What's new

Pakistan's turnaround at the CT shows that they revel in being labelled 'unpredictable'

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,977
In his latest article for FirstPost Sports, Saj writes about how Pakistan, a team ridiculed for its lack of effort, seemed to have undergone a transformation within a few days to earn a place in the semi-finals of the Champions Trophy.


GettyImages-695261344.jpg


Former British prime minister Winston Churchill once remarked that success could be defined as moving from one failure to another, without losing your enthusiasm. For only in failure, can one learn about one’s shortcomings and improve themselves before attempting to conquer their next objective.

For Pakistan’s ODI team, the number of failures in the past have been many but the will to improve themselves has been found lacking on a number of occasions. In fact, the current ODI ranking of eight seems to suggest that not much in terms of forethought has transpired between the numerous failures which the Pakistan team has faced in recent times.

The former World Cup winners entered the 2017 Champions Trophy as underdogs. This was not an assessment by the experts but by the team coach and captain themselves. This would either indicate that there was a distinct lack of faith in their own abilities or the team management wanted to water down any high expectations from fans and experts alike.

The start to Pakistan’s Champions Trophy campaign was to be a marquee clash against arch rivals India. The hype was to be seen to be believed and parallels were being drawn to the previous glorious encounters between the two nations. Of course, the gap in abilities of both teams became apparent on 4 June at Edgbaston when they clashed in front of a record audience.

Pakistan were swept away by a clinical Indian performance that day, yielding to a 124-run defeat (via DLS method) to a much superior opposition. The bowling which had always been a strong point of Pakistan appeared pedestrian and the batting failed to refute its reputation for being brittle, with the fielding bordering on the comical at times. Bowlers failed to perform with any conviction, the batsmen gave away wickets in schoolboy fashion and the fielders spilt chances to give the game away to the opposition.

Such was the malaise in the Pakistan camp that a visibly irate Pakistan head coach Mickey Arthur openly expressed his disbelief at the manner in which his players had disregarded all training to capitulate in front of India. Arthur remarked at that point that it had to be the magnitude of the occasion that had the better of his team and that the skills and talents were not in question.

The media and the fans may have scoffed at that suggestion, but whether by magic or fate and with a little bit of forethought, what transpired in Edgbaston against South Africa on 7 June left the sternest of critics shaking their heads in disbelief.

A team ridiculed for its lack of effort and poor body language appeared to have undergone a transformation within days, which not only pleasantly surprised their supporters but pulverised their opposition to submission.

Whilst it is true that the Pakistan team management took some wise decisions in terms of team selection, the fact is that the bowlers came up with immaculate lengths and seemed to execute their plans to perfection and the fielders attacked the ball as if their lives depended on it.

The inclusion of Junaid Khan and the ebullient Fakhar Zaman seemed to instil a new sense of purpose in a team which appeared to be heading for an exit at the end of the group stage. The result was a fantastic 19-run victory (via DLS method) against the much-vaunted South Africa which also happen to be the current No 1-ranked ODI side in the world.

The naysayers were having none of that. This was indeed an aberration, they said. False dawns, like the ones in the 2015 World Cup had been seen and had come to nothing in the past. This too was a blip and normal service would resume in the crucial virtual knockout game against Sri Lanka, people thought.

It would appear that the Pakistan side revels in it being labelled an 'unpredictable' group of players. But what transpired in Cardiff on Monday would suggest that being unpredictable is not a synonym for failure, but a quality that spurs them to greater heights.

Sri Lanka, fresh from an epic seven-wicket victory against the tournament favourites India were riding a wave of confidence. The theory was that an ‘unpredictable’ Pakistan would be no match for such a team, but whatever Pakistan did in the game against South Africa, they seemed to do better against Sri Lanka.

The bowling was exemplary and the fielding had no blemishes. The run chase was a little too tense for many but once again what emerged was a picture of a team with a new-found determination to succeed where previous units would have collapsed in a heap.

In a sense, this is the key difference between Sarfraz Ahmed’s side of today and those before him.

This is a side which was a shadow of itself at the start of the Champions Trophy, but has turned itself around with sheer grit to challenge the top teams of the tournament. The credit for this transformation must go to the players but the importance of the guidance of Arthur cannot be ignored. He spoke of ‘frank conversations’ after the defeat against India and how he felt that the team was in a better space in mental terms after coming to terms with their disappointing loss. He wasn't kidding.

If proof was needed of this change, the victories against South Africa and Sri Lanka are great examples of that and if the turnaround in Pakistan’s fortunes continues in the same manner, then Sarfraz lifting the Champions Trophy on 18 June will become more than just a pipe dream.
 
Last edited:
One thing is predictable.. the batting. Please Sarfi lift us from this mess.. Bat at #4!!
 
nothing unpredictable about the batting though. Eng only needs to make sure they put up 260 and then they are home.
 
I personally dont take this "Unpredictable" tag positively, in fact its an insult. Its a polite way of saying that we loose all the time but once in a while we are able to make an upset.

