Major
ODI Star
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2013
- Runs
- 35,043
- Post of the Week
- 7
I stumbled across an interview of Dav Whatmore back in 2014 (this was after he had completed his coaching contract with Pakistan), and the insights Whatmore had gives you a perspective how foreigners look at or deal with Pakistan. This is just one institute of Pakistan, yet it gives you a brief of how all other govt institutes of Pakistan are like.
I wanted to share some of the answers that Whatmore gave on Pakistan Cricket and for us to reflect on them in 2023
The gist of it was that, Whatmore has worked with many subcontinent boards and smaller cricket nations, yet you can see from what he had answered that he thought Pakistan was the most difficult and that too because of the bureaucracy, the media and ex cricketers. The same discussion that we have on pakpassion, that everyone thinks the guy on the bench is the better player and everyone wants their favorite guy to be selected in the team.
The guy didnt even want to renew his contract after its completion in two years.
Whatmore's insight into the time it takes to change cultural divides and mindsets in the subcontinent is profound. His approach of being perceptive rather than judgmental demonstrates his understanding of the need for patience and long-term thinking in cricket development.
The ever-changing leadership in the Pakistan Cricket Board created a challenging environment. Something that is still happening in Pakistan with the same characters in play..
Quite insightful and shows why Pakistan as a country is stuck. Whatmore also did 2 years at India's NCA and he describe that time as his best ever. So it shows the contrasting view of both 3rd world countries cricket or govt set up
Source:
www.espncricinfo.com
I wanted to share some of the answers that Whatmore gave on Pakistan Cricket and for us to reflect on them in 2023
Interviewer: You worked as head coach in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Pakistan, and in India with NCA and with Kolkata Knight Riders. What do you see as the various challenges in these very different places?
DW: The challenge really is to get ahead of the game if you can, particularly in Pakistan. It is a very tricky environment to be in. The players themselves don't make much of a difference. They are all willing to work hard, they all want to do well for themselves, they all want to have long careers in all three formats of the game. But working with the administration, working with the selectors, working with the media, are all big challenges. I felt more of that in Pakistan than I felt in the other three countries. So it was a bit of a tricky situation from time to time. But thankfully, I decided not to renew my contract and we left on very amicable terms.
Interviewer: In a recent interview, you had said that in the subcontinent it takes generations to change cultural divides and mindsets. Can you expand further on it?
DW: To be successful in environments like that, you can't change them overnight. Any major change that is born out of a cultural background takes a very long time. It is almost a generation or two before things change. For me to come and clash the cymbals and beat the drums will be absolutely stupid. That is not going to happen. And people who think that they are going to get the Miracle Whatmore, who will get immediate results, it is just not going to be. I was very keen to take on that position because I honestly thought I could make a difference. At the end of that period, I left with a lot more experience from that part of the world, and I am sure the other boys also had terrific experiences in working with a person from abroad who had actually lasted those two years. It is a case of being perceptive than judgmental.
Interviewer: What was your approach to this immovable force of bureaucracy and board politics?
DW: The chairman of the Pakistan Cricket Board changed thrice in just a few months, from Mr Zaka Ashraf to Najam Sethi back to Ashraf and now again to Mr Sethi. It becomes very difficult to feel secure in any position - whether you are a player, administrator, selector, or a coach. It requires very careful treading in terms of achieving what you want to do with the team as well as looking after yourself. So it was a very dicey situation, you know. You have to be very careful. As I said before, I was very pleased that I was able to leave with my head held high, and also leave with many friends in a number of areas in Pakistan.
Interviewer: A question from James: How did you deal with this rather incessant sniping through the media by opinion-makers like ex-Pakistani players?
DW: Very difficult, I have to tell you. In hindsight, it was good that I didn't understand too much of Urdu. I certainly couldn't read it. I was protected a lot more from the criticism that comes your way. Sadly, to me there was little show of nationalism. There always seem to be people pushing different players in the XI at the detriment of whoever was in the team. Regardless of what you did, there was always criticism, unjust criticism. A lot of it came to the captain, a bit of it came to me - on the principle that I was a foreigner. To be very honest to you, I didn't feel that it was a personal attack, it was a case of them promoting their own person for whatever reason at the expense of me. it was difficult for me to accept that because it took a little bit of time to understand what was going on. When I did, it still hurt. Nevertheless, that is the way it is in Pakistan. You have to grin and bear it and move on.
Interviewer: In a recent interview, you said that the psyche of a Pakistani cricketer is that they have to look after themselves because nobody else will. Is it coming out of the volatile nature around them? How should the Pakistani player be insulated from that?
DW: Unless these guys can do what they need to do for themselves there is no guarantee of anyone else doing it for them. As soon as a player starts to fail or has a bad series, there is every chance that the player will no longer be in the team. It arises from all these media creating so much hype. It affects the decisions made by the cricket board. That is a sad thing because it is not very easy to function in that environment.
The gist of it was that, Whatmore has worked with many subcontinent boards and smaller cricket nations, yet you can see from what he had answered that he thought Pakistan was the most difficult and that too because of the bureaucracy, the media and ex cricketers. The same discussion that we have on pakpassion, that everyone thinks the guy on the bench is the better player and everyone wants their favorite guy to be selected in the team.
The guy didnt even want to renew his contract after its completion in two years.
Whatmore's insight into the time it takes to change cultural divides and mindsets in the subcontinent is profound. His approach of being perceptive rather than judgmental demonstrates his understanding of the need for patience and long-term thinking in cricket development.
The ever-changing leadership in the Pakistan Cricket Board created a challenging environment. Something that is still happening in Pakistan with the same characters in play..
Quite insightful and shows why Pakistan as a country is stuck. Whatmore also did 2 years at India's NCA and he describe that time as his best ever. So it shows the contrasting view of both 3rd world countries cricket or govt set up
Source:

'If Misbah believed in a player, he'd absolutely bat for him'
Dav Whatmore talks about the challenges of coaching in the subcontinent, the 1996 World Cup, dealing with the PCB and the media, and his relationship with his captains
Last edited by a moderator: