[PICTURE] Narendra Modi, a dictator? ABC News documentary exposes Modi govt’s crackdown on press, minorities

Do you agree with Modi's portrayal as a dictator?


  • Total voters
    12

The Bald Eagle

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 25, 2023
Runs
9,051
A new documentary by ABC News, spearheaded by reporter Avani Dias, has unveiled serious allegations against the Modi government concerning its treatment of journalists and minority communities, extending both within India and on an international scale

The documentary details how Dias, alongside other foreign journalists such as French reporter Vanessa Dougnec and several from Al Jazeera, faced significant obstacles while reporting in India, especially during election times.

These journalists reportedly had their visas denied or were expelled from the country, indicating a pattern of repression towards critics of the Modi administration.

Dias’s work highlights various instances of censorship, including the forced removal of videos covering sensitive topics like the murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar. She also shared experiences of receiving threats from Indian authorities after such content was deleted.

Over its decade-long rule, the Modi government is accused of consistently targeting foreign journalists as part of a broader crackdown on dissent.

The documentary also sheds light on the systematic actions against minority groups, specifically Sikhs and Muslims, citing the involvement of organizations like the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh (HSS) in training operatives for violent acts against these communities.

Furthermore, the report connects the Indian government to severe international incidents, including the assassination of Hardeep Singh Nagar in Canada and the attempted assassination of Gurpatwant Singh Pannu in the United States, with investigative findings from these countries implicating the Modi government.

The documentary also exposes alleged espionage activities, where Indian intelligence officers were expelled from Australia in 2020 after attempts to procure sensitive defense technologies, as confirmed by Australia’s Chief of Security Intelligence Organization.

Source: Pakistan Today

_20240622_015930.JPG
 
Another hilarious attempt by the leftist media.

Avani Dias was expelled from India and foreigners cannot claim a right to reside and work in India, thats a privilege and not a right. May be these people think that a western passport is some kind of all access pass and it hurts their ego that India doesn't give two hoots to it.

All countries have spies in other countries. They get caught and are either exchanged or expelled.
 
You need free journalism to keep a government honest.

My own observation of India is there has been a systematic movement in recent years to clamp down on any critical journalism and inflate pro government journos while pumping up fake news via online channels.

Modi has many many flaws including his appalling dog whistle style of politics.

But I don't agree with portrayals of Modi as dictator type character. He is the complete opposite, relatively simple with no desire for wealth, no ostentatious displays, no desire for women or lavish life style.

This simplicity is what attracts many of the voters to him.

Contrast to Pakistani army generals and politicians. The way they behave and amass wealth and status.

How many overseas properties do they have and how many does Modi have?

They are the real general aludin type dictators.
 
You need free journalism to keep a government honest.

My own observation of India is there has been a systematic movement in recent years to clamp down on any critical journalism and inflate pro government journos while pumping up fake news via online channels.

Modi has many many flaws including his appalling dog whistle style of politics.

But I don't agree with portrayals of Modi as dictator type character. He is the complete opposite, relatively simple with no desire for wealth, no ostentatious displays, no desire for women or lavish life style.

This simplicity is what attracts many of the voters to him.

Contrast to Pakistani army generals and politicians. The way they behave and amass wealth and status.

How many overseas properties do they have and how many does Modi have?

They are the real general aludin type dictators.

Does India need journalists from Western countries to keep the government honest?

Why do Western countries think that they have the right to tell others how to function and others have to obey?

India's history culture people society everything is very different from Western countries, we don't need to follow them.

And this goes for every country.
 
Does India need journalists from Western countries to keep the government honest?

Why do Western countries think that they have the right to tell others how to function and others have to obey?

India's history culture people society everything is very different from Western countries, we don't need to follow them.

And this goes for every country.
Nobody is saying you need to follow them but what's wrong with them being critical and providing their point of view? Their reports can be easily rebutted and debated if needed.

The reality is that if they fawned at Modis feet they wouldn't be getting removed.
 
Nobody is saying you need to follow them but what's wrong with them being critical and providing their point of view? Their reports can be easily rebutted and debated if needed.

The reality is that if they fawned at Modis feet they wouldn't be getting removed.
Nobody needs to fawn a Modi's feet. And nobody should.

Their point of view cannot be against the very sovereignty of India. Avani Dias support to Khalistanis while living in India is something that couldn't be condoned. That's why her visa was extended for only 2 months.

