What's new

Test team of the decade (2010-2019)

Bel_Homme

Debutant
Joined
Nov 9, 2019
Runs
157
Below is the Fox Sports test team XI of the decade:

Alastair Cook (c)
David Warner
Kumar Sangakkara
Steve Smith
Virat Kohli
AB Devilliers
Mushfiqur Rahim (w)
Ravi Ashwin
Dale Steyn
James Anderson
Kagiso Rabada

Do you agree with the above? What will be your test team of the decade?
 
Kohli is the greatest Asian Test captain of all time. Absurd decision to make Cook the captain. He won Test series in India and South Africa, but didn’t come close to the dominance and consistency of Kohli.
 
Kohli is the greatest Asian Test captain of all time. Absurd decision to make Cook the captain. He won Test series in India and South Africa, but didn’t come close to the dominance and consistency of Kohli.

I agree. Also, Rabada is bit of a strange choice considering he only played for few years in this decade.
 
Below is the Fox Sports test team XI of the decade:

Alastair Cook (c)
David Warner
Kumar Sangakkara
Steve Smith
Virat Kohli
AB Devilliers
Mushfiqur Rahim (w)
Ravi Ashwin
Dale Steyn
James Anderson
Kagiso Rabada

Do you agree with the above? What will be your test team of the decade?

Add Stokes in there and make de Villiers keeper or get Watling as keeper batsmen. Kohli should be captain as well.
 
Alastair Cook
David Warner
Kane Williamson (c)
Steve Smith
Virat Kohli
AB Devilliers
BJ Watling (w)
Ravi Ashwin
Dale Steyn
James Anderson
Mitch Johnson

Reserves - Younis Khan, Sangakkara, Lyon, Rabada, B McCullum
 
Below is the Fox Sports test team XI of the decade:

Alastair Cook (c)
David Warner
Kumar Sangakkara
Steve Smith
Virat Kohli
AB Devilliers
Mushfiqur Rahim (w)
Ravi Ashwin
Dale Steyn
James Anderson
Kagiso Rabada

Do you agree with the above? What will be your test team of the decade?

That’s a good solid team.
 
Wisdens test team

Cook
Warner
Sanga
Smith
Kohli(cap)
Stokes
Abd(wk)
Ashwin
Steyn
Rabada
Anderson

This team is better.
Mushfiqur rahim is a warrior with the bat but he is a bad wicketkeeper so no place for him.
 
Younus Khan over ABD in tests XI of the decade for me. Younus has scored 18 test 100s in the last decade over ABD’s 13. Younus has better average 52 vs 50, more runs, more overall 100s by a big margin 34 vs 22 and a better conversion rate. Not to forget his 4th innings record which is one of the greatest in the history of the game.
 
Cricket Australia Announced Test X1 Of This Decade

Alastair Cook
David Warner
Kane Williamson
Steve Smith
Virat Kohli (c)
Ab de Villiers (wk)
Ben Stokes
Dale Steyn
Stuart Broad
Nathan Lyon
Jimmy Anderson
 
Broad is an okay pick althoug averaging 53 in India. He is reasonably an all condition bowler. Mone Morkel was good as well overall.
 
Kohli is the greatest Asian Test captain of all time. Absurd decision to make Cook the captain. He won Test series in India and South Africa, but didn’t come close to the dominance and consistency of Kohli.

Kohli hasn’t won in England or South Africa so I don’t see how that makes him greater than cook lol you’re literally contradicting yourself in that statement. I know kohli brings butterfly’s in your stomachs but stop ignoring facts and saying rubbish cook shouldn’t be the captain the test xi he’s Sir Alaistair cook now btw.
 
Kohli hasn’t won in England or South Africa so I don’t see how that makes him greater than cook lol you’re literally contradicting yourself in that statement. I know kohli brings butterfly’s in your stomachs but stop ignoring facts and saying rubbish cook shouldn’t be the captain the test xi he’s Sir Alaistair cook now btw.

Cook also lost home series against with sri lanka (3-2), also never won against pak.
4-0 whitewash against India in his last series as a captain.


Kohli won 33 test matches out of 53
Cook won 24 test matches out of 59
 
Cook also lost home series against with sri lanka (3-2), also never won against pak.
4-0 whitewash against India in his last series as a captain.


Kohli won 33 test matches out of 53
Cook won 24 test matches out of 59

Cook winning in SA is far more impressive than anything Kohli has done including beating a depleted Aus team in Aus.

Regarding number of wins, given how doctored Indian wickets are, its not a shocker that Kohli has won so many matches at home. England do not doctor their wickets at anywhere the same rate.

Anyway:

1. Cook
2. Warner
3. Williamson (c)
4. Smith
5. Kohli
6. De Villiers (wk)
7. Stokes
8. Johnson
9. Lyon
10. Steyn
11. Anderson/Cummins
 
1. Cook
2. Warner
3. Smith
4. Williamson
5. Kohli (c)
6. Sangakaara
7. De Villiers (wk)
8. Ashwin
9. Philander
10. Steyn
11. Anderson

Sadly no Pakistani players but YK was very good.
 
Shocking omissions in Mark Taylor's Rest of the World XI of the decade

Yesterday former captain Mark Taylor revealed his Australian Test team of the decade, and today he unveils his Rest of the World XI to take on the Aussies.

There's no shortage of talking points, with England failing to earn a single spot in the eleven, although Taylor admits the likes of James Anderson, Stuart Broad and Ben Stokes were firmly in the mix for a spot.

Players from South Africa and India make up a large percentage of the side, which is perhaps not surprising given those two nations, along with Australia, enjoyed the highest winning percentage in Test cricket this decade.

The difficulty of fitting so many great players into the lineup means it's not necessarily the best 11 players in each position, but what Taylor considers the best balanced team.

Taylor's two sides throw up many interesting questions about how a theoretical match would play out, so let the debate begin!

Graeme Smith – I'm not sure Australian fans ever saw the very best of Graeme Smith, but at his peak he was a very fine player, who knew his game well and played to his strengths. Despite retiring in 2014, he still made nine centuries this decade, including a 10-hour epic against Pakistan in Dubai where he made 234. I'm certain England supporters were glad to see Smith retire, because he averaged an impressive 56.97 against England over 21 Test matches.

Cheteshwar Pujara – It seemed every time I looked up in the Australia summer of 2018-19 Cheteshwar Pujara was batting. And batting. And batting some more. A key figure in India's series win over Australia, he's averaged a very impressive 49.48 over the decade. Never happy to settle for "just" a hundred, he's turned seven of his 18 centuries into scores of 150+, including innings of 204, 202 and 193 against Australia.

Virat Kohli – Kohli and Steve Smith are the two outstanding batsmen of their generation, and the number of Test centuries this decade confirms that fact. Kohli has scored 27 hundreds, the most of any player, although Smith is only one behind heading to the Boxing Day Test in Melbourne this week. Kohli's appetite for runs is amazing, since 2016 he's scored an incredible seven double-hundreds, in the same timeframe nobody else has scored more than two.

