What's new

[PICTURE] "This team will do great in the Champions Trophy": Aaqib Javed

The Bald Eagle

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 25, 2023
Runs
16,120
Aaqib Javed speaking during the post-match presser after losing the Tri-Nation series final against New Zealand:

About the mystery spinner’s effectiveness:


“You have to figure out what your best options are with spinners in ODIs and stick with them. Like today, just because they've played reverse well doesn’t mean it's always going to work. If you look at Abrar Ahmed’s performance, especially with the white ball, it's been impressive. But there are times when some players just manage the conditions better than others. It's not always straightforward. Every player manages things in their own way. You need to see if your accuracy is good and if your leg spin variety is on point. Sometimes, one player can handle things well, but that doesn't mean all players will play the same way in every match."

About a specialist opener missing in the squad and Babar Azam:

“If you look at the matches that have happened, the term "open" refers to the first five, six, or seven overs where you need a solid start. Our thinking was that, just like what happened in the three ODIs in South Africa, unfortunately, Babar Azam had to go in during the first over in all three games. Then Saim Ayub got injured during Test matches and Babar had to open in the Test. The challenge on these pitches isn't the top order because there’s no seam or anything like that on these kinds of pitches. If there's any movement and bounce, we thought that your best player could really suit us if he plays in the first 10 overs on these pitches. Also, we've been looking at the combinations we've had, whether it's Test or ODI, and we brought in the players who have been in form and performed well.”

“You'll notice a change in the ODIs; people are still trying to figure it out, but often they overlook the importance of the 11 to 40 overs and having those four fielders out of the circle. You really don’t need to go for crazy shots or try to accelerate too much in ODIs. If you look at the players who are mainly Test players and have solid techniques, like Kane Williamson and Tom Latham, they can be way more effective. You just need to use four fielders properly. I believe that with the way Babar is playing, he should open on pitches like this and make the most of the hard ball for the first 10 overs. The signs are clear that there's an important game coming up and there's one innings due. So maybe he will play that inning on the day when Pakistan needs it the most?”

“Babar Azam usually bats at number three, and when you're opening, there’s a difference. When you’re playing outside Pakistan, the ball tends to seam more and moves around a bit. So, if you’re going in after five or six overs or even ten, the ball can seam a bit less. If the swing isn’t happening, then on this pitch, you won’t get much seam or bounce either. So, if your best player usually bats at three and gets the chance to open, it’s not a bad idea.”

About Khushdil Shah and Salman Ali Agha as bowlers:

“You need to think about the team’s balance. If you’re playing two specialist spinners, it means you’re going to have to leave out two fast bowlers. We're going to need at least three seamers who can bowl with the new ball, and then we need a Haris Rauf-type bowler who can take wickets in the middle overs. Unfortunately, he hasn't been playing for the last couple of matches, so that gap is pretty noticeable. If you look around, every team has a specialist spinner, and the rest are all-rounders. Salman and Khushdil are also all-rounders. When you build a team, you usually include four specialist bowlers, and the rest you've got all-rounders, Pakistan has three options as well. If you look today or even in the last match, you can see that Khushdil has bowled pretty well. The problem that stands out is that Pakistan loses three wickets in just two or three overs. When that pressure builds up, that's when the spinners come in, and it becomes easier for them to bowl. Whereas, if you have a team where one wicket has fallen, and then there's a partnership of 40 runs followed by another of 50, it changes things for the spinners when they come in. They didn't get the playing conditions they needed.”

About losing 2 games against New Zealand back to back:

“If you look at the first game in Lahore, a few more runs were scored at the end. It was around 290-300 runs, which you can chase down. In this match, we noticed in the morning that this pitch wasn't the same as the usual one; it had 270-280 runs on it, and that’s why we batted first. If you bat first and get over 270 runs, chasing that becomes tough. In the end, when you know you're chasing 240 runs, your batters react differently. If things get a bit quiet in between, it doesn’t really matter. But when the total starts approaching 280, you take more risks, which can lead to wickets falling. So, the key is that the main batters on a given day need to play long innings. You'll have to play well because if you look at it, there are pitches where among the top three batters, at least one or two batters have scored big runs. That's a bit missing right now. I can feel that Babar is due for a big innings; he did well in the last two matches. I don’t think that's a major issue. The situation in both matches was that back-to-back wickets fell.”

