- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Runs
- 217,977
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is a modern-day team which is good to see. I'd remove de Villiers and place Lara in there and take out Kallis and slot Imran in as the captain.
Really tough one for me to decide between Viv and Lara, I'd always pick Lara but what makes me edge towards Viv is peer review and how highly he is spoken off.
Amla isn't an opener in tests.
I can tolerate no Imran Khan but no Viv Richard is just ridiculous.
Imran wasn't as good as Wasim Akram - the bowler...
Good team selection
some big names like Sobers,Lara,Viv missing out ... But then it is his personnel choice...
His opinion is wrong though. Lara>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>De Villiers
Think Imran at his peak in tests was probably as good a bowler as Wasim in tests..
enquiry... I demand a tribunal should be set up to investigateWhat? he chose just one Pak name? I demand an enquiry!
You cannot pick Ponting, Kallis and Amla in the same team. All of them are number 3 batsmen and there is only 1 space for a #3 batsman. Mushy, no sir, you cannot accommodate all three in your team lol. I'd pick Ponting only.
Would pick Gavaskar as the opener.
Number 6 has to be Garfield Sobers.
Replace Wasim Akram with Imran Khan.
Lara for AB de Villiers.
Think Imran at his peak in tests was probably as good a bowler as Wasim in tests..
So what? James Anderson is more skilled than McGrath.That's a myth.
Can't match Wasim in skill set.
I can't take an XI without Lara, Viv, Imran and Bradman seriously. Oh well, his opinion.
So what? James Anderson is more skilled than McGrath.
Imran Khan the bowler is a bonafide bowling ATG and the difference between the two in terms of effectiveness is so minute that there isn't really a wrong answer as to who's better. A case can be made for both.Umm, but Wasim > Imran in bowling, be it skills or effectiveness, or being a bowler-only ATG.
Imran Khan the bowler is a bonafide bowling ATG and the difference between the two in terms of effectiveness is so minute that there isn't really a wrong answer as to who's better. A case can be made for both.
Don't understand why these ex players put Sachin in their XI. There are so many other great #4s who graced the game. You can select Lara/Viv/Bradman/Sobers and many others. I think they do it to avoid backlash from Indian online warriors. Apart from that the XI looks alright. Te only change I'd make to bring Imran ahead of Kallis and make him the captain.
Don't understand why these ex players put Sachin in their XI. There are so many other great #4s who graced the game. You can select Lara/Viv/Bradman/Sobers and many others. I think they do it to avoid backlash from Indian online warriors. Apart from that the XI looks alright. Te only change I'd make to bring Imran ahead of Kallis and make him the captain.
The entire world is biased in favor of Sachin .... from WISDEN, Bradman, Richie Benaud, Cricinfo, Hanif Moammad, Shane Warne and countless others who have included him in their 'World XI'. The only non biased fans in the world are Pak cricket fans who want to claim Imran Khan as the captain in every 'World XI'.
I guess combination of both: genuine admiration and sucking up to his fan base
Imran Khan genuinely has a claim to be the captain of any world XI just for his captaincy, let alone his amazing bowling and effective batting. Imran averaged over 50 for the latter part of hs career, which is comparable to Sachin's overall batting career. So even without counting bowling, Imran (who incidentally averaged 19 while bowling) makes a case over Sachin as a batsman.