What's new

Should the likes of Mukhtar Ahmed and Awais Zia be fast tracked in the T20I team?

ahmedwaqas92

ODI Debutant
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Runs
10,582
Post of the Week
4
Hard Hitting batsmen who won't die wondering!

Also, I am pretty certain they'd do much better than what Umar 'The Legend' Amin has been churning out & our new #3 Mr. Mohammad 'Definition of Bits and Pieces' Nawaz.

Thoughts?

P.S. Mods if possible can we have a yes/no poll on this ??
 
I'm pretty sure you haven't seen awais zia bat, because if you had you probably wouldn't have asked him to be included in the team.
 
there'll be no harm in trying them out again in T20's, even Sohail Akhtar should must get a go. A quick 30,40 can really change the course of a T20 innings.
 
I would agree with Mukhtar in the team, but the guy isn't even in PSL while Shan Masood is. :facepalm:

Not Awais. He's trash.
 
It’s not so much about fast tracking as having patience with these guys. Ppl start calling for afridi recalls after one game
 
I can see ball flying high and coming back to the inner circle fielder that way.
 
Awais Zia is one of the worst batsmen I have seen in the sport. The word hack is thrown around liberally. Zia is the textbook definition of hack and not even a good one.
 
No, both are hacks . Better to invest on Nasir Nawaz, Zeeshan Malik type batsman who actually have some technique to play big shots not just blind slogging.
 
As a cricketing country, we first need to correctly diagnose the disease that is plaguing our batting lineup. I've seen so many comments on PP where everyone is throwing names around that so and so player should be in the team without realizing the disease that we have in our cricket. It seems like those who are outside the team are the best players.

The problem stems from the fact that we as a nation are not producing any proper batters who have their techniques aligned. Small glitches in technique will always be there in a batsman but overall we are only producing genuine hacks at the domestic level. Forget power hitting for a moment, how many genuine batters at the domestic T20 and ODI level can you name who can play in the V by simply presenting the full face of the bat?

Awais Zia and Mukhtar Ahmed are simply a product of this hack factory that we are nurturing at the domestic level. These guys will flay bowling attacks on the dead pitches of Faisalabad where the ball does not seam or swing and cross batted shots actually give you runs. The moment you give them a seaming and a bouncy pitch, these players look like fools. If you look at the first three dismissals of our innings today, every single one of them fell to a cross batted slog on the on-side. This has been ingrained into their batting by having wild slogs giving them runs on the Pakistani pitches.

The rest of the countries are so ahead of us simply because they have incorporated power hitting into their games without losing much of their technique as batsmen. With us, forget power hitting we haven't reached the first level yet which is to become a proper batsman playing proper cricketing shots. I can bet that if you asked Fakhar to bat for 20 overs in a T20 without caring for the Run Rate, he would still not survive the 20 overs. He will have an exceptional day but that is an exception, not the rule. So unless you have that base of being a proper batsman, consistent power hitting will be a distant dream.

This is why I believe that we need to identify batsmen at the Pakistani domestic level who have the ability to play proper cricketing shots irrespective of which format you're playing. Once you get that core, gradually you can incorporate power hitting into their game which is not that difficult to be honest. But when you don't have the technique of a batsman at all, power hitting is like searching for a needle in a haystack. The four batsmen who I feel we can genuinely work with going forward are Babar Azam, Haris Sohail, Umar Amin and Ahmed Shehzad. Crucify Ahmed Shehzad all you like, but the guy at least has the ability to bat. His problems are three fold - selfishness, attitude and insecurity. A good selection committee can get rid of his insecurity and a good coach can get rid of his selfishness and attitude. Its not rocket science. Not saying that Ahmed Shehzad is not at fault himself, but others need to do their bit as well. Once you have four solid batsmen, you can add a couple of all-rounders like Faheem and Imad who can hit out. And yes Umar Amin got out at 0 slogging but I'm seen enough at the domestic level which suggests that he is a good batsman by Pakistani standards. The pressure of being 0 off 6 balls initially got to him which could be a reason of his wild slog. But he's not bad. Give him time and consistent chances.
 
I'm pretty sure you haven't seen awais zia bat, because if you had you probably wouldn't have asked him to be included in the team.

I am pretty sure of one thing though:

Awais Zia has a better run per innings in FIRST CLASS cricket than both your Test Openers, Imam, and Babar Azam in the last four seasons so please, before you tell me to do something, go and do some research.
 