About Pakistan’s performance in the upcoming ICC Champions Trophy:

“This team will do great because, if you think about it, a couple of things could have gone better. If you just play normal batting, you could easily score 350 runs on these pitches if you play through to the 50 overs. And if Haris's fitness comes back, having him in the team along with your three fast bowlers who bowled brilliantly today, it could really make a difference at the right time. We've got Shaheen Shah Afridi, Naseem Shah, and Haris Rauf in the lineup, along with spinners. This team has everything it takes to beat any opponent. Sometimes, when we lose a match or two, it feels like the team is falling apart, but I honestly believe this squad has what it takes to stay on top. You can see the quality of our bowling – I don’t think any other team has three fast bowlers like ours who can reverse swing and handle death bowling in these conditions.”

About the selection of Khushdil Shah, Faheem Ashraf, and Saud Shakeel:

“If you are playing on home ground, then there's no need to rush. The reason is that when you have to go somewhere, like to Australia or wherever, the team that gets announced for travel plans has to be done, even if you don't want to. So, when you know it's happening in Pakistan, there's no need to hurry. First, you need to figure out that you need a spin all-rounder, and then a seam all-rounder. The reason for having Faheem and Khushdil is that sometimes when you're playing in a tournament, you need a bit of variation. When you're playing in a specific series against a team, you might decide to go with either a spin all-rounder or a fast bowler. Since you're facing teams from New Zealand, India, and Bangladesh, you have to consider their strengths. Sometimes you might think about giving less spin or opting for a seam bowler instead. That's how we were looking at Aamer Jamal; we were trying him out for the Tests and considering if he could fit into the squad, but it wasn't quite working out the way we wanted. After the last series against Australia, he had a bit of an injury, but now his confidence is not back, and 100% fit to bowl fast like before. If you look at the options available, there was Aamer Jamal and then there's Faheem Ashraf who comes to mind. Sometimes, we mix up T20 performances with ODI, but in a 50-over match, you need a bit of experience to meet the demands of the game. We needed both pace bowling all-rounders and spin bowlers”

Lessons from this tri-series:


“Learning is about chasing or you need to bat first and defend. You tried out a combination by playing Faheem. In the earlier matches, Mohammad Hasnain played instead of Faheem, and then Haris played. So, you're testing out your combination. Also, should we bat first or second? What's the best strategy? What effect does it have? What challenges come with bowling first? We've learned some stuff too. Now, if we have a match against New Zealand and win the toss, what decision should we make? Which team should we send out against the Kiwis?”

“The learning is that from Lahore till now, we've been trying to figure out whether a combination of batting first or chasing suits us better.”

“In this upcoming tournament or like we’ve already played three matches. We won one outstanding match, but we lost two. The key thing to focus on is identifying that one element you need to improve. If that part gets better, or if they can finish strong, then we’ll be in a good spot.”

“You can see what needs to improve in your batting and how you can make better choices while bowling. With the kind of matches we're seeing, once a batter gets settled, it’s hard to keep track of the game. In the last match, three got out, and two were set and won the match. These pitches are tricky; you won’t even realize how the number 8 or number 7 is going to bat. If Fakhar and Babar can build a solid partnership at the top, everything will change.”

About pitches:

“The tough pitches are made for Test series because the idea is to create conditions where you can win the series. But you can't play Tests and simultaneously prepare for ODIs. If you look at it positively, you've made some sacrifices and tough decisions, like sending your bowlers back during the Test series in South Africa so they'd be fresh for the tournament. Plus, now your players have come in and played a couple of first-class matches. Shaheen Shah Afridi also went to Bangladesh to play cricket. Other than that, if you look at the teams, many of their main fast bowlers are injured. So, I'm really happy with our planning and calculations because all our fast bowlers are ready to go, they're fit and fresh."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lo jee

So now this guy will open again in T20s with Rizwan?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It feels like Aaqib Javed has made it a matter of stubbornness that whatever he says must be right and then he goes to great lengths to prove it. Fine his Test formula may have been successful but relying on trundlers in ODIs is foolishness.

New Zealand defeated Pakistan twice in the Tri-Nation series using spin as their primary weapon yet no one seems to have learned anything. Mark my words Shaheen, Naseem and Faheem will take such a beating from the batters in the Champions Trophy that it will be embarrassing. And yet these shameless people still won’t admit that these bowlers are useless.
 
