What's new

Shadab Khan versus Hardik Pandya : Battle of the All-rounders

The_Odd_One

ODI Debutant
Joined
Dec 27, 2015
Runs
8,950
We already have Faheem vs Pandya thread but in my opinion, Shadab vs Pandya makes more sense. Both are extremely good athletes who are all set to have excellent careers.

Pandya has done better with the bat so far though Shadab has hardly gotten a chance to show his batting talent. In bowling, Shadab has definitely performed better than Pandya.

2017 CT final, Pandya launched an assault on Shadab. I hope it is a beginning of a sport rivalry that continues for many years. May the better cricketer win!
 
Our lack of quality allrounders in modern times is giving us some cause for unnecessary comparisons at the earliest opportunity. Given enough of a sample size vs quality opposition, the comparisons will become clear for themselves, preemptive assumptions on Faheem or Shadab vs Hardik or Stokes etc is pointless. We've barely had the chance to see Shadab bat vs good opposition or Fahim to even PLAY against quality opponents while Pandya etc have proven themselves in multiple formats, lets cool the jets a bit. This is how you end up with Akmal vs Kohli threads...
 
Shadab at the age of 19 is already miles ahead of Pandya in terms of bowling. In batting he has performed in whatever little oppurtunities he got and Pak won the matches in which he performed with bat.
 
Surprised this thread doesn't have a lot of posts. Shadab has been appointed VC by Pakistan and Pandya is playing an important role in the Indian side.
 
Shadab is a good player but in terms of batting skills(hitting abilities), he can't match Pandya. Having said so, Pandya hasn't proved worth of his hype yet.
 
Interesting comparison. Thank God we have gotten over Pandya v Ashraf.

I would take Shadab ahead of Pandya in my team.
 
Some of the shots Pandya plays are on par with Kohli.

I think he should completely abandon his bowling and play as a batsman. Quality batsman, mediocre bowler
 
I have not seen much of Pandya batting but when I have I only seen him smash mainly slower bowlers, which includes medium fast bowlers. So cannot judge him, but Shadab I have seen and he hardly has let me down he would always do something good in batti g, bowling or both in a match. Fielding and motivation to other players is never missing.
 
With all this money, experience, x-factor, fashion and style there is hardly any difference between Shadab and Pandya. :inti
 
Its an incorrect comparison in so many ways.

One is a genuine all rounder who happens to be the 3rd best batsman in his team and a very handy 1st change seamer. Shadab on the other hand is playing as what? Most of us are confused including Pak team management themselves. The batsman Shadab I saw in last Asia cup looked attrocious with bat and a genuine tailender. And the bowler Shadab was treated as a part-timer by his captain by giving just 11 overs in the test match against Eng just as a breather to Yasir Shah.

Hardik Pandya would cake walk into Pakistan team as 2nd best batsman after Babar Azam and would play in all formats. Shadab would never make into Indian team considering Chahal & Kuldeep are already superior bowlers.

Pandya's biggest enemy is he himself and his maverick personality. If he keeps his head grounded and works hard, he has the potential to become top 3 all rounders in world cricket after Stokes and Shakib. Considering he is married now and hopefully no more distractions, I expect him to fullfill his potential now.

Its no Shadab's fault but blame goes to OP for opening such weird comparison thread. Hardik Pandya and Shadab Khan has no comparison as far as cricket is concerned as we are talking about 2 cricketers with massive gulf in class and pedigree.
 
Poor comparison, Shadab should be compared with someone like Jadeja who is also a slow bowling all rounder. Obviously Jadeja is well ahead.
 
Its an incorrect comparison in so many ways.

One is a genuine all rounder who happens to be the 3rd best batsman in his team and a very handy 1st change seamer. Shadab on the other hand is playing as what? Most of us are confused including Pak team management themselves. The batsman Shadab I saw in last Asia cup looked attrocious with bat and a genuine tailender. And the bowler Shadab was treated as a part-timer by his captain by giving just 11 overs in the test match against Eng just as a breather to Yasir Shah.

Hardik Pandya would cake walk into Pakistan team as 2nd best batsman after Babar Azam and would play in all formats. Shadab would never make into Indian team considering Chahal & Kuldeep are already superior bowlers.

Pandya's biggest enemy is he himself and his maverick personality. If he keeps his head grounded and works hard, he has the potential to become top 3 all rounders in world cricket after Stokes and Shakib. Considering he is married now and hopefully no more distractions, I expect him to fullfill his potential now.

