What's new

[PICTURE] Power of Hype: How is it that Sachin Tendulkar gets more adulation than Steve Smith?

BouncerGuy

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 29, 2023
Runs
36,781
Look at the numbers after 205 Test innings—Smith and Sachin are almost identical—same number of hundreds and fifties, similar averages, even strike rates. But somehow, Sachin is worshipped, and Smith is just... respected.

Power of hype: India's billion fans turned a prodigy into a deity, while Aussies let their freak bat in peace.

It’s not just about stats. Sachin was cricket’s heartbeat for a billion people. Smith, no matter how brilliant, doesn’t carry that emotional weight. This isn’t about who’s better. It’s about how hype, timing, and legacy shape the way we remember greatness.

 
Sachind made 7 k extra runs which smith still has to score. Sachin had longevity factor though he was trash in his last 2,3 years like Kohli was in his last 4 years but Sachin wanted to score as many as he could to keep the record which Australians usually don't do.
 
Welcome to the world outside of Pakistan i.e the real world.

P.S. Why is it that Viv Richards gets more adulation than Greg Chappell inspite of the latter's superior numbers?​
These are identical numbers... Answer the question asked instead of trying to shift the whole thing..

Smith and tendulkar is the real deal here
 
These are identical numbers... Answer the question asked instead of trying to shift the whole thing..

Smith and tendulkar is the real deal here
First you answer my question on why does Viv Richards receive far more accolades than Greg Chappel despite the latter's much better numbers? At least Tendulkar and Smith played in different eras. Viv and Chappell played during the same time.​
 
First you answer my question on why does Viv Richards receive far more accolades than Greg Chappel despite the latter's much better numbers? At least Tendulkar and Smith played in different eras. Viv and Chappell played during the same time.​
O bhai... Can you read the topic of the thread?

I asked a question.. You answer it or let others do it instead of asking about irrelevant players here..
 
Well... I see no logic... question against question is not a logic
It is. Why you use a certain logic to compare 2 players, you should be willing to use the exact same logic to compare another 2 players. Not willing to do so makes you a hypocrite.
 
Legacy is not created through numbers. Babar would be better than many illustrious ODI players from the past if you purely go by numbers
 
It is. Why you use a certain logic to compare 2 players, you should be willing to use the exact same logic to compare another 2 players. Not willing to do so makes you a hypocrite.
I am comparing smith and tendulkar here... you can answer and prove the point instead of getting triggered for nothing...
 
I am comparing smith and tendulkar here... you can answer and prove the point instead of getting triggered for nothing...
I'm being triggered? You are the one getting triggered unable to answer my question. I compared 2 other players using the exact same logic that you did while comparing Tendulkar and Smith. Not once did I introduce any other criteria. All I did is use your own very logic.

If you are not willing to let me or anyone else you your own logic while comparing Tendulkar and Smith with other players, you have no right to expect a response from us to your original question.​
 
I'm being triggered? You are the one getting triggered unable to answer my question. I compared 2 other players using the exact same logic that you did while comparing Tendulkar and Smith. Not once did I introduce any other criteria. All I did is use your own very logic.

If you are not willing to let me or anyone else you your own logic while comparing Tendulkar and Smith with other players, you have no right to expect a response from us to your original question.​
Hahaha.... first explain the hype of Tendulkar, which is the real topic here.. you can compare all the players you want in their relevant thread....
 
Hahaha.... first explain the hype of Tendulkar, which is the real topic here.. you can compare all the players you want in their relevant thread....
The hype can be explained as artificial if it came from his home country. But his hype mostly came from the rest of the cricketing world. When the rest of the world showers and keeps showering accolades on you, what more needs to be said?

Of course it has always been a bitter pill to be swallowed by Pakistani fans over the years, it can be understood. The funniest bit is former Pakistani cricketers doing the same and showering him with accolades after accolades. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:



 
The hype can be explained as artificial if it came from his home country. But his hype mostly came from the rest of the cricketing world. When the rest of the world showers and keeps showering accolades on you, what more needs to be said?

Of course it has always been a bitter pill to be swallowed by Pakistani fans over the years, it can be understood. The funniest bit is former Pakistani cricketers doing the same and showering him with accolades after accolades. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:



Thanks for your answer..
 
Reason is their white ball exploits.

Why Wasim gets more adulation than Ambrose even though Ambrose is better test player?

Why Stokes gets more adulation than Jadeja even though Jadeja is better test player?

Why AB de Villiers gets more adulation than Amla even though their stats were pretty much same for most part and their career overlapped too?

Several such examples.

