What's new

State crackdown on dissent feared as four secularist activists 'disappear' in Pakistan

TalentSpotterPk

Test Debutant
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Runs
15,072
Post of the Week
1
Waqas Goraya, Asim Saeed, Salman Haider and Ahmed Raza have all criticised the authorities.


At least four social media activists, known for their secular and anti-militarist views, have disappeared in Pakistan – sparking fears of a crackdown on dissenters.

Intelligence services in Pakistan are known for illegal detentions, but such "forced disappearances" are usually directed against those supporting terrorism or violent separatism, reports the Guardian.


In what appears to be a fundamental tactical shift, outspoken critics of the government – particularly of Pakistan's army – now appear to be targeted.


Waqas Goraya and Asim Saeed disappeared on 4 January, while the relatives of Salman Haider said he vanished on 6 January and Ahmed Raza Naseer on 7 January.

All four were active on social media groups promoting left wing and secularist views, which criticised Pakistan's conservative establishment.


Haider's brother told Al Jazeera that his family is worried about his health as he suffers from a medical condition known as anaphylaxis.

"My brother's wife received a call late at night asking her to pick up Salman's car from an unknown location in Islamabad," Zeeshan Haider said.

"We did find the car but could not see any sign of Salman. It's been four days now and we don't know who and why would anyone kidnap my brother."

Haider has written for Pakistan's largest English-language newspaper, Dawn. He also teaches at Fatima Jinnah Women's University in the city of Rawalpindi, about 15km from the capital, Islamabad.


Al Jazeera reports that last year, Haider wrote a poem about human rights abuses in Pakistan's Balochistan province which included a line about the disappearances of some of his friends. The government of Pakistan has seen resistance from tribes in Balochistan since the country came into existence following India's partition in 1947.

Saeed and Goraya help to run the Mochi Facebook page, which is critical of Pakistan's powerful military.

Relatives of the fourth man, Ahmed Raza Naseer, say he was taken from his family's shop in the Punjab district of Sheikhupra.

In an editorial, Dawn called for all four men to be released. It said: "The sanitised language – 'missing persons', 'the disappeared', etc – cannot hide an ugly truth: the state of Pakistan continues to be suspected of involvement in the disappearance and illegal detentions of a range of private citizens.

"Now, with the disappearance of Salman Haider and at least three other activists, a dark new chapter in the state's murky, illegal war against civil society appears to have been opened.

"It is simply not enough for government and police officials to claim that the disappearances are being investigated. Mr Haider and the other recently missing activists need to be returned to their families immediately – it is surely impossible that several individuals can simply vanish and the state lack the resources to track them down and have them released on an emergency basis.

"The state, because it is the enforcer of the law, cannot be above the law."



http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/state-crac...cularist-activists-disappear-pakistan-1600362
 
Why Bloggers are dissappearing ?

A Perspective by Sami Ibrahim & Sabir Shakir

<iframe frameborder="0" width="480" height="270" src="//www.dailymotion.com/embed/video/x588new" allowfullscreen></iframe><br /><a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x588new_bloggers-gayab-kun-hue-sami-ibraheem-and-sabir-shakir-reveals-the-actual-background-story_news" target="_blank">Bloggers gayab kun hue ? Sami Ibraheem and...</a> <i>by <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/thezed-lad" target="_blank">thezed-lad</a></i>
 
Fifth Pakistani social media activist reported missing


A fifth Pakistani rights activist has gone missing, his colleagues said Thursday, as the United Nations raised concerns over shrinking freedoms for campaigners.

Samar Abbas, a middle-aged IT worker and head of the anti-militancy Civil Progressive Alliance, disappeared under mysterious circumstances after arriving in the capital Islamabad from the southern port city of Karachi on Saturday, January 7, according to Talib Raza, a colleague from his organisation.
Anarchists threaten to disrupt Trump inauguration, police say ready
"We formed the alliance to protect the rights of minorities. He had launched a struggle against the banned militant outfits' activities and we together staged protests for the rights of the minorities," said Raza.

"This seems to be an organised attempt to shut the progressive and liberal voices in the country," he added.

Four leftist bloggers were previously reported missing from various cities in Pakistan between January 4 and 7, raising fears of a crackdown on social media, the last bastion of free speech in a country where journalism is increasingly under threat.

Human Rights Watch said their near simultaneous disappearances raised concerns of government involvement.