India is more important than any foreign journalist.
 
Well, I won't be harsh on Modi g, as he is not a dictator but just a personification of character from the film General Aladin @pillionrider @DeadlyVenom @Itachi
He was hoping to be and had even started trying to walk like one though he looked cringe. Now he’s done in that ambition and is an old man clinging to power

Rahul describes his situation quite well here. Scroll to 17:17. He also looks like he’s ready to have some fun with Modi in his last year or two as PM. And we on the frustrated, depressed, oppressed side can sit back with thumsup and spicy potato chips in hand ready to enjoy this vertical slide ride of Modiji :dhoni


 
Another hilarious attempt by the leftist media.

Avani Dias was expelled from India and foreigners cannot claim a right to reside and work in India, thats a privilege and not a right. May be these people think that a western passport is some kind of all access pass and it hurts their ego that India doesn't give two hoots to it.

All countries have spies in other countries. They get caught and are either exchanged or expelled.
Forget about leftist media, even Modi's handpicked anchors inadvertently proved him a dictator.. lol. Check the video below

 
Let him be a dictator, their people chose him 3 times in a row. Also, he is making India super power and economy is booming. What did our “dictators” do? Rob the nation to a point bankruptcy, knocking on every country door to beg for funding, terrible education system to even lift us from the current situation.
 
5 more years of burnol for leftist news outlets.
Any government that does not bow down to their globalist agenda is automatically a dictator and a genocidal maniac.
 
He was hoping to be and had even started trying to walk like one though he looked cringe. Now he’s done in that ambition and is an old man clinging to power

Rahul describes his situation quite well here. Scroll to 17:17. He also looks like he’s ready to have some fun with Modi in his last year or two as PM. And we on the frustrated, depressed, oppressed side can sit back with thumsup and spicy potato chips in hand ready to enjoy this vertical slide ride of Modiji :dhoni



Like he said, rahul took highway “his way or highway” :LOL:
 
A murderer, racist, bigot this guy is. 100%.

However I don't see him or his government kidnapping Congress women and men, molesting them in jails, ransacking their houses, changing election forms and results.

And most of all he is not sitting on the PM seat he stole. He's won it fair and square
 
A murderer, racist, bigot this guy is. 100%.

However I don't see him or his government kidnapping Congress women and men, molesting them in jails, ransacking their houses, changing election forms and results.

And most of all he is not sitting on the PM seat he stole. He's won it fair and square
How is he a racist
 
How is he a racist
Well, its just a month old stuff
====
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is facing accusations of spreading hatred against Muslims after controversial comments on Sunday wherein he equated the community to “infiltrators” and peddled anti-Muslim tropes in the middle of the country’s general elections.

Speaking at a crowded rally in the western state of Rajasthan, Modi said if the opposition led by the Congress party came to power, it would distribute the country’s wealth among “those who have more children”, in an apparent reference to Muslims, whom he had spoken about just before.

“Should your hard-earned money be given to infiltrators?” he said to the cheering crowd, before alleging that the opposition would take away even mangalsutras — the auspicious necklace that a husband ties around his wife’s neck in Hindu weddings — if given a chance.

Local poll officials in Rajasthan confirmed to Al Jazeera that they had received at least two complaints against Modi, calling for his election campaign to be suspended and for his arrest.

Renu Poonia, a nodal officer of the Election Commission of India (ECI) in the state capital, Jaipur, revealed that the complaints were received from the Azad Adhikar Sena, a regional political party, and a local non-profit organisation. India’s election code bars parties and politicians from engaging in speeches and campaigns that aim to perpetuate religious or caste differences. But independent watchdogs and activists have long complained that election officials act too slowly, if at all, especially when cases involve powerful officials in the government.

 
Well, its just a month old stuff
====
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is facing accusations of spreading hatred against Muslims after controversial comments on Sunday wherein he equated the community to “infiltrators” and peddled anti-Muslim tropes in the middle of the country’s general elections.

Speaking at a crowded rally in the western state of Rajasthan, Modi said if the opposition led by the Congress party came to power, it would distribute the country’s wealth among “those who have more children”, in an apparent reference to Muslims, whom he had spoken about just before.

“Should your hard-earned money be given to infiltrators?” he said to the cheering crowd, before alleging that the opposition would take away even mangalsutras — the auspicious necklace that a husband ties around his wife’s neck in Hindu weddings — if given a chance.