Its no Shadab's fault but blame goes to OP for opening such weird comparison thread. Hardik Pandya and Shadab Khan has no comparison as far as cricket is concerned as we are talking about 2 cricketers with massive gulf in class and pedigree.

3rd best batsman? Since when India batting standard have gone so low? Currently he is neither a bowler nor a batsman for India. His best format is T20 where he is almost always the most expensive bowler and most of the time doesnt even bat.
 
I'll take Pandya any day of the week in limited overs cricket.

In Tests, I think Shadab has a little more utility especially in SENA where he can bat at no.7 and allow 4 fast bowlers to operate.

Al formats combined, I think Pandya is ahead as of now.
 
Pandya is only a better hitter of the cricket ball than Shadab.

Shadab overall is the better cricketer.

Pandya is only wasting his time in bowling, whereas he can become a fab 4 level batsman if he fully applies his mind to it
 
I'll take Pandya any day of the week in limited overs cricket.

In Tests, I think Shadab has a little more utility especially in SENA where he can bat at no.7 and allow 4 fast bowlers to operate.

Al formats combined, I think Pandya is ahead as of now.

I think Padiya is only ahead in T20s for his big hitting (touch and go here) in ODIs actually shadab is way ahead as he almost always fulfills his overs and take wickets where Pandiya neither completes his overs and always gives away most runs and hardly is required to bat.

When it comes to test so far both have been poor red ball crickets but as a preference I will actually take Pandiya as a 4th fast bowler and play specialist slow bowler instead of shadab that way I will have 3 specialist fast bowlers and one specialist slow bowler rather than having no specialist slow bowler.
 
Pandya is only a better hitter of the cricket ball than Shadab.

Shadab overall is the better cricketer.

Pandya is only wasting his time in bowling, whereas he can become a fab 4 level batsman if he fully applies his mind to it

Stop Joking - he cant even become top 4 allrounder which is easier than top 4 level batsman.
 
Stop Joking - he cant even become top 4 allrounder which is easier than top 4 level batsman.

Do you see me laughing?

I am 100% Pandya is a proper talent with the bat. I would bat him at number 4 after Kohli. Too much expected from him when he comes in at 6-7 to blast the ball out of the park. He can do it but he can also play beautifully with a straight bat.
 
I'll take Pandya any day of the week in limited overs cricket.

In Tests, I think Shadab has a little more utility especially in SENA where he can bat at no.7 and allow 4 fast bowlers to operate.

Al formats combined, I think Pandya is ahead as of now.

Pandya is 2-3 times the cricketer in all facets of the game comapred to Shadab. So in any format and in any ground, Pandya is a better player. However, I tend to agree with the utility factor considering Shadab plays for an weaker team. His 30 - 35 runs batting at no.7 is crucial for Pakistan in test cricket....same thing that we expect from Bhuvi Kumar or R.Ashwin.

However, the thread is who is better cricketer among the two and there is no doubt Pandya is way better than Shadab.
 
Pandya is only a better hitter of the cricket ball than Shadab.

Shadab overall is the better cricketer.

Pandya is only wasting his time in bowling, whereas he can become a fab 4 level batsman if he fully applies his mind to it
He doesn't have to. He is getting easy money in IPL and won't work hard for internationals. :inti
 
Do you see me laughing?

I am 100% Pandya is a proper talent with the bat. I would bat him at number 4 after Kohli. Too much expected from him when he comes in at 6-7 to blast the ball out of the park. He can do it but he can also play beautifully with a straight bat.

I take it you have not seen his embarrassing dismissals to slips in test cricket.
 
Pandya is 2-3 times the cricketer in all facets of the game comapred to Shadab. So in any format and in any ground, Pandya is a better player. However, I tend to agree with the utility factor considering Shadab plays for an weaker team. His 30 - 35 runs batting at no.7 is crucial for Pakistan in test cricket....same thing that we expect from Bhuvi Kumar or R.Ashwin.

However, the thread is who is better cricketer among the two and there is no doubt Pandya is way better than Shadab.

Just for your information its harder to perform for weaker team than a strong one.
 
I take it you have not seen his embarrassing dismissals to slips in test cricket.