The government has denied this, and on Tuesday Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan told the Senate authorities would soon recover all the missing.
3 More Women Disappear Near Sherri Papini Crime Scene
Rights groups say Pakistani activists and journalists often find themselves caught between the security establishment and militant groups including the Taliban.

The United Nations and Amnesty International have expressed concern for the missing activists.

"No government should tolerate attacks on its citizens," said the UN's special rapporteur on the right to freedom of expression, David Kaye.

"By making the investigation of these disappearances an urgent priority, the Pakistani authorities can send a strong signal that they take seriously the responsibility for the life and security of all of its citizens, particularly in cases involving freedom of expression."

Pakistan is also ranked among the world's most dangerous countries for journalists, and reporting critical of the military is considered a major red flag, with journalists at times detained, beaten and even killed.
In April 2014, unidentified gunmen attacked but failed to kill Hamid Mir, one of the country's most recognised TV anchors. His employer and his family later accused the director general of the powerful Inter-Services Intelligence agency of involvement.

Source: http://us.pressfrom.com/news/world/-18125-fifth-pakistani-social-media-activist-reported-missing/
 
This is Pakistan and you can not speak against Islam and Prophet Muhammad PBUH, it's against the law of this land.


Respect the law OR face the punishment. Well done for arresting all these people and destroy their network
 

Attachments

  • C14EeJGWQAErIJ8.jpg
    C14EeJGWQAErIJ8.jpg
    27.7 KB · Views: 317
  • C149ZNaWgAEqq5Y.jpg
    C149ZNaWgAEqq5Y.jpg
    176.3 KB · Views: 616
  • C14lvL-W8AAw9LJ.jpg
    C14lvL-W8AAw9LJ.jpg
    98.9 KB · Views: 426
Last edited:
Those laws that are used to persecute minorities?

In Pakistan the only thing that matters is power and the Army and government feel they are above the law. What is Islamic about how people in general are treated in Pakistan and when anyone states the obvious they are the enemy.
[MENTION=130419]shah_1[/MENTION] is that the kind of nation you are proud of?
 
Those laws that are used to persecute minorities?

In Pakistan the only thing that matters is power and the Army and government feel they are above the law. What is Islamic about how people in general are treated in Pakistan and when anyone states the obvious they are the enemy.
[MENTION=130419]shah_1[/MENTION] is that the kind of nation you are proud of?

By speaking against Islam and Prophet Muhammad PBUH?

I want freedom and rights for minorities but you can't break the law. It's clear provocation to hurt the sentiments of 1.7 billion Muslims. It's counts under HATE speech, not freedom of speech and violating our laws.

Rightly punished
 
So talking about civil rights abuses is now a crime?

Using your token, when someone talks about abuses in Palestine or Kashmir, do you also say their land, their laws?

Speaking against Islam and Prophet Muhammad PBUH isn't about civil rights but hate speech.
 
i think real issue here is that even if those bloggers are doing some crime, govt agencies should be following a proper procedure. first of all are they in govt. custody or not. there is a difference between apprehend by law enforcement agencies and kidnapped by some unknown people. why they are not presented in front of court and asked for remand. why they are not allowed to meet there family and lawyers. this is also against the law of the land.
 
Speaking against Islam and Prophet Muhammad PBUH isn't about civil rights but hate speech.

Thats your opinion. For some one, speaking against Israel or Kashmir could be about hate speech and a illegal activity.

Would you support their opinion too?
 
By speaking against Islam and Prophet Muhammad PBUH?

I want freedom and rights for minorities but you can't break the law. It's clear provocation to hurt the sentiments of 1.7 billion Muslims. It's counts under HATE speech, not freedom of speech and violating our laws.

Rightly punished

tell me when if any of those cases have been anything but personal vendettas?

My Islam or Prophet pbuh will not suffer because of a few peoples opinion bit definitely suffers when people abuse religion to persecute anyone that includes fellow Muslims.
 
If you speak against Islam then there will be a price to pay in a country like Pakistan. Freedom of speech has it's limitations as well. Some people just do it to be popular or controversial like the late Qandeel Baloch. I am not saying for a minute that what happened to her was right only that by acting in such a way come tremendous risks.
 
tell me when if any of those cases have been anything but personal vendettas?

My Islam or Prophet pbuh will not suffer because of a few peoples opinion bit definitely suffers when people abuse religion to persecute anyone that includes fellow Muslims.

