsheet accountant analysis to yourself thanks.
I am part of the group which feels it is too late for Fawad. No point bringing in a player who is 30+ and has been on the decline even in FC cricket.
It's sad how Fawad has been treated throughout his career. He should never have been dropped from Tests. I must admire his work ethic: he was treated unfairly series after series but kept his head down, performed every time and is still one of the fittest player in Pakistan. An absolute legend of Pakistan's domestic cricket.
Babar endured some of the toughest tours a Pakistani batsman can get, NZ and Australia. If you think not investing in your most promising batsman is a good idea on a sample size of 10 matches, I can't say much. Keep your research and data spreedsheet accountant analysis to yourself thanks.
People are getting emotional but this might be good for Fawad Alam. A few poor showings in the UK could have been the end of him in international cricket.
In the UAE he will be able to cement his place and be a permanent member of the team. I have a feeling that Wahab and Fawad will be in for the UAE tests.
Seriously doubt he'll be in contention again. Having a feeling he will soon move out to another country which I think is his right. His 4 importantyears have gone down the drain for a 33 average nephew of chief selector.
Also this fake drama and crying going on by some munafiq anchors and Pakistani sportsmedia is just to convert the outrage of fans into ratings, nothing else. Media knows beforehand who'll be in the squad. Media, the nepotistic selectors like Inzamam and Haroon Rasheed [who removed Fawad from team for Shoaib Malik] and PCB all ruined Fawad Alam's career.
Your making out that he is some Don Bradman, he isnt, but i agree that looking at some guys that have been picked over him over the years, he deserved a chance. As i have said many times, he just looks ugly at the crease and when 50/50 calls are made, he has lost out.
IF you had watched Don Bradman batting style you would've been scolding his unattractive looking batting as well. JAved Miandad was'nt that fantastic to look at but he is way above most batsmen in Pakistan. Nobody is calling Fawad Bradmanesque, just asking why match winner middle order player that won Pakistan close matches v Bangladesh [chasing 320+] and volunteered to open in Sri Lanka when no senior wanted to bat up and hit 168 on debut, should've been treated at least 50% as of some stalwarts like Selfie Shehzad and amazing Umar Akmal.
Justified. You have four middle order spots, 5 players make the cut.
1. Babar must be supported and persisted with, you risk Umar Akmal 2.0 if you drop him from the test side now (that was the catalyst for Umar's decline if anyone remembers)
2. Haris is our best player of pace and our best batsman alongside Azhar in my book
3. Usman has been waiting for his well deserved chance for over a year with the main team, would be absolutely ridiculous to shunt him, his call up was on merit in the first place and that hasn't changed
4. Shafiq, although so much about him infuriates me, scored a ton in his last innings and still has proven foreign pedigree, albeit his ridiculous inconsistencies
5. Saad EASILY outperformed Fawad in the QeA trophy last time and without a shadow of a doubt earned his spot ahead of him, anyone thinking otherwise is guilty of not believing the same numbers they use to revere Fawad as our shunted dark knight
I genuinely think there's no argument for Fawad in the 16 man team ahead of these players, playing in English conditions. None.
We need Azhar opening, Imam/Sami is a form based call and both will learn valuable lessons from such a tour, while Fakhar represents a completely different gameplan, so while Inzi may get flak for it, I can defend the 4 openers, so I won't buy the argument of dropping Imam/Sami for Fawad.
I agree with this 100 percent
Fawad has been wronged and it is too late, both these things can be true at the same time.
It harsh, it leaves a bad feeling in the stomach, but the team comes first.
Fawad was someone that should have been given more chances long ago. Sadly, looks like his ship has sailed and management are now looking to build a youthful side.
The issue is, that is the statement that is given everytime a player is selected for the squad in place of Fawad. We have been building a youth side for 5 years now. However a 39 year old and a 42 year old were a consistent time presence of the squad in that time...
Indeed, when Misbah was in the side fawad was not even in the squad. This has been a consistent omission on the part, at first it was because we had Misbah younis, now it is because we are selecting youth. Which is just ridiculous and a farce. He has been long overdue, which is a fact
I see where you're coming from, but in reality, the youth part has only really taken a practical slant in more recent times as Mickey Arthur begins to shape the team he wants. I think there's players in that Test squad that are more than capable of doing the job.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Congrats to all members of the squad. I will be cheering for all of you from home. With team efforts and Allah ke hukum se PAKISTAN will win InshAllah ���� <a href="https://t.co/z1pBdrTvw7">https://t.co/z1pBdrTvw7</a></p>— Fawad Alam (@iamfawadalam25) <a href="https://twitter.com/iamfawadalam25/status/985725868415660032?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 16, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Fawad Alam "Newcomers are picked & said to be performing in domestic circuit, but then where am I scoring all those runs? <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/853931080239525895?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 17, 2017</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
After that disgraceful batting performance against Australia in UAE in 2014, where his batting was painful to watch. It is clear he cannot play against top class bowling attacks on the international stage regardless of whether it is in Tests or ODIs. Good call.
Justified. You have four middle order spots, 5 players make the cut.
1. Babar must be supported and persisted with, you risk Umar Akmal 2.0 if you drop him from the test side now (that was the catalyst for Umar's decline if anyone remembers)
2. Haris is our best player of pace and our best batsman alongside Azhar in my book
3. Usman has been waiting for his well deserved chance for over a year with the main team, would be absolutely ridiculous to shunt him, his call up was on merit in the first place and that hasn't changed
4. Shafiq, although so much about him infuriates me, scored a ton in his last innings and still has proven foreign pedigree, albeit his ridiculous inconsistencies
5. Saad EASILY outperformed Fawad in the QeA trophy last time and without a shadow of a doubt earned his spot ahead of him, anyone thinking otherwise is guilty of not believing the same numbers they use to revere Fawad as our shunted dark knight
I genuinely think there's no argument for Fawad in the 16 man team ahead of these players, playing in English conditions. None.
We need Azhar opening, Imam/Sami is a form based call and both will learn valuable lessons from such a tour, while Fakhar represents a completely different gameplan, so while Inzi may get flak for it, I can defend the 4 openers, so I won't buy the argument of dropping Imam/Sami for Fawad.
Yes. his success despite that pantomime batting stance is a condemnation of our domestic cricket. And no his stance is nothing like Chanderpal's.
If there's a silver lining here, the next generation of cricketers will learn from this to ensure they focus on their technique.
I wouldn't fawad being appointed as a fitness/fielding consultant at the NCA
What about Smith? Technique isn't everything and I would take him (if eligible after the courses) over all the prima donna YKs.
P.S - Fawad was one of the best fielders we have had.
Yes I meant to say I am ok with him working at nca and not much else. Smith still has a few more things going in his stance vs Fawad. He is not crouched really low for starters, is a right hander etc
His domestic First Class record is mediocre: 4 centuries in 3 seasons since his 30th birthday, and his average this season was 40 - worse than Faisal Iqbal!