What's new

No charges to be brought against any of the 5 named in Al Jazeera corruption investigation [#123]

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/z13N6pGfRMs" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Around the 34 minute mark.
 
Last edited:
Lot of dirt it seems against all top teams, especially England and Australia, with some officials seemingly confirming it happend
 
Exclusive: Top international cricketers involved in spot-fixing

London, England - Al Jazeera's Investigative Unit has uncovered evidence of corruption at the highest levels of international cricket.

It appears to involve two dozen fixes in 15 international matches.

The evidence, from 2011 and 2012, points to a small group of England players allegedly carrying out spot-fixes in seven matches; Australia players in five matches; Pakistan players in three, with players from other teams carrying out spot-fixes in one match. In some cases, both teams appear to have delivered a fix.

Spot-fixes affect just a small part of the game and do not determine the overall result.

Al Jazeera has obtained purported recordings of a match-fixer calling in the fixes to a notorious Indian bookmaker linked to the organised crime. He is unaware that the recordings were leaked.

The matches in which fixes were allegedly carried out include England versus India at Lord's Cricket Ground, South Africa versus Australia in Cape Town and several matches during England's series against Pakistan in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

The files suggest that the suspected fixes were usually carried out by batsmen who agreed to underperform. Some of the world's most famous players were batting when the fixes allegedly occurred.

Many of the matches appear to include multiple fixes, making a total of 26 fixes in the 15 matches.

Al Jazeera exposed the alleged match-fixer, Aneel Munawar, in the documentary, Cricket's Match-Fixers, which shook the sport in May 2018.

Munawar is based in Mumbai but spends much of his time in Dubai. In the follow-up film, The Munawar Files, we reveal that he has been allegedly corrupting international cricket since 2010.

The matches include six Tests, six One Day Internationals and three T20 World Cup games.

We also discovered that the International Cricket Council (ICC), the sport's governing body, had known about Munawar for eight years.

Yet, the ICC issued a global appeal to find Munawar only after Al Jazeera informed them it was preparing this documentary.

Profile: Aneel Munawar
Lives: Mumbai and Dubai.
Country connections: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, UAE, South Africa, Australia and the UK.
Role: Cricket match-fixer. Provides 25-30 rich clients with advance details of spot-fixes during domestic and international cricket matches worldwide.
Operative years: 2010-present.
Fixing targets: Test matches, One Day Internationals (ODIs), Twenty20 and high-profile cricket tournaments including: T20 World Cup, ODI World Cup, Indian Premier League, Big Bash League (Australia).
Known fixing activity: 2011 World Cup, 2012 Twenty20 World Cup, 2016/17 Australia's Big Bash, England's tour of India 2016 and Australia's tour of India of India 2016/17.
Criminal connections: D-company's match-fixing and betting syndicates run by founder Dawood Ibrahim; Sonu Jalan, a "Kingpin bookie" from Mumbai; Dubai-based bookmaker Dinesh Khambhat alias DK and former Ahmedabad-based bookmaker Dinesh Kalgi (died 2014).

Twenty-five of the 26 predictions made by Munawar proved to be correct.

A UK-based firm of sports betting analysts said the odds of Munawar accurately predicting 25 of the 26 outcomes without fixing them were 9.2 million to one.

In the recordings, Munawar uses the same methods and language that he used during our undercover investigation in 2016 and 2017, when he gave advance details about alleged fixes in two Test matches in India.

His predictions were accurate in both cases.

Our dossier also includes photographs of Munawar and his associates hovering near, and purportedly talking to, international cricket players during the T20 World Cup in Sri Lanka in 2012.

There is no suggestion that these players were involved in match-fixing.

Among the players the match-fixer was seen close to is Virat Kohli, now India's captain and widely regarded as the world's best cricket player.

Other photographs show Umar Akmal, a Pakistani player, receiving and peering into a bag allegedly given to him by a Munawar associate, though the photographs do not show whether Akmal left with the bag.

Others who appear in the photographs include Andy Bichel, the Australian coach, and senior Indian players including Suresh Raina, Rohit Sharma and Lakshmipathy Balaji.

The ICC claims to have "spotters" at international tournaments to protect players from match-fixers.

The Munawar Files also include a recording of a call allegedly made by Munawar to an unnamed English cricketer, in which they appear to discuss spot-fixing. Munawar could be heard saying he is sending money to the player's account.

A forensic speech scientist has examined the recording and concluded that it had not been tampered with.

The player believed to be speaking with Munawar denied that the conversation took place and suggested the recording was a fabrication.

In the new documentary, Munawar's identity and match-fixing role is confirmed by a man who worked for the Indian bookmaker, and received and recorded Munawar's calls about the fixes.

Munawar's role is further confirmed by a senior Indian detective who arrested Sonu Jalan, an alleged high-profile criminal, days after the first Al Jazeera documentary was broadcast.

Pradeep Sharma, who fights organised crime in a Mumbai suburb, said Jalan had told officers that he knew Munawar.

"He had met him in Dubai," Sharma said. "He also informed us that he is connected to the D-Company. He looks after the betting syndicate of the D-Company."

D-Company is a powerful South Asian mafia that operates out of Pakistan, India and Dubai, and is believed to be heavily involved in match-fixing.

Lawyers for the England and Australia teams rejected Al Jazeera's evidence, while the ICC did not respond to questions about Munawar.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018...ers-involved-spot-fixing-181020115410646.html
 
Last edited:
Dubai, 21 October 2018

Statement from Alex Marshall, General Manager – ICC Anti-Corruption Unit

“The ICC is committed to working to uphold integrity in cricket. As you would expect we will again take the contents of the programme and any allegations it may make seriously and will investigate fully. However, I must refute the assertion that cricket does not take the issue of corruption seriously, we have more resources than ever before working to rid our sport of corruption.

“The investigation into these allegations has already commenced and will run alongside a number of other live unrelated investigations. When considering the claims, we will work with professional independent betting analysts.

“As with the first programme we have, and will continue to ask for the cooperation of the broadcaster. We have made repeated efforts to engage with the broadcaster as it can play such a crucial part in the full and thorough investigation it has called for.

“We do welcome the commitment from the broadcaster to share the files with Interpol and, I hope, other law enforcement agencies who can act upon the information and support us in ridding the sport of these criminals.”
 
It's the same drama from AlJz that they tried to do some months back.

Or similar.

I think it was targeting Australia, but was full of rubbish. Nothing substantiative, all for masala and ratings.

It's the same this time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just jail any player, big name or not, if found involved in corruption. And of course a life ban as well.
 
There's hardly any damning evidence. Maybe in some low-level T20 leagues there may be some fixing but all he presented absolutely no evidence that there is any fixing in international games.

Regarding Umar Akmal, he did not even play the three tests against England where the alleged fixing took place.

The Akmals may have very well done a whole of fixing throughout their careers but I can't say anything because there isn't any evidence of it.
 
Yet another Indian bookie/fixer, land of the most power and rich board which cannot do anything despite all the power and resources and connections...and will not help get anything done to do something against even a single bookie/fixer!

It just boggles the mind that BCCI has no knowledge or implication in some of this!
 
Yet another Indian bookie/fixer, land of the most power and rich board which cannot do anything despite all the power and resources and connections...and will not help get anything done to do something against even a single bookie/fixer!

It just boggles the mind that BCCI has no knowledge or implication in some of this!

Catching bookies is not the job of BCCI...its the job of police. BCCI is responsible only for its players and it has set a brilliant example of life banning any player(s) involve in match/spot fixing. Rather than accusing BCCI of everything, ask your board to take stern action against proven fixers.
 
Catching bookies is not the job of BCCI...its the job of police. BCCI is responsible only for its players and it has set a brilliant example of life banning any player(s) involve in match/spot fixing. Rather than accusing BCCI of everything, ask your board to take stern action against proven fixers.

And the PCB sets examples by welcoming a convicted fixer back into the team.
 
Catching bookies is not the job of BCCI...its the job of police. BCCI is responsible only for its players and it has set a brilliant example of life banning any player(s) involve in match/spot fixing. Rather than accusing BCCI of everything, ask your board to take stern action against proven fixers.

Wow shields up!
 
Watch the documentary awhile ago, why don't they name and shame the Australian players involved?
 
Watch the documentary awhile ago, why don't they name and shame the Australian players involved?

Huge risk by Al Jazeera to be making this up - they should be taken to court by all boards concerned for defamation, or they should step up and give names etc.
 
Huge risk by Al Jazeera to be making this up - they should be taken to court by all boards concerned for defamation, or they should step up and give names etc.

They're not making this up, they're not naming the Australian players cause of the influence their board has, if they were Pakistanis then their names would've been leaked out by now.
 
Watch the documentary awhile ago, why don't they name and shame the Australian players involved?

Very true. So they name the Pakistani but they are too scared to make the English and Australian. Usual double standards by the western media
 
Very true. So they name the Pakistani but they are too scared to make the English and Australian. Usual double standards by the western media

They haven't accused Akmal of anything more than the likes of Bresnan and Swann whose names are mentioned (but not accused of anything) in the documentary. They just have foootage of Akmal being handed a bag whilst meeting with multiple asociates of a known fixer.
 
Last edited:
this is getting boring now.

EIther bring proper proof along with naming and shaming them or dont bother.

NOTW was much better. THey made the videos got the proof and released it at the right time.
 
Yet another Indian bookie/fixer, land of the most power and rich board which cannot do anything despite all the power and resources and connections...and will not help get anything done to do something against even a single bookie/fixer!

It just boggles the mind that BCCI has no knowledge or implication in some of this!

according to the documentary, munnawar is Pakistani
 
ok didi my research now on one of the matches claimed by Munnawar to be fixed.

This is the match
http://www.espncricinfo.com/series/...d-odi-pakistan-tour-of-england-2010?innings=1

There were reports back then of being fixed aswell


THe bet was 45-47 runs in 10 overs. (any 10)
under 45 runs would be scored and in the 10th over no runs to be scored.

thus, opened the score card, 3 overs were bowled maiden.

1 by bresnan and 2 by anderson.

Bresnan maiden came earlier, now 2 of anderson left.

Thus, i have to make sure that before anderson's maiden comes, not mroe then 45 runs are scored in the 9 overs earlier

Now one situation was the 10th over of the match.
31 runs were scored by the 9th over, yousuf gets out first ball of the 10th over and fawad plays 5 dot balls to make that over miaden.

Now second sitaution
43rd over goes maiden, Umar Gul is the batsmen
but 60 runs are scored.

So by the looks of it it was the first 10 overs, which means both Yousuf and Fawad Alam were involved.


Interestingly, while both players were then selected for the South Africa series aswell, but after that series, Yousuf was dropped for good and Fawad didn't play again until 2014
 
The England and Wales Cricket Board has dismissed allegations of spot-fixing against England players made in a new television documentary.

An investigation by the Al Jazeera networkclaims to have "uncovered evidence of corruption at the highest levels of international cricket", including by a "small group" of England players.

"Whilst the limited information we have been given by Al Jazeera is poorly prepared and lacks clarity and corroboration, it has been properly assessed," the ECB said.

"Analysis of this by the ECB Integrity Team has cast no doubt on the integrity or behaviour of any England player, current or former."

Al Jazeera, which says it has obtained "purported recordings" of a match-fixer calling in the fixes to a notorious Indian bookmaker linked to organised crime, claims the corruption "appears to involve two dozen fixes in 15 international matches" dating from 2011 and 2012.

The broadcaster says the evidence points to a small group of England players allegedly carrying out spot-fixes in seven matches, Australia players in five matches and Pakistan players in three. Players from other teams allegedly carried out spot-fixes in one match.

The report adds the matches in which fixes were allegedly carried out include England versus India at Lord's, South Africa versus Australia in Cape Town and several matches during England's series against Pakistan in the United Arab Emirates.

"The ECB takes its responsibilities on anti-corruption and preserving the integrity of cricket very seriously," the statement added.

"The materials we have been given have been referred to the ICC's Anti-Corruption unit and we will continue to work with them, as is the correct procedure for protecting the game."

Responding to Al Jazeera's claims, world governing body the ICC said in a statement it was "committed to working to uphold integrity in cricket".

It added: "As you would expect we will again take the contents of the programme and any allegations it may make seriously and will investigate fully.

"The investigation into these allegations has already commenced and will run alongside a number of other live unrelated investigations. When considering the claims, we will work with professional independent betting analysts.

"We do welcome the commitment from the broadcaster to share the files with Interpol and, I hope, other law enforcement agencies who can act upon the information and support us in ridding the sport of these criminals."

https://www.bbc.com/sport/cricket/45934436
 
Last edited:
Feel like some people are always getting rich at each game.

Why are they always protecting Indian, Australia and English players ?
 
Pretty sure they mentioned he is South Indian.

rewatch it in OP

Yup, Munawar is Pakistani, No South Indian says so much Janaab LOL, here is his whatsapp pic:



2fcb2vs.png
 
Name and shame ALL involved parties.

If these 'allegations' are truly what they seem then the players and officials involved should be named.
 
I really dont care whether ANil Munawar is Pakistani or Indian, but thats what the documentary states.

Only the person interviewed said, “he believes Munawar is Pakistani”, which I highly doubt it.

Even if he is then he is no body.

Bigger fish and money are coming from India.
 
Last edited:
Only the person interviewed said, “he believes Munawar is Pakistani”, which I highly doubt it.

Even if he is then he is no body.

Bigger fish and money are coming from India.

Munawar's Whatsapp pic clearly shows he is a proud Pakistani, moreover he clearly said in the interview that he is the main betting man for Dawood Ibrahim's D Company. So the Big boss himself is sitting in Pakistan and you are talking about India here.
 
