What's new

Sati in Modern India: Legally Banned, Socially Persistent?

Major

ODI Star
Joined
Aug 28, 2013
Runs
35,361
Post of the Week
7
Sati—one of the most controversial and haunting practices in history. A ritual that saw widows immolating themselves on their husband's funeral pyres. But where did it come from? And why did it last for centuries?

The term Sati comes from Sanskrit, meaning "a virtuous woman." It is said to have mythological roots in the story of Goddess Sati, who self-immolated in protest against her father’s insult toward her husband, Lord Shiva. But what started as a divine narrative later turned into a brutal social custom. For centuries, particularly in parts of India, widows—sometimes willingly, often by force—were expected to jump into the flames alongside their deceased husbands. This practice was seen as the ultimate act of devotion and purity. But was it really about honor? Or was it a way to control and erase widows from society?

Several factors played a role in its continuation. Patriarchy viewed widows as burdens, and Sati was framed as an "honorable" escape. Religious justifications emerged from misinterpreted texts. Social pressure played a major role—many women were coerced, sometimes drugged or pushed into the flames.

The fight against Sati gained momentum in the 19th century. Reformers like Raja Ram Mohan Roy played a crucial role, leading to its formal ban by the British in 1829. Yet, occasional incidents persisted, proving that deep-rooted traditions don’t vanish overnight. Although legally banned, the last widely reported case was in 1987, when Roop Kanwar, an 18-year-old woman in Rajasthan, was forced onto her husband’s funeral pyre. While not practiced today, the glorification of Sati in some places remains a concern.

Sati wasn’t just about fire—it was about oppression, power, and control. A widow’s life should never be dictated by outdated traditions.

Sati Practice in modern days
In May 2023, a tragic incident occurred in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. A woman named Sangita Lakhra died by suicide after allegedly being harassed and taunted by her in-laws for not performing Sati following her husband's death. Reports indicate that her in-laws pressured her to transfer property and insurance money, and she faced ridicule for not adhering to the outlawed practice. The Times of India

Additionally, in October 2024, a Jaipur special court acquitted eight individuals accused of glorifying the Sati act of Roop Kanwar, an 18-year-old woman who died in 1987. This case, often cited as India's last known instance of Sati, led to the enactment of The Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act in 1987. The recent acquittal highlights ongoing legal and societal challenges related to this practice.
 
Sati is barbaric. Glad Brits banned it in year 1829. :inti

I fully expect some Indian posters to defend it as if their lives depend on it. :inti
 
Sati is barbaric. Glad Brits banned it in year 1829. :inti

I fully expect some Indian posters to defend it as if their lives depend on it. :inti
Do you support suicide bombings carried out by Islamist terrorists in current age? Pretty sure you don't, right?

So why exactly would you say that Hindus support and would defend something that was practised 200 years ago?
 
Do you support suicide bombings carried out by Islamist terrorists in current age? Pretty sure you don't, right?

So why exactly would you say that Hindus support and would defend something that was practised 200 years ago?
you need to check post no.2
 
You'll find similar Islamists who would support suicide bombing if carried out by Muslims in Israel. Heck, they already support what those subhuman Hamas terrorists did in Israel on 7th October, 2023.
So @Bhaijaan is your version of an Islamist terrorism supporter.

I dont mind such terrorists.
 
By the way, isn't that murderer Mumtaz Qadri a hero in Pakistan? All one needs to do is go to youtube and search for any of his videos. The comment sections are filled with tributes from Pakistanis. That's the honest mentality of Pakistanis.​
Hain? What has Mumtaz Qadri got to do with Sati?
 
Does your wife love you enough to commit this act of courage upon your demise?

Brother it’s extremely personal. Didn’t expect it from you.

I will not be taking further part in this debate because it is a matter of faith and might go in a direction i don’t intend to as I have pledged not to make comments about religious matters.

Khuda hafiz.
You will still be my brother always.

No offense taken
 
Sorry..I was just intrigued and didn't realize that I was putting you on the spot. However I have managed to read between the lines and received my answer. Apologies for crossing such boundaries on a public forum.

It’s no problem. Like i said you will still be my brother regardless. These things happen. I appreciate you offering an explaination. It’s nice of you dear. I don’t intend to make any comments that might hurt some persons I consider dear to me. Some discussions are sensitive topics.
 
Sati is barbaric. Glad Brits banned it in year 1829. :inti

I fully expect some Indian posters to defend it as if their lives depend on it. :inti

Mughals first tried to ban it before the Brits arrived. I guess it was not really the business of outsiders to tell native Indians how to practice their religion.
 
Mughals first tried to ban it before the Brits arrived. I guess it was not really the business of outsiders to tell native Indians how to practice their religion.

Great to know Mughals first tried to ban it. My respect for Mughals went up a notch.

Sati involves suicide/murder of the wife. Whoever invented Sati was clearly a psychopath. :inti
 
Mughals first tried to ban it before the Brits arrived. I guess it was not really the business of outsiders to tell native Indians how to practice their religion.
Islamic invaders were directly responsible for practices like Jauhar where Rajput women's used to commit mass suicide as a form of protest against foreign colonization during Delhi Sultanate & Mughal era. It was practiced by women and girls to avoid capture, sex slavery , enslavement and rape when facing certain defeat during a war and after their husbands were killed. Sati was a practice adopted from Jauhar. Mughals were no saints as you are trying to portray them. Raja Ram Mohan Roy fought against this evil practice and eradicated it with the help of British.
 
Funny thing is, people open threads on a topic but have no idea about it. First find out the reason behind practices like Jauhar and Sati. I am sure not many will like there as it involves their bhai bandhus. Atleast Hindusim had the courage to reform and open minded enough to remove evil practices from their own religion. Cant say same about others.
 
During the early-modern Mughal period of 1526–1857, sati was notably associated with elite Hindu Rajput clans in western India, marking one of the points of divergence between Hindu Rajputs and the Muslim Mughals, who banned the practice.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sati_(practice)#cite_note-AsherTalbot2006-14"><span>[</span>11<span>]</span></a> In the early 19th century, the British East India Company, in the process of extending its rule to most of India, initially tried to stop the innocent killing; William Carey, a British Christian evangelist, noted 438 incidents within a 30-mile (48-km) radius of the capital, Calcutta, in 1803, despite its ban within Calcutta.


Some sources, which detail the timeline of attempts to ban Sati in the subcontinent.
 
Sati Practice in modern days
In May 2023, a tragic incident occurred in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. A woman named Sangita Lakhra died by suicide after allegedly being harassed and taunted by her in-laws for not performing Sati following her husband's death. Reports indicate that her in-laws pressured her to transfer property and insurance money, and she faced ridicule for not adhering to the outlawed practice. The Times of India

Additionally, in October 2024, a Jaipur special court acquitted eight individuals accused of glorifying the Sati act of Roop Kanwar, an 18-year-old woman who died in 1987. This case, often cited as India's last known instance of Sati, led to the enactment of The Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act in 1987. The recent acquittal highlights ongoing legal and societal challenges related to this practice.

This part truly concerns me.

It again demonstrates how women are not safe in chaiwala Modi's India. Too many rape incidents and too many Sati supporters. :inti
 
The ultimate show of love, courage and sacrifice. Kindly do not insult another religion’s rituals.
Sati has no religious connotations. It was done once by Lord Shiva's wife Sati(Parvati) on her own will. Then there was the wife of Pandava king Pandu's wife Madri. She was persuaded not to do it. She did not listen and committed suicide.

Coming to the incidents mentioned in OP, those are women from Rajasthan and Gujarat. They call it Jauhar. Not Sati. Jauhar is a practice done by Rajput women to escape being captured by the great Turks and sold into sex slavery. :rolleyes:

Jauhar or Sati. If anyone practices it, they are pathetic fools. At least in this day and age.
 