It feels like Aaqib Javed has made it a matter of stubbornness that whatever he says must be right and then he goes to great lengths to prove it. Fine his Test formula may have been successful but relying on trundlers in ODIs is foolishness.

New Zealand defeated Pakistan twice in the Tri-Nation series using spin as their primary weapon yet no one seems to have learned anything. Mark my words Shaheen, Naseem and Faheem will take such a beating from the batters in the Champions Trophy that it will be embarrassing. And yet these shameless people still won’t admit that these bowlers are useless.
Do you ever get happy had pak played 2 spinners in line up you would have said pak should play more pacers i guess pakistani fans always complaining never happy have a look at australia they only play one spinner and they win world cup most of the times with their pacers.
 
Do you ever get happy had pak played 2 spinners in line up you would have said pak should play more pacers i guess pakistani fans always complaining never happy have a look at australia they only play one spinner and they win world cup most of the times with their pacers.
After the Asia Cup 2023 I don’t consider our pacers as main weapons. I have always believed that whether in Test cricket or LOIs the playing XI must have at least two specialist spinners who are ready to bowl in any situation.
 
"Our rationale behind the change was that if you look at the away series against South Africa, Babar Azam had to bat in the first over in all games. Then Saim got injured and he had to open in Tests too. These pitches are not troubling the batters at the start, we wanted our best batter to make good use of the powerplay, that suits us more."
Aqib bhai, you first need to educate Babar on the basics of a power play, then, make sure he gets some proper nutrition so he gains the strength to hit fours and sixes into the gaps. After that, you should have him open the innings.



"We saw the pitch in the morning and knew from that time that this wasn't a high-scoring surface, a total of 270-280 would've been a good one. So that's why we decided to bat first and try to post that kind of total and put them under pressure. We ended up posting around 240, and then if their batters can manage a quiet period or two, it
But in rizwans mind the pitch was a 200 pitch maybe you should have learnt pashto and explained to him in pashto that the pitch a 270-280 he didn't quite understood its a 270-280 he believed it was a 200 pitch
 
This team will do great in CT-------------- off the field.
Especially when you have Khushdil Shah with the ball lol. He bowls to the king in the off-field nets and the king thinks 'Woh kar ly ga'
 
Pakistan is going nowhere fast with mediocre all-rounders like Faheem & Khushdil. They're club level with bat and ball. Surely there's a lot more to gain from blooding in youngsters such as Minhas.
 
Duas of the nation may carry us forward and we can win.

But we can't rely on Aqib for developing our cricket in any capacity.

He will destroy us.

The coup against Kirsten and Gillespie won't be forgiven or forgotten
 
If pakistan is knockout from group stages than Aqib will be no longer Coach of pakistan .

:kp
 
Pakistan will be fighting with Bangladesh for the 3rd position in the group . India and NZL will be take the first 2.
 
A small price to pay for a bigger gain.
But Misbah is already in the queue to become next pakistan coach. :D

The Way pakistan treated Top coach like Kristen and Gillespie ,i don't think any big overseas coach will show any interest in pakistan team coaching .

:kp
 
His logic of just because "Shafique was getting out in the first over and Babar had to come out to play in the first over, so i'll shift him to open" is so dumb, it's laughable. Instead of putting a better opener out there, you displace the only batter from the position which was scoring the most runs in ODI at.
Babar may not be great but he ODIs is his best format and that is the only format he looks comfortable batting in.
Here even Saud didn't look at home at no.3 against pace.
 
This is a delusion of some highest caliber. I hope Pakistan does well in CT but the way they have performed in the tri-series with Khushdil and other pathetic players in the team, things are looking bad.
 
So Aqib still believes Khusdil & Faheem as genuine match winners
Yes he does and things have backfired so far. Khushdil is a joke with the bat so far, he is not that good of a fielder and his bowling is not trust worthy as well... Faheem has played just 1 game but I really have no hopes for him as well...
 
Yes he does and things have backfired so far. Khushdil is a joke with the bat so far, he is not that good of a fielder and his bowling is not trust worthy as well... Faheem has played just 1 game but I really have no hopes for him as well...
exactly local media has written off Pakistan in CT , after these performances
 
exactly local media has written off Pakistan in CT , after these performances
Writing them off is too much but yeah, Pakistan is not doing themselves any favors by losing to kiwis 2 times back to back and they have to face them again next.
 