You can opt to be a purist and rate players on basis of test cricket only but adulation isn’t restricted to what you do in one format.
 
India has a huge population
Their fans are into hero worship
Social Media dictates hype.
 
Because other formats exist. Simple answer but would totally expect Pakistani posters to read this as a newsflash.
 
Welcome to the world outside of Pakistan i.e the real world.

P.S. Why is it that Viv Richards gets more adulation than Greg Chappell inspite of the latter's superior numbers?​
Viv is one of the greatest ODI players alongside a goat Test batter too. Chappell is not one of the greatest ODI batter.

Viv also won Two World Cups with great knock in the Final.

Viv also played a brand of attacking cricket that was ahead of his time.

All of this puts him ahead of Chappell when you compare them both in both ODI and Test formats together as a batter
 
India has a huge population
Their fans are into hero worship
Social Media dictates hype.
They can hero worship to their hearts content but throwing abuse on people with alternative views and belittling other players is major insecurity.

Already potshots have been taken at Babar and Younis Khan, and the whole country of Pakistan for the opinion of the OP.

This is a unique behaviour amongst some Indian fans, and unfortunately because of their sheer numbers and easy access to internet, the opinion has the most volume online.

Many nuanced Indian fans even have the opinion that Smith is better than Sachin but in test only. However when a non Indian expresses that opinion we are subjected to terror and abuse.
 
Viv is one of the greatest ODI players alongside a goat Test batter too. Chappell is not one of the greatest ODI batter.

Viv also won Two World Cups with great knock in the Final.

Viv also played a brand of attacking cricket that was ahead of his time.

All of this puts him ahead of Chappell when you compare them both in both ODI and Test formats together as a batter
That’s all the same reason why Tendulkar is rated above Smith. Tendulkar is second greatest odi batsman while Smith is nowhere close.
 
Probably because -

a) Smith is not aesthetically pleasing to watch
b) He isn't a one-man army like SRT in the 90s
c) He is more of an accumulator than a dominator


Of course, having a billion fans helps as well :rabada2
 
Tendulkar gets more adulation because India have a much larger population than Australia. Australia's population is 27-million while India's population is over 1.4-billion.

Also, cricket isn't the most popular sport in Australia but it is the #1 sport in India.

It is why Tendulkar gets more adulation I guess.
 
Sachin is an all format ATG.
Steve Smiis only a test ATG.
Hence both don’t get the same adulation in cricket world.

Smith is also a complete failure in the most popular format of the game i.e t20. Sachin didn’t play any t20is as they were introduced late in his career.
 
Look at the numbers after 205 Test innings—Smith and Sachin are almost identical—same number of hundreds and fifties, similar averages, even strike rates. But somehow, Sachin is worshipped, and Smith is just... respected.

Power of hype: India's billion fans turned a prodigy into a deity, while Aussies let their freak bat in peace.

It’s not just about stats. Sachin was cricket’s heartbeat for a billion people. Smith, no matter how brilliant, doesn’t carry that emotional weight. This isn’t about who’s better. It’s about how hype, timing, and legacy shape the way we remember greatness.

Why is Roger Federer still more admired and considered GOAT compared to Djokovic??
Why Michael Jordan considered the GOAT vs Lebron??
Why are Senna , Schumacher considered above Hamilton and Verstappen?

The frequency of such threads by the "admins" just shows the salty nature. :P
 
If you don't understand why Tendulkar is hyped then Cricket is not the sport for you.
He started out as a 16 year old. Had centuries in all SENA countries before he turned 20.
Was the best bat in the world at the age of 22 (1995/96) and at 38 as well (2010/11)

There are great bats and then there are geniuses. Tendulkar was a genius.
Younis and Chanderpaul have similar numbers to Lara. Nobody thinks they are in the same bracket as him.
WHY? BECAUSE WE UNDERSTAND CRICKET

Coming back to Smith, he has regularly been called the Best Since Bradman. What more do you want??
If he was equally successful in White ball cricket then he would have been more hyped.

Tendulkar is the only bat who makes the top 5 in both Tests and Odi's. That is his case.
 
Yes. India's best ODI batters of all time are Kohli and Rohit.

Tendulkar is behind them in ODI but is ahead of them in Test. :inti
Tendulkar is 2 levels above Rohit as an Odi bat.
Kohli has beastly numbers but he is not in the same tier as SRT either.

Only Richards and De Villiers are comparable in Odi cricket to Tendulkar.
 
Tendulkar is 2 levels above Rohit as an Odi bat.
Kohli has beastly numbers but he is not in the same tier as SRT either.