Local poll officials in Rajasthan confirmed to Al Jazeera that they had received at least two complaints against Modi, calling for his election campaign to be suspended and for his arrest.

Renu Poonia, a nodal officer of the Election Commission of India (ECI) in the state capital, Jaipur, revealed that the complaints were received from the Azad Adhikar Sena, a regional political party, and a local non-profit organisation. India’s election code bars parties and politicians from engaging in speeches and campaigns that aim to perpetuate religious or caste differences. But independent watchdogs and activists have long complained that election officials act too slowly, if at all, especially when cases involve powerful officials in the government.

That is bigotry and religious hatred, not racism. Indian Muslims aren't a seperate, different race
 
But I don't agree with portrayals of Modi as dictator type character. He is the complete opposite, relatively simple with no desire for wealth, no ostentatious displays, no desire for women or lavish life style.
Well agree to the extent of wealth and being a non womanizer but on publicity you are mistaken bro as he has propped up Modiwood recently and never lets go any publicity event whether this be himself praying or meeting a guy like Mark Zuckerberg
That is bigotry and religious hatred, not racism. Indian Muslims aren't a seperate, different race

Well, its debatable but thanks that you acknowledged it as bigotry
 
Forget about leftist media, even Modi's handpicked anchors inadvertently proved him a dictator.. lol. Check the video below


Bhai atleast understand what the anchor said, she is saying "ecosystem" makes allegations against you. They are being sarcastic on the ecosystem.
 
Bhai atleast understand what the anchor said, she is saying "ecosystem" makes allegations against you. They are being sarcastic on the ecosystem.
But in the conversation that have pointed a number of autocratic actions like actions against political opponents like Kejriwal etc that appeared to me the real sarcastic stuff tbh
 
5 more years of burnol for leftist news outlets.
Any government that does not bow down to their globalist agenda is automatically a dictator and a genocidal maniac.
The said documentary,
====
At least four Indian spies have been expelled from Australia after reports of attempts to infiltrate political networks in the country. Former South Asia correspondent Avani Dias says the Modi administration has been building a ‘nest of spies’ to influence Australian lawmakers while sending threats to Indian Australians who oppose the Indian government.

 
A murderer, racist, bigot this guy is. 100%.

However I don't see him or his government kidnapping Congress women and men, molesting them in jails, ransacking their houses, changing election forms and results.

And most of all he is not sitting on the PM seat he stole. He's won it fair and square

Then what are our guys? :ROFLMAO:
 
Well, what about 234 seats alliance
-----
'BY DESCRIBING ME AS DICTATOR, OPPOSITION IS INSULTING 140 CRORE INDIANS': PM MODI

Prime Minister Narendra Modi today again hit out at the Opposition saying, "by describing me as dictator, they are insulting 140 crore Indians". He also vowed to oppose any move to amend the Constitution to provide reservation quota on the basis of religion.

Speaking to India TV anchor Minakshi Joshi, after filing his nomination for Varanasi Lok Sabha seat, Modi said, "When they use the word 'taanashah' (dictator) for an elected Prime Minister, they are insulting 140 crore voters of this country. Do you think the

voters of India will elect a dictator? Our voters are so mature that they threw out the dictator withing two years, when Emergency was imposed. Using the word 'dictator' is nothing but an abuse against crores of Indian voters. A person who served as chief minister of an important state by securing record majority, has served as prime minister for 10 years by winning elections. They are not insulting Modi, they are insulting the sanity (samajhdari) of Indian people. They are insulting the commitment of the Indian people towards democracy."

Source: India Today
 
The said documentary,
====
At least four Indian spies have been expelled from Australia after reports of attempts to infiltrate political networks in the country. Former South Asia correspondent Avani Dias says the Modi administration has been building a ‘nest of spies’ to influence Australian lawmakers while sending threats to Indian Australians who oppose the Indian government.

Yes, becos Australia no intelligence gathering.......
 
Well, what about 234 seats alliance
-----
'BY DESCRIBING ME AS DICTATOR, OPPOSITION IS INSULTING 140 CRORE INDIANS': PM MODI

Prime Minister Narendra Modi today again hit out at the Opposition saying, "by describing me as dictator, they are insulting 140 crore Indians". He also vowed to oppose any move to amend the Constitution to provide reservation quota on the basis of religion.

