"Kapil & Imran are the best all-rounders of all time, Pandya is nowhere that league" : Abdul Razzaq

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,826
"Kapil & Imran are the best all-rounders of all time, Pandya is nowhere that league" : Abdul Razzaq

Razzaq reckons Pandya nowhere near Kapil Dev, says he needs to work harder

Former Pakistani all-rounder Abdul Razzaq has said India's Hardik Pandya is nowhere near the league of Kapil Dev and needs to work harder to become a world-class cricketer.

The former Pakistani all-rounder also backtracked from his earlier comment on Jasprit Bumrah and said that his baby bowler comment on India spearhead Bumrah was wrongly interpreted.

One of the most prolific all-rounders to have come out of Pakistan, the 40-year-old also said India will continue to enjoy an unbeaten record against his team at the World Cup, as Indians handle the pressure of the big game much better.

Here’s what Abdul Razzaq said about Hardik Pandya

Talking about Pandya, who has been battling fitness issues of late, Razzaq feels the 26-year-old doesn't seem to be working hard enough.

"Pandya is a good player but he can be a much better all-rounder. It is all about hard work. When you don't give enough time to the game, it drifts away from you," news agency PTI quoted Razzaq.

"He has to prepare better mentally as well as physically. As you have seen, he has been getting injured a lot of late (underwent back surgery last year). When you earn a lot of money, you tend to relax. For every player it is the same. Mohammad Amir did not work hard enough and his performance dipped."

Pandya, who made his India debut in 2016, has drawn comparisons with the great Kapil, but Razzaq said it is way too premature.

"Kapil Dev and Imran Khan are the best all-rounders of all time. Hardik is nowhere near that league. Even I was an all-rounder but it doesn't mean that I would compare myself with Imran bhai.

"Kapil paaji and Imran bhai were in a different league," said Razzaq, who played 46 Tests, 265 ODIs and 32 T20 Internationals.

Abdul Razzaq on Jasprit Bumrah

Razzaq had courted controversy last year by calling Bumrah a "baby bowler" in comparison to the fast bowlers of his times. The Indian pacer has gone on to become one of the world's leading bowlers across formats after making his debut in 2016.

"I do not have anything personal against Bumrah. I was simply comparing him with the likes of Glenn McGrath, Wasim Akram, Curtly Ambrose, Shoaib Akhtar. It would have been much tougher to face them. My comments were misconstrued.

"He is heading towards becoming a world-class bowler. But in our times, the bowlers were of much higher calibre. Not many can dispute that."

Abdul Razzaq on standard of modern cricket

The standard of cricket has gone down, according to Razzaq.

"You don't feel the same pressure facing the current crop of pacers. Overall, there is a bad patch in world cricket. We are not producing world class players the way we used to 10-15 years ago.

"You had Tendulkar, Zaheer, Sehwag, Ganguly in the same team. They would have walked into any team. May be too much T20 cricket is responsible for this decline," he said.

Pakistan were the stronger team in the 90s but India have enjoyed an upper hand over the arch-rivals in the last decade. India have also extended their unbeaten World Cup record against Pakistan to 7-0.

"India will continue to maintain that record," said Razzaq, who played in three Indo-Pak World Cup games (1999, 2003, 2011).

"It is rare that India and Pakistan play each other in knock-out matches of ICC events. They most play in the league stage and India are favourites. Our players are not able to absorb the pressure that comes with this game.

"We used to win a lot against India in Sharjah, beat them in Canada twice. I remember the 1999 World Cup, people and media put pressure on the players before the game and we wilted. It has stayed like that unfortunately.

"The pressure builds on the players though it is like any other match. The players not are confident about beating India in World Cup," he said, adding Pakistan had the best chance of beating India in the 2011 edition.https://www.business-standard.com/a...s-he-needs-to-work-harder-120050100700_1.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Stokes is definitely becoming the contender for greatest allrounder. However, for me easily the greatest allrounder in my lifetime is Kallis
 
It's too early in his career to be mentioning Pandya in the same breath as those greats.
 
But who even mentioned Pandya at that level?

Why is he also disregarding Botham also?
 
