What's new

The Asians in UK crime Thread

Abused, felt suicidal’: Indian student’s ordeal exposes UK politician who kept her as nanny ‘illegally​





Himanshi Gongley told authorities she had been “physically abused” and felt “suicidal” under the conditions she faced in Mir’s home.​


The 45-year-old politician, Hina Mir, a qualified solicitor and former deputy mayor of Hounslow, was found to have hired Himanshi Gongley for £1,200 a month in cash, despite the student having no legal right to work in the UK, as reported by UK-based newspaper The Telegraph.


Student alleges abuse​

The case escalated after Gongley reportedly flagged down a police car for help in August last year. UK home office officials told the court the 22-year-old appeared distressed and was later found to be in the UK illegally, her visa having expired in March 2023.

She told authorities she had been “physically abused” and felt “suicidal” under the conditions she faced in Mir’s home.

According to the newspaper, Adam Goodchild, an immigration officer, told the court that the student fully understood her visa situation. “She was aware her leave had expired and that is why she was not attending university,” he said, adding that “she told me immediately that she was in the country illegally and that her leave status had been curtailed and expired.



Absolutely disgusting..... UK politicans have a record for dooing this, can remember few yrs ago - around covid time - that reece mogg guy was mistreating his nanny - like a slave


@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @RexRex @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti
 

Abused, felt suicidal’: Indian student’s ordeal exposes UK politician who kept her as nanny ‘illegally​





Himanshi Gongley told authorities she had been “physically abused” and felt “suicidal” under the conditions she faced in Mir’s home.​


The 45-year-old politician, Hina Mir, a qualified solicitor and former deputy mayor of Hounslow, was found to have hired Himanshi Gongley for £1,200 a month in cash, despite the student having no legal right to work in the UK, as reported by UK-based newspaper The Telegraph.


Student alleges abuse​

The case escalated after Gongley reportedly flagged down a police car for help in August last year. UK home office officials told the court the 22-year-old appeared distressed and was later found to be in the UK illegally, her visa having expired in March 2023.

She told authorities she had been “physically abused” and felt “suicidal” under the conditions she faced in Mir’s home.

According to the newspaper, Adam Goodchild, an immigration officer, told the court that the student fully understood her visa situation. “She was aware her leave had expired and that is why she was not attending university,” he said, adding that “she told me immediately that she was in the country illegally and that her leave status had been curtailed and expired.



Absolutely disgusting..... UK politicans have a record for dooing this, can remember few yrs ago - around covid time - that reece mogg guy was mistreating his nanny - like a slave


@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @RexRex @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti

Why didn't he return to NUMBER ONE INDIA? I thought India was booming as per the sanghis. :inti
 

Abused, felt suicidal’: Indian student’s ordeal exposes UK politician who kept her as nanny ‘illegally​





Himanshi Gongley told authorities she had been “physically abused” and felt “suicidal” under the conditions she faced in Mir’s home.​


The 45-year-old politician, Hina Mir, a qualified solicitor and former deputy mayor of Hounslow, was found to have hired Himanshi Gongley for £1,200 a month in cash, despite the student having no legal right to work in the UK, as reported by UK-based newspaper The Telegraph.


Student alleges abuse​

The case escalated after Gongley reportedly flagged down a police car for help in August last year. UK home office officials told the court the 22-year-old appeared distressed and was later found to be in the UK illegally, her visa having expired in March 2023.

She told authorities she had been “physically abused” and felt “suicidal” under the conditions she faced in Mir’s home.

According to the newspaper, Adam Goodchild, an immigration officer, told the court that the student fully understood her visa situation. “She was aware her leave had expired and that is why she was not attending university,” he said, adding that “she told me immediately that she was in the country illegally and that her leave status had been curtailed and expired.



