Member Interview : Convict

Abdul

ODI Debutant
Joined
Jul 1, 2015
Runs
9,212
PakPassion.net : To start off, what's the reason for your strong disliking towards Aaron Finch?

Convict : I don't dislike Aaron Finch as a person. I just don't rate him as a batsman at all. He's a batsmen with extremely poor technique, proven by his consistent failures at first class level, who can only play a few shots. Despite how commentators talk up "how rare him getting bogged down is", it's actually something that's very common. In the vast majority of his scores at ODI level of note he's had to have been carried by his partner early on. He gets bogged down and either gets his partner out or gets himself caught in the ring trying to force things on. Australia can do much better (eg Khawaja).


PakPassion.net : What do you think about the current state of Pakistan cricket?

Convict : Pakistani cricket in my opinion has really prolonged the transition process with the batting a bit too long. Younis and Misbah are very good players and Misbah especially has really held the team together with his leadership but I don't think Pakistan is equipped for their retirement. That's largely a structural thing, stemming from a stagnant domestic system. Younger batsmen aren't ready for international cricket and aren't really developing enough to force their way into the team and to stay in, but when they get dropped they haven't really been able to address the faults that got them dropped. So Umar Akmal for instance hasn't made the step up that his age peers in other countries have done and Pakistan really need that generation of batsmen to make the step up soon.


PakPassion.net : Who is your favourite Pakistan player and why?

Convict : Of all time it is Wasim Akram. At the moment probably Younis Khan or Yasir Shah. I really love seeing world class leg spin.


PakPassion.net : Who is coming through for Australia? Any good players of spin?

Convict : I think we have a few talented players coming through but they're all mostly a few years away from international level. I have major doubts about both Burns and Lynn from Queensland. Renshaw and Heazlett from the same state are apparently very good but I haven't had a chance to see them bat yet and I don't think it's fair to judge someone based solely on some streams and highlights packages and cricinfo scorecards. Billy Stanlake and Joel Paris are seriously good bowling talents. Bancroft, Handscomb, Head and Silk are the young batsmen that I rate the most. Silk has unfortunately really stagnated. Bancroft is mentally very strong and disciplined and has experienced success at first class level in India and from memory also in an U19 tour. In many ways he's more similar to Alastair Cook than to any recent Australian opening batsmen and I think he'll become the player we need to complement Warner. Handscomb is the player I think is closest to taking the step up and I rate him as a fairly good player of spin. Whether or not that translates to runs in Asia is not something I know yet, it's hard to judge that kind of thing based on runs in Australia against Australian bowlers. Travis Head well he's got the talent and he's going to be a good Limited Overs player for Australia and I suspect will be in our top order for the next world cup. As for Tests that remains to be seen, he's got the talent for it. I do however thing the South Australians have messed up by giving him the Captaincy so early.

Nic Maddinson is the most talented batsman in the country (including Smith) but I have no confidence in him making it in any format.


PakPassion.net : Do you think the PSL can be as successful as the BBL?

Convict : Once it moves back to Pakistan it will be. While it's in the UAE it's always going to be constrained.


PakPassion.net : What keeps you going as a cricket fan despite many people claiming the game is on the decline?

Convict : I love the game. Not just from winning but also purely from a technical point - I enjoy watching good, pure cricket. Some parts of cricket I think are in decline (batting) but I also believe that boards are beginning to wake up to that stuff and are trying to find ways to better develop batsmen. I don't think T20 cricket will change that direction because I think most people realise that even the best T20 batsmen are generally equipped with solid, basic fundamentals they learned in junior cricket.


PakPassion.net : How will it feel if Pakistan end Australia's home Test streak this year?

Convict : Losing Test series, especially series you ought to win, always hurts. To me it's about as likely as Australia winning a Test next time we tour India so it's not really a prospect I'm actually considering.


PakPassion.net : Are the flat nature of Australian pitches producing a generation of young batsmen poorly equipped to deal with quality swing and spin bowling overseas?

Convict : Well I'd actually have to say no. I'm not denying that this current generation of Australian batsmen are poorly equipped but the flat wickets at Test level haven't got anything to do with that. For one I don't think anyone makes meaningful technical changes to their batting at Test level. At shield level yes but shield wickets bare little resemblance to Test wickets (because sheffield shield is commercially irrelevant). For a three year period around 2010-2012, Shield wickets were actually the complete opposite of flat with Tasmania and Queensland in particular preparing greentops that were far greener than the wicket Broad destroyed Australia on last year. Season averages in the 30s were very good in those years and only Ricky Ponting and Phil Hughes out of regular shield batsmen had really good averages. Ponting actually pointed out that CA needed to clamp down on that because the wickets favoured bowlers so much that young batsmen weren't getting the opportunity to develop their games and dud bowlers were looking like champions.

