What's new

"Money laundering laws only apply to public servants" : Faryal Talpur

Money laundering laws only apply to public servants: Talpur

ISLAMABAD: Submitting a reply in the apex court with regard to Rs35 billion money laundering scam, Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) leader Faryal Talpur has said the initiation of a Federal Investigation Bureau (FIA) probe against her and the PPP supremo Asif Ali Zardari, ahead of July 25 polls was the ‘worst example of pre-poll rigging’.

Talpur, who is Zardari’s sister, has said the entire exercise of registration of the FIR and filing of an interim charge sheet nominating her and her brother was based on mala fide intention and ulterior motives to malign and defame them before the voters.
Taking a strange stance, her reply also claims that money laundering laws are not applicable on her or the former president, as they are not ‘public servants’.

The prosecution has applied sections 419, 420, 468, 471, 109 PPC read with section 5 (2) PCA 1947 and section 3 & 4 Anti Money Laundering Act 2010.

“All these sections are not attracted to the respondent (Talpur) as well as Asif Ali Zardari. Both are not public servants and as a matter of fact, none of the accused are public servants. Thus section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act is not applicable,” says the reply filed through Farooq H Naek. Though the reply has been submitted on behalf of Talpur, a defence has also been given on behalf of Zardari.

It further claimed that the Supreme Court’s purpose for initiating suo motu proceedings against in the case of alleged money laundering has been achieved as the FIA has lodged an FIR and an interim charge sheet has been filed nominating both the PPP leaders as an accused before the special court.

“Any further proceedings in the titled suo motu proceeding would be in violation of the respondents’ fundamental rights as envisaged by Articles 4, 13 and 25…as well as section 403 Code of Criminal Procedure regarding double jeopardy. No one can be prosecuted twice for the same offence.”

She requests the court to drop proceedings against both the PPP leaders, adding that the FIA should be directed to submit final challan within a month if the case is made out beyond a reasonable doubt.

Talpur pleads the SC to proceed strictly in accordance with law without harassing and disparaging and defaming her and her brother’s names and reputation. Likewise, the FIA be directed to remove Najaf Mirza and appoint an impartial FIA officer as head of its joint investigation team (JIT).

The reply says names of both the PPP leaders were falsely incorporated in the interim challan with mala fide intentions and ulterior motives in order to defame and disparage their reputation, which is also evident from vast adverse coverage of the incident in the media.

“The name of both leaders only appears with respect to the company namely Zardari Group which is allegedly a beneficiary and both of them in their personal capacities have not been shown as beneficiaries in the FIR. Even otherwise Asif Zardari has no role to play with respect to the business and other affairs of the said company. He is only a minority shareholder in the said company.”

It states that a sum of Rs15 million had been deposited in a bank account of the Zardari Group. However, there is no specific allegation against both leaders. The FIR does not show any manner that both respondents have committed any offence of cheating or forgery which would attract section 419, 420, 468 or 471 and or 109 PPC. No role has been assigned to them in the FIR as well as interim challan.

The reply alleges that the FIA Assistant Director Muhammad Ali Abro is acting under the instructions and collusion and in conspiracy with Director General Bashir Memon, whose brother, Naseer Memon, contested the election on a Grand Democratic Alliance (GDA) ticket against the PPP.

Likewise, FIA Additional Director General Najaf Quli Mirza, who also heads a Joint Investigation Team (JIT) was accused in an FIR registered by Zardari in 2005. Najaf is also a cousin of Dr Zulfiqar Mirza, who is hostile toward Zardari and contested the elections on a GDA ticket against a PPP candidate.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1773612/1-money-laundering-laws-apply-public-servants-talpur/
 
You know they are panicking when suddenly they cobble together a liquorice allsorts alliance to keep out IK, a few days after Billo said it wouldnt happen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
shes stupid if she thinks that only money laundering cases she haave to face. thre are more cases coming in few days for AZ and Faryal. Including murders etc etc.
 
I thought members of parliament were public servants or was I wrong?
 
It only applies to people who are not on good terms with the military.
 
here comes the saviour of corruption, an attention seeker.

Corruption is not an issue in Pakistan, it is all about the power struggle. If you are in bed with those who call the shots, your corruption will be neglected.

I will cite the most latest example - look at Jahangir Tareen, the man who was disqualified by the Supreme Court on Article 62-63 for being dishonest, and his corruption in the sugar mill case including his inside trading is not a secret.

However, that hasn’t stopped him from holding a prominent position within PTI, and from spending millions of rupees on electables so that PTI can form a majority, an investment that he will obviously recover when PTI comes into power.

If PTI wasn’t backed by the army, would they and Jahangir Tareen have been able to get away with all of this? Of course not.
 
I just wish we had a NAB that wasn't so useless. Lets see the cases prosecuted. NAB needs professional prosecutors and investigators
 
Corruption is not an issue in Pakistan, it is all about the power struggle. If you are in bed with those who call the shots, your corruption will be neglected.

I will cite the most latest example - look at Jahangir Tareen, the man who was disqualified by the Supreme Court on Article 62-63 for being dishonest, and his corruption in the sugar mill case including his inside trading is not a secret.

However, that hasn’t stopped him from holding a prominent position within PTI, and from spending millions of rupees on electables so that PTI can form a majority, an investment that he will obviously recover when PTI comes into power.

If PTI wasn’t backed by the army, would they and Jahangir Tareen have been able to get away with all of this? Of course not.

So how did he exactly get away with it, when he is banned for life? What else do you want? I think your bitterness at the Nooras losing the election must be really hurting.
 
So how did he exactly get away with it, when he is banned for life? What else do you want? I think your bitterness at the Nooras losing the election must be really hurting.

I am not bitter at the results because I voted for PTI. I am glad that they won because that is what the majority wanted and they deserved an opportunity to walk the talk.

As far Jahangir Tareen is concerned, I don’t think that a man who has been banned by the Supreme Court should continue to play active role in the party that is fighting to bring change to the country and put an end to corruption.

A disqualified person should not have been given the charge to convince independent members to join PTI which doesn’t happen without spending huge sums of money, money that he will find ways to recover because he is a businessman, and a businessman always seeks to make profits.
 
I am not bitter at the results because I voted for PTI. I am glad that they won because that is what the majority wanted and they deserved an opportunity to walk the talk.

As far Jahangir Tareen is concerned, I don’t think that a man who has been banned by the Supreme Court should continue to play active role in the party that is fighting to bring change to the country and put an end to corruption.

A disqualified person should not have been given the charge to convince independent members to join PTI which doesn’t happen without spending huge sums of money, money that he will find ways to recover because he is a businessman, and a businessman always seeks to make profits.

As far as JKT doesnt take any formal role in the govt than i am happy. If he doesnt help we dont have a PTI doesnt have a govt and the mafia rule. I know what is more important to me and to all those that want a PTI govt. If he uses his influence to make money than IK will go the same way as the Nooras and he too will be forced out.
 
Back
Top