AB de Villiers – Injuries hampered him through the second part of the decade, but even if he'd retired in 2015 I reckon he'd still have walked into this side. He averaged 57.49 this decade, a figure that actually went up in matches where he also wore the wicketkeeping gloves.

Kane Williamson – New Zealand's best batsman since Martin Crowe, Williamson announced himself with a century on debut against India in Ahmedabad, and has since gone on to score a hundred against each of the nine nations he's played against. Currently ranked the third best batsman in the world, he remains the key wicket when you're playing against New Zealand.

Kumar Sangakkara – captain and wicketkeeper – I thought about opening with Sangakkara, but I had to draw the line somewhere because I've also made him the captain and wicketkeeper! Sangakkara averaged 61.41 this decade, and joined the triple-century club with 319 against Bangladesh in 2014.

Jacques Kallis – Slightly lower than where you'd normally find him in a batting order, but the quality of the middle order means Kallis drops down to number seven. This spot was just about a 50-50 call between Kallis and Ben Stokes, but Kallis' performances with both bat and ball over a longer period of time mean he gets the nod.

Ravichandran Ashwin – 362 Test wickets at 25.37 is probably enough to get Ashwin selected solely as a bowler, but a more-than-handy batting average of 28.73 with four centuries doesn't hurt either. Deadly on subcontinental pitches, he's still very effective away from home.

agiso Rabada – This spot could so easily have gone to Rabada's countryman Vernon Philander, but I went with Rabada's extra pace. The emergence of Rabada has been one of the best stories to come out of South Africa since they were re-admitted to international cricket, with former spinner Pat Symcox referring to him as "the best fast-bowling talent we have ever produced."

Jasprit Bumrah – If you go on numbers alone it's probably a surprise to see Bumrah in this team, given he hasn't yet reached 100 Test wickets, but he's something special. His 21 wickets in Australia last summer showed what a fine bowler he is. Only 13 players in the history of the game have taken more than 50 Test wickets at an average under 20, and Bumrah is the only name on that list to have played after 1960.

Dale Steyn – Like many bowlers the latter part of his career was interrupted by injury, but still managed 267 wickets for the decade at 22.30, which is top-drawer. Averaged 21 in India, which for a fast bowler is mind-blowing.

12th man: Yasir Shah – I figure with Rabada, Steyn, Bumrah and Kallis I don't need another quick, so I looked for a wrist spinner to complement Ashwin if conditions suited. A good leg-spinner is such a benefit to a team, and Yasir is so dangerous when he's coming on to bowl after the opening bowlers have made some early breakthroughs.

https://wwos.nine.com.au/cricket/ma...e-decade/7299b769-d45c-4487-8a4d-f8a5420ed790
 
Interesting XI. Mine would be:

1. David Warner
2. Graeme Smith (c)
3. Virat Kohli
4. Steve Smith
5. Kumar Sangakkara (wk)
6. AB de Villiers
7. Ben Stokes
8. Mitchell Johnson
9. Dale Steyn
10. Ravichandran Ashwin
11. James Anderson
12th man: Yasir Shah/Ravindra Jadeja
 
Interesting XI. Mine would be:

1. David Warner
2. Graeme Smith (c)
3. Virat Kohli
4. Steve Smith
5. Kumar Sangakkara (wk)
6. AB de Villiers
7. Ben Stokes
8. Mitchell Johnson
9. Dale Steyn
10. Ravichandran Ashwin
11. James Anderson
12th man: Yasir Shah/Ravindra Jadeja
This is supposed to be a rest of the world XI.

Although your XI seems about right for a world XI.
 
Cook also lost home series against with sri lanka (3-2), also never won against pak.
4-0 whitewash against India in his last series as a captain.


Kohli won 33 test matches out of 53
Cook won 24 test matches out of 59

Kohli has lost only 10 tests as against Cook losing 22 tests. Cook was tactically a poor captain. Not that Kohli is great. But his record cannot be questioned. Always went after wins. Most of his losses very close ones. Even as a temp captain when Dhoni was injured for a test he went after the win on day 5 in Australia. Kohli and Vijay almost pulled off the 350 plus chase.
 
1. Alastair Cook
2. David Warner
3. Kane Williamson
4. Steven Smith
5. Virat Kohli*
6. Shakib Al-Hasan
7. BJ Watling+
8. Ravi Ashwin
9. Dale Steyn
10. Trent Boult
11. Shannon Gabriel

Yasir Shah and Tim Southee also were good.
 
This is supposed to be a rest of the world XI.

Although your XI seems about right for a world XI.

Whoops, forgot it was Rest of World XI vs Aussies. Need more time to think/research, but off the top of my head I guess I'll replace Warner with Cook, Smith with Williamson, and Johnson with Rabada.
 
1. Cook
2. Warner
3. Smith
4. Williamson
5. Kohli (c)
6. Sangakaara
7. De Villiers (wk)
8. Ashwin
9. Philander
10. Steyn
11. Anderson

Sadly no Pakistani players but YK was very good.

this is a good team but will slightly struggle bowling wise on flat wickets.
 
this is a good team but will slightly struggle bowling wise on flat wickets.

It comes down to what ball you use for the test. If it is SG ball i would have Umesh who is a different proposition on flat pitch with SG ball. Shami is also a terrific old ball bowler. Australian bowling is very poor with old ball. Kemar Roach is one of the under-rated bowler. He is one of my personal favorite. Great skills..
 
What is his Australia XI of the decade? If I have to make Aus XI, it will be:-

Warner
Rogers
Watson
Smith
Clarke
Hussey
Haddin(wkt)
Cummins
Starc/Johnson
Harris
Lyon
 
It comes down to what ball you use for the test. If it is SG ball i would have Umesh who is a different proposition on flat pitch with SG ball. Shami is also a terrific old ball bowler. Australian bowling is very poor with old ball. Kemar Roach is one of the under-rated bowler. He is one of my personal favorite. Great skills..

good points.

Shami is indeed very good with the old ball.

I agree Australians aren't great with it but Cummins is an exception, i think he does well with any kind of ball.

In swinging/seaming conditions (NZ, Eng, SA):

1. Steyn
2. Anderson
3. Philander

In flatter conditions + Aus:

1. Steyn
2. Mitch Johnson
3. Cummins/ Bumrah/ Rabada

Shami would come in after these guys but still a very good bowler.
 