Absolutely disgusting..... UK politicans have a record for dooing this, can remember few yrs ago - around covid time - that reece mogg guy was mistreating his nanny - like a slave


@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @RexRex @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti
On a day like this, when you lot have been shamed all over Britain - Have some shame and introspection. Blaming India is a laughable excuse

 
On a day like this, when you lot have been shamed all over Britain - Have some shame and introspection. Blaming India is a laughable excuse

i actually didnt see the news today, been super busy with work, finished at 5.30 - went straight to tennis for 6pm - finished at 8.45, had shower, and straight cae onto my laptop on here
 

Arrest made in ‘people smuggling adverts’ investigation​





A man has been arrested in Birmingham as part of a joint National Crime Agency and West Midlands Police investigation into the advertising of people smuggling services on social media.

The 29-year-old Indian national was detained by officers at an address in the Holyhead Road area of Handsworth this morning, Monday 22 December.

He is suspected of working on behalf of an organised crime network moving people in the backs of lorries, and was arrested on suspicion of facilitating illegal immigration.

The man remains in custody and is being questioned by investigators from the NCA and West Midlands Police.

A number of electronic devices were also seized and are being examined.

Following the raid on the property in Holyhead Road a second male was also arrested for being in the UK illegally. He was handed to the immigration authorities.

NCA Branch Commander Kevin Broadhead said:

“Tackling organised immigration crime remains a priority for the NCA, and we are determined to do all we can to target, disrupt and dismantle the networks involved.

“Our investigation, which is being conducted alongside partners from West Midlands Police, continues following this arrest.”
 

A Passage From India – Explaining The Unexpected Rise Of Indians Crossing The Channel​




This week the government disclosed that in 2023 Indians have been the second largest group of people illegally crossing the English Channel in small boats, making up 18 per cent of all crossings. Although the increase in Indians making the crossings had been reported earlier this year, that this remains the case several months into Spring suggests this May well be part of a wider trend.

This is in contrast with the number of Albanians making the crossings, which has nosedived since the government agreed a returns agreement with Albania in December (which has so far resulted in over 1,000 Albanians being returned).

Indians have now replaced Albanians as the most egregious example of the blatant abuse of the UK asylum system. Why?

Well, unlike other nationalities prominent among those making the crossings, Indians not only have negligible grounds for claiming asylum, it is also perfectly possible for them to make their way to the UK by legitimate means for visits, business, study or to join family members if they qualify for a visa.

While those making the crossings are, as often as not, asylum-shoppers, having to pass through a number of safe and developed countries to make the trip, they at least may have reason to leave their countries of origin, Indians, manifestly do not, beyond seeking a better life. This does not constitute grounds for claiming asylum. While like all developing countries – even one with a rapidly growing economy, democratic governance and a functioning judiciary and no systemic persecution of its citizens – there is still poverty and deprivation, but poverty does not qualify as grounds for granting asylum.

It is also not a country from which an individual can reach Europe without significant air or maritime travel. Unlike Middle Eastern and North African states, it is very difficult to reach Europe over land (or with short sea journeys) from India without encountering a level of risk multitudes greater than anything one might encounter within most of India itself.

To reach the shores of Calais, Indian migrants usually fly to Serbia from Delhi (where Indians don’t need a visa for short visits) before entering the European Union illegally and travelling through Central Europe.

Some have claimed Indians may be making the journey illegally across the Channel because asylum seekers get access to student finance upon the same terms as British students. This is not entirely true. While asylum seekers can study while their claim is assessed, they would normally have to pay the full fees for international students (although accepted refugees would pay ‘Home’ fees). What is also true is that those claiming to be minors on arrival and placed in the care of local authorities can remain the responsibility of the local authority should they go on to university with the LA ultimately footing the bill. We do not know what proportion of those coming illegally are treated as unaccompanied minors.

It is also possible that these individuals may have ties to Indian communities within the UK making it easier for them to disappear into the Indian diaspora and black economy. Apart from the proportion claiming to be minors. It would also be useful to know how many of those admitted temporarily pending a decision on their application later abscond.

Coming from India, these individuals will also know that their asylum claims are unlikely to be approved. In fact, from 2008 to 2021, of nearly 14,000 Indian asylum applications just 458 (or 3 per cent) were granted asylum or another form of protection. This makes it much more likely that they will disappear.

Besides those now crossing the Channel illegally, Indians are the nationality most likely to overstay when their visa expires. In 2018 the government said there were 75,000-100,000 Indian citizens living without authority living illegally in Britain.