Blasphemous law has been misused by many in Pakistan, they lie to court about witnessing the crime to settle an old score with someone but here it's not.

If we allow them then we give permission to other to abuse Islam as well.
 
even if somebody abuse islam, how that hurts islam. its just for our ego. did Rasul Allah (PBUH) punish somebody abusing islam.
 
Speaking against Islam and Prophet Muhammad PBUH isn't about civil rights but hate speech.

Let's say you're right.

Do people get kidnapped for breaking the law? No court date. No chance to appeal.

What a country.
 
Personal attack is however very civil

Every country has its own law, there are no activist but attacking our religion. They committed the crime so what part you don't understand?

People should be allow to say whatever they want. If your religion is so fragile that words are enough to diminish it, perhaps you should pick another one.

I bet you are one of the first to complain when France speaks of banning the hijab. Yet here you are, perfectly okay with people not even being able to have an opinion different than yours.
 
First of all its very very painful what these posts state. It will hurt every believer.

But where will be draw lines ?


I have read worst things about Hazrat Abu Bakr RA & Hazrat Ayesha being said and written by fellow Pakistanis. Even abuses and this is beyond me. Its unbearable.


Yes whatever he has said comes umder blasphemy for me personally.


But when I see He Pbuh, when I read his Seerat books I see forgiveness and prayers the only reaction. It is my believe that He Pbuh lead his life as per Allah's commandments so if Allah wanted Him Pbuh to punish blasphemers than definitely He Pbuh would have punished them and wouldn't have imposed His Pbuh feelings and wishes over Allah's commandments/instructions.


Blasphemy Law firstly is an inhumane and unislamic law. Secondly it has zero value in Pakistan. It is the most misused Law in Pakistan used against weak people or minorities. So it should be repealed.


Those who have picked these people should have also picked those who do hate speeches daily due to which voilence is instigated and people are killed because of their faith.


So if they are picked than others should be picked aswell. Than support of militant organisations should be ended aswell.


If any Pakistani breaks Law of Land than law should take its course lawfully as per rules of the books.


I hope these people return safely to their loved ones but as a believer of La Ilaha Illallah Mohammad ur Rasool Allah I also hope that people stop abusing holy figures and stop ridiculing them. Don't hurt religious people's feelings. Even don't hurt feelings of non believers. Be Civial. But if anybody doesn't abide than Unislamic laws are not the way forward.
 
Let's say you're right.

Do people get kidnapped for breaking the law? No court date. No chance to appeal.

What a country.


Many Lawyers of those " accused of blasphemy " are murdered in Pakistan. Country is made of People.

These killings increased after inception of this Law.
 
Insignificant bloggers who pose no threat against the state are abducted, but hate-preachers like Mullah Khadim Hussain Rizvi are allowed to spew their filth.
 
then people wonder why Pakistan is in the state that it is in and especially it's international standing (note to all no mirpuris ruining Pakistan's reputation doing it all by itself)
 
Alhamdoulillah

<iframe frameborder="0" width="480" height="270" src="//www.dailymotion.com/embed/video/x59x5v3" allowfullscreen></iframe><br /><a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x59x5v3_blogger-salman-haider-returns-home_news" target="_blank">Blogger Salman Haider returns home</a> <i>by <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/passionate4cricket" target="_blank">passionate4cricket</a></i>

[MENTION=26195]DW44[/MENTION] [MENTION=52972]Salma_T[/MENTION] [MENTION=763]munda_khi[/MENTION] [MENTION=42489]Black Zero[/MENTION] [MENTION=140132]GujjarLife[/MENTION]
 
LONDON: Mohammad Gohir Khan, a 31-year-old British man convicted of conspiring to murder Netherlands-based dissident Pakistani blogger Ahmad Waqass Goraya was sentenced to life in prison at the Kingston-upon-Thames court on Friday.

The court held that Mr Khan will serve 13 years before he is eligible to apply for parole. The days served in custody will count towards his sentence.

Conspiracy to murder is an offence by virtue of section 1(1) of UK’s Criminal Law Act 1977. If found guilty, convicts can face sentences ranging between a few years to the maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

In January this year, a jury returned a unanimous verdict finding Mr Khan guilty of conspiring to kill self-exiled blogger Mr Goraya in Rotterdam.

Mr Khan, born on Feb 16, 1990, was charged in June last year with one count of conspiracy to murder Mr Goraya. The blogger is an activist who left Pakistan after he and five other bloggers were abducted and later released in Islamabad in 2017.