England XI and India XI IMO would be

England XI:-

Cook(c)
Trott
Bell
Root
KP
Stokes
Bairstow (wkt)
Woakes
Swann
Broad
Anderson

India XI:-

Vijay
Rohit
Pujara
Kohli(c)
Rahane
Dhoni(wkt)
Jadeja
Ashwin
Ishant
Shami
Bumrah/Yadav
 
And lastly SA XI(which actually is the best team) would be:-

Smith(c)
Elgar
Amla
Kallis
AB
Faf
de Kock(wkt)
Philander
Rabada
Steyn
Morkel
 
Interesting XI. Mine would be:

1. David Warner
2. Graeme Smith (c)
3. Virat Kohli
4. Steve Smith
5. Kumar Sangakkara (wk)
6. AB de Villiers
7. Ben Stokes
8. Mitchell Johnson
9. Dale Steyn
10. Ravichandran Ashwin
11. James Anderson
12th man: Yasir Shah/Ravindra Jadeja

I'd probably have Rabada, Bumrah or Cummins replace Johnson, his peak, albeit a thing to remember, was pretty short to earn him a place in the world could IMO. Totally agree with your other picks BTW.
 
1. Cook
2. Warner
3. Sangakkara
4. Smith
5. Kohli
6. Devilliers
7. Stokes
8. Ashwin
9. Steyn
10. Hazlewood
11. Anderson

Sanga and Devilliers to share wicket keeping
 
Wisden's test team of the decade:

1. Alastair Cook
2. David Warner
3. Kumar Sangakkara
4. Steve Smith
5. Virat Kohli (c)
6. Ben Stokes
7. AB De Villiers (wk)
8. Ravi Ashwin
9. Dale Steyn
10. Kagiso Rabada
11. James Anderson

12th Man: BJ Watling
 
Most runs in each decade

1990s - Sachin Tendulkar
2000s - Ricky Ponting
2010s - Virat Kohli

Most Wickets in each decade

1990s - Wasim Akram
2000s - Muttiah Muralitharan
2010s - Ravichandran Ashwin
 
Wisden Cricketers of this Decade
1) Virat Kohli
2) Steve Smith
3) Ellyse Perry
4) Dale Steyn
5) Ab devilliers
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Everyone's picking teams of the decade so I thought I'd join in the fun. This would be my Test team of the 2010's:<br><br>David Warner<br>Alastair Cook<br>Kane Williamson<br>Steve Smith<br>Virat Kohli (c)<br>Kumar Sangakkarra (wk)<br>Ben Stokes<br>Dale Steyn<br>Nathan Lyon<br>Stuart Broad<br>James Anderson</p>— Ricky Ponting AO (@RickyPonting) <a href="https://twitter.com/RickyPonting/status/1211508674356641792?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 30, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Everyone's picking teams of the decade so I thought I'd join in the fun. This would be my Test team of the 2010's:<br><br>David Warner<br>Alastair Cook<br>Kane Williamson<br>Steve Smith<br>Virat Kohli (c)<br>Kumar Sangakkarra (wk)<br>Ben Stokes<br>Dale Steyn<br>Nathan Lyon<br>Stuart Broad<br>James Anderson</p>— Ricky Ponting AO (@RickyPonting) <a href="https://twitter.com/RickyPonting/status/1211508674356641792?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 30, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Only two Asians
 
Cook
Warner
Smith
Kohli (c)
Root
Stokes
De Villiers (wk)
Ashwin
Broad
Steyn
Anderson
 
Cook
Warner
Smith
Kohli (c)
Root
Stokes
De Villiers (wk)
Ashwin
Broad
Steyn
Anderson

I’d go with the same team asides from Ashwin. I’d go with Jadeja or Lyon.

Ashwin’s poor choice imo. He’s very ineffective in SENA to the point where he has been dropped multiple times with Jadeja picked as the sole spinner. And iirc even in India Jadeja has a good strike rate. Ashwin’s utility abroad is that he dries up runs and doesn’t get tonked like Yasir if things aren’t going his way but that in my opinion is not enough to warrant a place in a World XI.
 
Only two Asians

That’s fair enough team. Not many Asians were consistent enough and India’s pacers have done well and been on scene only last couple of years so would be unfair to pick them over the selections here.

The problem with that team is Sangakarra did not keep in a Test at all in 2010s so you can’t just select him as a wicketkeeper.
 
I’d go with the same team asides from Ashwin. I’d go with Jadeja or Lyon.

Ashwin’s poor choice imo. He’s very ineffective in SENA to the point where he has been dropped multiple times with Jadeja picked as the sole spinner. And iirc even in India Jadeja has a good strike rate. Ashwin’s utility abroad is that he dries up runs and doesn’t get tonked like Yasir if things aren’t going his way but that in my opinion is not enough to warrant a place in a World XI.

* Jadeja has better strike rate than Ashwin
 
Cook
Warner
Smith
Kohli (c)
Root
Stokes
De Villiers (wk)
Ashwin
Broad
Steyn
Anderson

Again like Sanga, AB hardly kept in test cricket at all. Start of the decade it was Boucher and later if was De Kock.

I think only high profile series where he kept was England series
 
Bumrah and Shami would have been in with a shout for these sides had they been drafted in earlier in test cricket (or having had same impact as they’ve had in past 2-2.5 years
 
Again like Sanga, AB hardly kept in test cricket at all. Start of the decade it was Boucher and later if was De Kock.

I think only high profile series where he kept was England series

AB kept in 22 out of 60 matches in this decade.

Interestingly, as a keeper (in the 2010s) his batting average was 60 with 7 hundreds and 6 fifties, while his average as a specialist bat was lower - 56 with 6 hundreds and 21 fifties, and one of those 6 hundreds was the 278* in UAE.

Sanga as mentioned above, didn't keep at all in the 2010s.
 
AB kept in 22 out of 60 matches in this decade.

Interestingly, as a keeper (in the 2010s) his batting average was 60 with 7 hundreds and 6 fifties, while his average as a specialist bat was lower - 56 with 6 hundreds and 21 fifties, and one of those 6 hundreds was the 278* in UAE.

Sanga as mentioned above, didn't keep at all in the 2010s.

Oh I stand corrected then.

I guess most of the matches were in the period between bouchers end and QdK’s debut
 
Kohli is the greatest Asian Test captain of all time. Absurd decision to make Cook the captain. He won Test series in India and South Africa, but didn’t come close to the dominance and consistency of Kohli.

Hope u now appreciate the value of alister cook, rightfully captain of the decade in the test format, (keep your dummy in your mouth), also the great imran khan ring a bell when it comes to champion cricketers
 
How does Root get in. Williamson, Sanga clearly ahead

I believe Root is still the highest scorer of the decade. He has been in a rut since 2017-18, but he was extremely prolific before that.

Sangakkara just about misses out because he retired in 2014-15, and Williamson is the most overrated batsman of his generation.

He is great against average attacks and average against great attacks. Unlike Root, he escapes a lot of flak because he players for a less flashy team and mostly plays his matches when the rest of the world is sleeping.
 