I would agree with Mukhtar in the team, but the guy isn't even in PSL while Shan Masood is. :facepalm:

Not Awais. He's trash.

I can see ball flying high and coming back to the inner circle fielder that way.

Awais Zia is one of the worst batsmen I have seen in the sport. The word hack is thrown around liberally. Zia is the textbook definition of hack and not even a good one.

No, both are hacks . Better to invest on Nasir Nawaz, Zeeshan Malik type batsman who actually have some technique to play big shots not just blind slogging.

This is a classic case of people labelling someone a 'hack' or a 'Legend' just because SIX YEARS AGO they saw him bat and slog widely against SL in a handful of games.

Yet magically and for some reason unknown to mankind, this same hack has been churning out runs at a better rate than our test openers combined, a guy who's touted to be Pakistan next in line (when it comes to openers) and the celebrated Babar Azam.....

Supremely comical and weird!
 
This is a classic case of people labelling someone a 'hack' or a 'Legend' just because SIX YEARS AGO they saw him bat and slog widely against SL in a handful of games.

Yet magically and for some reason unknown to mankind, this same hack has been churning out runs at a better rate than our test openers combined, a guy who's touted to be Pakistan next in line (when it comes to openers) and the celebrated Babar Azam.....

Supremely comical and weird!

I understand where you're coming from but are you comparing Awais Zia's domestic stats with the international numbers of our Test team players?
 
Babar, Haris , Sarfaraz and Amin should not be playing T20s and replacing them with Mukhtar and 31 year old Awais zia will certainly be an improvement but not by much.

We should look to develop young dynamic batsmen who can play at different conditions, adopt to different situations and can play against quality bowling. Just look at how Munro played today. We can do better than bringing back the hacks like Mukhtar and Zia.
 
I understand where you're coming from but are you comparing Awais Zia's domestic stats with the international numbers of our Test team players?

No not at all, I am comparing the domestic stats of Awais Zia with the DOMESTIC STATS of the three people that I mentioned in my Post!

The point of me making this comparison would've made as much sense as CHOCOLATE CAKE right now if I would've made that statement based on the number of Intl vs Domestics.

I did a 6000 worded detailed thread on it a few weeks ago. He is scording runs in First Class cricket (that would've exposed him if he was a hack, also Pakistani Pitches are basically a minefield) but yet he's outscoring people we select to play the highest form of the game.
 
No not at all, I am comparing the domestic stats of Awais Zia with the DOMESTIC STATS of the three people that I mentioned in my Post!

The point of me making this comparison would've made as much sense as CHOCOLATE CAKE right now if I would've made that statement based on the number of Intl vs Domestics.

I did a 6000 worded detailed thread on it a few weeks ago. He is scording runs in First Class cricket (that would've exposed him if he was a hack, also Pakistani Pitches are basically a minefield) but yet he's outscoring people we select to play the highest form of the game.

Ok. But I've seen Awais and Mukhtar play domestic cricket recently and believe me they would not last 10 balls in T20s in NZ. They may have the better scores in domestic cricket than some of our first teamers, but that's no gauge of their own ability to succeed at the international level.
 
No not at all, I am comparing the domestic stats of Awais Zia with the DOMESTIC STATS of the three people that I mentioned in my Post!

The point of me making this comparison would've made as much sense as CHOCOLATE CAKE right now if I would've made that statement based on the number of Intl vs Domestics.

I did a 6000 worded detailed thread on it a few weeks ago. He is scording runs in First Class cricket (that would've exposed him if he was a hack, also Pakistani Pitches are basically a minefield) but yet he's outscoring people we select to play the highest form of the game.

What are the domestic stats of Rafatullah Mohmand, Ahmed Shehzad, Akmal brothers, Khurram Manzoor etc. Should they be brought into the team as well based on their stats or am I missing something ?
 
Zia hasn't done anything good recently in the domestic cricket.

Mukhtar deserves a chance ahead of all openers in T20Is.
 
Ok. But I've seen Awais and Mukhtar play domestic cricket recently and believe me they would not last 10 balls in T20s in NZ. They may have the better scores in domestic cricket than some of our first teamers, but that's no gauge of their own ability to succeed at the international level.

I am not disputing what you might've seen and I'll take your word for it but the part that I've made bold in not the criteria then what exactly is and if there is some other subjective criteria that you think should be applied here why are we running domestic competitions then ??