Writing them off is too much but yeah, Pakistan is not doing themselves any favors by losing to kiwis 2 times back to back and they have to face them again next.
We are a write-off as we have been comprehensively thumped by NZ twice in the space of a week.

We are not beating India in Dubai, so where does that leave us?

Not even a miracle can save this lot. NZ and India are out-right favorites for this trophy and they are in our group unfortunately.
 
We are a write-off as we have been comprehensively thumped by NZ twice in the space of a week.

We are not beating India in Dubai, so where does that leave us?

Not even a miracle can save this lot. NZ and India are out-right favorites for this trophy and they are in our group unfortunately.
I know things are pretty bad... I hope Pakistan can do the unthinkable but yeah not every CT is 2017
 
I don't understand why a tournament winning Head Coach cannot see the issues in this side? He's gone into the "la la la la I can't hear you" mode...
 
Aqib is stubborn, and he dragged Lahore Qalandars to the ground in the early seasons.

Bringing back Khushdil and Faheem is a crime and a half.
 
His logic of just because "Shafique was getting out in the first over and Babar had to come out to play in the first over, so i'll shift him to open" is so dumb, it's laughable. Instead of putting a better opener out there, you displace the only batter from the position which was scoring the most runs in ODI at.
Babar may not be great but he ODIs is his best format and that is the only format he looks comfortable batting in.
Here even Saud didn't look at home at no.3 against pace.
Who are the better openers? 🤔
 
Who are the better openers? 🤔
Anyone who has been scoring runs in LA cricket of late. Just need to keep the seat warm till Saim comes back. Could even try one of the newbies like Nafay, Maaz, Nawaz or whoever is in good nick atm.
 
Anyone who has been scoring runs in LA cricket of late. Just need to keep the seat warm till Saim comes back. Could even try one of the newbies like Nafay, Maaz, Nawaz or whoever is in good nick atm.
That’s not how it works you can’t just bring in someone with no international experience. So, aside from these inexperienced guys, who else would be viable options?
 
Aaqib is damaging his reputation he rates guys like Usman Khan Khusdil Shah Faheem Ashraf over Abdullah Shafique and Imam Ul Haq.
 
Aaqib has realised the gaps in team selection. Its too late now I guess.

For Pakistan to win Babar, Fakhar, Naseem & Shaheen will need to click. The rest of the squad will need to support.
 
But Misbah is already in the queue to become next pakistan coach. :D

The Way pakistan treated Top coach like Kristen and Gillespie ,i don't think any big overseas coach will show any interest in pakistan team coaching .

:kp
That would be Misbah's 3rd attempt to kill whatever life is left in Pakistan cricket.
 
If Pakistan had Saim(on current form) with fakhar opening and Babar on his 2019 form, Pakistan could have had a very strong batting lineup for ct.

Since fakhar, Saim, Babar would make for a fine top order and both rizwan and Agha are at their batting best when their batting side by side, My guess is it's probably due to the fact that these 2 bat in tests alongside one another hence they compliment each other well.

After that had they chosen abrar, Sufiyan and Sajid as an extra option, Pakistan could have had 3 pacers + 2 spinners and 2 extra bowlers in sajid and Agha who could compensate.

Only issue would have been our no 6 and 7 would be weak as sajid isn't a great no 7 and tayyab, Kamran, Irfan khan niazi are just okayish spinners

A ct 15 squad of

1) Rizwan
2) Babar
3) Shaheen
4) Fakhar
5) Agha
6) Sajid
7) Naseem
8) Rauf
9) Sufiyan
10) Abrar
11) Wasim Jnr
12) Saim
13) Tayyab
14) Niazi
15) Saud Shakeel/Kamran Ghulam

Could have made for a very good squad.

Instead thanks to injuries and brainless selections we don't have an opener hence Babar who's already out of form and has a terrible record at opening has to act as makeshift.

Followed by the fact that saud and Kamran are terrible options for no 3. That's 2 walking wickets at the top.

We also don't have a no 7, as Khusdil Shah is terrible. Ik people hate sajid, but why not take sajid and use him as an extra bowler and batter? And have abrar and sufiyan be your main spinners?

Then we don't have an extra pacer as husnain and faheem are awful.

Had waseem jnr been chosen, we wouldn't have to worry about over reliance on our pace trio.
 