Hope u now appreciate the value of alister cook, rightfully captain of the decade in the test format, (keep your dummy in your mouth), also the great imran khan ring a bell when it comes to champion cricketers

You don’t need to remind of Cook’s greatness. I am one of the few on this forum who considers him a great of the game. However, he is not a better captain than Kohli and he is not the best captain of this decade.

Imran Khan was a great captain but Kohli has surpassed his legacy. He only won 14 Tests and was one of the two captains who lost a Test to Sri Lanka in the 80s.

Miandad had a better W/L ratio than Imran while captaining in the same era.

The rate at which Kohli wins Tests is incredible. He is well on his way of becoming the most prolific Test captain in history.

Anyway, I don’t want to commit blasphemy against Imran in this thread. It is a cardinal sin on this forum anyway, but this particular thread will get destroyed.

Hence, out of respect for this thread, I am not comment on Imran in this thread again.
 
I believe Root is still the highest scorer of the decade. He has been in a rut since 2017-18, but he was extremely prolific before that.

Sangakkara just about misses out because he retired in 2014-15, and Williamson is the most overrated batsman of his generation.

He is great against average attacks and average against great attacks. Unlike Root, he escapes a lot of flak because he players for a less flashy team and mostly plays his matches when the rest of the world is sleeping.

Well England players play significantly more tests than other countries so aggregates are a bit irrelevant. Are you one of those guys that thinks Anderson is an ATG fast bowler.

Sangakarra probably has more series defining performances than Root, so that is enough for me even though he played for a shorter period.

Both Williamson and Root are low impact players, but Williamson has been better, shown by his higher average.

I find you to be ridiculously pro-England, by the way. Even the Broad selection is a bit iffy as an attack with Broad, Anderson will be a bit weak away from England
 
You don’t need to remind of Cook’s greatness. I am one of the few on this forum who considers him a great of the game. However, he is not a better captain than Kohli and he is not the best captain of this decade.

Imran Khan was a great captain but Kohli has surpassed his legacy. He only won 14 Tests and was one of the two captains who lost a Test to Sri Lanka in the 80s.

Miandad had a better W/L ratio than Imran while captaining in the same era.

The rate at which Kohli wins Tests is incredible. He is well on his way of becoming the most prolific Test captain in history.

Anyway, I don’t want to commit blasphemy against Imran in this thread. It is a cardinal sin on this forum anyway, but this particular thread will get destroyed.

Hence, out of respect for this thread, I am not comment on Imran in this thread again.

Lol you really are deluded
 
You don’t need to remind of Cook’s greatness. I am one of the few on this forum who considers him a great of the game. However, he is not a better captain than Kohli and he is not the best captain of this decade.

Imran Khan was a great captain but Kohli has surpassed his legacy. He only won 14 Tests and was one of the two captains who lost a Test to Sri Lanka in the 80s.

Miandad had a better W/L ratio than Imran while captaining in the same era.

The rate at which Kohli wins Tests is incredible. He is well on his way of becoming the most prolific Test captain in history.

Anyway, I don’t want to commit blasphemy against Imran in this thread. It is a cardinal sin on this forum anyway, but this particular thread will get destroyed.

Hence, out of respect for this thread, I am not comment on Imran in this thread again.

Using Miandads Win loss record to put Imran down is really an exercise of exhibiting either your bias or ignorance. Imran sat out of many easy wins which then Miandad captained in and won as a result. I’m sure you already knew that. Either way both worked as a team regardless of who was captain.

Losing one off matches to minnows does not destroy legacy at all. Especially when so called minnows draw tests in Australia which the established sides of the time struggled to do.
 
cook
williamson
smith
sangakara
kohli
de villiers(wk)
stokes
lyon
rabada
steyn
anderson

warner is a flat track bully and I don't see any opener outstanding enough to cement their place . I know kane is not an opener, but he should not be left out. williamson only just now has reached bad form, otherwise avgs around 60 for the last 3 years. he is also slightly better than root

anderson has many haters, but keep in mind he was good abroad until 2014, he was exceptional in uae in 2012, decent in india tour and won man of the match award there , was also good during ashes in australia 2013-2014.

india 2016 onwards, he has been pretty horrible.
 
Picking a squad. :inzi2 (no Imam)

Openers: Cook and Warner, way ahead of the other options amongst those who had a good sample size.

Middle-order: Sanga (numbers too good and specialist #3, Williamson unlucky to miss out), Kohli, Smith. Amla as backup (also cover for openers). Considered YK (instead of Amla) also as he provides beast quality in Asia but can't be a top-order option.

Wicket-keeper: De Villiers. Watling backup.

All-rounders: Stokes, Jadeja

Spinners: Lyon (SENA), Ashwin (Asia)

Pacers: Steyn (everywhere), Anderson (Dukes), Johnson (bounce), Philander (seam), Shami (Asia)

Cook
Warner
Sanga
Kohli
Smith
Amla
de Villiers
Watling
Stokes
Jadeja
Ashwin
Lyon
Johnson
Steyn
Anderson
Philander
Shami
 
Well England players play significantly more tests than other countries so aggregates are a bit irrelevant. Are you one of those guys that thinks Anderson is an ATG fast bowler.

Sangakarra probably has more series defining performances than Root, so that is enough for me even though he played for a shorter period.

Both Williamson and Root are low impact players, but Williamson has been better, shown by his higher average.

I find you to be ridiculously pro-England, by the way. Even the Broad selection is a bit iffy as an attack with Broad, Anderson will be a bit weak away from England

I can prove to you with stats that Williamson is clearly an inferior Test batsman to Root.

Take a look at their overall records against each Test side:

Williamson

Australia 41

Bangladesh 113

England 43

India 37

Pakistan 47

South Africa 47

Sri Lanka 66

West Indies 47

Zimbabwe 78

Root

Australia 40

Bangladesh 24

India 57

Ireland 16

New Zealand 44

Pakistan 61

South Africa 54

Sri Lanka 44

West Indies 57

Here are some key facts that are worth noting:

- Williamson’s average is severely inflated because of an average of 113 vs Bangladesh and 78 vs Zimbabwe.

- Root has not feasted against weak bowling attacks. He averages 24 vs Bangladesh and 16 vs Ireland. He also has not played a Test against Zimbabwe. Moreover, Root has not faced Bangladesh at home while Williamson has played 4 Tests against Bangladesh at home.

- Williamson averages 30 in England. Root averages almost 40 in New Zealand.

- Williamson averages in 35 in India and 21 in South Africa. Root averages 53 in India and 51 in South Africa.

- Williamson averages 26 in Sri Lanka. Root averages 38 in Sri Lanka.

Now finally, here is the most eye opening fact. Root’s slump since 2018 is known to everybody. He has averaged 39 since January 2018.