Speaking to India TV anchor Minakshi Joshi, after filing his nomination for Varanasi Lok Sabha seat, Modi said, "When they use the word 'taanashah' (dictator) for an elected Prime Minister, they are insulting 140 crore voters of this country. Do you think the

voters of India will elect a dictator? Our voters are so mature that they threw out the dictator withing two years, when Emergency was imposed. Using the word 'dictator' is nothing but an abuse against crores of Indian voters. A person who served as chief minister of an important state by securing record majority, has served as prime minister for 10 years by winning elections. They are not insulting Modi, they are insulting the sanity (samajhdari) of Indian people. They are insulting the commitment of the Indian people towards democracy."

Source: India Today
What about them? Modi is operating under the mandate of the elections.

Do you even know what dictatorship is?
 
But in the conversation that have pointed a number of autocratic actions like actions against political opponents like Kejriwal etc that appeared to me the real sarcastic stuff tbh
Nothing autocratic about action against Kejriwal. Kejriwal had plenty of opportunity to answer the bribery charges. He chose not to.
 
What about them? Modi is operating under the mandate of the elections.

Do you even know what dictatorship is?
Lol was Hitler ruling without mandate, please elaborate. Also enlighten me regarding your view of dictatorship
 
But in the conversation that have pointed a number of autocratic actions like actions against political opponents like Kejriwal etc that appeared to me the real sarcastic stuff tbh

They said the ecosystem says these are autocratic actions.
 
Lol was Hitler ruling without mandate, please elaborate. Also enlighten me regarding your view of dictatorship

Every 5 years Modi faces elections. BJP faces elections in states whenever they are due.

People vote them and that's why they are in power.

That's democracy.

Its another point that pakistanis don't like him or that he isn't into muslim appeasement, so you think he is a dictator.
 
Every 5 years Modi faces elections. BJP faces elections in states whenever they are due.

People vote them and that's why they are in power.

That's democracy.

Its another point that pakistanis don't like him or that he isn't into muslim appeasement, so you think he is a dictator.
True, but could be better put in this way that he does not care about Muslims at all for the sake of Hindu appeasement even marginalizing them for the same goal
 
Does India need journalists from Western countries to keep the government honest?

Why do Western countries think that they have the right to tell others how to function and others have to obey?

India's history culture people society everything is very different from Western countries, we don't need to follow them.

And this goes for every country.

But you do follow them, at every step from independence, India has made sure to fall in line with every western trend or philosophy. It is why it is always far easier for Indians to integrate in western countries than Pakistanis or Afghans.
 
Such attempts are nothing for Modiji… reporters claiming this since 2014, but no one proved yet.. in India every reporter have freedom to bark freely. If any of these reports born our neighbouring countries, they would have killed.

I m sharing one example… 2 years back when Gautam Adani acquired NDTV group. NDTV media group always against ruling BJP government and praising opposition parties. After hearing Adanis acquiring NDTV, Pranab Roy, Senior management fellows tendered their resignations immediacy. They feared that if Adani controls NDTV, then Modi used him to change the policy of NDTV and it will turn BJP pro… now after 2 years, NDTV remains unchanged, they are continued their agenda against BJP government .
 
But you do follow them, at every step from independence, India has made sure to fall in line with every western trend or philosophy. It is why it is always far easier for Indians to integrate in western countries than Pakistanis or Afghans.

No we don't. We have always kept ourselves independent of what others want us to do.

We acquired Atomic bomb when the west didn't want us to.

We don't support the NATO against Russia or then USSR.

Foreigners have never been allowed to meddle in our internal matters.
 
True, but could be better put in this way that he does not care about Muslims at all for the sake of Hindu appeasement even marginalizing them for the same goal

Name one law that his government has passed that marginalizes Indian Muslims.
 
Lol was Hitler ruling without mandate, please elaborate. Also enlighten me regarding your view of dictatorship
ha the hitler bogeyman. we have reached an inevitable internet discussion end point.


Looks like your already walking things back with post #32

your post that CAA should include bengali muslims, while bangli nuslims are the violently asked for partition shows that all you care about is muslim causes.

you have little to no objectivity in you outlook and can see things only thro one prism
 
His policies reflect a dictatorial streak in him.
His wings have been clipped to economy class now, making him as powerful as 'Thakur' in the movie 'Sholay'. The good thing for him is he has no shortage of Ramlals in India. The best one lives in Australia.😆 :inti
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No we don't. We have always kept ourselves independent of what others want us to do.