Why not then just have net sessions & select players based on these subjective criteria then? Why are we wasting time and resources on our FC and domestics then bro?
 
I am pretty sure of one thing though:

Awais Zia has a better run per innings in FIRST CLASS cricket than both your Test Openers, Imam, and Babar Azam in the last four seasons so please, before you tell me to do something, go and do some research.

no need to get offended, figures aren't everything. The guy is genuinely a horrible batsman, I still don't know how he makes runs in domestics.
 
I am not disputing what you might've seen and I'll take your word for it but the part that I've made bold in not the criteria then what exactly is and if there is some other subjective criteria that you think should be applied here why are we running domestic competitions then ??

Why not then just have net sessions & select players based on these subjective criteria then? Why are we wasting time and resources on our FC and domestics then bro?

The thing is you're making stats as the only criteria for selection. If that is the case, then there is no point in having a selection committee. At the end of the season, just have an excel sheet and filter out in descending order who the best batsmen and bowlers were. But that's not how players should be selected. If you're asking for Awais Zia to be in the team because he scored more than Sami Aslam in the domestics, then by extension of your logic, Kamran Akmal should be the first player to get the nod for selection. And why not Saad Ali?
 
I am not disputing what you might've seen and I'll take your word for it but the part that I've made bold in not the criteria then what exactly is and if there is some other subjective criteria that you think should be applied here why are we running domestic competitions then ??

Why not then just have net sessions & select players based on these subjective criteria then? Why are we wasting time and resources on our FC and domestics then bro?

Players and support staff ki rozee lagi hui hai . That is domestic cricket all about at the moment unfortunately.
 
What are the domestic stats of Rafatullah Mohmand, Ahmed Shehzad, Akmal brothers, Khurram Manzoor etc. Should they be brought into the team as well based on their stats or am I missing something ?

Rafatullah Mohmand = 40+ Year Old (investment doesn't make Logic)
Shehzad = Massive Sample size from Intl Cricket
Akmal = Massive Sample Size from Intl Cricket + 36 Year Old
Khurram Manzoor = If the numbers make him a deserving candidate then yes I have no problems in giving him a go (but he too has a lot of sample from Intl Games to gauge ability).

Mukhtar and Awais do not have any such baggage!
 
The thing is you're making stats as the only criteria for selection. If that is the case, then there is no point in having a selection committee. At the end of the season, just have an excel sheet and filter out in descending order who the best batsmen and bowlers were. But that's not how players should be selected. If you're asking for Awais Zia to be in the team because he scored more than Sami Aslam in the domestics, then by extension of your logic, Kamran Akmal should be the first player to get the nod for selection. And why not Saad Ali?

Kamran Akmal doesn't make it into the Selection Criteria because he's a bad investment as we have a massive sample size of K.Akmal from Intl to gauge his ceiling and he's 36+ in age so him scoring runs is a mere fact that he's channeling his experience against lesser players who hadn't had the same luxury.

Saad Ali would be the first name in my batting sheet tbh, especially if it comes to the Test XI. He's 24 and scored runs in a season where everyone was collecting ducks for fun.

Age, where the runs are scored, how much are they scored, the longeviety factor et al, these are the kind of contexts the selection commettie is hired for but as a baseline they need stats to actually come up with a pool of player that deserve a call not people who languish at the bottom half of the batting table.
 
Hard Hitting batsmen who won't die wondering!

Also, I am pretty certain they'd do much better than what Umar 'The Legend' Amin has been churning out & our new #3 Mr. Mohammad 'Definition of Bits and Pieces' Nawaz.

Thoughts?

P.S. Mods if possible can we have a yes/no poll on this ??

Are you kidding?

Mukhtar and Zia?

Both are not international material especially Mukhtar.
 
no need to get offended, figures aren't everything. The guy is genuinely a horrible batsman, I still don't know how he makes runs in domestics.

If he was a horrible batsman he wouldn't be making runs now would he? That's as paradoxical as it can get. At the end of a cricket match runs and wickets win you game and if a player cannot do that what's the point of having that player??

Case in point Umar Amin looking pretty and solid to make 4 runs will not win you games !!
 