In the same period, Williamson has averaged 55. However, in spite of their contrasting forms in the last two years, Root’s numbers against good attacks and in major countries are still far more impressive which clearly indicates the following:

- Root is several notches above Williamson as a batsman, and Williamson is the one who does not deserve to be part of the Fab Four. He has never belonged to that league as his mediocre numbers reflect.

- Williamson is by far the most overrated batsman of his generation. It is not even close.

- As I said before, the only reason Root gets more flak is because he plays for a high profile, flashy side. Whatever England or English players do is always noticed by everyone, while New Zealand and New Zealand players have low profiles.

Hence, Root is always under the spotlight while Williamson escapes a lot of justified criticism.
 
Using Miandads Win loss record to put Imran down is really an exercise of exhibiting either your bias or ignorance. Imran sat out of many easy wins which then Miandad captained in and won as a result. I’m sure you already knew that. Either way both worked as a team regardless of who was captain.

Losing one off matches to minnows does not destroy legacy at all. Especially when so called minnows draw tests in Australia which the established sides of the time struggled to do.

There is a difference between losing and drawing a Test match. Sri Lanka won only 2 Tests in the 1980s - against India and against Pakistan.

India had almost a minnow attack after the retirement/decline of their spin quartet, and they were carried by Kapil who was hardly an elite Test bowler.

That Pakistan side is considered by many as the so-called greatest Asian Test side ever. The fact that Pakistan lost to that Sri Lanka side was clearly an embarrassing result. No wonder Imran decided to stop playing weak teams after that series to avoid further humiliation.

Yes the umpires might have benefited Sri Lanka but that is a moot point because every team benefited from biased home umpiring in those days.

Furthermore, Imran won a grand total of 14 matches while Kohli has won 33 matches after captaining for only 5 more Tests than Imran. Regardless of the different eras and other variables, there is a very, very clear gap between the two in terms of winning matches. A modern Asian captain does not have to climb Mt. Everest to be considered a better captain than Imran.

The fact is that Kohli is already only 4 Test wins away from becoming the third most prolific Test captain in history and considering he will captain for another 4-5 years, he will certain overtake G. Smith as the captain with most Test wins.

In addition, he won a Test series in Australia. Yes it was a weakened Australia, but so was the West Indies that Imran beat. Moreover, no Asian team can come close to winning in Australia today even without Smith and Warner.

It is very obvious that Kohli has clearly surpassed Imran as a Test captain and it won’t be an exaggeration to call him the greatest Asian Test captain. No one comes close to the phenomenal rate at which he wins Test matches.

A common excuse for Imran is that he captained in an era where draws were common while Kohli plays in a result oriented era. That indeed is true. However, that also means that it is easier to lose in an result oriented era and harder to lose in a draw era.

In spite of playing in an era of draws, Imran lost 8 in 48 matches while Kohli has lost 10 in 53. There is very clearly nothing to separate between the two when it comes to losing matches. However, when it comes to winning matches, Kohli beats Imran to a pulp.

Imran is a father figure for Pakistan cricket and Pakistani fans have special attachment to him and his career. I respect that. However, if we take an objective viewpoint, Kohli has done more than enough to surpass him as Test captain. The huge disparity in their respective records can no longer be undermined due to XYZ hypothetical reasons.

We not like to admit it, but it is an indisputable fact that Kohli is a better Test captain than Imran. The people who refuse to admit it now will continue to refuse even if Kohli whitewashes every single team away from home.
 
He is I destroyed him on the other thread where he is mentioning the same rubbish of kohli being the best test captain of this decade and when I destroyed him with facts he had to come to this thread and didn’t even reply to me on that thread. All he does is write very long paragraphs to seem very intellectual but ends up contradicting himself he’s a lost cause he can argue with you all day but won’t ever mention a valid point he will make the debate in his favour by setting his own terms of what makes the best captain of this decade for example. His example of the dominance in this decade is beating India in India lol and when I told him England did beat India in this decade he will say oh they got lucky they had panesar lmao.

They should name a roundabout where ever his neck of the woods are named MAMOON
 
He is I destroyed him on the other thread where he is mentioning the same rubbish of kohli being the best test captain of this decade and when I destroyed him with facts he had to come to this thread and didn’t even reply to me on that thread. All he does is write very long paragraphs to seem very intellectual but ends up contradicting himself he’s a lost cause he can argue with you all day but won’t ever mention a valid point he will make the debate in his favour by setting his own terms of what makes the best captain of this decade for example. His example of the dominance in this decade is beating India in India lol and when I told him England did beat India in this decade he will say oh they got lucky they had panesar lmao.

And England beat an aging India in 2012. That team had a lot of players who were past their primes. England caught them at the right time just like Pakistan caught them at the right time in the 2012-2013 ODI series.

Winning in India is the biggest challenge in Test cricket in this decade. It is not disputable. If you want to live in denial you are free to do so.
 
During my 7 years on PP, I have read a lot of ridiculous stuff. However, the notion that Kohli is not the best Test captain of this decade after winning 33 Tests, winning in Australia and sustain the number 1 ranking since 2016 is arguably the most ridiculous nonsense I have read.
 
Well England players play significantly more tests than other countries so aggregates are a bit irrelevant. Are you one of those guys that thinks Anderson is an ATG fast bowler.

Sangakarra probably has more series defining performances than Root, so that is enough for me even though he played for a shorter period.

Both Williamson and Root are low impact players, but Williamson has been better, shown by his higher average.

I find you to be ridiculously pro-England, by the way. Even the Broad selection is a bit iffy as an attack with Broad, Anderson will be a bit weak away from England

I forgot to reply about Anderson and Broad. When you talk about performances over a decade, you have to value consistency.

It is pure arrogance to not pick Anderson and Broad in the team of the decade when they have taken 400+ wickets each in the last 10 years. It is a testament to their consistency and superb fitness levels.

Furthermore, Anderson took 24 wickets in Australia to inflict the most humiliating home series defeat to Australia in the modern era while Broad took 18 wickets to help England win in South Africa.

Anderson also bowled very well in England’s win in India in 2012, albeit India was a washed up team then.

They have clearly made an impact outside England as well and definitely deserve to be in the team of the decade.
 
There is a difference between losing and drawing a Test match. Sri Lanka won only 2 Tests in the 1980s - against India and against Pakistan.

India had almost a minnow attack after the retirement/decline of their spin quartet, and they were carried by Kapil who was hardly an elite Test bowler.

That Pakistan side is considered by many as the so-called greatest Asian Test side ever. The fact that Pakistan lost to that Sri Lanka side was clearly an embarrassing result. No wonder Imran decided to stop playing weak teams after that series to avoid further humiliation.

Yes the umpires might have benefited Sri Lanka but that is a moot point because every team benefited from biased home umpiring in those days.

Furthermore, Imran won a grand total of 14 matches while Kohli has won 33 matches after captaining for only 5 more Tests than Imran. Regardless of the different eras and other variables, there is a very, very clear gap between the two in terms of winning matches. A modern Asian captain does not have to climb Mt. Everest to be considered a better captain than Imran.

The fact is that Kohli is already only 4 Test wins away from becoming the third most prolific Test captain in history and considering he will captain for another 4-5 years, he will certain overtake G. Smith as the captain with most Test wins.

In addition, he won a Test series in Australia. Yes it was a weakened Australia, but so was the West Indies that Imran beat. Moreover, no Asian team can come close to winning in Australia today even without Smith and Warner.

It is very obvious that Kohli has clearly surpassed Imran as a Test captain and it won’t be an exaggeration to call him the greatest Asian Test captain. No one comes close to the phenomenal rate at which he wins Test matches.

A common excuse for Imran is that he captained in an era where draws were common while Kohli plays in a result oriented era. That indeed is true. However, that also means that it is easier to lose in an result oriented era and harder to lose in a draw era.

In spite of playing in an era of draws, Imran lost 8 in 48 matches while Kohli has lost 10 in 53. There is very clearly nothing to separate between the two when it comes to losing matches. However, when it comes to winning matches, Kohli beats Imran to a pulp.

Imran is a father figure for Pakistan cricket and Pakistani fans have special attachment to him and his career. I respect that. However, if we take an objective viewpoint, Kohli has done more than enough to surpass him as Test captain. The huge disparity in their respective records can no longer be undermined due to XYZ hypothetical reasons.

We not like to admit it, but it is an indisputable fact that Kohli is a better Test captain than Imran. The people who refuse to admit it now will continue to refuse even if Kohli whitewashes every single team away from home.

I haven’t claimed that Kohli hasn’t achieved better result or whether he is even the better captain or not.

I was just pointing out the simple fact that losing a test to Sri Lanka has had zero impact on Imran Khan’s Test captaincy legacy whether it be in Pakistan or abroad.

Many documentaries have been made on him and his leadership by both the media in England and Australia and even more articles have been written on this subject. And not once has this been mentioned to dilute his legacy. If it was a legitimate stain then someone would have atleast fleetingly mentioned it.

Losing one off tests doesn’t impact legacy at all. In many sports great teams have been in the end of unbelievable upsets and it hardly dents their overall legacy. In my 20 years following cricket no one apart from you has brought this to put a question mark on his credentials. And I am not talking about Pakistanis here.

As for him skipping tests against weaker teams to not have more Sri Lanka type results you are purely dealing in conjecture and it would be laughable to even entertain such thoughts. The fact that you even are imagining this (and it clearly is a figment of imagination because there in nothing solid you can point to come to such a conclusion) just goes to show your Imran-phobia I guess.

Anyways this is the last I’ll post on this topic to not detail thread but be happy in the knowledge that only you are of this opinion (-(even outside pakpassion) and you should probably think over why this is the case.
 
Last edited:
I forgot to reply about Anderson and Broad. When you talk about performances over a decade, you have to value consistency.

It is pure arrogance to not pick Anderson and Broad in the team of the decade when they have taken 400+ wickets each in the last 10 years. It is a testament to their consistency and superb fitness levels.

Furthermore, Anderson took 24 wickets in Australia to inflict the most humiliating home series defeat to Australia in the modern era while Broad took 18 wickets to help England win in South Africa.

Anderson also bowled very well in England’s win in India in 2012, albeit India was a washed up team then.

They have clearly made an impact outside England as well and definitely deserve to be in the team of the decade.

Anderson also has a better record than steyn in the UAE
 
And England beat an aging India in 2012. That team had a lot of players who were past their primes. England caught them at the right time just like Pakistan caught them at the right time in the 2012-2013 ODI series.

Winning in India is the biggest challenge in Test cricket in this decade. It is not disputable. If you want to live in denial you are free to do so.

You’re the only one in denial. You don’t decide what makes the best test captain of the decade based on your own set factors. Winning in South Africa and England is a major factor in that and kohli has not achieved that. Ghar mein to kutta bhi sher hota hai if you know what that means. Again you bring out lame reasons to defend your flawed arguments aging india this and that. Should I say than that the Australian team without smith and warner and Pattinson was a c grade team you’ll get hurt over that. Wisden has set the perfect test captain of this decade not that they are English but the only one and deserving Sir Alaistair Cook. You are counting the last three years as a decade shows how absurd your argument is I don’t even need to say no more and please learn the meaning of what a decade means and than quote me again. But only if you could reply to the other thread instead of running away to this thread I would give u some respect but you’re hopeless.
 
Top 5 batters of 2010s decade:-

Kohli
Smith
AB
Sangakkara
Amla

Top 5 bowlers of 2010s decade:-

Steyn
Anderson
Broad
Philander
Lyon/Ashwin
 
I can prove to you with stats that Williamson is clearly an inferior Test batsman to Root.

Take a look at their overall records against each Test side:

Williamson

Australia 41

Bangladesh 113

England 43

India 37

Pakistan 47

South Africa 47

Sri Lanka 66

West Indies 47

Zimbabwe 78

Root

Australia 40

Bangladesh 24

India 57

Ireland 16

New Zealand 44

Pakistan 61

South Africa 54

Sri Lanka 44

West Indies 57

Here are some key facts that are worth noting:

- Williamson’s average is severely inflated because of an average of 113 vs Bangladesh and 78 vs Zimbabwe.

- Root has not feasted against weak bowling attacks. He averages 24 vs Bangladesh and 16 vs Ireland. He also has not played a Test against Zimbabwe. Moreover, Root has not faced Bangladesh at home while Williamson has played 4 Tests against Bangladesh at home.

- Williamson averages 30 in England. Root averages almost 40 in New Zealand.

- Williamson averages in 35 in India and 21 in South Africa. Root averages 53 in India and 51 in South Africa.

- Williamson averages 26 in Sri Lanka. Root averages 38 in Sri Lanka.

Now finally, here is the most eye opening fact. Root’s slump since 2018 is known to everybody. He has averaged 39 since January 2018.

In the same period, Williamson has averaged 55. However, in spite of their contrasting forms in the last two years, Root’s numbers against good attacks and in major countries are still far more impressive which clearly indicates the following:

- Root is several notches above Williamson as a batsman, and Williamson is the one who does not deserve to be part of the Fab Four. He has never belonged to that league as his mediocre numbers reflect.

- Williamson is by far the most overrated batsman of his generation. It is not even close.

- As I said before, the only reason Root gets more flak is because he plays for a high profile, flashy side. Whatever England or English players do is always noticed by everyone, while New Zealand and New Zealand players have low profiles.

Hence, Root is always under the spotlight while Williamson escapes a lot of justified criticism.
That's a whole lot of analysis.

Point is they both suck for elite players for different reasons - bottom line is neither belong in the Fab 4. If Marnus and Babar keep it up another year or two, they should be in there with Smith and Kohli.
 