Only Richards and De Villiers are comparable in Odi cricket to Tendulkar.
Kohli is bettee than Tendulkar is Odis, lol at putting Tendulkar a tier ahead.

Devilliers is consistently rated lower than Kohli by all contemporaries as well as past legends.
 
Kohli is bettee than Tendulkar is Odis, lol at putting Tendulkar a tier ahead.

Devilliers is consistently rated lower than Kohli by all contemporaries as well as past legends.
Kohli is a great accumulator. Tendulkar was a dasher and an accumulator.

Cheteshwar Pujara thinks Ben Stokes is the best Test cricketer of the century. Cannot take these things that seriously.

Also, all the top bowlers of the last 20 years have called Ab the toughest to bowl to. From Buttler to Warner, everyone fanboys over AB. Even Kohli does lol
 
Why do Pakistani pacers get hype by Pakistanis when there are multiple pacers with better averages?

Out of all pace bowlers with 200+ test wickets, Pakistanis are not even in the top 10.

Imran no 12, Waqar 16, Wasim 17.
 
Mainly because how good he was when debuting at 16 and then becoming best batsman by the age of 21. Doing it for 20 more years at very high level in both formats with dominating style of cricket.
 
Viv, SRT, Warne, Wasim, AB, McGrath, Bumrah etc - all catches your eyes for similar reasons. Be very good in all formats. Then if you do it for more than 2 decades ...
 
I’d still rate Sachin above Kohli. It’s not just about piling up runs, it’s about the era.

Sachin played when bowling attacks were vicious, pitches were less forgiving, and he often had to carry the team on his shoulders.

Kohli had 10 other match winner batsmen around him. Same with Smith. Sachin was the lone warrior more often than not
 
Look at the numbers after 205 Test innings—Smith and Sachin are almost identical—same number of hundreds and fifties, similar averages, even strike rates. But somehow, Sachin is worshipped, and Smith is just... respected.

Power of hype: India's billion fans turned a prodigy into a deity, while Aussies let their freak bat in peace.

It’s not just about stats. Sachin was cricket’s heartbeat for a billion people. Smith, no matter how brilliant, doesn’t carry that emotional weight. This isn’t about who’s better. It’s about how hype, timing, and legacy shape the way we remember greatness.

After 205 innings -

Sachin was 31, Smith was 35. general fan opinion often leans towards valuing potential, so a younger player with similar stats to an older one may be viewed more favourably due to their projected future success.

No one had any clue that Smith would go on to become an ATG and potentially the second-best Test batsman of all time. In contrast, Sachin was rated among the very best even in his early days, scoring overseas Test hundreds at a very young age. In the 1990s, only Steve Waugh and Brian Lara could match him in Test cricket, but in ODIs, he was head and shoulders above them, stamping his absolute authority. Think of Anwar in ODIs and Lara in Tests, combined in one player.

Smith tends to slip out of the limelight when he's not playing Tests, whereas Sachin was relentless throughout the late 1990s.

Many people actually believe that Sachin underachieved due to his tennis elbow injury. He didn’t feast on the flat pitches of the 2000s as much as players like Dravid, Kallis, Sangakkara, Ponting, and Younus did.

Another factor that works in Sachin’s favour is that the 1990s were arguably the last golden era of cricket. We were lucky to witness legends like Warne, Akram, Donald, Saqlain, Murali, McGrath, and many other all-time greats playing together. Even teams like Zimbabwe, Sri Lanka, and the West Indies were strong and competitive.

In the Indian context, Sachin is comparable to WG Grace, a pioneering and highly influential figure. His stardom helped fill the coffers of the BCCI and played a huge role in popularizing the game.

Sachin also reached the peak of his stature thanks to his integrity and dedication. He came out of the match-fixing era completely unscathed, which only strengthened his reputation as a true ambassador of the sport.
 
Tendulkar was box office. U can spend hours watching a Tendulkar innings & not get tired. Great finesse , easy on the eyes.

Steve Smith was more workmanlike. Very effective but nobody spends his free time watching Steve Smith highlights on Youtube
 
Look at the numbers after 205 Test innings—Smith and Sachin are almost identical—same number of hundreds and fifties, similar averages, even strike rates. But somehow, Sachin is worshipped, and Smith is just... respected.

Power of hype: India's billion fans turned a prodigy into a deity, while Aussies let their freak bat in peace.

It’s not just about stats. Sachin was cricket’s heartbeat for a billion people. Smith, no matter how brilliant, doesn’t carry that emotional weight. This isn’t about who’s better. It’s about how hype, timing, and legacy shape the way we remember greatness.

