What's new

Rafi vs Kishore vs Mukesh

However one thing I'll say, Rafi's songs were more like sung from heart while Kishore's songs were like breeze, effortless singing.

In cricket terminology, if Rafi is Tendulkar then Kishore is more like VVS, Lara, M Waugh, Gower, Anwar etc. The former being more methodical, latter being outrageously talented.
 
That's your choice, not necessarily the latter song being the better version of that song.

I liked Kishore's version better, doesn't make Parveena's version any inferior.

Singing ability and popularity are two different things .

The Kishore version lacked alaaps , murkis and taans . I never said Kishore was not a singer at all , but he was not a trained singer , thus his limitations were very much evident
 
As for difficult to separate between Rafi and Kishor, I meant for me as a fan. I love them both equally so for me, its really difficult to say which one was better between the two.

I already replied to that.
 
However one thing I'll say, Rafi's songs were more like sung from heart while Kishore's songs were like breeze, effortless singing.

In cricket terminology, if Rafi is Tendulkar then Kishore is more like VVS, Lara, M Waugh, Gower, Anwar etc. The former being more methodical, latter being outrageously talented.

Talent alone does not win you games , it is performance.

Also , without Talent Tandulkar would not have got 100 International hundreds.
 
Talent alone does not win you games , it is performance.

Also , without Talent Tandulkar would not have got 100 International hundreds.
Who is saying Tendulkar didn't have talent? That's sacrilege!
 
Melody romance tragedy simplicity all in these 3 legendary stuff
One thing is clear, we are not getting all these attributes in such abundance at the same time, again. Those 50s, 60s and 70s were something else. 80s spoiled it all and its been downhill ever since.
 
Back
Top