hayder ali
Debutant
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2017
- Runs
- 89
Ever since CT, I am just seeing cricket of other countries and Pakistan players in various leagues but no good International cricket...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To be honest, a lot of teams have been diabolical on their away tours for quite some time now. India's struggles are well documented. Australia is awful in the subcontinent. England have been hot and cold. Sri Lanka is well, Sri Lanka and yet still get invited quite a lot. South Africa is probably the only team you could say that has an all-round value right now in world cricket.Pakistan are still paying the price for a few things- poor performances on away tours means less TV & crowd interest, which affects broadcast deal values, making Pakistan less likely to be invited.
Match-fixing has compounded these same issues regarding crowds, sponsors & broadcast deals as people don't tune in if they think the game is fishy. See Sydney Test from last Pakistan tour. CA unlikely to want Pakistan back in a hurry after that disgrace to the game.
Even if these problems have been put aside, the bad memory still lingers with the fans & the perception is set for a while. It's those things which make the difference between a Board actively looking to see if they can squeeze in a series vs Pakistan or passing that option over for someone else.
The answer is to keep playing well whenever you play and play an interesting brand of cricket. Pakistan with real fast bowlers, leg spinners and a few fiery batsmen firing will probably find Boards all of a sudden regain interest.
Pakistani players were on the road for the most part in 2016. They deserved some rest and they got it
To be honest, a lot of teams have been diabolical on their away tours for quite some time now. India's struggles are well documented. Australia is awful in the subcontinent. England have been hot and cold. Sri Lanka is well, Sri Lanka and yet still get invited quite a lot. South Africa is probably the only team you could say that has an all-round value right now in world cricket.
The quality of the team has very less to do with tours in my opinion. It's down to the board to have the pull to arrange a bilateral series, something the PCB is highly inept at.
PCB have been obsessed with vanity projects like World XI series and yet another T20 series against West Indies instead of focusing on arranging proper full multiformat series for our national team.
Looking at the original FTP, we were slated to tour India in November and December this year so that's part of the reason why we've these gaps in the calendar.
But it is disgraceful we are only playing one Test in Ireland before the England tour. How is a Test team in transition going to stabilise itself by playing so few Tests ? How is an ODI team meant to prepare for 2019 World Cup when we don't have an ODI series planned until the Asia Cup next June ?!
PCB could have invited Bangladesh in UAE.
PCB have been obsessed with vanity projects like World XI series and yet another T20 series against West Indies instead of focusing on arranging proper full multiformat series for our national team.
Looking at the original FTP, we were slated to tour India in November and December this year so that's part of the reason why we've these gaps in the calendar.
But it is disgraceful we are only playing one Test in Ireland before the England tour. How is a Test team in transition going to stabilise itself by playing so few Tests ? How is an ODI team meant to prepare for 2019 World Cup when we don't have an ODI series planned until the Asia Cup next June ?!
Cricket is played by few countries out of those few countries you can't play against one which is the major revenue generating team..
Then you had tussle with BD board when they refused to tour Pakistan..
SRi Lanka plays India and makes their money..
Aussies would probably prefer to play England or India more to get money and maybe even NZ?
So yea Pakistan is having it tough in this game of limited competition if you can't your main rivals it's tough..
Our board make by far the most money off India & England series. SA are third choice as they always provide good opposition (too good lately!)
WI used to be our #1 priority & drawcard until their decline at the turn of last century so certainly performance plays a role, they would be straight back up there if they ever produced a good team again.
NZ drawing power here fluctuates with their team also- right now with Boult & a few decent young quicks & a decent batting lineup they are an attractive series.
Cricket I would think Australia have been so dominant over NZ it's not much of a rivalry? Unless both squads have equalish teams.
Yes, should have hosted BD and may be crowd will be better as well as some Bangladeshis will also be there.
If you look at the FTP, right now we are supposed to be playing India in India for 3 Tests, 5 ODIs, and 2 T20s. Sethi saab should've known way before that that series is not happening and re-scheduled something else. 0 proactive-ness.
After the NZ series we've got the PSL, and then the IPL window where our players will be....resting? (after the long PSL party of course)
2 Tests in England, short Asia Cup in India ... and then another empty slot in July 2018. Let's see if Sethi saab has something planned for us then. (doubt it), but both SA and Bangladesh are free in that time slot.
Latter part of 2018 and early 2019 leading into the World Cup are nicely packed though with series vs Aus, NZ, SA, and Eng which is great to see.
Huge empty slot again in Aug-Sep 2019 ... god knows what the PCB has got planned there.
Pakistan are still paying the price for a few things- poor performances on away tours means less TV & crowd interest, which affects broadcast deal values, making Pakistan less likely to be invited.
Match-fixing has compounded these same issues regarding crowds, sponsors & broadcast deals as people don't tune in if they think the game is fishy. See Sydney Test from last Pakistan tour. CA unlikely to want Pakistan back in a hurry after that disgrace to the game.
Even if these problems have been put aside, the bad memory still lingers with the fans & the perception is set for a while. It's those things which make the difference between a Board actively looking to see if they can squeeze in a series vs Pakistan or passing that option over for someone else.
The answer is to keep playing well whenever you play and play an interesting brand of cricket. Pakistan with real fast bowlers, leg spinners and a few fiery batsmen firing will probably find Boards all of a sudden regain interest.
Just stop this non sense about the performance on away tours. India has been terrible away from home since they started playing cricket. Aus has been struggling for a long time now away from home. ENG has been so so.
Only SA is doing well away from home.
It wouldn't probably attract many TV rights if it runs parallel to IPL.Can we have PSL run parallel to IPL?
Like just a wild idea. You can literally do a player draft once the IPL auction is done. There would be many second string international players doing nothing during that period anyway.
Say for example Australia - barring the first choice players, the second choice ones will all be free. Don't know how many teams IPL has these days but they were like 8 last time I checked and that meant maximum of 50 international players would be busy.
I think since PSL mainly focuses on the Pakistani market, we'd manage to get by anyway. No?
Hosting some matches in Pakistan is the biggest priority for the PCB at the moment, even if it comes at the expense of a few Tests and ODIs elsewhere. Right now, we are not in a position to host ODIs and Tests, so we have to make do with T20Is.
We hosted Zimbabwe for ODIs in 2015. If the ground is deemed safe enough to host a T20 then why isn't safe enough to host an ODI ?
I agree its important to revive home international cricket but it feels like PCB are pouring so much energy into hosting the odd T20I or a few PSL matches at home with little payoff (international teams haven't exactly flooded back) and ignoring the biggest priority which is the national team.
We hosted Zimbabwe for ODIs in 2015. If the ground is deemed safe enough to host a T20 then why isn't safe enough to host an ODI ?
I agree its important to revive home international cricket but it feels like PCB are pouring so much energy into hosting the odd T20I or a few PSL matches at home with little payoff (international teams haven't exactly flooded back) and ignoring the biggest priority which is the national team.