My thought is that batting technique in particular goes back to junior cricket where young batsmen need to build the basic fundamentals, they then go into grade cricket where they finally come up across experienced adult veterans who further Test their techniques and then on to shield which is basically the finishing school. Traditionally you could possibly say that junior cricket = Primary School, Grade Cricket = High School, Shield Cricket = University and then Test cricket is the Professional field. Nowadays however players are reaching Shield cricket without many of the basic fundamentals that previous generations had and then going to Test cricket ill equipped. The new system of developing batsmen optimises them for certain game styles but doesn't give them the basic tools they need to adapt quickly to different conditions.

I go into all this stuff a lot more in this thread http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/s...The-development-of-batsmen-in-the-modern-game


PakPassion.net : Which Australian cricketers do you think had immense potential to be greats but underachieved and what do you think is the reason behind their downfall?

Convict : Of recent players it's probably pretty harsh to see he underachieved but I think Damien Martyn had the potential to do much more with his career. Unfortunately he didn't have the appetite for big innings which really held him back. Ryan Harris is another one. Not just from injury but because it took him far too long to finally decide to get series about a professional career.


PakPassion.net : How would you rate Watson's career now that it's coming to an end? Did he achieve his potential in your book or could he have been one of the great all rounders of the game?

Convict : Good old Watto. It's quite funny. His final career stats in isolation are fairly decent yet every cricket fan in Australia thinks he's a complete dud. And in terms of ODI cricket, he's probably in Australia's All Time Best XI and we've won 5 World Cups. He was a very clever bowler and a much better bowler than his stats indicated. In terms of batting you always got the feeling that the opposition teams and opposition fans viewed him as a key wicket even while he was a laughing stock in Australia.

Watto batted like he spent thousands of hours every year facing a bowling machine and creating a perfectly repeatable technique. With the problem being that clever international bowlers aren't restricted in the way a bowling machine is and that predictability is not always a virtue. He also, especially early in his career was almost too strong for his body due to a lot of time building muscles in the gym which led to constant soft tissue injuries.

Tragically, in the way only Watto could be tragic, one gets the impression that he's possibly the only example of someone who would have been better in his chosen profession if he were just a bit lazier and a bit less robotic.

Tried too hard to be the Terminator but instead ended up as C3P0

But these are the sort of traits that could make him a very good coach in the future. He's an overseas player who many young Pakistani players, who aren't in danger of over training, could learn from.


PakPassion.net : Do you think that Aaron Finch will be selected to open for the Test team?

Convict : We're more likely to whitewash India in India than Finch is to to play Test cricket. He's a fringe shield player for Victoria. The selectors have a pretty good grasp on Finch's major limitations in red ball cricket so no selection will happen unless he somehow changes his game completely and earns a spot through sheer weight of runs in Shield cricket. In which case he will have earned his selection.

And even if he did get selected for Australia, I'd hope he succeeds and call for him to be dropped when he inevitably fails, but he'd be far from the first spud to represent Australia (Doherty for instance)


PakPassion.net : Tell us a little bit about yourself.

Convict : Not really much to say. I'm fairly typical for an Australian male of my generation I guess though I probably do watch far more cricket than most. I played cricket at a fairly decent level but was never good enough for any sort of consideration for a state squad but I've played against many players who were good enough and have gone on to higher honours. I have a strong bias towards Chris Rogers and Adam Voges due to club connection.

I also note that in the question thread I was asked why I hate/dislike Indian cricket. I don't though I admit that India is a rival team. I just find myself occasionally getting sucked into responding to bait some times and then finding myself throwing out my own bait in other threads.


PakPassion.net : What is the attraction of posting on PakPassion for a non-Pakistan person such as yourself?

Convict : It's probably the best specialist cricket forum on the internet or at least I haven't found any better. I like cricket enough to be interested in teams that I don't support which helps but most of the posters here are in a similar position which is why there is such a strong international contingent as well as a very knowledgeable Pakistani fan base here. PP is also a lot more active than most cricket forums.


PakPassion.net : What are some of your hobbies?

Convict : Cricket, footy (Australian Football) and computer games - mainly simulation and strategy. I also do like reading science fiction.


PakPassion.net : Which countries would you like to visit, and why?