Do you ever get happy had pak played 2 spinners in line up you would have said pak should play more pacers i guess pakistani fans always complaining never happy have a look at australia they only play one spinner and they win world cup most of the times with their pacers.
Two specialist spinners can be played only when they are bowling all rounders. Other than that team cannot be balanced.
from bowling allrounders you would want at least 6 - 7 overs a game.
 
So Aqib still believes Khusdil & Faheem as genuine match winners
Every coach for some reason believes faheem is a match winner. It’s so weird haha. He has been brought back so many times.

I think we’re just desperate to have a fast bowling allrounder. I can see why though, when one of your main fast bowlers gets injured or honked it’s really useful.
 
If Pakistan had Saim(on current form) with fakhar opening and Babar on his 2019 form, Pakistan could have had a very strong batting lineup for ct.
Abdullah was our backup opener. We’ve just lost faith in him so much even a makeshift opener sounds better. We also dropped imam for him so we now it’s difficult to go back to imam.

If Saim hadn’t got injured, we arguably either don’t have to play an allrounder due to extra bowling option. Or the reverse are able to risk an extra bowler as we know we have more batsmen in form.

Then what you said Babar in great form, and if we had a good spinner (or even if Shadab hadn’t lost it), we’d actually be a decently strong team, at least there wouldn’t be huge weaknesses.
 
The dangerous point is 3 of our main pacers are always on borderline to have an off day, add to it the useless allrounders its like we are partying near a volcano.
 
Abdullah was our backup opener. We’ve just lost faith in him so much even a makeshift opener sounds better. We also dropped imam for him so we now it’s difficult to go back to imam.

If Saim hadn’t got injured, we arguably either don’t have to play an allrounder due to extra bowling option. Or the reverse are able to risk an extra bowler as we know we have more batsmen in form.

Then what you said Babar in great form, and if we had a good spinner (or even if Shadab hadn’t lost it), we’d actually be a decently strong team, at least there wouldn’t be huge weaknesses.
What baffled me is the fact that they opted to change Babar's position. They have now ended up with an uncertain opening spot and no. 3.

All it was needed was to bring someone to partner with Fakhar. Even Imam is better than having no opener.
 
Just for record.

Rashid Latif has raised questions on CT squad claiming 5-6 players not deserving their place and for a successful team should have 4-5 match winners which this team is lacking.

Amir Sohail has criticised the squad with specially use and bin strategy like Hasnain picked bowled 8 overs binned next game Faheem picked bowled on 3-4 overs , showing lack of clarity in team selection
 
What baffled me is the fact that they opted to change Babar's position. They have now ended up with an uncertain opening spot and no. 3.

All it was needed was to bring someone to partner with Fakhar. Even Imam is better than having no opener.
Most of us fans wanted either Babar to open or Saud open as a makeshift. People didn’t want imam back. I’m sure if we did a poll, people wouldn’t have chose imam then. Or Abdullah. And I’m sure if imam was opening people would complain.

Tbh I think imam is underrated. I don’t think he’s amazing, but you can’t have those stats and centuries and be downright awful. I also think fakhar and imam don’t suit each other batting. But even I had hope Babar might perform at opener and Saud at 3. In hindsight maybe I was wrong, the safer thing was to go with imam. But then again I don’t know what form or fitness imam is in right now.
 
Most of us fans wanted either Babar to open or Saud open as a makeshift. People didn’t want imam back. I’m sure if we did a poll, people wouldn’t have chose imam then. Or Abdullah. And I’m sure if imam was opening people would complain.

Tbh I think imam is underrated. I don’t think he’s amazing, but you can’t have those stats and centuries and be downright awful. I also think fakhar and imam don’t suit each other batting. But even I had hope Babar might perform at opener and Saud at 3. In hindsight maybe I was wrong, the safer thing was to go with imam. But then again I don’t know what form or fitness imam is in right now.
More than Babar the opener. We need Babar the no. 3
 
About a specialist opener missing in the squad and Babar Azam:

“If you look at the matches that have happened, the term "open" refers to the first five, six, or seven overs where you need a solid start. Our thinking was that, just like what happened in the three ODIs in South Africa, unfortunately, Babar Azam had to go in during the first over in all three games. Then Saim Ayub got injured during Test matches and Babar had to open in the Test. The challenge on these pitches isn't the top order because there’s no seam or anything like that on these kinds of pitches. If there's any movement and bounce, we thought that your best player could really suit us if he plays in the first 10 overs on these pitches. Also, we've been looking at the combinations we've had, whether it's Test or ODI, and we brought in the players who have been in form and performed well.”