Kamran Akmal doesn't make it into the Selection Criteria because he's a bad investment as we have a massive sample size of K.Akmal from Intl to gauge his ceiling and he's 36+ in age so him scoring runs is a mere fact that he's channeling his experience against lesser players who hadn't had the same luxury.

Saad Ali would be the first name in my batting sheet tbh, especially if it comes to the Test XI. He's 24 and scored runs in a season where everyone was collecting ducks for fun.

Age, where the runs are scored, how much are they scored, the longeviety factor et al, these are the kind of contexts the selection commettie is hired for but as a baseline they need stats to actually come up with a pool of player that deserve a call not people who languish at the bottom half of the batting table.

Hussain Talat, Saad Ali, Sahibzada Farhan
 
Players and support staff ki rozee lagi hui hai . That is domestic cricket all about at the moment unfortunately.

This is Exactly what's wrong with Pakistan Cricket in general (There is no Forward Thinking), there is no logic to selection, there are no analysts who are making sure that a specific pool of players are available that are most suited for a particular selection criteria. Everything is just Allah Saharay !!
 
If he was a horrible batsman he wouldn't be making runs now would he? That's as paradoxical as it can get. At the end of a cricket match runs and wickets win you game and if a player cannot do that what's the point of having that player??

Case in point Umar Amin looking pretty and solid to make 4 runs will not win you games !!

Some players just can't make it at international level, I believe he happens to one of those. He got found out against England in the very first match that he played, and he hadn't improved one bit the next time he played against Australia and New Zealand. He had no balance, he lost his shape while playing shots, and he couldn't time a single ball.

Sure you can look pretty and have a great technique and not make any runs, that just means that you're not up to international cricket mentally, but to progress to that level you at least have to have some basic fundamentals of batting, and Awais Zia doesn't not have that.
 
Some players just can't make it at international level, I believe he happens to one of those. He got found out against England in the very first match that he played, and he hadn't improved one bit the next time he played against Australia and New Zealand. He had no balance, he lost his shape while playing shots, and he couldn't time a single ball.

Sure you can look pretty and have a great technique and not make any runs, that just means that you're not up to international cricket mentally, but to progress to that level you at least have to have some basic fundamentals of batting, and Awais Zia doesn't not have that.

So 3 chances scattered across three years that were mind you almost half a decade from Today is somehow the barometer for us to judge a given. He is churning out the runs, he is in the acceptable age bracket, we are just not going to select him because 5 years ago he 'looked' ugly at the handful of opportunities he was given?? That for mean is just pure injustice my friend.

Do we know how many hours of nets he does, Do we know how many hours he might've spent with coaches to rectify the kinks in his armor during these last 4-5 years. He is producing the runs so he might be doing something right ain't it?? We've tried medocrity after medocrity in these years. Why not go with someone who is making runs in the difficult FC conditions of our domestics and give the lad a proper chance ??

Is that too much to ask??
 
This is Exactly what's wrong with Pakistan Cricket in general (There is no Forward Thinking), there is no logic to selection, there are no analysts who are making sure that a specific pool of players are available that are most suited for a particular selection criteria. Everything is just Allah Saharay !!

Exactly. Only in a professional domestic system (where pitches and balls are of decent quality, where selections are based on merit and roles of players are analytically evaluated) can we attain considerable weightage to the statistics as a basis for selection for the national team.
 
Rafatullah Mohmand = 40+ Year Old (investment doesn't make Logic)
Shehzad = Massive Sample size from Intl Cricket
Akmal = Massive Sample Size from Intl Cricket + 36 Year Old
Khurram Manzoor = If the numbers make him a deserving candidate then yes I have no problems in giving him a go (but he too has a lot of sample from Intl Games to gauge ability).

Mukhtar and Awais do not have any such baggage!

Okay. What about Israrullah, Naveed Malik, Bilal Asif etc ? Should they be selected as well ? If stats were the only criteria, Faheem Ashraf would have never played for Pakistan.
 
So 3 chances scattered across three years that were mind you almost half a decade from Today is somehow the barometer for us to judge a given. He is churning out the runs, he is in the acceptable age bracket, we are just not going to select him because 5 years ago he 'looked' ugly at the handful of opportunities he was given?? That for mean is just pure injustice my friend.

Do we know how many hours of nets he does, Do we know how many hours he might've spent with coaches to rectify the kinks in his armor during these last 4-5 years. He is producing the runs so he might be doing something right ain't it?? We've tried medocrity after medocrity in these years. Why not go with someone who is making runs in the difficult FC conditions of our domestics and give the lad a proper chance ??