Convict : It's an ambition of mine to watch Australia play a Test match in every Test nation in the world.


PakPassion.net : Lastly, how did you find PakPassion?

Convict : The spot fixing saga. I was looking for more on it and came across PP. I sporadically lurked every now and then over the next few years before seeing a few threads I really, really wanted to respond to.
 
Quality interview from a quality poster!

It's funny but I always imagine Shane Watson in my mind when I read Convict's posts because of his dp:rp
 
I am surprised no one asked him a question regarding PakPassion's new favorite Australian cricketer, Usman Khawaja. If I am not wrong, he didn't rate him and thought he wasn't good enough for international cricket.

Would be interesting to see his views on his current form. Is it just a big purple patch or has he simply improved as a cricketer mentally?

Also, how much did Hughes' death propel his career forward?
 
I am surprised no one asked him a question regarding PakPassion's new favorite Australian cricketer, Usman Khawaja. If I am not wrong, he didn't rate him and thought he wasn't good enough for international cricket.

Would be interesting to see his views on his current form. Is it just a big purple patch or has he simply improved as a cricketer mentally?

Also, how much did Hughes' death propel his career forward?

Convict rates him. Its Gilly who does not
 
Good interview.

Enjoyed reading it
 
No, I do remember Convict saying that he is mediocre but gets hype because of the fact that he is Pakistani.

I didn't rate him and he deserved to be dropped when he did.

But he went back and spent a few years working on a few major issues and is now a better player for it.

I still believe that when put under serious pressure that he'll have major issues rotating the strike.
 
Great interview [MENTION=132373]Convict[/MENTION]

Good leave on the India question. :srini I see on Oz social media pages there's a general dislike for Indian cricket team (from Aussies), why's that?

Perhaps I'm wrong in my observation.
 
Great interview [MENTION=132373]Convict[/MENTION]

Good leave on the India question. :srini I see on Oz social media pages there's a general dislike for Indian cricket team (from Aussies), why's that?

Perhaps I'm wrong in my observation.

You're reading social media.
 
Decent interview (good answers, but the questions selected certainly could have been better).

Nice to get some detail about Australian domestic cricket and why their batting has been one dimensional.
 
Excellent interview. I personally like interacting with Convict.

Sent from my XT1097 using Tapatalk
 
Great interview [MENTION=132373]Convict[/MENTION]

Good leave on the India question. :srini I see on Oz social media pages there's a general dislike for Indian cricket team (from Aussies), why's that?

Perhaps I'm wrong in my observation.

To be fair, India is probably the most hated team in the world facing stiff competition from Australia (India probably just edges it due to BCCI, etc.).

So I don't think the hate is limited to Australia. I always get the feeling that we are the Chelsea of cricket:misbah
 
thanks. Why the username "convict"?

Didn't I answer that one?

Looking at the OP and it didn't make the final cut.

Well in a forum with very few Australian posters it's a pretty straightforward name for an Australian to take.

Because of the whole Australian convict thing
 
Well I'm open to more questions

Do you see Hazlewood ending his career as an Australian Great or ATG?

Will Australia ever consistently produce good players of spin?

Does Australia have any chance of beating Pakistan in the upcoming series?
 
Gaah forgot to ask a very important one.

How did you rate Phil Hughes considering he was in line for a call up, and how big of a loss was he in a cricketing sense.

May he RIP all the same.
 
Do you see Hazlewood ending his career as an Australian Great or ATG?

Will Australia ever consistently produce good players of spin?

Does Australia have any chance of beating Pakistan in the upcoming series?

Hazlewood has a fairly decent chance of 200+ wickets and being an Australian great. Given how many tests he will play 300 is also possible.

Australia's inability to play spin now is very closely related to how bad our spin bowling stocks are, especially at lower levels. They're focusing on an elite group of youngsters going on numerous tours of India to fix things so maybe we'll get a few good players of spin but overall no.

Yeah. We do.

Gaah forgot to ask a very important one.

How did you rate Phil Hughes considering he was in line for a call up, and how big of a loss was he in a cricketing sense.

May he RIP all the same.

I was probably Hughes' biggest advocate on this site. I rated him pretty highly and he had made major improvements in the last few months of his life.

Would have dominated on Australian flattracks and still a better option than our other post Rogers opening options in Shaun Marsh and Joe Burns.

Warranted one last shot.
 
Also, do you believe if instead of Ponting if Warne had been made captain of Australia team, Australia's dominance on world cricket had prolonged further until warney's retirement? Would have Australia won 2005, 2009 and home ashes of 2010/11 under Warne?
 