We acquired Atomic bomb when the west didn't want us to.

We don't support the NATO against Russia or then USSR.

Foreigners have never been allowed to meddle in our internal matters.

That's because you agree with them on everything.
 
Rich coming from a country who has been under the thumb of the NATO and the US since 1947.

They even supported you against us in the 71 war, while we were alligned with the USSR

But I'm not arguing it, I agree Pakistan has always been under NATO thumb. But if US had really supported Pakistan against India, there would have been no winners of that war.
 
That's because you agree with them on everything.
USA asked us not to buy oil from Russia after the Russia-Ukraine war. We still did, ignoring their warning. And your former PM Imran Khan gave that particular example saying that that is what an independent foreign policy worked and looked like.

Care to explain how that happened?
 
Gujarat was enough to expose Modi. His many comments against his own Muslim's are for all to see when he calls them "thos who have too many children" and things as such.
 
Gujarat was enough to expose Modi. His many comments against his own Muslim's are for all to see when he calls them "thos who have too many children" and things as such.

When RaGa said resources will be divided as per percentage of population it was clear that Muslims with higher fertility rate will benefit and other communities with lower fertility rate will suffer.

Modi told the truth.
 
Gujarat was enough to expose Modi. His many comments against his own Muslim's are for all to see when he calls them "thos who have too many children" and things as such.
Why do you think "those who have too many children" means muslims?

This is a secular remark and refers to anyone who has too many children. There are people from many communities which have too many children. Modi made a secular remark.
 
Modi is poor dictator. Cant even dictate his own will. The kind of narrative being pushed against him is nauseating. People don't understand the meaning of Dictator or they are just gleaming when Modi gets called a dictator. None of this changes the ground reality.
 
Why do you think "those who have too many children" means muslims?

This is a secular remark and refers to anyone who has too many children. There are people from many communities which have too many children. Modi made a secular remark.
He has made many other comments about Muslim people.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When RaGa said resources will be divided as per percentage of population it was clear that Muslims with higher fertility rate will benefit and other communities with lower fertility rate will suffer.

Modi told the truth.
Whose stopping Hindu's from making more babies? Also, it is a myth that your Muslims have more children.
 
Whose stopping Hindu's from making more babies? Also, it is a myth that your Muslims have more children.
maybe becos they are not looking for handouts from the governments and want to educated culture children.

More children = less resources=less education
 
It is a well-known fact that violence against Journalism and minorities is there. Especially against Muslims, we hear news every day. Dictator is small term now.
 
It is a well-known fact that violence against Journalism and minorities is there. Especially against Muslims, we hear news every day. Dictator is small term now.
Especially against muslims, because any event related to muslim gets the megaphone, while others news get drowned out.

My friend was involved in demolishing illegal structures. 1 illegal mazar and 3 temples. But only the mazar made it to BBC. I called him up reading his name in the article. He said the journalist was muslim and the journo removed his statement that 3 temples were also demolished in the anti encroachment drive.

The news you get to hear is because only that particular bite is given a platform.

Dictator is not the small term, it is the WRONG term. Anyone elected by democratic elections and confined by the boundaries of constitution cannot be called a dictator.
 
Lol was Hitler ruling without mandate, please elaborate. Also enlighten me regarding your view of dictatorship
Fantastically, YES. Hitler came to power without a popular mandate. Its well documented and what he did after coming to power, please go through it. One might not like Modi is one thing but Modi as a dictator is nothing hyperbolic political rhetoric.
 
It is a well-known fact that violence against Journalism and minorities is there. Especially against Muslims, we hear news every day. Dictator is small term now.

You are making statements with no credible evidence.
 
USA asked us not to buy oil from Russia after the Russia-Ukraine war. We still did, ignoring their warning. And your former PM Imran Khan gave that particular example saying that that is what an independent foreign policy worked and looked like.

Care to explain how that happened?

No problem. USA did not give any warning to India not to buy oil from Russia, they requested. There was never any warning given but if there was, then please provide some proof of it. There is also a good reason for not warning India: it is too important as both a market for USA products, and as a co-operative and docile partner which sets them apart from China. This also reinforces my point made that India generally falls in line with every western whim right down to adopting the language of the British Raj.