Well because of this may be
 
I'm not that ignorant or delusional like some of his fanboys.
Your post suggest otherwise. SRT scored 18500 runs at avg of 44@SR 86 in ODIs.

Lara and Ponting from his era averaged lower, SR lower and total runs tally also lower.
 
You should watch interviews with someone like Unmukt Chand to know the pressures and naivete of an 18-19 year-old. And then revisit 16-year-old Sachin debuting vs THAT Pak bowling attack and returning home with his confidence boosted rather than dented.
 
India has a huge population
Their fans are into hero worship
Social Media dictates hype.
Social media wasn't a thing back then. In fact, I'd argue that Sachin had a massive role to play in why the BCCI ended up becoming so powerful and wealthy. And as has been stated by others, the thing with Sachin was, unlike some glorified IPL hero today, it was a case of the whole world queuing up to watch him bat. I remember Andy Flower once being stopped for a short interview late into his career at the ground and he said, gotta go, I'm here to watch Sachin bat. A Sri Lankan journalist ran into Aravinda de Silva on the London tube and Aravinda told him he had zoned out of cricket (this was before he'd got involved in their board). Apparently he only asked the journalist one question - How is Sachin doing? And when told he was back to scoring after his tennis elbow, de Silva just nodded, said 'Good' and left. There are countless stories like this from all over the world. The consistent love he received from the Australian public - surely no one believes the Australian cricket fans give a damn about some IPL money or Indian reporting.
 
Sachin is superior to any batsman that’s ever played the game. To single handedly carry the burden of expectations of 1 billion cricket mad people for close to a decade and have such a phenomenal record.
Sachin indeed seemed to possess supernatural abilities and was rightly called the God of cricket.
 
Because Sachin is simply a greater batsman than Steve Smith.

Numbers matter, but so do stories and heroic accomplishments. Sachin is celebrated not just for his extraordinary stats, but for entering international cricket at 16 and carrying the weight of hype, pressure, and expectation for 24 years while playing some of the most feared bowlers of all time, across formats, and did it all while upholding the highest level of integrity and humility.

At times, others may have looked more dominant in short bursts. But Sachin’s story shines out because it is unmatched in emotional depth.

He isn’t alone, Imran Khan, Shane Warne, and Wasim Akram are examples of players whose genius and impact on people cannot be truly understood by numbers alone.

Humans connect with stories more than statistics. That’s my learning in Sports and in general.
 
Kohli is a great accumulator. Tendulkar was a dasher and an accumulator.

Cheteshwar Pujara thinks Ben Stokes is the best Test cricketer of the century. Cannot take these things that seriously.

Also, all the top bowlers of the last 20 years have called Ab the toughest to bowl to. From Buttler to Warner, everyone fanboys over AB. Even Kohli does lol
Kohli is a great accumulator plus a great finisher, the like of which this world has never seen.

Just like Sachin, Rohit is an aggressor plus accumulator but there is no one in history who has combined accumulating big runs with finishing.

Yes, Abd had more talent and was difficult to bowl to when in mood but he was no Viv Richards, he also hasn’t played many iconic knocks and his performance in tournaments is not comparable to Kohli.
 
Sachin is more technically correct. In fact as close to the perfect batsman as ever. Steve Smith bats like he is playing French cricket. Not easy on the eye.
Sachin is an all format great. Steve Smith is too slow for the shorter formats. He is not a threat in ODI’s and T20’s.

Only a fool will pick Smith over Sachin.
 
Tendulkar was a 16 year old prodigy. At 16 years he smashed Qadir for 4 straight sixes in one over. Played against Pakistan, NZ, England, Australia all overseas. Saved a test match by scoring 63 & 119* at the age of 17. Smith is one of those hardworking batsman like Steve waugh. He just maximized his form with stats. There is nothing natural about him. Jo Root did the same with a bit more flair. Statistics is not be all end all. Pak fans have this bitter jealousy about Sachin's popularity. They somehow try new thread every week to bring him down. Not going to silence any of his admirers around the world.
 
You should watch interviews with someone like Unmukt Chand to know the pressures and naivete of an 18-19 year-old. And then revisit 16-year-old Sachin debuting vs THAT Pak bowling attack and returning home with his confidence boosted rather than dented.

And then follow that up with tours to Eng, SA, Aus and come up with 100s in each of those tours ... a feat that no other test cricketer has achieved ... atleast not while in their teens.
 
Smith is still playing and most Australians for years have been calling him the best test batsman since Bradman. I'm not sure how much more adulation you are looking for. The remarkable thing here is that on top of their test stats being nearly identical after 205 innings, Sachin is also inarguably one of the top three greatest ODI batsmen of all time.
 