That happens. Babar averages 45 now whereas not so long ago he was on the verge of being dropped as a Test Batsman
 
I think Padiya is only ahead in T20s for his big hitting (touch and go here) in ODIs actually shadab is way ahead as he almost always fulfills his overs and take wickets where Pandiya neither completes his overs and always gives away most runs and hardly is required to bat.

When it comes to test so far both have been poor red ball crickets but as a preference I will actually take Pandiya as a 4th fast bowler and play specialist slow bowler instead of shadab that way I will have 3 specialist fast bowlers and one specialist slow bowler rather than having no specialist slow bowler.


It's not really a good comparison to be honest.

Pandya is more of a batting all-rounder capable of batting in the top-6 (actually did many times and played some brilliant knocks against good teams) and bowling a few overs here and there.

Whereas Shadab is more of a bowling all rounder (like Jadeja or Woakes) who'll almost always bowl his full quota but will hardly do anything with the bat at no.8 most of the time.

And even their playing styles are vastly different. But I do think Shadab has more Test batting pedigree than Pandya.
 
Just for your information its harder to perform for weaker team than a strong one.

But it also gives you more oppurtunity to shine like Shakib Al Hassan or Andy Flower etc. You think Shadab would ever become a vice captain playing for a stronger side? Lol.
 
That happens. Babar averages 45 now whereas not so long ago he was on the verge of being dropped as a Test Batsman

Babar on the verge of being dropped? I know you are not laughing but your jokes are making me laugh. I have to say usually your points make sense but not this one.
 
But it also gives you more oppurtunity to shine like Shakib Al Hassan or Andy Flower etc. You think Shadab would ever become a vice captain playing for a stronger side? Lol.

I cant answer whether he would become vice captain or not that depends on to many things.
 
It's not really a good comparison to be honest.

Pandya is more of a batting all-rounder capable of batting in the top-6 (actually did many times and played some brilliant knocks against good teams) and bowling a few overs here and there.

Whereas Shadab is more of a bowling all rounder (like Jadeja or Woakes) who'll almost always bowl his full quota but will hardly do anything with the bat at no.8 most of the time.

And even their playing styles are vastly different. But I do think Shadab has more Test batting pedigree than Pandya.

Its not a good comparison at all 100% agree shadab is more comparable to Jadeja however Jadeja is way ahead.
 
Pandya is 2-3 times the cricketer in all facets of the game comapred to Shadab. So in any format and in any ground, Pandya is a better player.

However, the thread is who is better cricketer among the two and there is no doubt Pandya is way better than Shadab.

Come on man. He's not that good to be fair :)

IMO,

In ODIs and T20s

Pandya - Better batsman
Shadab - Slightly better bowler

In Tests

Pandya - Slightly better bowler
Shadab - slightly better batsman
 
Shadab at least has some escape route as bowler - he'll trouble many teams every day, some teams some days .... even in Test. But, this guy Hardik is the ultimate B&Pieces cricketer outside T20. Not good enough batsman to make IND D as specialist bat, not good enough to make IND F as specialist pacer. All that batting blast he has done is coming at 40th over after the top order has posted 200+ .... put him at three against new ball, he'll struggle to match Shakib's one world cup in all WC career combined. I know about his 93 at Jo'burg or his ODI heroics against Aussies .... but our Imrul also has a scintillating 107 against Poms and was instrumental with bat in the only Test that we won against Poms - these are one off.

Overall package, HP gives decent balance between bat & ball for LO cricket, but he is the ultimate example of "caught in between". Still, MILES BETTER than "all-rounder" Faheem Ashraf (which to be honest isn't a benchmark to be honest) and a brilliant fielder, but his ultimate use is : Istemal ke liye (Utility player). Just to give a perspective, Hardik is officially 27 this OCT, at same age (Jan 1986) some Kapil Dev Nikhanj had played 74 Tests, 3000+ runs at 30+ average with 3 hundreds and almost 300 wickets (281) at <29 with 18 5fors and 2 10fors ...... and in ODI 76 games (must say those were not diluted by ICC's globalization) for 1600+ runs at 28/102 stats in late 70s/early 80s and almost 100 wickets (97) at <25 average .... FOR GODS SAKE.......

