What's new

Pakistan's re-election to UN rights body a unique opportunity to raise Kashmir issue: FM Qureshi

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,977
Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi on Wednesday said that Pakistan's re-election to the United Nations Human Rights Council for a fifth time has provided a unique opportunity for highlighting the Kashmir issue.

Speaking to the media, the foreign minister said that there was a communications blockade in the occupied valley while independent observes don't have access to the region. "So, this is a forum that can become the voice [of the Kashmiris]."

Asked about Pakistan’s priorities as a member of the UN body, Qureshi said that there should be four priorities; the Kashmir issue, the rise of Islamophobia, “Muslim causes” and human rights.

He said that the Kashmir issue was currently ongoing and the voice of the people was being suppressed. “Pakistan wants to send a clear message through this forum that we will not let the voice [of the Kashmiris] be suppressed and will continue to provide moral, diplomatic and political support to them."

ARTICLE CONTINUES AFTER AD

In an earlier statement carried by Radio Pakistan, the minister had termed Pakistan's re-election an "important diplomatic achievement". He said that Pakistan was supported by every region in its re-election while influential and important countries had also backed the country's bid.

He added that the vote vouched for Pakistan's performance in the council over the past three years, adding that the country's role was now being recognised by the world. Qureshi said human rights violations were increasing in occupied Kashmir and becoming a part of the UN body at this critical juncture was a big achievement, the report said.

In a tweet late night on Tuesday, the foreign minister said the re-election was "a manifestation of the international community’s confidence and trust in Pakistan’s commitment to a progressive national & global human rights agenda."

The Prime Minister's Office added that the re-election reflected the confidence of the international community in Pakistan's credentials.

"Pakistan’s resounding success in this election showcases the country as a principled, reliable and responsible player at the international stage with the capacity to contribute meaningfully to the UN, especially on issues related to human rights," the statement said.

Information Minister Shibli Faraz said that Pakistan's re-election was an "honour and a huge diplomatic win".

"This represents the international community's growing trust [and] is proof that the world thinks of Pakistan as an advocate for human rights," he said.

Among the five candidates from the Asia-Pacific region vying for four seats, Pakistan secured the highest number of votes.

Pakistan has been serving on the council since January 2018. With Tuesday’s re-election, Pakistan will continue as a member for another three-year term commencing on Jan 1, 2021.

“The international community has once again reposed confidence in Pakistan, recognising our contribution to the national and global human rights agenda and strong credentials as a consensus builder in the HRC,” said a statement issued by Pakistan’s Permanent Mission to the UN in New York.

“Pakistan remains firmly committed to upholding, promoting and safeguarding human rights and fundamental freedoms for all,” it added.

Diplomatic sources say that Pakistan will sustain its efforts towards ensuring that the HRC’s work is guided by the principles of universality, impartiality, dialogue and cooperation.

“In line with Pakistan’s commitment, we will prioritise advancement of tolerance, respect and constructive engagement in the HRC,” the Pakistani mission said.

The HRC has been a prominent forum for discussing the gross and systematic human rights abuses being perpetrated in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir.

“Pakistan will remain actively engaged with the council as well as its related processes to continue to highlight the plight of Kashmiris and other oppressed people all over the world,” the Pakistani mission said.

China and Russia win seats, Saudis lose
China, Russia and Cuba also won seats on the UN's premier human rights body despite opposition from activist groups over their abysmal human rights records, but another target, Saudi Arabia, lost.

Russia and Cuba were running unopposed, but China and Saudi Arabia were in a five-way race in the only contested race for seats on the council.

In secret-ballot voting in the 193-member UN General Assembly on that race, Uzbekistan received 164 votes, Nepal 150, China 139 and Saudi Arabia just 90 votes. In 2016, the Saudis won a seat with 152 votes.

Despite announced reform plans by Saudi Arabia, Human Rights Watch (HRW) and others strongly opposed its candidacy saying the Middle East nation continues to target human rights defenders, dissidents and women's rights activists and has demonstrated little accountability for past abuses, including the killing of Washington Post columnist and Saudi critic Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul two years ago.

Under the council's rules, seats are allocated to regions to ensure geographical representation. Except for the Asia-Pacific contest, the election of 15 members to the 47-member body was all but decided in advance because all the other regional groups had uncontested slates.

Four countries won four Africa seats: Ivory Coast, Malawi, Gabon and Senegal. Russia and Ukraine won the two East European seats. In the Latin American and Caribbean group, Mexico, Cuba and Bolivia won the three open seats. And Britain and France won the two seats for the Western European and others group.