This part truly concerns me.

It again demonstrates how women are not safe in chaiwala Modi's India. Too many rape incidents and too many Sati supporters. :inti
So how many incidents have happened in the last 100 yrs? May be a few screw lose ones.
 
This is too much for usual suspects to understand.

I still do not support anyone committing such self immolation acts no matter what the situation is. But one also has to take a serious look at the criminals and savages that sell women to sex slavery. Married women were also not spared.
Sati and Jauhar practices were not religious as you rightly said. The reasons were totally different. Looks like OP were not aware of the background and opened this thread thinking it will tarnish Hinduism. LMAO.
 
This was not uncommon during riots. For example many Muslim women committed suicide during partition to avoid rape by Dharmic mobs.
It was Muslim Jauhar or Sati.

Still should be condemned. No place for such acts in this day and age.

I am not going to sit here and judge the decisions of the Muslim women to kill themselves during partition or Hindu women during Turkic invasions committing Jauhar. It was a violent period. Humans are the most violent creatures the planet has ever seen. Most wild animals kill to satisfy their hunger. Human behavior is no different to a Chimps when it comes to violent behavior.
 
Sati has no religious connotations. It was done once by Lord Shiva's wife Sati(Parvati) on her own will. Then there was the wife of Pandava king Pandu's wife Madri. She was persuaded not to do it. She did not listen and committed suicide.

Coming to the incidents mentioned in OP, those are women from Rajasthan and Gujarat. They call it Jauhar. Not Sati. Jauhar is a practice done by Rajput women to escape being captured by the great Turks and sold into sex slavery. :rolleyes:

Jauhar or Sati. If anyone practices it, they are pathetic fools. At least in this day and age.
Which turks were invading India over the last few years that made the women in the OP commit Jauhar?

it is a nice attempt to deflect and again try to blame Muslims but I believe the opinion of those involved is more reliable than yours. The police commisioner in the case said it was due to pressures of Sati. Why are you so keen to tarnish the legacy of the dead woman?
 
Sati and Jauhar practices were not religious as you rightly said. The reasons were totally different. Looks like OP were not aware of the background and opened this thread thinking it will tarnish Hinduism. LMAO.
Those Rajput women who were committing Jauhar were doing it to escape from being sold into sex slavery from the great Turkic invaders. The same invaders whose names are used to name their missiles.

Ghaznavi, Ghauri, Abdali... are all the names of Pak missiles. They named their missiles that way for a reason. A reminder to Hindu India.
 
Sati has no religious connotations. It was done once by Lord Shiva's wife Sati(Parvati) on her own will. Then there was the wife of Pandava king Pandu's wife Madri. She was persuaded not to do it. She did not listen and committed suicide.

Coming to the incidents mentioned in OP, those are women from Rajasthan and Gujarat. They call it Jauhar. Not Sati. Jauhar is a practice done by Rajput women to escape being captured by the great Turks and sold into sex slavery. :rolleyes:

Jauhar or Sati. If anyone practices it, they are pathetic fools. At least in this day and age.

This was exactly my point. Sati is a sacred act in hinduism and is considered the ultimate act of love, devotion and sacrifice.

This thread is promoting blasphemous commentary on Hindu religion which is very unfortunate given the standards set on the forum over the years.
 
Yes it does, it is mentioned a few religious Hindu texts.
I already mentioned where it was mentioned in Hindu Texts. One of them is Shiva's wife Sati(on whose name the practice was named). Then we have one incident in Mahabharata(Madri).

There were hundreds of widows in Mahabharata and Ramayana. No one ever committed Sati. For example Pandavas Matriarch Kunti was a widow. She lived her full life as a Maharani and she is the widow of Pandu. Same with Lor Ram's mother. They all lived after King Dashrath passed away. There are countless widows in the entire epics(Ramayana, Mahabharata) that never even considered Sati. They all lived on and moved on after their husband's death.
 