As a cricketer, despite all the hype, I'll take Shadab everyday because his Leg spin can be developed into a decent level, which Hardik's batting won't reach, and least said about pace bowling is better - I know he clocks 140K+ in IPL. But, both's best suit is T20 (Yaak) & weakest is Test cricket, which tells almost everything about them. Both, are light years away from Shakib or Stokes as all-rounders respectively..... and Imran/Kapil are a defame charge away.
 
Some of the shots Pandya plays are on par with Kohli.

I think he should completely abandon his bowling and play as a batsman. Quality batsman, mediocre bowler

Definite batting talent and what you are suggesting is probably the route he is already going on. You can get away with being a mediocre batsman in some teams but there is no place for mediocre/expensive bowlers in any team. If he has to play as an AR he must put in top notch bowling effort day in day out otherwise better of focussing on batting
 
But it also gives you more oppurtunity to shine like Shakib Al Hassan or Andy Flower etc. You think Shadab would ever become a vice captain playing for a stronger side? Lol.

Are you saying Shakib or Flower were ordinary players? Give it a break, the way Pandya has been talked up you would think he was indias answer to Ben Stokes, truth is he is only slightly better than Shadab if that.
 
Poor comparison, Shadab should be compared with someone like Jadeja who is also a slow bowling all rounder. Obviously Jadeja is well ahead.

In tests in batting shadab has similar stats to jadeja in odis jadeja is ahead and shadab wins it in t20s

In the bowling department in tests jadeja is ahead but in the other 2 departments shadab wins it hands down how can you say jadeja is well ahead ?
 
Overall I'd take shadab in all three formats if it's based on t20s then I'd take pandya
 
In tests in batting shadab has similar stats to jadeja in odis jadeja is ahead and shadab wins it in t20s

In the bowling department in tests jadeja is ahead but in the other 2 departments shadab wins it hands down how can you say jadeja is well ahead ?

Jadeja is just better everywhere.
 
Are you saying Shakib or Flower were ordinary players? Give it a break, the way Pandya has been talked up you would think he was indias answer to Ben Stokes, truth is he is only slightly better than Shadab if that.

Well definitely going by this thread I am in the minority as most here do not rate Pandya but I continue to believe he is a top talent. The only issue is he does not get to play enough test cricket and he himself focuses more on T20s/IPLs. He has all the ingredients to be a top test all rounder given he is given constant oppurtunities.
 
Well definitely going by this thread I am in the minority as most here do not rate Pandya but I continue to believe he is a top talent. The only issue is he does not get to play enough test cricket and he himself focuses more on T20s/IPLs. He has all the ingredients to be a top test all rounder given he is given constant oppurtunities.

So doesnt shadab hes only played a few tests here and thier ?
 
Based upon what ?
Only one thing, Jadeja is close to being a proper allrounder in Tests. Last 5 years, he has a batting average of 40+ and sub-25 bowling average. A proper match winner in most test conditions. Will walk into most international test teams as a specialist bowler.

Shadab has had a good start but has a long way to go. Let him play 25-30 tests and pick at least 100 test wickets before comparing him to ond of the best test all rounders going around.
 
Pandya has much higher ceiling than Shadab.

I feel Shadab is more hard-working though. They both would be very important element of their respective sides come 2023 world cup let's see how their career pans out.
 
Only one thing, Jadeja is close to being a proper allrounder in Tests. Last 5 years, he has a batting average of 40+ and sub-25 bowling average. A proper match winner in most test conditions. Will walk into most international test teams as a specialist bowler.

Shadab has had a good start but has a long way to go. Let him play 25-30 tests and pick at least 100 test wickets before comparing him to ond of the best test all rounders going around.

Thankyou for the stats in tests Pakistan dont play much tests so it will hard for him to compete with jadeja but in limited overs theit comparison is fair both are excellent fielders
 
Only one thing, Jadeja is close to being a proper allrounder in Tests. Last 5 years, he has a batting average of 40+ and sub-25 bowling average. A proper match winner in most test conditions. Will walk into most international test teams as a specialist bowler.

Shadab has had a good start but has a long way to go. Let him play 25-30 tests and pick at least 100 test wickets before comparing him to ond of the best test all rounders going around.

Holder and stokes are the best going then woakes and so on
 
Pandya is one of the most exciting batsmen out there. A very clean hitter. Won't lie, I enjoy watching him bat over several other good batsmen. Its like a guilty pleasure.

On the other hand, he's inconsistent, which you expect considering his role in the team. Contrary to what some posters have mentioned, Pandya has at times done a good job of picking the team up from a mess.