During the trial, the prosecution maintained that Mr Khan was hired by persons who appeared to be based in Pakistan to carry out the “intended killing” of Mr Goraya.

The prosecution said that Mr Khan had travelled to Rotterdam, Netherlands last year as part of a conspiracy to murder Mr Goraya, and that he had undertaken a reconnaissance mission outside his home and even bought a tool with the aim to succeed in his mission.

The financial rewards for his actions were believed to be significant, with a payment of £100,000 on offer. At the time, the prosecution said, the defendant was in significant debt, with no clear means of paying his creditors.

Mr Khan was “enthusiastic” about “carrying out the killing to earn the money and to carry out further attacks” in the future, the prosecution told the jury.

The jury was also told how Pakistan-based middleman Muzamil allegedly contacted Mr Khan in 2021 with an offer to pay £80,000 for the job, while telling him about his own commission of £20,000.

It is unclear who Muzamil was working for, but evidence that £5,000 was paid into a Pakistani bank account and received through a hundi transfer in London was shared in the court.

Published in Dawn, March 12th, 2022
https://www.dawn.com/news/1679511/h...er-ahmad-waqass-goraya-gets-life-imprisonment
 
The federal government on Monday constituted a seven-member committee for the "deliberation of a policy" related to enforced disappearances in the country after the Islamabad High Court (IHC) instructed the heads of the government to explain how disappearances ‘became state policy’.

According to a notification issued by the Ministry of Interior, the committee will be headed by Minister for Law and Justice Azam Nazeer Tarar and comprise Minister for Interior Rana Sanaullah, Minister for Power Alleviation and Social Safety Shazia Marri, Minister for Communications Asad Mahmood, Minister for Defence Production Muhammad Israr Tareen, Minister for Maritime Affairs Faisal Ali Subzwari, and Minister for Science and Technology Agha Hassan Baloch.

Recommendations or report of the committee will be presented in the federal cabinet for further deliberations. "The interior ministry shall provide secretarial support to the committee," it said.


The notification added that the committee will also be allowed to co-opt eminent jurists, representatives of human rights organisations and other members "it deems appropriate".

The development comes after IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah, in a 15-page order on Sunday, directed the federal government to serve notices on former president retired Gen Pervez Musharraf and all successive chief executives, including Imran Khan and incumbent premier Shehbaz Sharif, for following an “undeclared tacit approval of the policy regarding enforced disappearances”.

He passed the orders in a case related to the disappearance of journalist Mudassar Mahmood Naro and five other people after their petitions were fixed for final arguments, but the federal government requested an adjournment.

In his order, Justice Minallah said: “Retired Gen Pervez Musharraf and all other successor chief executives i.e. the former prime ministers, including the incumbent holder of the office shall submit their respective affidavits explaining why the court may not order proceedings against them for alleged subversion of the Constitution in the context of undeclared tacit approval of the policy regarding enforced disappearances and thus putting national security at risk by allowing the involvement of law enforcement agencies, particularly the armed forces.”

“Pervez Musharraf has candidly conceded in his autobiography In the Line of Fire that ‘enforced disappearances’ was an undeclared policy of the state,” he said.

The judge pointed out that the onus was on each chief executive to "rebut the presumption and to explain why they may not be tried for the offence of high treason".

He further observed the armed forces had and continued to render sacrifices for the security and integrity of the country and ought to be respected by every citizen otherwise security and integrity of the country and its people would be exposed to being jeopardised.

However, the order continued, “the involvement or even a perception of the involvement of the armed forces in acts amounting to violation of human rights and freedom of the citizens weakens and undermines the rule of law”.

Justice Minallah said that in case the missing persons were not recovered nor effective and demonstrable actions/decisions were taken by the federal government, the current and former ministers of interior shall appear in person to explain why the petitions might not be decided and exemplary costs imposed upon them for the unimaginable agony and pain suffered by the petitioners on account of lack of response and empathy while dealing with their grievances.

“The learned attorney general shall satisfy the court that in case of alleged disappearances in future why criminal cases may not be ordered to be registered against the chief executives of the federation and the concerned provinces,” the order said.

In the meantime, the court instructed the federal government to produce the missing persons before the court on the date fixed (June 17) or "justify the failure of the state to effectively investigate and trace their whereabouts".

DAWN
 
Last edited:
Back
Top