This was exactly my point. Sati is a sacred act in hinduism and is considered the ultimate act of love, devotion and sacrifice.

This thread is promoting blasphemous commentary on Hindu religion which is very unfortunate given the standards set on the forum over the years.
This thread exposes the lack of knowledge on Sati and Jauhar. They think both are same.
 
This thread exposes the lack of knowledge on Sati and Jauhar. They think both are same.

They know everything.
The thread has been created with malicious intentions to make blasphemous comments on a religion. People have already openly made derogatory remarks on it without caring about the religious reverence of the subject.

If the forum is opening itself to such derogatory remarks about religions, it’s their choice but I hope they stay consistent if there is retaliation of the similar kind.

My personal opinion is that for the sake of 2-3 known hateful trolls, the forum must not compromise its integrity and values to allow such disgusting remarks being posted here.
 
I guess we have to be grateful to the Brits and the Hindu reformers for the abolition of Sati in Indian society. Even assuming it was never as big a practice as it was made out to be (restricted to a few upper caste communities in the North of India as far as I know), treatment of widows in India in general and Hinduism in particular is abominable. Seclusion, abandonment, exclusion from religious rituals are all par for the course. They're declining slowly but it's still far more common that I'd hope for.

Islam is definitely more enlightened on widows. It's still pretty condemnable in it's discrimination against women in general but better on widows from everything I read.
 
I guess we have to be grateful to the Brits and the Hindu reformers for the abolition of Sati in Indian society. Even assuming it was never as big a practice as it was made out to be (restricted to a few upper caste communities in the North of India as far as I know), treatment of widows in India in general and Hinduism in particular is abominable. Seclusion, abandonment, exclusion from religious rituals are all par for the course. They're declining slowly but it's still far more common that I'd hope for.

Islam is definitely more enlightened on widows. It's still pretty condemnable in it's discrimination against women in general but better on widows from everything I read.
Widow re-marriage is one thing we have to appreciate Islam. In Hinduism, widows are indeed excluded from religious functions and other social gatherings. Widow re-marriage is not encouraged in Hinduism. They are relegated to Kitchens and pretty much self isolation.
I am glad that such practices are a thing of past now. Most widows get married now. Unless they are 60 and above.

I have to mention that by the time Brits showed up in India, they were a much reformed society. Europe in general were a much better society by 1800's for women. But Brits and other Euro nations used to burn women on the suspicion of them being witches. Hundreds of women fell victim to that practice. It is all past now thankfully.
 
Funny thing is, people open threads on a topic but have no idea about it. First find out the reason behind practices like Jauhar and Sati. I am sure not many will like there as it involves their bhai bandhus. Atleast Hindusim had the courage to reform and open minded enough to remove evil practices from their own religion. Cant say same about others.
Umm this is a discussion thread. Im no a hindu, i read on this opened up a discussion thread.

You and your other indian brothers can give us insight about this topic. But no, instead you got insecure, bashing posters and bringing in other religion.
 
Umm this is a discussion thread. Im no a hindu, i read on this opened up a discussion thread.

You and your other indian brothers can give us insight about this topic. But no, instead you got insecure, bashing posters and bringing in other religion.
Thats what we are doing brother.
 
Funny thing is, people open threads on a topic but have no idea about it. First find out the reason behind practices like Jauhar and Sati. I am sure not many will like there as it involves their bhai bandhus. Atleast Hindusim had the courage to reform and open minded enough to remove evil practices from their own religion. Cant say same about others.

It is fine to reform Hinduism, but should credit be given to the movements which led to reform? Buddhism, Sikhism for example were examples of religions in the subcontinent that arose presumably because Hinduism was resistant to reform at the time.
 