Munawar's Whatsapp pic clearly shows he is a proud Pakistani, moreover he clearly said in the interview that he is the main betting man for Dawood Ibrahim's D Company. So the Big boss himself is sitting in Pakistan and you are talking about India here.

India generate 6 billion dollars annually in illegal betting.

Dawood can be replaced.
 
These documentaries can easily be fabricated. Is there a way to verify and confirm the timeline of these videos? What did Umar Akmal take cash for when he wasn't even in the test team?
 
I don't get one thing. Most matches seem to be 2010-11 times. As per the documentary, calls recorded are also of those times. So why did it take Al Jazeera 7-8 years to come out with the documentary? It's not that baring the calls and videos, there is anything more revealing in the documentary which needed time.
 
Munawar is Indian, he was roaming all over India. the documentary said being Indian they were surprised he had a Pak flag on his profile. Then linked D company to Pakistan
 
The documentary said he lives in Mumbai. I am sure no Pakistani can live Mumbai :))
 
Rough summary of the main points (allegations) from the documentary.

  • Al Jazeera not giving details of sessions fixed - just info regarding the matches
  • It's based on maiden overs, scores below expectations and below the market
  • England vs India 2011 - Munawar said maiden over and it happened. Said less runs in a bracket, and it happened
  • South Africa vs Australia Nov 2011, Cape Town. Said low-scoring session. Got it right
  • Munawar says he has players working for him in all teams
  • All seems to be related to batting sides batting maidens or scoring below expectations
  • Says this gang operating on behalf of Dawood Ibrahim
  • Pakistan vs England UAE Test, Dubai, Jan 2012. Fixed 10 over session. Team to score below market rate. Last over of 10 over session will be a maiden.
  • Pakistan vs England UAE Test, Abu Dhabi, Jan 2012 - Low score in 10-over session, less than 2 runs in last over
  • Umar Akmal in lobby of Grand Hyatt Hotel on night of the fix during 3rd Test PAKvENG. Allegedly met member of D Company. Then they both meet another associate. Umar Akmal is given a bag, no evidence to show if he took it
  • D Company and Munawar pictured at WT20 in SL. Pics of Munawar with various players and coaches
  • England vs Afghanistan World T20 low-scoring 2 overs
  • 2011 World Cup - Munawar congratulates England player on Ashes win, says sending money to his account
  • Munawar talking to England player saying he is to under-score, below market rate, AJ contacted player who denies speaking with Munawar
  • 2011 World Cup England vs South Africa - Low score in 10 over period. Last over of period below market
  • Australia vs Pakistan 2016/17 - Fixing in one Test match
  • Pakistan vs England 2012, 1st Test. Batsman scored 1 more run that he should have done
  • Munawar predicted 25 out of 26 predictions correctly in 15 matches - Odds of that happening 9.2
    million to 1
  • England vs Pakistan 2010 ODI at The Oval. Pakistan batting, market had 45-47 runs in a 10-over bracket. Munawar said it'd be below and Pakistan scored well under 45
  • ICC ACSU rep was in The Sun's office during Oval match, so they seemingly knew about Munawar. One month later, they said no evidence of fixing
 
Yup, Munawar is Pakistani, No South Indian says so much Janaab LOL, here is his whatsapp pic:



2fcb2vs.png

Yeah, a Pakistani living in Mumbai. Read post number 4. Aljazeera lists his location as Mumbai.
 
Saddened after watching this.

I'm not sure how much of this is true, but the details are depressing for the whole of cricket.

The fixes involving overs, or runs scored in 10 overs brackets, were correct in 25 out of the 26 times this guy said they would be - that cannot be ignored.
 
All of this is fabricated masala.

ECB has already confirmed it's rubbish.
 
Don't get how people can just shrug off these accusations as "masala" and ask where is the proof, it is all there.
 
Saddened after watching this.

I'm not sure how much of this is true, but the details are depressing for the whole of cricket.

The fixes involving overs, or runs scored in 10 overs brackets, were correct in 25 out of the 26 times this guy said they would be - that cannot be ignored.

I find it difficult to believe that English and Aussie players are involved simply because they are better paid and better looked after then the other players from places like Zim, SL etc. If it turns out to be true that they are involved then cricket as we know it is finished.
 
I find it difficult to believe that English and Aussie players are involved simply because they are better paid and better looked after then the other players from places like Zim, SL etc. If it turns out to be true that they are involved then cricket as we know it is finished.

Simon Hughes said the same thing to me when I was on BBC radio with him.

I referred him to the Smith, Warner and Bancroft episode.

They are not angels.
 
There should be a #MeToo like movement for Cricket also where cricketers who had shady past and fixed matches should come forward and accept it in public. Danish Kaneria has already started it by speaking the truth.
 
Simon Hughes said the same thing to me when I was on BBC radio with him.

I referred him to the Smith, Warner and Bancroft episode.

They are not angels.

Both actions have pretty different intentions though. Smith, Warner and Bancroft were doing what they were to improve their teams performance, not for financial gain.
 
I find it difficult to believe that English and Aussie players are involved simply because they are better paid and better looked after then the other players from places like Zim, SL etc. If it turns out to be true that they are involved then cricket as we know it is finished.

Greed has no boundaries.
 
I wonder if Mohsin Khan when he alluded to non parliamentary elements responsible for Pakistan's ODI 4-0 loss and T-20 2-1 loss to England after the White wash in 2012, was referring to all this?
 
I find it difficult to believe that English and Aussie players are involved simply because they are better paid and better looked after then the other players from places like Zim, SL etc. If it turns out to be true that they are involved then cricket as we know it is finished.

Azharuddin was a millionaire in $ terms yet still fixed, Ajay Jadeja came from a super wealthy princely family in Gujarat yet still fixed. Sreesanth earned millions from his IPL contracts yet still fixed etc etc.

Millionaires are greedy too and this is all about greed as opposed to desperation.

Greed is god to these guys.
 
Simon Hughes said the same thing to me when I was on BBC radio with him.

I referred him to the Smith, Warner and Bancroft episode.

They are not angels.

Thats cheating to win, this cheating to lose. Both are bad but given a choice between the these two- i would accept the former rather than the latter.
 
Azharuddin was a millionaire in $ terms yet still fixed, Ajay Jadeja came from a super wealthy princely family in Gujarat yet still fixed. Sreesanth earned millions from his IPL contracts yet still fixed etc etc.

Millionaires are greedy too and this is all about greed as opposed to desperation.

Greed is god to these guys.

I cant disagree with your premise- maybe i cant rationalise whats patently obvious.
 
Thats cheating to win, this cheating to lose. Both are bad but given a choice between the these two- i would accept the former rather than the latter.

Cheating is cheating.

Cheating can mean bans and ends to a career.

I repeat players from non-Asian teams can't be accepted as angels.
 
I don't have the time to watch the when documentary. Can someone just clarify why and how exactly do we know the "calls" weren't recorded after the match had been played? Also in the documentary they showed pictures of the guy with many top cricketers like Kohli etc. However who is to say he didn't pose as a fan and just had a pic with them. Especially when in most of those pictures he comes across as a bystander than somebody the players recognize.
 
Ok guys I have seen both documentary’s and everyone here saying it’s masala news let me ask you this ?

Has any player accused of spot fixing tried to sueeeee al jazeraaaa?

We all know the answer is no , sometimes you have to look at what people are not doing.

I am convinced spot fixing is wide spread , what does al jazeraaaaa have to gain by fabricating this ?
 
I have a feeling that this is one of those occasions when a player doesn’t know what he’s being shown or offered and for whatever reason. I don’t think Umar is so stupid to accept a payment from a bookie in a public hotel lobby with cctv.
 
Australian players 'sick and tired' of spot fixing allegations

Five cricket matches involving Australia have been stained by spot fixing, according to a media report claiming widespread match fixing in the sport.

Al Jazeera has published a second series of allegations against cricketers around the globe, claiming 15 matches between January 2011 and September 2012 contained spot fixing.

Cricket Australia cleared Australian players of any wrongdoing after Al Jazeera’s initial claims which linked two unnamed Australian cricketers to corruption claims.

The latest Al Jazeera documentary claims to have video evidence of an alleged fixer discussing spot fixing with at least one international player ahead of the 2011 World Cup in Sri Lanka.

The report, which also accuses at least one unidentified England player of corruption, claims there were 26 spot-fixing attempts across the 15 matches, with 25 of the attempts successfully executed.

The report claimed three ODI matches and two tests involving Australia had been tainted by spot fixing.

The allegations are that players fixed small sections of games to manipulate the number of runs scored.

Cricket Australia released a statement on Monday saying they had full confidence in their players, while the players’ association said its members were “sick and tired of being subject to accusations, without proper evidence.”

“Cricket Australia takes a zero-tolerance approach against anyone trying to compromise the integrity of the game, and to suggest anything otherwise is unsubstantiated and incorrect,” said CA CEO James Sutherland.

“Prior to the broadcast of Al Jazeera’s documentary, Cricket Australia’s Integrity Unit conducted a review of the latest claims by Al Jazeera, from a known criminal source, and, from the limited information provided by Al Jazeera, our team have not identified any issues of corruption by any current or former player, including in relation to Big Bash League matches.