Pandya is nowhere close to Stokes, let alone Imran and Kapil.

But he can become third best all-rounder for India after Dev and Mankad. Razzaq has made some good points here about Pandya.
 
Last edited:
Lol the perennially bitter man Razzaq getting smart and understanding worth of indian clicks.

He doesn’t want to look like he backtracked so much that he would be embarrassed so won’t praise pandya but still get indian clicks by taking Kapils name whose records I’m sure he has little idea of in his ignorance
 
Forget about Imran and Kapil, Pandya is nowhere near Abdul Razzaq lol.

I think Pandya could be India's answer to Zimbabwe's legendary allrounder Guy Whittall. :inti
 
Lol the perennially bitter man Razzaq getting smart and understanding worth of indian clicks.

He doesn’t want to look like he backtracked so much that he would be embarrassed so won’t praise pandya but still get indian clicks by taking Kapils name whose records I’m sure he has little idea of in his ignorance

It’s all really easy with Indian fans
 
Pandya can only dream what Stokes has done till this date. Stokes won a WC for England.

Pandya can only win IPL matches.
 
Haha, Razzaq is hardly one to point the finger about not working hard! Maybe he's trying to give Pandya the benefit of his experience of how his own skills went on a perennial decline shortly after his debut.

I'm unsure why anyone cares what Razzaq has to say anyway. Hardly going to have any special insight into the game given how much of his talent he managed to spectacularly throw down the drain during his career.
 
It's too early in his career to be mentioning Pandya in the same breath as those greats.

too early? there is a chance he can become as good as them lol?
not even close.

he is just a good player who adds balance. He is more in the mould of CDG who I believe is better btw but pandya can get to his level potentially.

imran is legions away from these players. Kapil too.

imran is like amongst the top 3 best ever.
kapil top 5-7 ish.

stokes is a top 10 great now. stokes did turn his career around yes but he was always more talented than pandya.
 
Pandya would get into that league only if Razzaq coached him :))

Razzaq bhai was a great all rounder.

Razzaq was a pacey bowler at early in his career. Pandya is nothing close to Razzaq and that’s the fact.
 
Razzaq bhai was a great all rounder.

Razzaq was a pacey bowler at early in his career. Pandya is nothing close to Razzaq and that’s the fact.

And you derived that fact from which equation of physics? An average of 28 with the bat and 37 with the ball in 46 Tests, those are Razzaq's numbers. Now that's what I call a fact.
 
And you derived that fact from which equation of physics? An average of 28 with the bat and 37 with the ball in 46 Tests, those are Razzaq's numbers. Now that's what I call a fact.

Bro, allrounders usually don’t post 50avg with the bat. It’s not normal until unless your name is Kallis, Lloyd, Sobers.

For a guy who batted his entire career at 6/7 plus saving a Mohli test for you - that’s a fact.

Pandya can only dream of saving a test for India.

Razzaq achieved the man of the series award for his best all round performances at Carlton and United Series.
 
And you derived that fact from which equation of physics? An average of 28 with the bat and 37 with the ball in 46 Tests, those are Razzaq's numbers. Now that's what I call a fact.

If you have to draft an all rounder and your options are Pandya and Razzaq, who would you pick?

If you pick Pandya, he will not give you important breakthroughs like Razzaq used to provide for Pakistan.

Razzaq is still a better hitter than Pandya.
 
Last edited:
Pandya will surpass Razzaq in test, ODIs won't be easy but Pandu bhai can reach Afridi level. Pandya is a genuine no.6 batsmen. The only problem with Pandya is that he will be retained by Mumbai Indians all through his career and hence even if he doesn't work enough, he will earn a lot of money.
 
Pandya will surpass Razzaq in test, ODIs won't be easy but Pandu bhai can reach Afridi level. Pandya is a genuine no.6 batsmen. The only problem with Pandya is that he will be retained by Mumbai Indians all through his career and hence even if he doesn't work enough, he will earn a lot of money.

So you agree that Pandya will only going to win IPL matches for India.

Pandya is not a test cricketer. You can’t force yourself to be great when you know yourself you’re not that great.
 