It is fine to reform Hinduism, but should credit be given to the movements which led to reform? Buddhism, Sikhism for example were examples of religions in the subcontinent that arose presumably because Hinduism was resistant to reform at the time.
Reforms in Hinduism happened due to natural progression and modernization of the world. Everyone realizes that burning someone alive just because her husband died is an evil practice and should be eradicated. Budhhism and Sikhism has no role in it, LOL. Both the religions were formed of completely different reasons. I know few religions though who never want to reform and believe in caging women as part of Sharia law even in 2025.
 
Reforms in Hinduism happened due to natural progression and modernization of the world. Everyone realizes that burning someone alive just because her husband died is an evil practice and should be eradicated. Budhhism and Sikhism has no role in it, LOL. Both the religions were formed of completely different reasons. I know few religions though who never want to reform and believe in caging women as part of Sharia law even in 2025.

I think if you were so confident then you wouldn't need to keep doing whataboutism in both the posts I am quoting.
 
I think if you were so confident then you wouldn't need to keep doing whataboutism in both the posts I am quoting.
Confident of what exactly? Evil practices like Sati been banned long time ago is a fact. It is also a fact that it has nothing to do with efforts of Buddhism (formed in 4th century BC) and Sikhism (formed in 15th century). Both the religions were formed for completely different reasons but that will be going off topic. Dnt worry I am enough confident about my religion. When is your religion reforming? Or you will continue to hide under it calling it as whataboutery?
 
Confident of what exactly? Evil practices like Sati been banned long time ago is a fact. It is also a fact that it has nothing to do with efforts of Buddhism (formed in 4th century BC) and Sikhism (formed in 15th century). Both the religions were formed for completely different reasons but that will be going off topic. Dnt worry I am enough confident about my religion. When is your religion reforming? Or you will continue to hide under it calling it as whataboutery?

The point is that many Hindus were disaffected and left the religion and formed new religions. Eventually Hindus themselves realised it was a losing battle and while it is good that they got rid of evil practises, it is slightly disingenuous to take on new ideas then proclaim them as Hinduism.
 
The point is that many Hindus were disaffected and left the religion and formed new religions. Eventually Hindus themselves realised it was a losing battle and while it is good that they got rid of evil practises, it is slightly disingenuous to take on new ideas then proclaim them as Hinduism.
I know I am giving you a tough day here today but how did you come back with such silly posts. :facepalm:

Hinduism is a polytheistic religion of pre medieval era like Judaism. So obviously it will be subjected to criticism and reforms like anything in life. Abrahamic religions like Christianity and Islam were formed from Judaism. Similarly Gautam Buddha formed Buddhism in 5th century BC much before Christianity or Islam. When Guru Nanak formed Sikhism in 15th century, he did that because he rejected the rigid rituals of both Hinduism and Islam, emphasizing that true spirituality comes from a direct connection with one God (Ik Onkar) rather than through priests, idols, or dogma.

All the above have absolutely nothing to do with Sati pratha ban.

Eventually Hindus themselves realised it was a losing battle it seems...hahaha :ROFLMAO:

1743522431552.png
 
Widow re-marriage is one thing we have to appreciate Islam. In Hinduism, widows are indeed excluded from religious functions and other social gatherings. Widow re-marriage is not encouraged in Hinduism. They are relegated to Kitchens and pretty much self isolation.
I am glad that such practices are a thing of past now. Most widows get married now. Unless they are 60 and above.

I have to mention that by the time Brits showed up in India, they were a much reformed society. Europe in general were a much better society by 1800's for women. But Brits and other Euro nations used to burn women on the suspicion of them being witches. Hundreds of women fell victim to that practice. It is all past now thankfully.
Read "Gods, Guns and Missionaries" by Manu Pillai. Hindu reformist movements existed but were scattered and Sati itself wasn't a practice they focused on much. It was certain Christian Missionaries who bullied the British government into outlawing it. Then certain Hindu reformers made common cause with them and steadily the practice got eliminated.