“We have full confidence in our players in also protecting the game, and we are working closely with the ACA to keep them informed of any developments.
"We urge Al Jazeera to provide all un-edited materials and any other evidence to the ICC Anti-Corruption Unit.”

Australian Cricketers’ Association Chief Executive Alistair Nicholson added: “The players and the ACA remain committed to taking genuine match fixing claims seriously and cooperating in any investigation process should it be required.

“However, as I said two months ago, enough is enough when it comes to unsupported accusations which unfairly tarnish players reputations.

“The players are sick and tired of being subject to accusations, without the proper evidence to substantiate it.”

The International Cricket Council said it would investigate the allegations.

“The ICC is committed to working to uphold integrity in cricket,” said ICC anti-corruption unit boss Alex Marshall.

“As you would expect we will again take the contents of the program and any allegations it may make seriously and will investigate fully.

“However, I must refute the assertion that cricket does not take the issue of corruption seriously, we have more resources than ever before working to rid our sport of corruption.”

The England and Wales Cricket Board said the Al Jazeera report was “poorly prepared” and lacked “clarity”.

“ECB takes its responsibilities on anti-corruption and preserving the integrity of cricket very seriously,” its statement said.

“Whilst the limited information we have been given by Al Jazeera is poorly prepared and lacks clarity and corroboration it has been properly assessed.

“Analysis of this by the ECB integrity team has cast no doubt on the integrity or behaviour of any England player, current or former.

“The materials we have been given have been referred to the ICC’s anti- corruption unit and we will continue to work with them, as is the correct procedure for protecting the game.

“We are also working closely with the PCA (Professional Cricketers’ Association) and keeping them informed.”

The recordings aired by Al Jazeera claim to show a conversation between an alleged match-fixer and an English cricketer where payments are discussed.

“Congratulations for the Ashes. The last payment is ready for going in the account. You will be credited in a week,” the alleged cricketer is told during the documentary.

Al Jazeera have pinpointed 15 internationals involving 12 different teams that are said to have been fixed by Aneel Munawar, a notorious bookmaker.

The documentary shows a number of leading international players – including Virat Kohli, Chris Gayle and Graeme Swann – in the vicinity of Munawar in hotels at major events. It does not suggest the players know who Munawar was, or that they had any contact with him at any time.

https://wwos.nine.com.au/cricket/cr...umentary/a82c1078-8d48-42e1-9c36-7cf15902ff59
 
Cricket Australia CEO, James Sutherland said:

Cricket Australia takes a zero-tolerance approach against anyone trying to compromise the integrity of the game, and to suggest anything otherwise is unsubstantiated and incorrect.

Prior to the broadcast of Al Jazeera’s documentary, Cricket Australia’s Integrity Unit conducted a review of the latest claims by Al Jazeera, from a known criminal source, and, from the limited information provided by Al Jazeera, our team have not identified any issues of corruption by any current or former player, including in relation to Big Bash League matches.

We have full confidence in our players in also protecting the game, and we are working closely with the ACA to keep them informed of any developments.

The materials we have been given have been referred to the ICC’s Anti-Corruption unit and we will continue to work with them in order to ensure the integrity of the game.

We urge Al Jazeera to provide all un-edited materials and any other evidence to the ICC Anti-Corruption Unit.

Australian cricket is proactive with its sports integrity management and Cricket Australia’s Integrity Unit oversees and maintains the integrity of all domestic cricket in Australia, including BBL and WBBL matches.

In addition to this, prior to the start of each Australian season, all professional cricketers are required to participate in thorough anti-corruption education sessions before being eligible to compete in CA’s domestic competitions.

Australian Cricketers’ Association Chief Executive Alistair Nicholson added:

The players and the ACA remain committed to taking genuine match fixing claims seriously and cooperating in any investigation process should it be required,” Nicholson said.

However, as I said two months ago, enough is enough when it comes to unsupported accusations which unfairly tarnish players reputations.

The players are sick and tired of being subject to accusations, without the proper evidence to substantiate it.
 
Ok guys I have seen both documentary’s and everyone here saying it’s masala news let me ask you this ?

Has any player accused of spot fixing tried to sueeeee al jazeraaaa?

We all know the answer is no , sometimes you have to look at what people are not doing.

I am convinced spot fixing is wide spread , what does al jazeraaaaa have to gain by fabricating this ?

Which player have Al Jazeera accused of spot fixing?
 
