Ok, let's have this discussion, shall we. I am not gonna quote the OP because I have seen these type of accounts come, troll and go away in the last half a decade so many times that I feel it's not worth investing into an argument that will eventually fade and have no reference point since the poster might abandoned ship mid way. However, since you are one of the seniors and have a good repute I'll address you and try to break into whetever the disucssion seems to be here.
Reading the OP, which has a title stated
'Pakistan should not be hosting International Cricket' is a definitive statement that displays the narrative that the OP believes that Pakistan
should not be hosting international cricket and the post that you have quoted brother this is the gist of the argument.
Pakistan should not host International Cricket because:
1) The players that have visited Pakistan including World XI were not of repute (even though that is not the case, ESPNcricinfo of all people spoke to Bazid Khan stating exactly the opposite and that this is the first time a lot of internationally recognized and acclaimed sportsmen were visiting Pakistan, but for the OPs sake let's just assume it is true)
2) The city goes into Lockdown (partially true) & the players are put under cerfew! They are scared and are thinking that why did they come to this hell of a place (not entirely sure how does the OP know what the players are thinking) because no one forced them to come here and I haven't read any SINGLE statement from any player that said otherwise.
Although as a matter of fact all the blokes that have visited & toured Pakistan have made official statements that have praised the hospitality of its people and the safety of the region so the definition of OPs torture doesn't fly (at least objective speaking), but again lets assume for OPs sake this too is taking place
3) The production quality is low - completely agreed! So since Pakistan do not have fancy cameras & a international level production team that gives HD quality streams worldwide we should not be allowed to host international matches?
Anybody who has a sound mind and can logically and coherently align their thought process will just laugh at this proposition. The Op thinks one of the major reason why we shouldn't be hosting cricket is because he doesn't get a 1080p broadcast in his HOME IN ENGLAND!!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
He then goes on to say that our grasp of Economics, Politics and Socialism is laughable yet at the same time he/she himself has not given a single verifiable metric that may suggest holding International games in Pakistan is actually counter productive because I would most ideally like to look at numbers which might suggest the social and economic negative reprecussions of holding matches in Pakistan and or Pakistan cricket - Until then the ball is in his court.
Holding cricket games should never be a matter of ego neighter should it be a discussion of whether it is right or wrong. The only thing that should amount to any weightage is whether holding games in Pakistan it would, economically, socially and politically benefit the discourse of our country internationally - If yes! We should invite people who are willing to come and participate in such events, if No - Then so be it! As we might have to work towards securing a front that would give us that 'Yes' answer from foreigners.
Also in case people are forgetting before every single international match that is held in Pakistan an independent security team vists the premisis assess situation in the city & adjoining areas who then give their recommendations to the member boards or to whomsoever may be participating in the event. This security agency is not hired or employed by the PCB rather it is directly sought by the personnel we might have put forth the invitation towards. Recently we also got FICA into the loop (who have been a staunch critic of us as of late) and guess what even they approved the World XI tour and had no reservations as the security team analysis of the on ground situation was statisfactory.
I would like to reiterate something that I heard on a Pakistan political podcast (conducted by leading IVY grad analysts with 35 years of journo exp on this exact same situation). According to them this decision was in line with the weightage factor that I explained in the earlier para. Risks are always there no matter what you do but as suggested by many posters you have to start somewhere while all you can do is make the best preperations (which Kudos to PCB they did very well) and hope for the best. They have done the same 4 TIMES in the last 2 years and now are branching into other cities (E.g. Karachi) with the same security model that has a 100% success rate.
This type of planning is in line with a scientific and logical approach and should be commended rather than condemned and I see no reason why after the success of all these tours Pakistan should just step back and not continue the progress just because our production value of cricket broadcast isn't in HD or because someone sitting in ENGLAND 'thinks' the players are in some sort of mental agony (laughable as there is no evidence whatsoever to back this claim)
We give invites (Optional for everyone), do our homework, execute flawlessly and try to do the best we can with whatever means we have and at the moment it is working - I don't see any reason why we should stop the latter. Brother cricket isolation is like a Unidirectional highway with no exits, if you keep on harping about why it's not perfect one will never get cricket back in Pakistan.
I hope the explanation helps.