I wish we treated widows better in India. There's improvement in the cities but rural areas are still pretty bad and even in the cities it's rare for widows to be allowed to involve themselves in religious rituals.

Christianity and Islam have their own problems with treatment of women but at least Christianity has mostly reformed things in practice if not theory. Islam has yet to admit there's a problem.

Co-incidentally, I think the Brits were pretty enamored of the glamour and horror of Sati. There are multiple Victorian era stories of brave British gentlemen saving beautiful Indian widows from a terrible fate - "Around the world in 80 days" has a mention for example.
 
I know I am giving you a tough day here today but how did you come back with such silly posts. :facepalm:

Hinduism is a polytheistic religion of pre medieval era like Judaism. So obviously it will be subjected to criticism and reforms like anything in life. Abrahamic religions like Christianity and Islam were formed from Judaism. Similarly Gautam Buddha formed Buddhism in 5th century BC much before Christianity or Islam. When Guru Nanak formed Sikhism in 15th century, he did that because he rejected the rigid rituals of both Hinduism and Islam, emphasizing that true spirituality comes from a direct connection with one God (Ik Onkar) rather than through priests, idols, or dogma.

All the above have absolutely nothing to do with Sati pratha ban.

Eventually Hindus themselves realised it was a losing battle it seems...hahaha :ROFLMAO:

View attachment 152861


Not really sure what you have said different to me though. Buddhists and Sikhs were formerly Hindus right? They formed new religions because they couldn't reconcile with some tenets of Hinduism. If Hinduism was as all encompassing and holistic as you say, then why would they not have remained Hindus?
 
Not really sure what you have said different to me though. Buddhists and Sikhs were formerly Hindus right? They formed new religions because they couldn't reconcile with some tenets of Hinduism. If Hinduism was as all encompassing and holistic as you say, then why would they not have remained Hindus?

Rajdeep will get back to you on this shortly.
 
Not really sure what you have said different to me though. Buddhists and Sikhs were formerly Hindus right? They formed new religions because they couldn't reconcile with some tenets of Hinduism. If Hinduism was as all encompassing and holistic as you say, then why would they not have remained Hindus?
Sikhism was formed when Guru Nanak rejected the rigid rituals of both Hinduism and Islam.

When Buddhism was formed, there was no Islam. Had it been there, I am sure Gautama would not be happy with it either.
 
Brother it’s extremely personal. Didn’t expect it from you.

I will not be taking further part in this debate because it is a matter of faith and might go in a direction i don’t intend to as I have pledged not to make comments about religious matters.

Khuda hafiz.
You will still be my brother always.

No offense taken
Awww, has it become personal now? You invade others personal space here, but the moment someone does the same to you, you try to back away. Anyway, he asked a genuine question. And in today's India, no wife would sacrifice her life for her husband. :inti
 
Awww, has it become personal now? You invade others personal space here, but the moment someone does the same to you, you try to back away. Anyway, he asked a genuine question. And in today's India, no wife would sacrifice her life for her husband. :inti

It hurt me because i never expected a brother of mine talking about my death and about his bhabhi like that.

Say whatever but i am also a human being with a soft heart on the inside despite my outer tough persona. I have feelings.

Having said that, no offense was taken and no brotherhood was lost.
 
The ultimate show of love, courage and sacrifice. Kindly do not insult another religion’s rituals.
What???? It is such a regressive thing and was banned. Cant believe there are still folks out there who believe in this nonsense , religious rituals hogwash. Honestly, shaking my head here.

Exactly the reason, why Ind should never ever be or even aspire to be a Hindu Rashtra or any other religious rashtra. A progressive, secular democratic republic it is and it will remain not bcos of the existing laws but bcos of the people there who believe in it.
 
What???? It is such a regressive thing and was banned. Cant believe there are still folks out there who believe in this nonsense , religious rituals hogwash. Honestly, shaking my head here.

