What's new

[PICTURE] Cricket experts - Is this out or not out?

Not out - bails has to be removed.

I give other example - ball hits the stick, bails flies up & then settles again on its grove - it’s not out (it happend in Test - S Waugh I Bell be). Or, ball passes through the sticks but bails don’t drop - it happend to Symcox against Mushtaq.

Here, middle stick has been knocked. However, local umpires may get not know this & batsman himself might start to walk.
 
out. since the stump has been uprooted. Either the bails need to be taken off or the stumps uprooted.
 
Not out - bails has to be removed.

I give other example - ball hits the stick, bails flies up & then settles again on its grove - it’s not out (it happend in Test - S Waugh I Bell be). Or, ball passes through the sticks but bails don’t drop - it happend to Symcox against Mushtaq.

Here, middle stick has been knocked. However, local umpires may get not know this & batsman himself might start to walk.

No. Even if stump is uprooted it's enough.
 
MCC law for when a player can be declared out bowled

32.1 Out Bowled

32.1.1 The striker is out Bowled if his/her wicket is put down by a ball delivered by the bowler, not being a No ball, even if it first touches the striker’s bat or person

Now to the 'wicket is put down'

29.1 Wicket put down

29.1.1 The wicket is put down if a bail is completely removed from the top of the stumps, or a stump is struck out of the ground,

29.1.1.1 by the ball,

29.1.1.2 by the striker’s bat if held or by any part of the bat that he/she is holding,

29.1.1.3 for the purpose of this law only, by the striker's bat not in hand, or by any part of the bat which has become detached,

29.1.1.4 by the striker’s person or by any part of his/her clothing or equipment becoming detached from his/her person,

29.1.1.5 by a fielder with his/her hand or arm, providing that the ball is held in the hand or hands so used, or in the hand of the arm so used.

29.1.1.6 The wicket is also put down if a fielder strikes or pulls a stump out of the ground in the same manner.

29.1.2 The disturbance of a bail, whether temporary or not, shall not constitute its complete removal from the top of the stumps, but if a bail in falling lodges between two of the stumps this shall be regarded as complete removal.
 
Rule was amended a long time back. Now it reads the bails or stumps have to be uprooted
 
No. Even if stump is uprooted it's enough.

May be the rule is amended or I missed something.

As far I knew - "up-rooting wicket" comes only if there is not bails used. In olden days, sometimes in windy condition, Umpires were allowed to run the game without bails - then the wicket comes. B
 
Back
Top