"Saudi Arabia's failure to win a seat on the Human Rights Council is a welcome reminder of the need for more competition in UN elections,” HRW's UN director, Louis Charbonneau, said after the results were announced.

"Had there been additional candidates, China, Cuba and Russia might have lost too,” he said. "But the addition of these undeserving countries won't prevent the council from shining a light on abuses and speaking up for victims. In fact, by being on the council, these abusers will be directly in the spotlight."

https://www.dawn.com/news/1585008/p...opportunity-to-raise-kashmir-issue-fm-qureshi
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I am pleased with Pakistan’s re-election to UN Human Rights Council for another 3-yr term. We remain committed to upholding human rights for all, prioritizing advancement of tolerance & constructive engagement. We stand resolute against Islamophobia & in support of mutual respect</p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/1316326402929688576?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 14, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Pakistan will continue efforts towards consensus building and ensuring HRC’s work is guided by principles of universality, impartiality, dialogue & cooperation. Pak will continue to expose human rights violations committed with impunity by the Indian occupation forces in IIOJK</p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/1316326409263083520?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 14, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I commend the role of the Foreign Office and Pakistan’s Missions abroad in yet another diplomatic achievement, enhancing Pakistan’s profile and recognition on the international stage.</p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/1316326420537315329?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 14, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Please think first about resolving human rights abuses in Pakistan before worrying about what is happening elsewhere. Maybe SMQ could start by improving conditions of his followers in Multan and rest of South Punjab which is one of most deprived regions in the whole country. Maybe IK and PTI could think about human rights of Shias, Ahmedis, Hindus and Christians in Pakistan first before worrying about what is happening in occupied Kashmir.
 
Situation has become so perfect in Pakistan that it has become the Scandanavia of South Asia, hence the government has the luxury to focus on human rights abuses in neighbouring countries.

Just usual deflecting tactics from your own problems.
 
Well for starters, treating your minorities like equals would be a great start. Remember charity starts at home
 
Pakistan will remain actively engaged with the council as well as its related processes to continue to highlight the plight of Kashmiris and other oppressed people all over the world,” the Pakistani mission said.

Yes when it suits you politically.
 
Loving how Loralai types are always on the same page as our Indian members. His post is echoed by 3 of them barely before he's read the script. :91:
 
Loving how Loralai types are always on the same page as our Indian members. His post is echoed by 3 of them barely before he's read the script. :91:

I used to find it amusing... no longer though.
Not going to waste my time with such people who masquerade as something else when in reality they have an agenda to spread hate.

These people are either,

PMLN or PPP supporters and are thus corrupt
Indian citizens pretending to be Pakistani
Pakistani’s wanting to be Indian (aka traitors)..

Hate filled cretins
 
I used to find it amusing... no longer though.
Not going to waste my time with such people who masquerade as something else when in reality they have an agenda to spread hate.

These people are either,

PMLN or PPP supporters and are thus corrupt
Indian citizens pretending to be Pakistani
Pakistani’s wanting to be Indian (aka traitors)..

Hate filled cretins

I am surprised that you will use such strong words against a pper who has not posted anything directed at you.

Just because your agenda doesn't co incide with him, it doesn't mean one should resort to personal attack. Among his and your posts, yours has more hatred than his.

I have many disagreement with bhaag viru bhaag or even CJ, but that doesn't mean I will support that someone should attack them on personal level.

You should learn how to put forward your argument while standing your ground and not resorting to personal attacks.
 
I am surprised that you will use such strong words against a pper who has not posted anything directed at you.

Just because your agenda doesn't co incide with him, it doesn't mean one should resort to personal attack. Among his and your posts, yours has more hatred than his.

I have many disagreement with bhaag viru bhaag or even CJ, but that doesn't mean I will support that someone should attack them on personal level.

You should learn how to put forward your argument while standing your ground and not resorting to personal attacks.

Your disagreements with other Indians are in a relatively safe space, on a Pakistani forum so therefore removed from Indian public, hence have little impact on India in general.

Those posing as Pakistanis on a Pakistani website have access to thousands of Pakistanis and their use of propaganda can be much more impactful, thus obviously will engender stronger reactions when they single-mindedly pursue nefarious agendas.
 
I am surprised that you will use such strong words against a pper who has not posted anything directed at you.

Just because your agenda doesn't co incide with him, it doesn't mean one should resort to personal attack. Among his and your posts, yours has more hatred than his.