Potentially Pandya is 2nd best all rounder of this generation after Stokes. One have to wait and watch if that potential transcribes into performances.
 
Potentially Pandya is 2nd best all rounder of this generation after Stokes. One have to wait and watch if that potential transcribes into performances.

2nd best all rounder is Shakib not Pandya.

2nd Best all rounder saves your team from humiliation in Semifinals. Pandya had a perfect opportunity to win a game for India. Instead he laid an egg with Pant.
 
He is right.

Kapil and Imran are definitely class apart compared to the rest fi ARs in Asia.

Kapil in particular was something else.

No one dominated the West Indies and Australia the way he did, he turned into a monster against the best teams of his era and that is all whole being 80% of Indian bowling attack all by himself what a GIANT of a cricketer.

Paaji we love you.now and always.

Never forget that 175.
 
He is right.

Kapil and Imran are definitely class apart compared to the rest fi ARs in Asia.

Kapil in particular was something else.

No one dominated the West Indies and Australia the way he did, he turned into a monster against the best teams of his era and that is all whole being 80% of Indian bowling attack all by himself what a GIANT of a cricketer.

Paaji we love you.now and always.

Never forget that 175.


Ehh Kapil wasn’t that great. Ppl still talks about Imran. Kapil is a lost story.
 
Who compares pandya with kapil dev?

Kapil dev is the greatest ODI allrounder of all time.
 
So you agree that Pandya will only going to win IPL matches for India.

Pandya is not a test cricketer. You can’t force yourself to be great when you know yourself you’re not that great.

He will win a lot of matches for India but there are chances of him under achieving in both the formats. Either way, it doesn't take much to surpass Razzaq in test cricket which he will do comfortably but the question is whether he can reach Stokes/ Cairns/Flintoff level or not and I feel he might under achieve.
 
Potentially Pandya is 2nd best all rounder of this generation after Stokes. One have to wait and watch if that potential transcribes into performances.

2nd best all-rounder? May be in your dreams. You can take a look at ICC rankings to know where he stand in all-rounder rankings. Shakib, Jadeja are much better than him. :inti
 
Way to state the obvious, I mean he made his debut less than 3 years ago don't think anyone is comparing him with Imran Khan lol

Tomorrow's headline "Paul Collingwood : Marnus Labuschagne is nowhere near Don Bradman"
 
Shakib and stokes are on par.
Stokes was brilliant in world cup 19 but shakib was even better. In test matches also shakib is a better bowler and equally good batsman but for some weird reasons he keeps on avoiding tough away tours.
Shakib was robbed of a man of the tournament award in the previous world cup, just bcoz icc wanted to wipe the tears off kiwi faces.
 
stokes
shakib
jadeja
woakes
neesham
CDG
pandya
stoinis
Mitch marsh

these are my current best all rounder rankings.
 
I wish Raazaq paid this much attention to his own performance the way he does the media. Maybe he would have been remembered as a good player
 
I wish Raazaq paid this much attention to his own performance the way he does the media. Maybe he would have been remembered as a good player

Razzaq always been a good player not a great one but def a good player.

He even got drafted to pay World XI for SuperSeries against Aussies.
 
Headline: “Two greatest AR of all time are GOAT ARs” “untested 26 year old is not a GOAT AR”

Media: compares razzaq to pandya
 
Shakib and stokes are on par.
Stokes was brilliant in world cup 19 but shakib was even better. In test matches also shakib is a better bowler and equally good batsman but for some weird reasons he keeps on avoiding tough away tours.
Shakib was robbed of a man of the tournament award in the previous world cup, just bcoz icc wanted to wipe the tears off kiwi faces.

That was a big snub.

Shakib's performance in the 2019 WC was arguably the greatest performance ever in a world cup, 3rd highest run scored in a World Cup (Highest by a middle order batsman) and add to that got 11 wickets with ER around 5 (not exactly sure). Shakib was the best allrounder in the world in the last decade. Perhaps in this decade Stokes will outperform Shakib given that Stokes is older and he plays a lot more cricket.

As for avoiding tough tours, he did miss out on SA tour in 2018 intentionally, no mercy for that. In other cases he had injury. More recently, he got banned.
 
Back
Top