I forgot to reply about Anderson and Broad. When you talk about performances over a decade, you have to value consistency.

It is pure arrogance to not pick Anderson and Broad in the team of the decade when they have taken 400+ wickets each in the last 10 years. It is a testament to their consistency and superb fitness levels.

Furthermore, Anderson took 24 wickets in Australia to inflict the most humiliating home series defeat to Australia in the modern era while Broad took 18 wickets to help England win in South Africa.

Anderson also bowled very well in England’s win in India in 2012, albeit India was a washed up team then.

They have clearly made an impact outside England as well and definitely deserve to be in the team of the decade.

Vernon Philander has a better average than Broad in every country they have both played in apart from Sri Lanka, where Broad's is 0.15 lower. Philander has also played in 67.8% of South Africa's tests this decade, and for me that is enough for him to be included
 
I can prove to you with stats that Williamson is clearly an inferior Test batsman to Root.

Take a look at their overall records against each Test side:

Williamson

Australia 41

Bangladesh 113

England 43

India 37

Pakistan 47

South Africa 47

Sri Lanka 66

West Indies 47

Zimbabwe 78

Root

Australia 40

Bangladesh 24

India 57

Ireland 16

New Zealand 44

Pakistan 61

South Africa 54

Sri Lanka 44

West Indies 57

Here are some key facts that are worth noting:

- Williamson’s average is severely inflated because of an average of 113 vs Bangladesh and 78 vs Zimbabwe.

- Root has not feasted against weak bowling attacks. He averages 24 vs Bangladesh and 16 vs Ireland. He also has not played a Test against Zimbabwe. Moreover, Root has not faced Bangladesh at home while Williamson has played 4 Tests against Bangladesh at home.

- Williamson averages 30 in England. Root averages almost 40 in New Zealand.

- Williamson averages in 35 in India and 21 in South Africa. Root averages 53 in India and 51 in South Africa.

- Williamson averages 26 in Sri Lanka. Root averages 38 in Sri Lanka.

Now finally, here is the most eye opening fact. Root’s slump since 2018 is known to everybody. He has averaged 39 since January 2018.

In the same period, Williamson has averaged 55. However, in spite of their contrasting forms in the last two years, Root’s numbers against good attacks and in major countries are still far more impressive which clearly indicates the following:

- Root is several notches above Williamson as a batsman, and Williamson is the one who does not deserve to be part of the Fab Four. He has never belonged to that league as his mediocre numbers reflect.

- Williamson is by far the most overrated batsman of his generation. It is not even close.

- As I said before, the only reason Root gets more flak is because he plays for a high profile, flashy side. Whatever England or English players do is always noticed by everyone, while New Zealand and New Zealand players have low profiles.

Hence, Root is always under the spotlight while Williamson escapes a lot of justified criticism.

The issue with Root is he has no match winning of very strong performances away from home. The best cricketers turn matches and keep their sides in games, and while Williamson doesn't do this to the degree of Smith or Kohli, he does it more than Root
 
You’re the only one in denial. You don’t decide what makes the best test captain of the decade based on your own set factors. Winning in South Africa and England is a major factor in that and kohli has not achieved that. Ghar mein to kutta bhi sher hota hai if you know what that means. Again you bring out lame reasons to defend your flawed arguments aging india this and that. Should I say than that the Australian team without smith and warner and Pattinson was a c grade team you’ll get hurt over that. Wisden has set the perfect test captain of this decade not that they are English but the only one and deserving Sir Alaistair Cook. You are counting the last three years as a decade shows how absurd your argument is I don’t even need to say no more and please learn the meaning of what a decade means and than quote me again. But only if you could reply to the other thread instead of running away to this thread I would give u some respect but you’re hopeless.

Kai kuttay ghar me bhi kuttay rehtay hain aur BHAU BHAU kar ke matches har jaatay hain.

Please compare India’s home record to other teams in this decade before nonchalantly dismissing their achievements.

If winning and dominating home was a walk in the par, India would not be so far ahead of other sides, so please give credit where its due.

Winning in South Africa and England has not been the biggest challenge in this decade. Winning in India is thanks to the captaincy of Kohli. Since 2013, India has only lost 1 Test at home. Yes that is right, only 1 Test.

How many Tests have the likes of South Africa and England lost?

As far as the Australian tour is concerned, had India lost to an Australian side without Smith and Warner, you would now be doing bhangra over how Kohli was not able to defeat a weakened Australia side.

Now that he lead India to a dominant series win, you are dismissing the achievement because it comes against a weakened Australian side. So please don’t think that I cannot see through your act. Please try to fool someone else.

Apart from maybe England and South Africa, no team is capable of winning in Australia even if the likes of Smith and Warner do not play, and Asian sides except India certainly don’t stand a chance.

I have said it before and I have said again - there is no captain in this decade who has a stronger claim of being the best captain of this decade than Kohli. Cook won in India and South Africa but he lost far too many matches and was sacked after the 4-0 defeat in India in 2016.

I “ran” from that thread because I don’t want to repeat the same arguments in two parallel threads. Furthermore, I don’t need respect from you. You can say what you want, but don’t expect me to agree with you when you come up with ridiculous arguments.
 
The issue with Root is he has no match winning of very strong performances away from home. The best cricketers turn matches and keep their sides in games, and while Williamson doesn't do this to the degree of Smith or Kohli, he does it more than Root

I don’t know about that. I remember Root scoring series winning hundreds in South Africa and Sri Lanka, and was the most prolific batsman for England in India. Apart from an excellent hundred in the UAE, I don’t recall Williamson playing series defining knocks away from home. All I remember is him failing hopelessly in India.

People will have their preferences, but there are no facts that seem to suggest that Williamson is a better batsman than Root. That is quite clearly a myth.
 
That's a whole lot of analysis.

Point is they both suck for elite players for different reasons - bottom line is neither belong in the Fab 4. If Marnus and Babar keep it up another year or two, they should be in there with Smith and Kohli.

You have to dig deep to dispel myths. The notion that Williamson is better than Root is one of those myths. I agree that purely in Test cricket, the gap between Smith and Kohli and Root and Williamson is quite wide now, but Williamson is clearly the weakest player among the four.
 
Vernon Philander has a better average than Broad in every country they have both played in apart from Sri Lanka, where Broad's is 0.15 lower. Philander has also played in 67.8% of South Africa's tests this decade, and for me that is enough for him to be included

You can include him but he has not done enough to be picked ahead of a bowler with 400+ wickets in this decade. Philander probably deserves to be a third seamer after Anderson and Broad, but he is not my cup of tea personally.
 
Kai kuttay ghar me bhi kuttay rehtay hain aur BHAU BHAU kar ke matches har jaatay hain.

Please compare India’s home record to other teams in this decade before nonchalantly dismissing their achievements.