I have many disagreement with bhaag viru bhaag or even CJ, but that doesn't mean I will support that someone should attack them on personal level.

You should learn how to put forward your argument while standing your ground and not resorting to personal attacks.

I’m sorry but time for putting forward arguments ended a while ago.
Not going to waste any more of my time on the types of people I mentioned above.

Let me draw a line under this..
 
I am surprised that you will use such strong words against a pper who has not posted anything directed at you.

Just because your agenda doesn't co incide with him, it doesn't mean one should resort to personal attack. Among his and your posts, yours has more hatred than his.

I have many disagreement with bhaag viru bhaag or even CJ, but that doesn't mean I will support that someone should attack them on personal level.

You should learn how to put forward your argument while standing your ground and not resorting to personal attacks.

Unfortunately criticism of IK and PTI is often met with this type of response - you're either "unpatriotic" because you don't support the government or you're a corrupt PPP/Noon League supporter.

Sadly their criticism diverts attention from the real issue of persecution of minority communities and human rights in Pakistan. Less than 24 hours ago protests have been held in Muhammad Khel, Bannu Distt yet these posters have no concerns about recent incidents there

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Today the women of Muhammad Khel come out to protest against the brutality of the army & for the release of the locals. The locals have now staged a sit-in.We demand that the innocent people picked up by the army must be released and the valuables taken away must be returned. 2/2</p>— Mohsin Dawar (@mjdawar) <a href="https://twitter.com/mjdawar/status/1316010941608124416?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 13, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Please think first about resolving human rights abuses in Pakistan before worrying about what is happening elsewhere. Maybe SMQ could start by improving conditions of his followers in Multan and rest of South Punjab which is one of most deprived regions in the whole country. Maybe IK and PTI could think about human rights of Shias, Ahmedis, Hindus and Christians in Pakistan first before worrying about what is happening in occupied Kashmir.

Every nations see some sort of human rights abuses but you are confused and ignorant.

Pakistan is not butchering men, women and children with a force of over 1/2 million troops in a land which doesnt belong to the country.

On topic.

Pakistan under IK has continued to make publiciy of the state terrorism of India in Kashmir. Every few months the Indians are being shown up for the crimes.
 
Your disagreements with other Indians are in a relatively safe space, on a Pakistani forum so therefore removed from Indian public, hence have little impact on India in general.

Those posing as Pakistanis on a Pakistani website have access to thousands of Pakistanis and their use of propaganda can be much more impactful, thus obviously will engender stronger reactions when they single-mindedly pursue nefarious agendas.

c'mon Cap I thought you were better than that :abdv
If you criticize IK you are a traitor
If you bring issues of human rights abuses you are a raw agent
If anything out of line from what general public than you're automatically an Indian (trust me this insult hurts the most especially for people whose ancestors suffered so much to get a country for the Muslims to be called "Indian" is like someone cursing you with the choicest of words)

This is the thinking that leads to downfall of a country finding enemy from within trying to "purge" dissenting voices
this is not the way to go

no matter how ridiculous they sound this "traitor" fatwa shouldn't be issued so easily

Its very lazy to call someone a traitor but to understand someone's thinking is harder but better for the country in the long run (doesn't mean you have to agree with it)
 
Last edited:
Loving how Loralai types are always on the same page as our Indian members. His post is echoed by 3 of them barely before he's read the script. :91:

Haha true. Funny how Pakistan getting endorsed by 169 countries is causing heartache for Indians and Loralai types
 
c'mon Cap I thought you were better than that :abdv
If you criticize IK you are a traitor
If you bring issues of human rights abuses you are a raw agent
If anything out of line from what general public than you're automatically an Indian (trust me this insult hurts the most especially for people whose ancestors suffered so much to get a country for the Muslims to be called "Indian" is like someone cursing you with the choicest of words)

This is the thinking that leads to downfall of a country finding enemy from within trying to "purge" dissenting voices
this is not the way to go

no matter how ridiculous they sound this "traitor" fatwa shouldn't be issued so easily

Its very lazy to call someone a traitor but to understand someone's thinking is harder but better for the country in the long run (doesn't mean you have to agree with it)

I have no problem with those who bring up their own country's faults, but there is a difference between the genuine posters who post on many subjects both good and bad, and those who camp on forums relentlessly banging on the same agenda. Just look at how elections were supposedly affected in the US by Russian bots, and the general disapproval of spamming websites. These are the principles I am upholding, there is nothing nationalistic in it. All about quality input to create a better product.
 
Back
Top