Because Sachin is simply a greater batsman than Steve Smith.

Numbers matter, but so do stories and heroic accomplishments. Sachin is celebrated not just for his extraordinary stats, but for entering international cricket at 16 and carrying the weight of hype, pressure, and expectation for 24 years while playing some of the most feared bowlers of all time, across formats, and did it all while upholding the highest level of integrity and humility.

At times, others may have looked more dominant in short bursts. But Sachin’s story shines out because it is unmatched in emotional depth.

He isn’t alone, Imran Khan, Shane Warne, and Wasim Akram are examples of players whose genius and impact on people cannot be truly understood by numbers alone.

Humans connect with stories more than statistics. That’s my learning in Sports and in general.

I’m annoyed by current India as anyone to put it politely . IMO Sachin isn’t the GOAT batter in cricket but he’s up there as a legend batsmen . Stats are there in multiple categories but he was picked for Yorkshire as a 17 year old because from age of 10 it was obvious this kid is a future protege . The bloke was natural genius with the bat , comparing him to Smith is liking slapping your own face . In time pass India can be torn apart but let’s leave cricket about cricket, India produced an artist of a batsmen , no other Indian batsmen will come close ever
 
Sachin is the greatest marketed cricketer of all time, whatever he lacked as a player was made up by BCCI’s marketing and PR departments to really sell him as the best player of all time. Ten sports whenever there was rain or interruptions for matches would play the same cherry picked highlights of his over and over to really drive the point home.
 
Sachin is the greatest marketed cricketer of all time, whatever he lacked as a player was made up by BCCI’s marketing and PR departments to really sell him as the best player of all time. Ten sports whenever there was rain or interruptions for matches would play the same cherry picked highlights of his over and over to really drive the point home.
That would be imran khan lol
 
Sachin managed to be an all format GOAT while smashing Bharat's biggest rival at the biggest stage for multiple decades. That's the reason he is celebrated. Apparently, the multi-generational trauma he left behind still haunts some nationalities nearly 15 years after his retirement, a tribute to his GOAT status.
 
Sachin managed to be an all format GOAT while smashing Bharat's biggest rival at the biggest stage for multiple decades. That's the reason he is celebrated. Apparently, the multi-generational trauma he left behind still haunts some nationalities nearly 15 years after his retirement, a tribute to his GOAT status.
It took Sachin two years to become a global superstar. 18 years, that is. Australians immediately recognized it. Richie Benaud went wow. Then in England. As a 17-year-old, he almost made a 100 against Richard Hadlee. Got out at 88. You tour NZ, Australia, England, and even before playing a couple of first-class games in India, and do well in all places, you do get noticed. Then the World Cup, where he did well. Imran Khan was hyping Inzamam to counter Sachin. Sachin left everyone in the dust. IN 1992 there was no marketing or hype or anything. Every single adulation he received was from Australia, England and other countries. He also toured SA and made a 100. Pak fans have no clue about Sachin's evolution as generational superstar. SO they use these useless cricinfo stats to put him down. Legacies are not built using cricinfo stats. Imran khan was hyping inzamam incessantly. Nobody paid attention.
 
It is natural to get admired when there are more people in your country... Simple facts. India has more population and they see Sachin as some god so his value automatically goes up because he gets more votes and likes LOL

He was a great batter himself... No doubts... No one can take his greatness away.
 
It is natural to get admired when there are more people in your country... Simple facts. India has more population and they see Sachin as some god so his value automatically goes up because he gets more votes and likes LOL

He was a great batter himself... No doubts... No one can take his greatness away.
Sachin Tendulkar did not become famous because of the population. He was famous because he was a prodigy all over the world. In Australia kids were queing up to get his autograph. Read this article from an aussie. Fairly lengthy article and see how Tendulkar's legacy reached lofty heights in Australia even before it happened in India.






Between his debut at 16 and retiring at 40, he made 34,357 international runs. Kumar Sangakkara is the second all-time run scorer with 28,016, and Ricky Ponting is third with 27,483.

See how easily I turned to statistics? That's a cricket-lover's habit, usually about half the story.

But I rated him highest before his numbers shot off the charts."
 
It is natural to get admired when there are more people in your country... Simple facts. India has more population and they see Sachin as some god so his value automatically goes up because he gets more votes and likes LOL

He was a great batter himself... No doubts... No one can take his greatness away.
As pointed out again and again and again, he is admired by the entire world and not just Indians. By current and ex cricketer, the greatest voices and commentators in cricket history.

There are multiple quotes in this very post which shows that.

Its dishonest to claim it's just Indians.
 
Back
Top