Overall, Pandya adds a lot of balance to the Indian team. I would be very disappointed if his career doesn't take off from here and we miss out on all the entertainment.
 
In tests in batting shadab has similar stats to jadeja in odis jadeja is ahead and shadab wins it in t20s

In the bowling department in tests jadeja is ahead but in the other 2 departments shadab wins it hands down how can you say jadeja is well ahead ?

Jadeja is so far ahead in tests in bowling and ODIs which make him well ahead.
 
Lol I dont think there is a need to explain that jadeja is better than Shadab. Infact Jadeja is a better bowler than Yasir and is comparable to rizwan as a batsman

No I am not saying shadab isn't good. Shadab is very good in odi and even tests batting wise.

But Jadeja is better yes.
 
Right now Jadeja is better but i can still see shadab doing better than him in lois but not in tests though. As for hardik pandya he is simply better in batting while shadab is better in bowling but shadab is 5 years younger than him so he has alot of time to improve. He has improved his batting significantly in the last year and should be given a chance ahead of yasir in upcomming nz series. He can do no worse than yasir with the ball while adding a few 30 or 40 odd runs as well.
 
Bringing jadeja in a fight between shadab and pandya is like bringing a bazooka in a knife fight.

Jadeja is a world class allrounder who has proven himself in test cricket, is better than any other bowler in asia and a very good package away from home too.
 
Pandya can become a 35+ avg 120 str rate batsman in odis which in think would be good enough for our lower order.
In tests he is very important for the balance of our team
He bowls 135 to 140 kph and has a fifer in england and 3 fer in southafrica, also a batting average of 32 (all away from home) isn't too shabby either.

Overall a very good package.

As for shadab he can transform himself into a really good batsman in test cricket, in lois his batting is a liability (coz he bats at no. 7 or 8 with that str rate) .
A decent leg spinner in odis, so good package.
 
Bringing jadeja in a fight between shadab and pandya is like bringing a bazooka in a knife fight.

Jadeja is a world class allrounder who has proven himself in test cricket, is better than any other bowler in asia and a very good package away from home too.

Absolutely. Jadeja has legit ATG stats and legit ATG status in Asia. He just needs to improve a bit away from home in bowling. His batting is clutch. He can contribute. He is going down as a legend imo.

I rate Jadeja higher than Ashwin.
 
Yes. I love jaddu Bhai. He is a legend.

Anyway shadab reminds me alot of Jadeja actually. He has the potential but his bowling isn't good in tests though

Jadeja shouldn't be mentioned in the same breath as these two, he is at minimum a couple of notches higher in the talent stakes. Shadab needs to do a lot more if he even wants to get close, that will be an achievement in itself.
 
Bringing jadeja in a fight between shadab and pandya is like bringing a bazooka in a knife fight.

Jadeja is a world class allrounder who has proven himself in test cricket, is better than any other bowler in asia and a very good package away from home too.

You are right this time Meso bhai. :inti
 
World cup final.

90 to win from 50 balls

Pandya is the sort of talent who can pull it off even with the tail from a scenario like this and you back talent lile that for those pote tial moments.

The world could not see Pandya at his prime during last 2-3 years. Injuries have kept him out of international cricket amd hindered his growth.

Everybody is aware how dangerous and explosive he is.

Electric fielder too and a very handy 5th bowler.

He won India their one and only test match in England on their last tour.
 
World cup final.

90 to win from 50 balls

Pandya is the sort of talent who can pull it off even with the tail from a scenario like this and you back talent lile that for those pote tial moments.


The world could not see Pandya at his prime during last 2-3 years. Injuries have kept him out of international cricket amd hindered his growth.

Everybody is aware how dangerous and explosive he is.

Electric fielder too and a very handy 5th bowler.

He won India their one and only test match in England on their last tour.

Bas kar de bhai. World Cup semi final.

221 to chase and Pandya ji scored 32 from 62 balls and mind you he was batting alongside the next big thing in Indian cricket that time. Tailenders were no where to be seen. May be he has played these type of innings in Pyjama League but in internationals he has a lot to prove. Ofcourse you can dream whatever you want in your la la land. :inti
 
Its an incorrect comparison in so many ways.