Is that too much to ask??

Mind if I ask what are Awais Zia's List A and T20 records in the last 4 years? Are they better than Babar Azam's, Fakhar Zaman's and Umar Amin's??? I don't want us to induct Awais Zia in the T20 team just because he outscored many in FC cricket.
 
I would agree with Mukhtar in the team, but the guy isn't even in PSL while Shan Masood is. :facepalm:

Not Awais. He's trash.

Mukhtar not playing in the PSL doesn't mean he can't be selected for T20Is. Amin has done literally nothing in PSL, don't even remember him playing 1 game, but he's still playing Limited overs cricket for Pakistan.
 
The real problem with Pakistan cricket is this sub-continent mentality of proper shots, correct technique and all this rubbish.

Forget all this and see who is scoring fast and pick them for white-ball cricket. It's very simple.
 
Sorry this board is too biased, corrupt and nepotistic for these 2. The PSL is the only tournament where chief selector has to mandatory pick from performers of PSL. And they are not playing in PSL.

If chief selector had chosen some batting alternative minus Shehzad, Malik, Azam, Haris, Umar Amin, Akmals and Hafeez in the last 2 years, there might have been some hope.

As long as Inzamam is selector he will replace Malik with Hafeez, and Hafeez with Akmal. Will never select a talented batsman from the domestic circuit.
 
Isn't this why we have the PSL? So that we can gauge their ability to play fast attacking cricket at a level considerably higher than the domestic stage. The thing is though the pitches in the UAE for the past PSL tournaments have been slow and low and not conducive to very high scores overall so teams ended up picking "proper" batsmen. These two should go through the PSL which needs to be host to better pitches if we wish to unearth strikers.
 
Absolutely untrue. Name me hacks in the Australian/Indian/SA/NZ teams?

Bro bro bro bro
Just look at the squads of SA & AUS on last few tours... Lets look at the squad AUS have selected for the tri-series against Eng and NZ... Warner, Finch and Maxi are the only guys who have established themselves in cricket, look at other guys, they are nobodies in International cricket, all are top performers of BBL. Similarly SA also have lots of new guys in T20Is every time they play this format. Earlier Last year they had selected Lungi for SL T20I series and thought he has too good to play in Tests and ODIs and fast tracked him into senior team although injury made him to wait almost a year. Even look at NZ T20I team and compare with ODI team. These teams use T20 format for developing new players but unfortunately Pakistan take T20Is as seriously as Tests and ODIs, i would say they take it more seriously than other two formats...
India is the only team who have got players who have no hesitation in changing gears from ODIs to T20Is and i will give all the credit for it to IPL and when u look at their team every T20Is series they have 2 or 3 new guys in their team...
It is about how you approach a particular format.. Ever since T20s have come into existence, Pakistan have given all importance to this rubbish format.
 
Last edited:
No, both are hacks . Better to invest on Nasir Nawaz, Zeeshan Malik type batsman who actually have some technique to play big shots not just blind slogging.

No this is a post I agree with. Both the batsman you mentioned have a decent technique and don't just slog mindlessly. I think they will turn out to be a worthwhile investment.
 
You know things are bad when..........





Give a young, unknown lad a chance. Maybe that u19 kid who was hitting huge sixes, Nasir Nawaz. For that to happen we need a better chief selector than the revolutionary. Pretty sure the Akmals and possibly Butt are making a return after this series.
 
You know things are bad when..........




Give a young, unknown lad a chance. Maybe that u19 kid who was hitting huge sixes, Nasir Nawaz. For that to happen we need a better chief selector than the revolutionary. Pretty sure the Akmals and possibly Butt are making a return after this series.
Inzi XI:

Butt *
Kamran +
Nawaz
Umar
Hafeez
Malik
Haris
Amin
Tanvir
Gul
Wahab
 
Last edited:
Mukhtar definetly deserves another go in international cricket. He has atleast performed in international cricket. Also seems to have worked on some of his issues and was fairly consistent in the national t20 cup. It's disappointing his not in the PSL because I'm sure he would have lit up the tournament.
 
Hard Hitting batsmen who won't die wondering!

Also, I am pretty certain they'd do much better than what Umar 'The Legend' Amin has been churning out & our new #3 Mr. Mohammad 'Definition of Bits and Pieces' Nawaz.