“You'll notice a change in the ODIs; people are still trying to figure it out, but often they overlook the importance of the 11 to 40 overs and having those four fielders out of the circle. You really don’t need to go for crazy shots or try to accelerate too much in ODIs. If you look at the players who are mainly Test players and have solid techniques, like Kane Williamson and Tom Latham, they can be way more effective. You just need to use four fielders properly. I believe that with the way Babar is playing, he should open on pitches like this and make the most of the hard ball for the first 10 overs. The signs are clear that there's an important game coming up and there's one innings due. So maybe he will play that inning on the day when Pakistan needs it the most?”

“Babar Azam usually bats at number three, and when you're opening, there’s a difference. When you’re playing outside Pakistan, the ball tends to seam more and moves around a bit. So, if you’re going in after five or six overs or even ten, the ball can seam a bit less. If the swing isn’t happening, then on this pitch, you won’t get much seam or bounce either. So, if your best player usually bats at three and gets the chance to open, it’s not a bad idea.”
Kick this senseless arrogant buffoon out of PCB, people saw ytd what happened...

1 specialist opener in Fakhar and he was injured, Pak put forward makeshift openers like Saud and Babar and Rizwan at 3 look what happened, they made the lowest score in the first 10 overs in last 5 yrs...
 
Also selecting 1 spinner + part timers for an ICC tournament...

India has selected 5 ( Varun ,Kuldeep, Washington, Jadeja and Axar patel )

Another rubbish from Aaqib , how many more u want... This is the reason why he was never selected as a Head coach before .. Pakistani head coach when do such rubbish makes me think are they really int'l players with such experience..
 
Aquib as coach has been exposed when he is facing full fledged sides. The decisions he has made , he should be sacked immediately. , Pakistan should go without coach in the next game.
 
Aqib was brought in with full authority to bring down players power. I think he has done assigned job very well. Those so called supaa stars who were fighting for the captaincy and bring in their friends into the team, are now on the brink of getting dropped from the team themselves.
 
Aqqib already planning for Tonty Tonty against NZ , will be with team for sight seeing in Oceania
 
Pakistan is the 3rd weakest team.in the tournament with 1 and 2 being Aus and Bangladesh
Allthough Aus looks weak and struggled against SL recently, they will raise their game when it matters most. And don't underestimate BD either. They have mental issues facing Pakistan, otherwise on paper they have strong team.
 
Allthough Aus looks weak and struggled against SL recently, they will raise their game when it matters most. And don't underestimate BD either. They have mental issues facing Pakistan, otherwise on paper they have strong team.
With fakhar injured Pakistan is now weaker then bang and Aus
 
It's easy to pin blame on the coach. Aqib deserves blame for his actions in tests and his plans for FC yes. But in ODI he's not been at the helm wrong.

The way we play ODI cricket is due to a long term rot. Short term blaming the coach will not change things. To give Aqib some credit his selection of Khushdil got some flack but Khush ended up being our player of the match.

Aqib isn't the man to take us forward but he hasn't developed these players, this strategy or this squad depth. He got handed the reigns at the last minute, as did the last coach, as did the coach before him. We have had decades of knee jerk reactions, defensive selections, fear in players and tolerance of mediocrity. Do we really expect Aqib to reverse it overnight?

Fans must have reasonable expectations. This rebuild will take a lot of time.
 
😂😂😂 Only in Pakistan will you get rid of Kirsten, Gillespie to accommodate this joker.
Weren't you over the moon that we got rid of those two coaches because they didn't do throwdowns in the NCA?

I remember lots of bhangras when they got fired in the coups triggered by Aqib.

Only in Pakistan indeed....
 
Think Aaqib will walk himself if Pakistan don't win the tournament
 
Think Aaqib will walk himself if Pakistan don't win the tournament
That's the problem- he will get away as he pleases. Has he also signed a weird multiple year salary contract to he provided by the PCB irrespective of termination? That's how you can play the system right.
 
The problem is not whether Aaqib will resign or not, the real problem is the system and its continuance. Tomorrow another person will come and then when the team performs worst, he will leave.

That is how it goes. No accountability.
 
Back
Top