I would rather be dominant ,predictable and be in top 4 then have some romenticized label and be in the bottom.

BTW no one calls you unpredictable if you win all the time and thats the good thing.
 
I personally dont take this "Unpredictable" tag positively, in fact its an insult. Its a polite way of saying that we loose all the time but once in a while we are able to make an upset.

I would rather be dominant ,predictable and be in top 4 then have some romenticized label and be in the bottom.

BTW no one calls you unpredictable if you win all the time and thats the good thing.

Well said bro. If only the media guys would also abhor this word then the team will also be forced to mend their ways and will play more professionally. They wouldn't have to bank on this crutch and get a sense of feel good factor which in turn would spur them on to greater Heights.
 
There is nothing unpredictable in this, absolutely nothing. I think, I have written several times that PCT operates at 60-65% of it's capacity because of the amount of baggage it has to carry.

If I analyze those 3 matches for PAK so far, we can categorically see why Inzamamul Haque is the biggest culprit in this regard (or the reason, why SF spot looks a surprise).

VS IND: a total shambles. In that match, there were 2 above par/average performance - Amir & to a certain extent Azhar (above par of his standard), and I'll give Shadab a pass as well. And there were few shambolic performance - Shehzad, Babar, MoHa, Imad & the wooden spoon to Wahab. Besides, fitness had been a culprit.

SAF: there was one outstanding performance - Hasan. And par or above par performance from most players. Couple of shambles again - MoHa & Azhar with bat. MoHa chiped with Kok's wicket, but he was instrumental to make DWL almost fatal after Fakhar gave a brisk start.


SRL: overall poor performance, but team won for 4 above par performance - Amir, Sarfraz, Fakhar & JK; while Hasan, Fahim were not under par. There were few shambolic performance - Babar, Malik, MoHa & Azhar - Azhar takes the cake here because he almost spoiled Fakhar's brilliance with 0 (15) start & then getting out exactly when you don't want your set batman to get out.

Now, if I summarize PAK's tournament so far - it's a clear indication that categorical nepotism to few undeserving seniors basically is holding back this side at least 35% of its capability. These seniors are occupying key batting spots without merit what so ever, bowling rubbish & getting away scot free for their lathergic approach in field. This tournament for PAK had been 90% bowling, an area which managed to dodge "experience bullet", after 1st match due to Wahab's injury - otherwise, one of Hasan or JK would have missed next 2 matches & these 2 are PAK's best two bowlers since.

I would rather say, PAK had been quite predictable in last few years, which has resulted into 8th/9th ranks - that's only because WI & ZIM had declined further due to non cricket field issues. Bring the WI or ZIM side of just about a decade back - PAK would have been predictably at 10th by now, fighting to keep nose above AFG, for that the squad & leadership that had been picked for last few years. This tournament is unique in this regard that few youngsters (despite twice failure from Babar) could pull their socks to carry the garbage baggage, on top of their own luggage on their inexperienced shoulders.

Next ICC event is also in UK, at similar time & condition will be almost identical - it doesn't change much in 2 years. After this CT is over, unless Haq is sacked or taken to task for shaping up his acts, in 2 years time, even winning a meaningful match will look like unpredictable. I believe, time has come to bring this guy to live programs & ask direct questions, so that he can't hide behind words. This same guy debuted 3 players in total over his 4 years tenure as Captain & being one of the most powerful Captain ever of PAK cricket - in a period, so ironic that PAK won 2 U19 WCs - lighting doesn't strike same spot twice, but this guy stroke PAK team perfectly twice with his grouping, nepotism & fellow feeling, to the level that I have to say instead of being messiah, this guy has been a curse.

Despite mass scale age cheating, current PAK side is by far the oldest in world, in terms of average age - in an young men's game; that too after this guy couldn't drop few players in their teens, early or mid 20s. If he is given a complete free ride, he'll make PAK's official average age by 2019 WC somewhere in between 35 to 38 with his buddies & followers.

I wrote it during the match thread & I'll reteriate it here - PCT's prospect in 2019 WC hangs completely at the hand of PCB itself - no unpredictability there. For a team like PAK, which is the slowest starters of the lot, 2019 WC format is the best possible scenario to make the KO stage. 9 matches with teams playing each other's, more importantly giving PAK team enough time to aclamatize & hit their peak. Even if I consider ENG, AUS & IND as invincibles, still in a world where 5/6 serious cricket countries exists - PAK's fight for SF probably remains a function of just couple of matches against SAF & BD.

This is the time to bring a strong Mickey Arthur. Come July 2017, give him 25 players pool - in between official age of 19 to 29 with 1/2 exceptions, so that the official average age of the team at the start is around 23-24; by the WC it may reach to 24-25; with players in their 20s holding key stakes in the team instead of these old haggards lurking around the spoils, backing on their relationship & past reputation - a reputation that is written only in shame. These bunch has the glorious past of dragging a team from top 3 to 9th within their career & still don't have the self dignity to call it a day untill they are dragged out of their shambles.