Thoughts?

P.S. Mods if possible can we have a yes/no poll on this ??

Thinking we're jumping the gun. It's not about ability, it's about the mentality and maturity. These players did not assess the pitch and revisit the target. A mature player on the other hand will be able to assess and get himself in and capitalise.
Babars and munros innings was an illustration of just that.
Where 140 would have been enough, our top order got out going for 180.
Such a shame our think tank couldn't get the message out.
 
You know things are bad when..........





Give a young, unknown lad a chance. Maybe that u19 kid who was hitting huge sixes, Nasir Nawaz. For that to happen we need a better chief selector than the revolutionary. Pretty sure the Akmals and possibly Butt are making a return after this series.

Exactly. A guy like Nasir Nawaz should be given a chance. Seems like big hitting comes naturally to him. You cant expect Inzi to do it though.
 
The form that Mukhtar had been on, he should have been a part of the team. In fact he should be the first choice partner up top with Fakhar.
 
The real problem with Pakistan cricket is this sub-continent mentality of proper shots, correct technique and all this rubbish.

Forget all this and see who is scoring fast and pick them for white-ball cricket. It's very simple.

I don't think anyone will say it, but for me the problem is mental. Some of your young players and the senior players freeze when the heat is on.
 
As a cricketing country, we first need to correctly diagnose the disease that is plaguing our batting lineup. I've seen so many comments on PP where everyone is throwing names around that so and so player should be in the team without realizing the disease that we have in our cricket. It seems like those who are outside the team are the best players.

The problem stems from the fact that we as a nation are not producing any proper batters who have their techniques aligned. Small glitches in technique will always be there in a batsman but overall we are only producing genuine hacks at the domestic level. Forget power hitting for a moment, how many genuine batters at the domestic T20 and ODI level can you name who can play in the V by simply presenting the full face of the bat?

Awais Zia and Mukhtar Ahmed are simply a product of this hack factory that we are nurturing at the domestic level. These guys will flay bowling attacks on the dead pitches of Faisalabad where the ball does not seam or swing and cross batted shots actually give you runs. The moment you give them a seaming and a bouncy pitch, these players look like fools. If you look at the first three dismissals of our innings today, every single one of them fell to a cross batted slog on the on-side. This has been ingrained into their batting by having wild slogs giving them runs on the Pakistani pitches.

The rest of the countries are so ahead of us simply because they have incorporated power hitting into their games without losing much of their technique as batsmen. With us, forget power hitting we haven't reached the first level yet which is to become a proper batsman playing proper cricketing shots. I can bet that if you asked Fakhar to bat for 20 overs in a T20 without caring for the Run Rate, he would still not survive the 20 overs. He will have an exceptional day but that is an exception, not the rule. So unless you have that base of being a proper batsman, consistent power hitting will be a distant dream.

This is why I believe that we need to identify batsmen at the Pakistani domestic level who have the ability to play proper cricketing shots irrespective of which format you're playing. Once you get that core, gradually you can incorporate power hitting into their game which is not that difficult to be honest. But when you don't have the technique of a batsman at all, power hitting is like searching for a needle in a haystack.
The four batsmen who I feel we can genuinely work with going forward are Babar Azam, Haris Sohail, Umar Amin and Ahmed Shehzad.
Crucify Ahmed Shehzad all you like, but the guy at least has the ability to bat. His problems are three fold - selfishness, attitude and insecurity. A good selection committee can get rid of his insecurity and a good coach can get rid of his selfishness and attitude. Its not rocket science. Not saying that Ahmed Shehzad is not at fault himself, but others need to do their bit as well. Once you have four solid batsmen, you can add a couple of all-rounders like Faheem and Imad who can hit out.
And yes Umar Amin got out at 0 slogging but I'm seen enough at the domestic level which suggests that he is a good batsman by Pakistani standards. The pressure of being 0 off 6 balls initially got to him which could be a reason of his wild slog. But he's not bad. Give him time and consistent chances.

Agreed. As u said if they need proper batsmen to hold the ship then those four are the future and the ones that can genuinely be worked on all formats. Adding to that is Umar akmal can also be a part but unfortunately UAkmal and AShehzad has to get rid off their off-field issues and keep attitude in check... if they achieve something small then they will become seniors overnight and think themselves as sachin and ponting..
 
Back
Top