What's new

Pakistan loses Hyderabad Fund Case as UK top court favours India

Bhaijaan

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Runs
68,673
Post of the Week
1
(Karachi) Pakistan has lost the Hyderabad Fund Case after a High Court in United Kingdom ruled in favour of India, it transpired on Wednesday. The case had been under proceedings for the last couple of years.

The case pertains to $39 million that were transferred to Pakistan by the then Nizam of Hyderabad Osman Ali Khan before its forcible occupation by India. The hearing of the case commenced in 2012 when India laid claim to the money which was deposited in a bank account in the name of High Commissioner of Pakistan since September 20, 1948.

The case opened after the then High Commissioner of Pakistan Wajid Shamsul Hassan waived immunity in the matter.

Reaction on Judgment

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs took notice of the verdict and issued a statement saying, “Pakistan has taken note of the judgment by the High Courts of Justice of the UK in the Hyderabad Fund Case, today, after two weeks trial in June 2019. The judgment rejects the longstanding claims of the two major parties and upholds the claims of the heirs of Nizam of Hyderabad.”

It added, “The ruling does not take into account the historical context of the transfer when India illegally annexed Hyderabad in violation of International Law and all civilized norms, leading the Nizam of Hyderabad to make desperate efforts to defend his people and the state from Indian invasion.” The Ministry of Foreign Affairs maintained that the Nizam also raised the matter with the UN Security Council where the issue remains on the agenda to date. “The Nizam as a sovereign approached Pakistan for assistance which the Government of Pakistan provided.”

The statement stated, “Pakistan is closely examining all aspects of the detailed judgment and will take further action in light of legal advice received.”

History

Earlier, India failed to convince the court that Pakistan’s position was undefendable and that it could show no legal entitlement to the £35 million.

The judge said there was good evidence in support of Pakistan’s claim to the money, which needed to be fully considered at a trial. The judge also accepted that there were positive legal arguments which supported Pakistan’s position.

The legal team from Pakistan side was led by Khawar Qureshi who presented strong legal arguments and evidences in the court.

During the proceedings, the court heard arguments by Pakistan’s lead counsel and considered the evidences. In light of the proofs, India failed to assert that Pakistan’s claim to the money was without a basis.

The evidence of assistance came from the official British archives, including British intelligence reports and British government documents.

However, India dismissed these materials even though they came from British intelligence sources and argued that because the Nizam of Hyderabad had asked for the return of the money within days of its transfer to Pakistan, he must not to have consented to it being handed over to Pakistan.

The judge observed that it might be naive to expect the Nizam to have been acting of his own free will after India had invaded his country, and forced him to surrender and hand over power.

https://www.brecorder.com/2019/10/0...abad-fund-case-as-uk-top-court-favours-india/

----------------------

35 million pounds go to India

A huge win for Modi government and a set back for Imran.

It is a decades old legal battle
 
Last edited by a moderator:
(Karachi) Pakistan has lost the Hyderabad Fund Case after a High Court in United Kingdom ruled in favour of India, it transpired on Wednesday. The case had been under proceedings for the last couple of years.

The case pertains to $39 million that were transferred to Pakistan by the then Nizam of Hyderabad Osman Ali Khan before its forcible occupation by India. The hearing of the case commenced in 2012 when India laid claim to the money which was deposited in a bank account in the name of High Commissioner of Pakistan since September 20, 1948.

The case opened after the then High Commissioner of Pakistan Wajid Shamsul Hassan waived immunity in the matter.

Reaction on Judgment

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs took notice of the verdict and issued a statement saying, “Pakistan has taken note of the judgment by the High Courts of Justice of the UK in the Hyderabad Fund Case, today, after two weeks trial in June 2019. The judgment rejects the longstanding claims of the two major parties and upholds the claims of the heirs of Nizam of Hyderabad.”

It added, “The ruling does not take into account the historical context of the transfer when India illegally annexed Hyderabad in violation of International Law and all civilized norms, leading the Nizam of Hyderabad to make desperate efforts to defend his people and the state from Indian invasion.” The Ministry of Foreign Affairs maintained that the Nizam also raised the matter with the UN Security Council where the issue remains on the agenda to date. “The Nizam as a sovereign approached Pakistan for assistance which the Government of Pakistan provided.”

The statement stated, “Pakistan is closely examining all aspects of the detailed judgment and will take further action in light of legal advice received.”

History

Earlier, India failed to convince the court that Pakistan’s position was undefendable and that it could show no legal entitlement to the £35 million.

The judge said there was good evidence in support of Pakistan’s claim to the money, which needed to be fully considered at a trial. The judge also accepted that there were positive legal arguments which supported Pakistan’s position.

The legal team from Pakistan side was led by Khawar Qureshi who presented strong legal arguments and evidences in the court.

During the proceedings, the court heard arguments by Pakistan’s lead counsel and considered the evidences. In light of the proofs, India failed to assert that Pakistan’s claim to the money was without a basis.

The evidence of assistance came from the official British archives, including British intelligence reports and British government documents.

However, India dismissed these materials even though they came from British intelligence sources and argued that because the Nizam of Hyderabad had asked for the return of the money within days of its transfer to Pakistan, he must not to have consented to it being handed over to Pakistan.

The judge observed that it might be naive to expect the Nizam to have been acting of his own free will after India had invaded his country, and forced him to surrender and hand over power.

https://www.brecorder.com/2019/10/0...abad-fund-case-as-uk-top-court-favours-india/

----------------------

35 million pounds go to India

A huge win for Modi government and a set back for Imran.

It is a decades old legal battle

Has it not earned any interest?
 
Since the state of Nizam was illegally annexed by India this whole judgement is a farce.
 
This is the third legal battle in recent times where India has absolutely decimated Pakistani arguements.

What is wrong with Pakistan. Do they pick the wrong battles or are just very poor at handling legal battles?
[MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION]
 
Well if the money wasn't donated to Pakistan then its rightfully the families money.
 
This is the third legal battle in recent times where India has absolutely decimated Pakistani arguements.

What is wrong with Pakistan. Do they pick the wrong battles or are just very poor at handling legal battles?

[MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION]

If you read the article you will read this:

"The judge said there was good evidence in support of Pakistan’s claim to the money, which needed to be fully considered at a trial. The judge also accepted that there were positive legal arguments which supported Pakistan’s position."


So it seems that it was a perfectly valid legal case and we don't really know what swayed the final judgement. Could be a valid argument put forth by Indian representation, or could simply be British courts are under pressure to facilitate British trade interests with India.
 
This money actually belongs to the Nizam’s heirs. However, they have done an undisclosed outside deal with India.
 
Isn’t this guy, Khawar Qureshi, who has represented Pakistan in all of the legal battles recently? He does not seem to win anything, but Pakistan continues hiring him. Should be well connected.
 
Isn’t this guy, Khawar Qureshi, who has represented Pakistan in all of the legal battles recently? He does not seem to win anything, but Pakistan continues hiring him. Should be well connected.

My point.

Are you picking wrong battles or being represented poorly?

Harish Salve who fought Kukbhushan Jadhav case for India fought the case for pride and charged Rs 1 from GOI
 
Pakistan fighting the wrong cases most like.

It has been reported in the news today that one of the main reasons this was decided in the Nizam's favour was that India finally decided to set aside their own claim for the money. Then it became an individual vs a country which probably made it much easier for the British courts to side with the Nizam.

So yes, you could argue that Pakistan was slightly less savvy than the Indians, who were also fighting the wrong case for decades.
 
This is the third legal battle in recent times where India has absolutely decimated Pakistani arguements.

What is wrong with Pakistan. Do they pick the wrong battles or are just very poor at handling legal battles?

[MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION]

Did India win the Kulbushan Jadhav case? Is he back in India now?
 
This is the third legal battle in recent times where India has absolutely decimated Pakistani arguements.

What is wrong with Pakistan. Do they pick the wrong battles or are just very poor at handling legal battles?

[MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION]

This type of humiliation is standard procedure when you are high on emotion and romanticism and low on pragmatism. Unfortunately that is the story of Pakistan. A series of mistakes and blunders since 1947.
 
On topic please.

Other threads available for discussions about constitution, minorities, etc.
 
Just shows you that Pakistan needs to improve the quality of its education system.

We focus way to much on quantity and so we talk a lot about how we can send all Pakistanis to school, but most don’t bother to ask about the quality of education in Pakistan.
 
Lol you can't keep sticking to a lawyer who keeps on losing.
 
This type of humiliation is standard procedure when you are high on emotion and romanticism and low on pragmatism. Unfortunately that is the story of Pakistan. A series of mistakes and blunders since 1947.

That is just a poor response with vague put downs of Pakistan which don't really pertain to this case. I think freelance bro ( who is an excellent poster) has already had much better and more specific replies in this thread which answered his questions better.
 
Lol you can't keep sticking to a lawyer who keeps on losing.

The guy must be seriously well connected,/.He keeps losing still getting new cases from Pakistan gormint
 
If you read the article you will read this:

"The judge said there was good evidence in support of Pakistan’s claim to the money, which needed to be fully considered at a trial. The judge also accepted that there were positive legal arguments which supported Pakistan’s position."


So it seems that it was a perfectly valid legal case and we don't really know what swayed the final judgement. Could be a valid argument put forth by Indian representation, or could simply be British courts are under pressure to facilitate British trade interests with India.
Doesn't it sound similar to ICC verdict between BCCI vs PCB MoU?
 
So are the Nizam's family gonna get the money or will Modi just keep it!:rp
 
Back
Top