Also, do you believe if instead of Ponting if Warne had been made captain of Australia team, Australia's dominance on world cricket had prolonged further until warney's retirement? Would have Australia won 2005, 2009 and home ashes of 2010/11 under Warne?

Warne had too much of an ego and is too self focused to effectively lead that sort of team.

Warne had retired by 2009 anyway
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here comes my barrage of questions:asif

1. Who do you think is the best Test batsman and bowler at the present?

2. Which team do you think has the best Test batting and bowling line ups in the world?

3. Which team do you think is the best Test team in the world right now?
 
Here comes my barrage of questions:asif

1. Who do you think is the best Test batsman and bowler at the present?

2. Which team do you think has the best Test batting and bowling line ups in the world?

3. Which team do you think is the best Test team in the world right now?

1. Smith and Broad

2. India or South Africa. Not sure about bowling.

3. South Africa or England
 
Description of Watson sounds a lot like Hafeez, who IMO is a slightly worse Watson himself.

Gets mocked a lot by Pakistanis, but fans of other countries at least have an ounce of respect for him in general. Also has pretty good stats when you compare them to the other Pakistani batsmen of the past 15 years, yet he is the butt of many jokes.
 
Great interview!

I've a Khawaja follow-up question.

I was looking forward to his technique being tested at Wellington, but through no fault of the Aussies the toss precluded that.

But of the two centurions, to me Voges looked a better all-round batsman.

So my first question is: do you think that Khawaja has the defence to cement his ascent from FTB to truly exceptional Test batsman?

And my second question is this. Is Josh Hazlewood going to end up as Glenn McGrath or Stuart Clark? When he keeps it simple he looks exceptional to me.

Oh, a third question. Will Aussie Tests continue to be played on flat tracks: did two unplayed days at Adelaide cost Cricket Australia too much in terms of Channel Nine's advertising revenue?

And here's a fourth. Perth was already a Prime Time Test and so is Adelaide now, with the Gabba to follow. Boxing Day obviously won't, but what about Sydney and Canberra and Hobart?
 
1. Smith and Broad

2. India or South Africa. Not sure about bowling.

3. South Africa or England

Thanks.

1. Agree here.

2. Regarding batting, I'm tempted to say India, but our batsmen flounder on seaming tracks. But to our defence, pretty much all teams do flounder on such tracks now. Though England probably perform the best on such tracks. But their weakness is that they aren't dominant enough at home like Australia or India. Also they are poor away (excepting this last series win). Lost 5 zip in Australia, drew at the West Indies, lost 2 zip in the UAE. Personally I don't think SA batting isn't all that except for AB and Amla. So this one is hard to predict.

Regarding bowling, I think it's a toss up between Australia, England and South Africa. The kiwi attack has become too one dimensional. Australia have a great line up of fast bowlers who can extract arguably the best from unresponsive flat tracks out of all teams. They disappointed in the recent Ashes but Hazelwood has improved greatly with his performance in the last match. England has a great all round attack for me, but I'll wait to see how they go on unresponsive tracks in Australia, where they were found wanting last time around. Also one another drawback for them is that they don't really have a specialist spinner, which was exposed in their last series loss against Pakistan. SA when everyone is fully fit can field an attack of Steyn/Rabada/Philander/Morkel/Piedt
which is a mighty impressive attack. I'm again tempted to pick them as the best attack, but Steyn looks like he's on his last legs. Piedt has been really impressive and I think it's a close call between these 3 sides atm. Though I think Pakistan can be right up there if they play their cards right in the future.

3. This is something very tricky. Personally I think SA will struggle a bit during their rebuilding phase. England has got 2 home tours next summer I think, which they're expected to win. I think they can be the best team in the world if they can bring that consistency element to their game. I personally think that thay have got the team to do it. In any case, their acid test will be their tour to India this year end which will decide their true credentials imo.
 
Great interview!

I've a Khawaja follow-up question.

I was looking forward to his technique being tested at Wellington, but through no fault of the Aussies the toss precluded that.

But of the two centurions, to me Voges looked a better all-round batsman.

So my first question is: do you think that Khawaja has the defence to cement his ascent from FTB to truly exceptional Test batsman?

And my second question is this. Is Josh Hazlewood going to end up as Glenn McGrath or Stuart Clark? When he keeps it simple he looks exceptional to me.

Oh, a third question. Will Aussie Tests continue to be played on flat tracks: did two unplayed days at Adelaide cost Cricket Australia too much in terms of Channel Nine's advertising revenue?