If winning and dominating home was a walk in the par, India would not be so far ahead of other sides, so please give credit where its due.

Winning in South Africa and England has not been the biggest challenge in this decade. Winning in India is thanks to the captaincy of Kohli. Since 2013, India has only lost 1 Test at home. Yes that is right, only 1 Test.

How many Tests have the likes of South Africa and England lost?

As far as the Australian tour is concerned, had India lost to an Australian side without Smith and Warner, you would now be doing bhangra over how Kohli was not able to defeat a weakened Australia side.

Now that he lead India to a dominant series win, you are dismissing the achievement because it comes against a weakened Australian side. So please don’t think that I cannot see through your act. Please try to fool someone else.

Apart from maybe England and South Africa, no team is capable of winning in Australia even if the likes of Smith and Warner do not play, and Asian sides except India certainly don’t stand a chance.

I have said it before and I have said again - there is no captain in this decade who has a stronger claim of being the best captain of this decade than Kohli. Cook won in India and South Africa but he lost far too many matches and was sacked after the 4-0 defeat in India in 2016.

I “ran” from that thread because I don’t want to repeat the same arguments in two parallel threads. Furthermore, I don’t need respect from you. You can say what you want, but don’t expect me to agree with you when you come up with ridiculous arguments.


If kohli was so dominant why couldn’t he defeat a hopeless english and South African side. Lost very badly indeed looking at the sides both England and South Africa had infact should have gotten demolished by the dominant kohli. Regardless Cooks achievements are actually of a decade and easily surpass kohlis home bullying 3 year record. 3 years is not a decade. Test captain of the decade isn’t considered in 3 years I don’t know how to put that in that very thick head of yours. I’ll consider him the best test captain ever if he wins in South Africa and England this time around. Heck if he even wins in newzeland this time I’ll call him the best Asian test captain too so before you write another worthless essay learn first what a decade means and wait for your beloved kohli to win in England and South Africa.
 
If kohli was so dominant why couldn’t he defeat a hopeless english and South African side. Lost very badly indeed looking at the sides both England and South Africa had infact should have gotten demolished by the dominant kohli. Regardless Cooks achievements are actually of a decade and easily surpass kohlis home bullying 3 year record. 3 years is not a decade. Test captain of the decade isn’t considered in 3 years I don’t know how to put that in that very thick head of yours. I’ll consider him the best test captain ever if he wins in South Africa and England this time around. Heck if he even wins in newzeland this time I’ll call him the best Asian test captain too so before you write another worthless essay learn first what a decade means and wait for your beloved kohli to win in England and South Africa.

No captain can have a perfect record. Even the great Australian side led by Steve Waugh lost in India.

To be the best you don’t have to be perfect; you have to be better than others, and that is what Kohli has done as Test captain.

Moreover, Kohli became the Test captain in 2015 and his team has performed consistently since, so please don’t repeat this 3 year nonsense.

No captain has a stronger claim than Kohli of being the best captain of this decade and that includes Cook. Please don’t repeat yourself over and over again.
 
No captain can have a perfect record. Even the great Australian side led by Steve Waugh lost in India.

To be the best you don’t have to be perfect; you have to be better than others, and that is what Kohli has done as Test captain.

Moreover, Kohli became the Test captain in 2015 and his team has performed consistently since, so please don’t repeat this 3 year nonsense.

No captain has a stronger claim than Kohli of being the best captain of this decade and that includes Cook. Please don’t repeat yourself over and over again.

Sir alister cook does, so get over it
 
No captain can have a perfect record. Even the great Australian side led by Steve Waugh lost in India.

To be the best you don’t have to be perfect; you have to be better than others, and that is what Kohli has done as Test captain.

Moreover, Kohli became the Test captain in 2015 and his team has performed consistently since, so please don’t repeat this 3 year nonsense.

No captain has a stronger claim than Kohli of being the best captain of this decade and that includes Cook. Please don’t repeat yourself over and over again.



There you go you are out of ideas buddy you have given up accept the fact already Sir Alastair Cook is unarguably the best test captain of this decade. You saying kohli became the captain in 2015 shows how finished you are in this argument so 4 years is equal to a decade now ahaha. I am posting here the definition of a decade for you since you are in complete denial. I hope this makes you understand better what a decade is.

13667C64-B0BA-4B11-9767-33E16FB15282.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There you go you are out of ideas buddy you have given up accept the fact already Sir Alastair Cook is unarguably the best test captain of this decade. You saying kohli became the captain in 2015 shows how finished you are in this argument so 4 years is equal to a decade now ahaha. I am posting here the definition of a decade for you since you are in complete denial. I hope this makes you understand better what a decade is.

View attachment 98124

I am sorry but the only denial is on your part because you simply cannot digest the fact that Kohli is the greatest cricketer of this decade and also the greatest Test captain of this decade.

To be the best in a decade, you do not have to do it for all 10 years. For example, 5 incredible years are way better than 10 decent years.

Let’s take a hypothetical example - player A makes his debut in 2020 and averages 60 over the next 10 years.

Player A makes his debut in 2025 and averages 100 over the next 5 years.

At the end of 2029, who would you call the better player of the decade? I hope I don’t have to spell the answer for you.

Now let me put your feeble argument to bed once and for all.

Cook become the English captain on 29 August 2012 and was removed as Test captain on 6 February 2017.

That means that he was the captain for 4 years and 5 months.

So how does Cook qualify for the Test captain of the decade based on your definition of “decade” that you googled?

In comparison, Kohli took over as Test captain on 6 January 2015 and he is still the captain today, so he has led the team for 4 years and 11 months.

So in conclusion, Kohli has led India for a longer period in this decade than Cook has led England.

Now once again, please explain how Cook is more qualified to be the Test captain of the decade based on the definition of “decade” that you googled.

Now who is in complete denial “ahaha”?

I am sorry for dropping a nuclear bomb on your argument but you forced my hand. I might be a tired old horse and past my prime but please don’t take me on with weak arguments.
 
Sir alister cook does, so get over it

If you want to live in denial it is your choice, but as I said before, the argument that Cook has been the better Test captain in this decade is utterly ridiculous.

Even ECB don’t seem to agree with this nonsense considered they removed the so-called greatest captain of the decade in 2017 after 4 years and 5 months.
 
If you want to live in denial it is your choice, but as I said before, the argument that Cook has been the better Test captain in this decade is utterly ridiculous.

Even ECB don’t seem to agree with this nonsense considered they removed the so-called greatest captain of the decade in 2017 after 4 years and 5 months.


Last decade:

Cook captained 59 tests - won 24 - lost 22 - W/L 1.09

Kohli captained 53 tests - won 33 - lost 10 - W/L of 3.3

Since both have captained 50-60 tests in decade, sample size is comparable, but result is not comparable. I won't directly take result in same porportion to judge captain, but if you take results then it's extremely lopsided.
 
Back
Top