No western will ever be in the dock. Ever. it just wont happen. They can cheat all they want and they wont be called up on it. And why wouldnt they? they arent "fixing" a game just a few runs here and there and betting. Betting is part of the culture in the west and in India so I owuld suggest it is more likely they would be fixing. But their western privilege will protect them..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It looks very likely that spot fixing took place. How can it be possible than munaweer was right 25 our of 26 times? But the problem is ICC won't do anything because cricket's name will be tarnished completely. It's not like it's just 1 country. It's England, Australia, Pakistan and possibly South Africa, India and Windies.
 
2012 all test matches were fixed between eng and pak omg. I don't know how I will be able to watch cricket anymore.
 
Some on here can play the victim of white players getting away with fixing etc. If there is ever a day where an Australian or English player is caught fixing, they will be banned for life and won't represent Australia or England again. Whilst in Pakistan they are welcomed back and treated like heros.

I don't know how reliable this documentary is . But if it's reliable I'm sure Australian and England cricket boards will deal with it correctly.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">England's <a href="https://twitter.com/MAWood33?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MAWood33</a> has given a strong response to a new Al Jazeera documentary that includes allegations of spot-fixing against England players.<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/bbccricket?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#bbccricket</a> <a href="https://t.co/yJi0iWa5eW">pic.twitter.com/yJi0iWa5eW</a></p>— Test Match Special (@bbctms) <a href="https://twitter.com/bbctms/status/1054334544285982720?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 22, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
The only player they ever mentioned clearly was umar akmal. I fail to ubderstand why djdnt al jazeera release the audio of the english cricketer on the phone. Why havent they taken names of the australians. Honestly this investigative documentary seems quite incomplete.
 
Lol.

Conspiracy theorists out in numbers! This is the perfect MAGNET for them.

They LOVE this stuff - when there's NO evidence, NOTHING concrete, NO names, NO videos showing players took money OR accepted to spot fix.

Rubbish.

To conspiracy theorists, you can enjoy all you want. But there's no truth behind this evidence-less accusations.

It's just a fantasy of another conspiracy theorist.



Some on here can play the victim of white players getting away with fixing etc. If there is ever a day where an Australian or English player is caught fixing, they will be banned for life and won't represent Australia or England again. Whilst in Pakistan they are welcomed back and treated like heros.

I don't know how reliable this documentary is . But if it's reliable I'm sure Australian and England cricket boards will deal with it correctly.

That is very true.

They do NOT tolerate cheating. Heck, they bannned players for ball tampering.. who does that in Asia? We love fixers.
 
The only player they ever mentioned clearly was umar akmal. I fail to ubderstand why djdnt al jazeera release the audio of the english cricketer on the phone. Why havent they taken names of the australians. Honestly this investigative documentary seems quite incomplete.

Because it's a fantasy of some conspiracy theorist.

Not reality.
 
Lol.

Conspiracy theorists out in numbers! This is the perfect MAGNET for them.

They LOVE this stuff - when there's NO evidence, NOTHING concrete, NO names, NO videos showing players took money OR accepted to spot fix.

Rubbish.

To conspiracy theorists, you can enjoy all you want. But there's no truth behind this evidence-less accusations.

It's just a fantasy of another conspiracy theorist.





That is very true.

They do NOT tolerate cheating. Heck, they bannned players for ball tampering.. who does that in Asia? We love fixers.

Brother i can remember when the ball tampering happened for Australia, Some on this forum said ball tampering is worse than fixing. I can remember 1 poster in particular who said this.

Fixing and selling your country out for cash is the lowest of the low. Yet when Pakistan do it, instead of being critical of the fixer he is defended . :facepalm:
 
Some of this seems not legit. Watching the documentary now and 1 of the alleged fixes is to get that 48-50 runs won't be scored in a 8 over period.

As many of us know, there are very rarely periods in tests where a team will score at 6 and over for a 8 over period. So to bet underneath that and for a player not to get to 48 plus isn't surprising and a high chance you will win that bet.

Fixing could have taken place but I don't think that scenario is a realistic prospect
 
Lol.

Conspiracy theorists out in numbers! This is the perfect MAGNET for them.

They LOVE this stuff - when there's NO evidence, NOTHING concrete, NO names, NO videos showing players took money OR accepted to spot fix.

Rubbish.

To conspiracy theorists, you can enjoy all you want. But there's no truth behind this evidence-less accusations.

It's just a fantasy of another conspiracy theorist.





That is very true.

They do NOT tolerate cheating. Heck, they bannned players for ball tampering.. who does that in Asia? We love fixers.