Exactly the reason, why Ind should never ever be or even aspire to be a Hindu Rashtra or any other religious rashtra. A progressive, secular democratic republic it is and it will remain not bcos of the existing laws but bcos of the people there who believe in it.
Not even regressive, criminal actually. And we have a poster here supporting Sati, honestly ridiculous.
 
Great to know Mughals first tried to ban it. My respect for Mughals went up a notch.

Sati involves suicide/murder of the wife. Whoever invented Sati was clearly a psychopath. :inti
No need to make it into a religious issue. Sati is despicable and was rightly banned. And thats how all religions should be. The religious books are a guide to be a better person, not something you follow to the T and not something that you cant question. And it should apply to "every" religion.
 
This was not uncommon during riots. For example many Muslim women committed suicide during partition to avoid rape by Dharmic mobs.
Please be sensitive. It should be any women by any mobs. Applies to Islamic mobs as well. These mobs these thugs have no religions, they are all plain criminals.
 
Please be sensitive. It should be any women by any mobs. Applies to Islamic mobs as well. These mobs these thugs have no religions, they are all plain criminals.
I do agree. However there were many posts saying it was a turkic or Islamic practice, if we are happy to paint in a religious lens for some examples then we should use the same brush consistently.
 
Awww, has it become personal now? You invade others personal space here, but the moment someone does the same to you, you try to back away. Anyway, he asked a genuine question. And in today's India, no wife would sacrifice her life for her husband. :inti
what did i do u dummy?

Read all the posts

I think Rajdeep and all the bhakts should feature in Desperate Housewives. :inti

They can fit right in with their dramas.
 
Yes it does, it is mentioned a few religious Hindu texts.
Mentioned, its totally wrong and it should be abolished and removed. Thats why we have laws in place or else the religious zealots will run riot. The religious books not something you follow to the T and not something that you cant question. Irrational religious posts need to be questioned and purged. And it should apply to "every" religion.
 
Which turks were invading India over the last few years that made the women in the OP commit Jauhar?

it is a nice attempt to deflect and again try to blame Muslims but I believe the opinion of those involved is more reliable than yours. The police commisioner in the case said it was due to pressures of Sati. Why are you so keen to tarnish the legacy of the dead woman?
A few idiots out of a billion Hindus means nothing.
There is slavery till today in Arabia. Slavery was finally banned by British in Arab countries in 1960’s. Again, a few Arabs owning slaves well into 20th century does not mean it is widely prevalent.
 
Some of these Indian posters are resorting to whataboutism and deflection instead of unequivalently condemning Sati. :inti

Very cringy.
No one praises sati. You are deluded if you think majority Indians do that. That too in this day and age.

You don’t even know the difference between Sati and Jauhar and you are quick to shoot from the hip as usual.

Your favorite Turks are the main reason for Jauhar nonsense. Some of the remnants might persist till today. You know why North Indian Hindu women observe the stupid Purdah especially in rural communities? It’s a backward system influenced by the Mughal rule. If the girl is remotely beautiful, she would end up in the emporor or some bigwig in the Mughal rule’s harem. So to protect themselves from the eyes of these Mughal soldiers, women were covering their face. Basically hiding. Mughal rule ended, but the practice stayed centuries later. It became part of the culture. Such a shame.

There is no ghunghat or Purdah system in south India. Thankfully. The backward practice is still carried out in rural areas of Haryana, Rajasthan etc.
 
Mentioned, its totally wrong and it should be abolished and removed. Thats why we have laws in place or else the religious zealots will run riot. The religious books not something you follow to the T and not something that you cant question. Irrational religious posts need to be questioned and purged. And it should apply to "every" religion.

This is fine, I don't have any problem with this view because at least you are following the logic through, regardless of whether I agree with it. It is secular law how I understand it. What I don't understand is secular law which is obviously tainted by a religious colour.
 
So the British had to invade India and than place a ban on Sati.

As an Indian, does this bother you? @Bhaijaan
Outsiders coming and banning your religious practices
 
Back
Top