Imran Khan's words need to be seen in context. He is no admirer of BJP led India, he is on record as being a fierce critic, hence why he is disliked by hindutvas far more than the current Pak administration. IK was merely comparing Indian self interest compared to Pakistan's shadow administration which has been mocked even by American ministers publicly.
 
There is also a good reason for not warning India: it is too important as both a market for USA products, and as a co-operative and docile partner which sets them apart from China. This also reinforces my point made that India generally falls in line with every western whim right down to adopting the language of the British Raj.

Cap I totally agree with this, Indians have been falling in line with the West, just like the Chinese have been also, hence these countries have great economies while our Pakistan is constantly facing humiliation, being broke, begging in front of the international community constantly for money to survive...

Maybe it's not a bad idea for Pakistan to fall in line as well 🤔
 
Cap I totally agree with this, Indians have been falling in line with the West, just like the Chinese have been also, hence these countries have great economies while our Pakistan is constantly facing humiliation, being broke, begging in front of the international community constantly for money to survive...

Maybe it's not a bad idea for Pakistan to fall in line as well 🤔

I'm sure many in the Pakistan administration would love to fall in line with the west, unfortunately it would mean compromising their position as an Islamic nation and to do so they would need to drop quite a few of their current positions on censorship, Sharia laws, and israeli genocide. Will the public accept that? I doubt it.

I don't know why you lumped China in with India, there are wargames being conducted over the last few years with China and NATO facing off over several territorial disputes.
 
Well, according to that logic the answer of following headlines would also be in 'No' then just curious what we call a person ruling a government that is Not Democratic? 🤔

Betteridge's law of headlines: Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no.
 
Well, according to that logic the answer of following headlines would also be in 'No' then just curious what we call a person ruling a government that is Not Democratic? 🤔

This is just rephrasing of the headline, but the intended meaning of the headline still remains the same. They are still insinuating that minorities are not safe in india, and india is not a democracy. Betteridge himself talked about such cases.
 
Name one law that his government has passed that marginalizes Indian Muslims.
OK for a moment let's ignore NRC and CAA what about reservations, isn't it for socially underwhelmed communities?, In the article below, Modi himself acknowledging it and denying it's benefits for Muslims
====

Reservation on the basis of religion will be against the values and principles enshrined in the Indian Constitution, said Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday.
“As long as I am alive, I will not let reservations of Dalits, adivasis, OBCs be given to Muslims on the basis of religion," he said in Maharashtra's Nandurbar while campaigning for elections.
Click here to connect with us on WhatsApp

“The Congress never bothered about the welfare of adivasis," he said about India’s main Opposition party.
What did PM Modi say in Rajasthan's Banswara in April?
The controversy started when during an election rally in Rajasthan's Banswara last month, Modi said that if voted to power, the Congress will distribute the country's wealth among "infiltrators" and families with more children.

Modi cited a speech by former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and said his rival’s administration had advocated for the redistribution of property from Hindus to Muslims.

"This ‘urban Naxal’ mindset, mothers and sisters, will not even leave your mangalsutra. They can go to that extent. The Congress manifesto claims it will calculate the gold possessed by mothers and sisters, gather information about it, and then distribute that property. They will distribute it to whom? Manmohan Singh's government had said Muslims have the first right on the country's assets," Modi had said.

"Earlier, when their [Congress] government was in power, they had stated that Muslims have the first right on the country's assets. This implies to whom will this property be distributed? It will be distributed among those who have more children. It will be distributed to the infiltrators. Should your hard-earned money go to the infiltrators? Do you approve of this?"

"Do governments have the right to confiscate your property which you have earned through hard work? The gold with our mothers and sisters is not for showing off; it is tied to their self-respect. The value of their mangalsutra is not in gold or its price, but is related to their dreams in life. And you are talking about snatching it?" the prime minister had said in Rajasthan.
The Congress asked the Election Commission (EC) to take action against Modi for his comments. The Congress said the Prime Minister's speech was "divisive, objectionable and malicious” and he had made “blatantly defamatory”, “false” and “unverified allegations” against the party.

The Communist Party of India (Marxist) too asked the EC to take action against PM Modi and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

'Not against Muslims or Islam', says PM Modi
In a recent interview to Times Now TV news channel, Modi said that he is not biased against Muslims.
In an interview clip shared on X (formerly Twitter), Modi said, "Neither we are against Muslim nor Islam. This is not our work. Muslim community understands everything. When I ended the tradition of triple talaq, when I give Ayushman card or when I give Covid-19 vaccine, Muslim sisters feel I am a genuine man who does not discriminate."

Answering to allegations made against him for being against Muslims, he said, “When there was the government of Atal Bihari Vajpayee, our manifesto mentioned Ram Mandir, Article 370. When you speak about 100 per cent, every community is included. There is a guarantee of social justice, secularism. Modi ensures that everyone gets everything."

'Muslims, leaders should introspect', says PM Modi
He further said that the Muslim community and their leaders should introspect. “The country is moving forward. If your community is lagging, then what is the reason? Did you receive the benefit of government schemes during Congress' rule?" he said.


The Prime Minister accused the Congress party of disrespecting the Constitution. “Shouldn't we create a spirit of Constitution in the country? It is not that the Constitution should be only for judges and lawyers. When I brought a proposal in Parliament to celebrate Constitution Day, Kharge ji [Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge] himself opposed it, saying what was the need when we celebrate January 26."

 
ha the hitler bogeyman. we have reached an inevitable internet discussion end point.


Looks like your already walking things back with post #32

your post that CAA should include bengali muslims, while bangli nuslims are the violently asked for partition shows that all you care about is muslim causes.

you have little to no objectivity in you outlook and can see things only thro one prism
An easy way to dodge the main question
Well still waiting for your definitions of terrorist and dictator.
 
Not at all. I just showed you what the world consensus on thought process like yours. you don't like it, tough

since you seem pretty confident using that term, Why don't you give me your definition? We will go from there.
Well I have done it before in OBL thread but you didn't return the favor so it would also be futile now.

And OK bro if you really belive in global consensus, then tell me why Modi was banned by US, how was your PM viewed by countries and international media before PMship. Infact also afterward. Would you now still go with the 'global consensus'?
 
Well I have done it before in OBL thread but you didn't return the favor so it would also be futile now.
Now who is dodging?

You simply asked the question if OBL was terrorist or freedom fighter.

Go ahead and gimme the difference with definition.

And OK bro if you really belive in global consensus, then tell me why Modi was banned by US, how was your PM viewed by countries and international media before PMship. Infact also afterward. Would you now still go with the 'global consensus'?
Global? does US and UK become the globe? there are 162 countries.

All it shows is hypocrisy of countries that banned him and the traitors traits among Indian leaders which in the past led tot its conolonisation
 
OK for a moment let's ignore NRC and CAA what about reservations, isn't it for socially underwhelmed communities?, In the article below, Modi himself acknowledging it and denying it's benefits for Muslims
All of a sudden you are expert on indian constitution? You might not like it, but indian constiutiion doesn't caste based reservation.

If it is equitable system, it would be based one economics and not religious or caste identity

all you you capable of is seeing green tinted glasses
 
Now who is dodging?

You simply asked the question if OBL was terrorist or freedom fighter.

Go ahead and gimme the difference with definition.


Global? does US and UK become the globe? there are 162 countries.

All it shows is hypocrisy of countries that banned him and the traitors traits among Indian leaders which in the past led tot its conolonisation
@The Bald Eagle I hear crickets chirping.
 
Well, according to that logic the answer of following headlines would also be in 'No' then just curious what we call a person ruling a government that is Not Democratic? 🤔

two highly credible articles.

One from a free lancer from islamabad <snicker>

The other declared that Indian democracy is dying in July 2023, Now its almost July 2024. Is Indian democracy dead yet?
 
'Muslims, leaders should introspect', says PM Modi
He further said that the Muslim community and their leaders should introspect. “The country is moving forward. If your community is lagging, then what is the reason? Did you receive the benefit of government schemes during Congress' rule?" he said.
If it is equitable system, it would be based one economics and not religious or caste identity
It seems you didn't read the article i quoted.
 
@The Bald Eagle I hear crickets chirping.
Yep i can give mine but you can't give yours beside vanishing

Terrorists are those who enforce their opinions on others, who kill people aimlessly just to further their powers and those who kick people out of their land for their colonization and just to get their dirty hands over their resources.
The above text is from post 15 OBL thread and on freedom fighter its too simple anyone who fights to liberate their land from invaders, colonizers or imperialist forces

Hopefully now you will tender your definitions too instead of dodging tactics
 
Back
Top