Did you watch the documentary? Your post suggests you didn't but anyways, let me break down the reasons why there actually is evidence and I believe it:

1. They passed info to Interpol, why would they do that if they no evidence at all.
2. They had people who had worked wih the ICC, with Interpol, distinguished cricket writers who watched the evidence and read it and they confirmed the legitimacy of the allegations. So are you saying these people are lying?
3. The ICC is clearly clueless, they rely on investigative journalism to spot fixing, cheating etc. Examples being NOTW and the Sri Lanka pitch tampering.
4. They had phone calls and a police officer confirm the role of Munawar and D Company in cricket as well as DK.
5. Knowing this individual is shady, he is pictured with players and ICC's spotters were unable to recognise him. Why is someone that shady being allowed near players, how common is this where fixers are photographed with players? He must have some sort of power to get himself in those positions.
6. Without this documentary ICC apparently had no knowledge of him. Why would they out a fixer and then the details of his fixes being completely untrue, that just doesn't make sense to anyone.
7. He is on video himself ADMITTING to fixing and actually setting up a fix, he can't fix without players.

We don't know the real extent of fixing in cricket, Munawar is one person, imagine how many other Munawars are in cricket. Once Interpol have investigated the evidence, they should release names ASAP because cricket needs a public shaming of fixers to deter others because clearly the NOTW ordeal wasn't enough.

Cannot trust the ICC as even he said he has contacts in the ICC hence why Al Jazeera are reluctant to give the evidence to the ICC.
 
Did you watch the documentary? Your post suggests you didn't but anyways, let me break down the reasons why there actually is evidence and I believe it:

1. They passed info to Interpol, why would they do that if they no evidence at all.
2. They had people who had worked wih the ICC, with Interpol, distinguished cricket writers who watched the evidence and read it and they confirmed the legitimacy of the allegations. So are you saying these people are lying?
3. The ICC is clearly clueless, they rely on investigative journalism to spot fixing, cheating etc. Examples being NOTW and the Sri Lanka pitch tampering.
4. They had phone calls and a police officer confirm the role of Munawar and D Company in cricket as well as DK.
5. Knowing this individual is shady, he is pictured with players and ICC's spotters were unable to recognise him. Why is someone that shady being allowed near players, how common is this where fixers are photographed with players? He must have some sort of power to get himself in those positions.
6. Without this documentary ICC apparently had no knowledge of him. Why would they out a fixer and then the details of his fixes being completely untrue, that just doesn't make sense to anyone.
7. He is on video himself ADMITTING to fixing and actually setting up a fix, he can't fix without players.

We don't know the real extent of fixing in cricket, Munawar is one person, imagine how many other Munawars are in cricket. Once Interpol have investigated the evidence, they should release names ASAP because cricket needs a public shaming of fixers to deter others because clearly the NOTW ordeal wasn't enough.

Cannot trust the ICC as even he said he has contacts in the ICC hence why Al Jazeera are reluctant to give the evidence to the ICC.

All the points you mentioned point to nothing conclusive and no evidence. Rather more conspiracy theories.

I can say a lot of stuff and make tall claims. People can talk to any agency they want. People can hang out with hundreds of different people. Without knowing their true intentions.

If there was any evidence or substance behind this, Interpol and ICC would have gone after these players or the self-proclaimed fixer.

Show me one document or evidence where he's talking to players about fixing matches, and players accepting them or giving him signals.

There's nothing.

In Sharjeel and Jamshed's case, there was clear evidence. Here, they have none, that's why they are NOT giving any evidence to ICC, ECB, CA, PCB.
 
For this documentary to be worth anything, Al Jazeera needs to establish that all the recordings were made before the games in question. Because, otherwise it sounds weird that it took them 6-7 years to come out with recordings of fixing, what exactly were they waiting for?

And what do they mean when they say they don't know if Umar Akmal took the bag with him or not. On one hand, they are saying that Munawwar was telling them everything, and then he didn't tell them what was inside the bag handed to Akmal or whether Akmal took the bag home or not? For all you know, some stupid fans were giving some ripe mangoes to Akmal. Because regardless of how stupid Akmal is, he ain't going to get cash in a hotel lobby in front of the entire world. If some hanky panky was going on, they could have handed over the bag in the washroom, who does that in the middle of the lobby?
 
Statement from PCB today:

The PCB is committed to its fight against corruption in cricket. It has and continues to cooperate, assist and coordinate with the ICC’s Anti Corruption Unit in respect of investigations related to international cricket.

The recent allegations of corruption emanating from a documentary released by a broadcaster are under review jointly by ICC and PCB’s Anti Corruption Units. The broadcaster has not been forthcoming with provision of any evidence whatsoever in the absence of which their allegations remain unsubstantiated.

PCB in the recent past has been proactive in uprooting the menace of corruption and has charged and banned numerous cricketers for failing to abide by the Anti Corruption Code. It stands by that resolve.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top