One is a genuine all rounder who happens to be the 3rd best batsman in his team and a very handy 1st change seamer. Shadab on the other hand is playing as what? Most of us are confused including Pak team management themselves. The batsman Shadab I saw in last Asia cup looked attrocious with bat and a genuine tailender. And the bowler Shadab was treated as a part-timer by his captain by giving just 11 overs in the test match against Eng just as a breather to Yasir Shah.

Hardik Pandya would cake walk into Pakistan team as 2nd best batsman after Babar Azam and would play in all formats. Shadab would never make into Indian team considering Chahal & Kuldeep are already superior bowlers.

Pandya's biggest enemy is he himself and his maverick personality. If he keeps his head grounded and works hard, he has the potential to become top 3 all rounders in world cricket after Stokes and Shakib. Considering he is married now and hopefully no more distractions, I expect him to fullfill his potential now.

Its no Shadab's fault but blame goes to OP for opening such weird comparison thread. Hardik Pandya and Shadab Khan has no comparison as far as cricket is concerned as we are talking about 2 cricketers with massive gulf in class and pedigree.
sorry to disappoint but Shadab is better cricketer overall.
 
[MENTION=152021]Rajdeep[/MENTION] What's Pandya first class average. He will not even get into Zimbabwe team as a batter alone
 
From what I have seen so far of the two, I will take Pandya over Shadab any day. Its not even close. Pandya is a match winner and can turn the match anytime.
 
They are very different cricketers

I think Shadab batting is yet to develop completely, he can be a top 5 batsmen who can bowl 7- 8 overs . Not a match-winner , but a consistent performer who can set up games for others.
 
[MENTION=152021]Rajdeep[/MENTION] What's Pandya first class average. He will not even get into Zimbabwe team as a batter alone

Interesting that you think Pandya will even get into Zimbabwe team.
 
60 runs in 21 balls with 7 sixes. Not many doubt my cricketing acumen but let me put out my neck and say it again. Pandya is the 3rd best batsman in India currently after Rohit and Kohli. And if he was a Pakistani, he would be just behind Babar. It is hilarious and borderline blasphemy to compare him with the likes of Shadab, Faheem etc.

Hardik Pandya is future ATG...you heard it here first.
 
21 ball - 60 tonight.

This is why Pandya is all the hype. When he gets going. He's in my opinion a level above Russel, Pollard, Maxwell among the pinch hitters.
 
60 runs in 21 balls with 7 sixes. Not many doubt my cricketing acumen but let me put out my neck and say it again. Pandya is the 3rd best batsman in India currently after Rohit and Kohli. And if he was a Pakistani, he would be just behind Babar. It is hilarious and borderline blasphemy to compare him with the likes of Shadab, Faheem etc.

Hardik Pandya is future ATG...you heard it here first.

You are looking too much into mickey mouse league (t20 is not the format to label some one atG).Just look at his record in international cricket he is yet to prove himself just shows some glimpses but way too inconsistent in batting and terrible bowler .So 2 medicore player comparison is worth of argument instead of him comparing with the likes of stokes holder,shakib Who are way ahead of him .
 
60 runs in 21 balls with 7 sixes. Not many doubt my cricketing acumen but let me put out my neck and say it again. Pandya is the 3rd best batsman in India currently after Rohit and Kohli. And if he was a Pakistani, he would be just behind Babar. It is hilarious and borderline blasphemy to compare him with the likes of Shadab, Faheem etc.

Hardik Pandya is future ATG...you heard it here first.

Pandya better batsman than Dhawan?
 
India must be in its worst crisis if a batsman with a first class average of 30 and a lifetime collection of ONE hundred so far is the best batsman in the country. Its not as if he is a 18 year old. He will be 27 in 4 days
 
Just saw the video clip. That was terrible bowling. However is a great 20-20 player. Sme insane shots. Not a fair comparison with SHadab
 
India must be in its worst crisis if a batsman with a first class average of 30 and a lifetime collection of ONE hundred so far is the best batsman in the country. Its not as if he is a 18 year old. He will be 27 in 4 days

He is only useful cause he adds balance and gives our main bowlers rest in odi and probably tests.

In T20 he is good but who did he score this 20 ball 60 against is the question?

Lucky for him he doesn't have to face top bowlers after the first 4 overs in T20. I think that's why he can be dangerous. I am still suspect over his ability vs pace.

Well technically he would face the top bowlers at the death but the damage could have already been dished out in the middle overs.
 
Back
Top