And here's a fourth. Perth was already a Prime Time Test and so is Adelaide now, with the Gabba to follow. Boxing Day obviously won't, but what about Sydney and Canberra and Hobart?

Khawaja's defence isn't the issue. It's that he has been and may still be a 4 or nothing kind of batsmen and that getting bogged down will make him force shots which will get him out.

He's worked hard to eliminate it but at this stage there is nothing conclusive to suggest he has. Easily the fourth best batsman in the country though.

Hazlewood is going to be better than Clark but not as good as McGrath. Still going to be a very good player for Australia.

Flat but not as flat as this summer. The money they missed out on Adelaide was more than made up for by the massive ratings boost. They'll try and target four day tests for the day nighters.

They're already trialling a newer version of the pink ball in this current shield rounds. Bancroft has adapted nicely.

The Gabba won't be a day nighter for long because of the humidty and storms.

Sydney won't either.
 
Ok.I have a question too. Rank them as a test batsmen- Amla, Cook, De Villiers, Younis, Clarke, KP?
 
Good read but stopped reading after "Watson tried too hard to be the Terminator but instead ended up as C3P0." How could you say that about the great man. I mean c'mon.
 
One of the cooler posters on this forum. Always stop to read his posts more seriously.

Actually the whole Aussie gang here in PP is great though OzGod and RandomAussie have stopped posting. They generally don't get involved in wars except for Gilly. :yk

Anyways, let me shoot some questions:

1. Dennis Lillee vs McGrath - Who is better and why?

2. Ponting vs Greg Chappell? - Same.

3. What's your take on Steve Smith? Can he carry on and do great things or will he eventually fade away or just be decent?
 
Last edited:
Ok.I have a question too. Rank them as a test batsmen- Amla, Cook, De Villiers, Younis, Clarke, KP?

This is pretty hard.

1. Younis
2. KP
3. Clarke
4. Amla
5. De Villiers
6. Cook

I feel like I'm rating Cook very harshly though while overrating a few others - probably a reaction to the over the top criticism of Clarke on PP.

One of the cooler posters on this forum. Always stop to read his posts more seriously.

Actually the whole Aussie gang here in PP is great though OzGod and RandomAussie have stopped posting. They generally don't get involved in wars except for Gilly. :yk

Anyways, let me shoot some questions:

1. Dennis Lillee vs McGrath - Who is better and why?

2. Ponting vs Greg Chappell? - Same.

3. What's your take on Steve Smith? Can he carry on and do great things or will he eventually fade away or just be decent?

First I have to say that I never watched either Lillee or Chappell play so some of the comparisons are a bit unfair and I can only make an educated second hand judgement on them.

DK to me is better for the same reasons I rate Lara over Tendulkar.
Both extremely good and consistent in which case you go for the guy who had just the bit extra and could perform just that bit better when needed.

I don't buy the arguments against Lillee because they're based on fairly flimsy arguments.

Plus I'm both a Western Australian and a Melville boy so I can't not vote for DK

I can't split Ponting and Chappell at all.

Steve Smith is going to be a very, very good batsmen and will retire with an average over 50.
 
This is pretty hard.

1. Younis
2. KP
3. Clarke
4. Amla
5. De Villiers
6. Cook

I feel like I'm rating Cook very harshly though while overrating a few others - probably a reaction to the over the top criticism of Clarke on PP.



First I have to say that I never watched either Lillee or Chappell play so some of the comparisons are a bit unfair and I can only make an educated second hand judgement on them.

DK to me is better for the same reasons I rate Lara over Tendulkar.
Both extremely good and consistent in which case you go for the guy who had just the bit extra and could perform just that bit better when needed.

I don't buy the arguments against Lillee because they're based on fairly flimsy arguments.

Plus I'm both a Western Australian and a Melville boy so I can't not vote for DK

I can't split Ponting and Chappell at all.

Steve Smith is going to be a very, very good batsmen and will retire with an average over 50.

I see...thanks.
 
This is pretty hard.

1. Younis
2. KP
3. Clarke
4. Amla
5. De Villiers
6. Cook

I feel like I'm rating Cook very harshly though while overrating a few others - probably a reaction to the over the top criticism of Clarke on PP.


Thanks for your views.Even I find Cook a bit overrated.Younis to me is a bit underrated but then he hasn't done much outside Asia and hasn't been tested vs quality pace attack on their backyard like Steyn,Broad,Johnson, Anderson, Harris etc.
 
Back
Top