Unless these opportunists are uprooted with the core of seniority culture, as I said, by 2019 WC, we'll might have to bring those 2/3 matches against WI, ZIM & AFG as an example of unpredictable Pakistan Cricket Team.

Cheers//
 
There is nothing unpredictable in this, absolutely nothing. I think, I have written several times that PCT operates at 60-65% of it's capacity because of the amount of baggage it has to carry.

If I analyze those 3 matches for PAK so far, we can categorically see why Inzamamul Haque is the biggest culprit in this regard (or the reason, why SF spot looks a surprise).

VS IND: a total shambles. In that match, there were 2 above par/average performance - Amir & to a certain extent Azhar (above par of his standard), and I'll give Shadab a pass as well. And there were few shambolic performance - Shehzad, Babar, MoHa, Imad & the wooden spoon to Wahab. Besides, fitness had been a culprit.

SAF: there was one outstanding performance - Hasan. And par or above par performance from most players. Couple of shambles again - MoHa & Azhar with bat. MoHa chiped with Kok's wicket, but he was instrumental to make DWL almost fatal after Fakhar gave a brisk start.


SRL: overall poor performance, but team won for 4 above par performance - Amir, Sarfraz, Fakhar & JK; while Hasan, Fahim were not under par. There were few shambolic performance - Babar, Malik, MoHa & Azhar - Azhar takes the cake here because he almost spoiled Fakhar's brilliance with 0 (15) start & then getting out exactly when you don't want your set batman to get out.

Now, if I summarize PAK's tournament so far - it's a clear indication that categorical nepotism to few undeserving seniors basically is holding back this side at least 35% of its capability. These seniors are occupying key batting spots without merit what so ever, bowling rubbish & getting away scot free for their lathergic approach in field. This tournament for PAK had been 90% bowling, an area which managed to dodge "experience bullet", after 1st match due to Wahab's injury - otherwise, one of Hasan or JK would have missed next 2 matches & these 2 are PAK's best two bowlers since.

I would rather say, PAK had been quite predictable in last few years, which has resulted into 8th/9th ranks - that's only because WI & ZIM had declined further due to non cricket field issues. Bring the WI or ZIM side of just about a decade back - PAK would have been predictably at 10th by now, fighting to keep nose above AFG, for that the squad & leadership that had been picked for last few years. This tournament is unique in this regard that few youngsters (despite twice failure from Babar) could pull their socks to carry the garbage baggage, on top of their own luggage on their inexperienced shoulders.

Next ICC event is also in UK, at similar time & condition will be almost identical - it doesn't change much in 2 years. After this CT is over, unless Haq is sacked or taken to task for shaping up his acts, in 2 years time, even winning a meaningful match will look like unpredictable. I believe, time has come to bring this guy to live programs & ask direct questions, so that he can't hide behind words. This same guy debuted 3 players in total over his 4 years tenure as Captain & being one of the most powerful Captain ever of PAK cricket - in a period, so ironic that PAK won 2 U19 WCs - lighting doesn't strike same spot twice, but this guy stroke PAK team perfectly twice with his grouping, nepotism & fellow feeling, to the level that I have to say instead of being messiah, this guy has been a curse.

Despite mass scale age cheating, current PAK side is by far the oldest in world, in terms of average age - in an young men's game; that too after this guy couldn't drop few players in their teens, early or mid 20s. If he is given a complete free ride, he'll make PAK's official average age by 2019 WC somewhere in between 35 to 38 with his buddies & followers.

I wrote it during the match thread & I'll reteriate it here - PCT's prospect in 2019 WC hangs completely at the hand of PCB itself - no unpredictability there. For a team like PAK, which is the slowest starters of the lot, 2019 WC format is the best possible scenario to make the KO stage. 9 matches with teams playing each other's, more importantly giving PAK team enough time to aclamatize & hit their peak. Even if I consider ENG, AUS & IND as invincibles, still in a world where 5/6 serious cricket countries exists - PAK's fight for SF probably remains a function of just couple of matches against SAF & BD.

This is the time to bring a strong Mickey Arthur. Come July 2017, give him 25 players pool - in between official age of 19 to 29 with 1/2 exceptions, so that the official average age of the team at the start is around 23-24; by the WC it may reach to 24-25; with players in their 20s holding key stakes in the team instead of these old haggards lurking around the spoils, backing on their relationship & past reputation - a reputation that is written only in shame. These bunch has the glorious past of dragging a team from top 3 to 9th within their career & still don't have the self dignity to call it a day untill they are dragged out of their shambles.

Unless these opportunists are uprooted with the core of seniority culture, as I said, by 2019 WC, we'll might have to bring those 2/3 matches against WI, ZIM & AFG as an example of unpredictable Pakistan Cricket Team.

Cheers//

You are asking for too much, boldness and Pak cricket, that relationship has ended in last century, this timid and corrupt lot running pak cricket would wet their pents even at the thought of what you are asking.
 
Back
Top