Ofcom to probe BBC coverage of antisemitic attack

Technics 1210

Test Debutant
Joined
Feb 27, 2019
Runs
14,189
The media regulator has initiated an investigation into the broadcaster's report on an attack against Jewish teens

UK media regulator Ofcom has launched an investigation into a BBC report on a November attack against Jewish teenagers, with the broadcaster issuing an apology.

BBC London was one of many media outlets covering a London attack against a group of Jewish teenagers who were sitting in a bus when several men started spitting at them from outside, making Nazi salutes and verbally offending them.

Describing the November 29 attack, a reporter mentioned that “some racial slurs about Muslim people” could be heard from inside the bus, saying it wasn’t clear if that had played a role in the incident.

This claim was refuted by an independent report commissioned by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, which accused the BBC of “deeply irresponsible journalism” and said that the story raised serious questions about “deep-seated biases” within the corporation against Jews. The Campaign Against Antisemitism group also raised concerns over the coverage.


On Wednesday, the BBC published the conclusions of its executive complaints unit (ECU), which found no evidence of “victim-blaming” but discovered inaccuracies both in an online article and a TV report on the incident.

As a result, the ECU said that both items “must now be regarded as no longer meeting the BBC’s standards of due accuracy” and, considering that the anti-Muslim slur claim has itself become controversial, they also lack “due impartiality in failing to reflect alternative views.”

The ECU report prompted BBC, which is ranked third on the Global Anti-Semitism Top Ten list by the Simon Wiesenthal Center, to issue an apology “for not doing more” to highlight that the anti-Muslim slur claim was contested, saying “we should have reflected this and acted sooner.”

Ofcom, in turn, responded to the news by launching its own investigation.

“We consider it raises issues under our due accuracy rules and have launched an investigation,” the regulator’s spokesman said, as quoted by the media.

The Ofcom announcement was welcomed by Board of Deputies of British Jews President Marie van der Zyl.

“We welcome Ofcom’s decision to investigate the incident. We trust that justice will prevail,” she said in a statement.

She went on, however, to express the organization’s discontent with the BBC.

“We are however dismayed that the Corporation continues to justify certain erroneous editorial decisions that continue to cloud the issue and will compound the distress faced by the victims,” van der Zyl said.

https://www.rt.com/news/547498-bbc-report-ofcom-investigation/

See bold. Seems like the powers to be were not happy with the reports of filth hurled at Muslims which may have triggered anti-Semitic vibes, and as a result have forced BBC to apologise.

Sickening.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do OFCOM feel any reporting showing Jews being abuse is an attack on the Jewish race?
 
Russian state propaganda trying to divide the British against themselves, stirring up a sense of grievance between religions.
 
The news articles are a give away. You talk about freedom in the UK, it seems reporters are and their employees are reprimanded if their news/reporting doesn’t follow the agenda.

The agenda seems to be that of fair reporting enforced by Ofcom.
 
The agenda seems to be that of fair reporting enforced by Ofcom.

The agenda is never to make a Jew look in poor light.

Its Europeans who have abused Jews more than anyone else, suddenly they are the protectors lol. The real reason is they want to defend/hide Israeli crimes.
 
The agenda is never to make a Jew look in poor light.

Its Europeans who have abused Jews more than anyone else, suddenly they are the protectors lol. The real reason is they want to defend/hide Israeli crimes.

It gets worse, Atheists defending a Judeo-Christianity ideology. Just sums up how powerful the systematical brainwashing was the during the 40s/50s/60s/70s.
 
I hope there is some video footage showing the anti-muslim slurs hurled by the bus passengers.

The Anti-semitism hysteria whipped up the British media against Jeremy Corbyns Labour party has had disastrous implications.
 
I hope there is some video footage showing the anti-muslim slurs hurled by the bus passengers.

The Anti-semitism hysteria whipped up the British media against Jeremy Corbyns Labour party has had disastrous implications.

Video or no video, the Board of Deputies of British Jews, ruled the eye witness testimony as false.

Why?

This is the point.
 
Video or no video, the Board of Deputies of British Jews, ruled the eye witness testimony as false.

Why?

This is the point.

They have undertaken an investigation and said it was false.

Not that I believe them, but eye witnesses can be known to lie.

If an investigation proves otherwise or if some video evidence is found then they can be proven wrong and hopefully it stop the false anti semitism allegations.
 
They have undertaken an investigation and said it was false.

Not that I believe them, but eye witnesses can be known to lie.

If an investigation proves otherwise or if some video evidence is found then they can be proven wrong and hopefully it stop the false anti semitism allegations.

Why is video evidence so important when it comes to anti-seimitism, when your boy Andrew is in trouble over a verbal piece of evidence?
 
Why is video evidence so important when it comes to anti-seimitism, when your boy Andrew is in trouble over a verbal piece of evidence?

Video evidence or evidence in general is not just important in cases of anti-semitism but is important for any case. In this instance, the BBC is suffering the effects of political intervention as Nadine Dorries has personally spoken about this case.

Remember the BBC hasn't officially been censured yet - an allegation has been made by the BOD which the BBC has partially upheld, and Ofcom are required to investigate. At the moment it's like the "monkey gate" issue where both sides are claiming to hear different things. The jews say it was a Hebrew statement whereas the BBC say the Jewish passengers used the word "dirty Muslim"

I don't know much about the specifics of the Andrew situation so I'm not sure what the parallel is here.
 
They have undertaken an investigation and said it was false.

Not that I believe them, but eye witnesses can be known to lie.

If an investigation proves otherwise or if some video evidence is found then they can be proven wrong and hopefully it stop the false anti semitism allegations.


There is only one video im aware of. In the video its difficult to hear from both sides. Only men outside are seen 'attacking' the bus.

If the shoe was on the opposite foot, Jews hurling abuse at Muslims on a bus wouldnt have even raised an issue.
 
I hope there is some video footage showing the anti-muslim slurs hurled by the bus passengers.

The Anti-semitism hysteria whipped up the British media against Jeremy Corbyns Labour party has had disastrous implications.

That’s a bit rich, given that numerous Jewish Labour members including at least one MP were driven out of the Party by antisemitism.
 
There is only one video im aware of. In the video its difficult to hear from both sides. Only men outside are seen 'attacking' the bus.

If the shoe was on the opposite foot, Jews hurling abuse at Muslims on a bus wouldnt have even raised an issue.
The BBC claim that they heard the phrase 'Dirty Muslims' used in the video.

If the shoe was on the opposite foot then yeah this would unfortunately have been a non-issue. Many elements of the media would have cheered if Muslims were getting a beating.
 
That’s a bit rich, given that numerous Jewish Labour members including at least one MP were driven out of the Party by antisemitism.

They weren't driven out. They left, and used anti-semitism as an excuse.

Please do not fall into the trap of thinking anti-zionism and anti-semitism are the same thing.
 
Back
Top