It is important that the government acts quickly and decisively to nip this developing trend in the bud before the current flow of Indians across the Channel grows out of control (as was the case with Albanians in 2022). This means expanding the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agreed with India on illegal immigration in 2021 and press Delhi to act quickly to document and accept back its citizens. The 2021 MOU clearly failed to take account of actions like the intentional destruction of documents which greatly inhibits returns. The MOU was part of a wider package that granted access to the UK for 3,000 young Indians a year. We felt at the time that this would not be enough for the Indian government and so it has proved.

No doubt, India will be as slow and obstructive as it has in the past over documenting and accepting back its citizens. Its frequent ploy has been to link immigration with trade and even, on occasion, make trade agreements dependent on greater immigration access for its citizens. It is of paramount importance that the commendable Kemi Badenoch continues to resist such pressure. The UK has been negotiating a trade deal with India for the past couple of years and Delhi will insist upon greater legal immigration access to the UK in return for meeting their own responsibilities. The Rwanda plan could help solve the new Indian Channel problem. Add to this detention and speedy returns and we could see a decline in illegal Indian crossings similar to the one experienced with Albanians.




@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @RexRex @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti
 

A Passage From India – Explaining The Unexpected Rise Of Indians Crossing The Channel​




This week the government disclosed that in 2023 Indians have been the second largest group of people illegally crossing the English Channel in small boats, making up 18 per cent of all crossings. Although the increase in Indians making the crossings had been reported earlier this year, that this remains the case several months into Spring suggests this May well be part of a wider trend.

This is in contrast with the number of Albanians making the crossings, which has nosedived since the government agreed a returns agreement with Albania in December (which has so far resulted in over 1,000 Albanians being returned).

Indians have now replaced Albanians as the most egregious example of the blatant abuse of the UK asylum system. Why?

Well, unlike other nationalities prominent among those making the crossings, Indians not only have negligible grounds for claiming asylum, it is also perfectly possible for them to make their way to the UK by legitimate means for visits, business, study or to join family members if they qualify for a visa.

While those making the crossings are, as often as not, asylum-shoppers, having to pass through a number of safe and developed countries to make the trip, they at least may have reason to leave their countries of origin, Indians, manifestly do not, beyond seeking a better life. This does not constitute grounds for claiming asylum. While like all developing countries – even one with a rapidly growing economy, democratic governance and a functioning judiciary and no systemic persecution of its citizens – there is still poverty and deprivation, but poverty does not qualify as grounds for granting asylum.

It is also not a country from which an individual can reach Europe without significant air or maritime travel. Unlike Middle Eastern and North African states, it is very difficult to reach Europe over land (or with short sea journeys) from India without encountering a level of risk multitudes greater than anything one might encounter within most of India itself.

To reach the shores of Calais, Indian migrants usually fly to Serbia from Delhi (where Indians don’t need a visa for short visits) before entering the European Union illegally and travelling through Central Europe.

Some have claimed Indians may be making the journey illegally across the Channel because asylum seekers get access to student finance upon the same terms as British students. This is not entirely true. While asylum seekers can study while their claim is assessed, they would normally have to pay the full fees for international students (although accepted refugees would pay ‘Home’ fees). What is also true is that those claiming to be minors on arrival and placed in the care of local authorities can remain the responsibility of the local authority should they go on to university with the LA ultimately footing the bill. We do not know what proportion of those coming illegally are treated as unaccompanied minors.

It is also possible that these individuals may have ties to Indian communities within the UK making it easier for them to disappear into the Indian diaspora and black economy. Apart from the proportion claiming to be minors. It would also be useful to know how many of those admitted temporarily pending a decision on their application later abscond.

Coming from India, these individuals will also know that their asylum claims are unlikely to be approved. In fact, from 2008 to 2021, of nearly 14,000 Indian asylum applications just 458 (or 3 per cent) were granted asylum or another form of protection. This makes it much more likely that they will disappear.

Besides those now crossing the Channel illegally, Indians are the nationality most likely to overstay when their visa expires. In 2018 the government said there were 75,000-100,000 Indian citizens living without authority living illegally in Britain.

It is important that the government acts quickly and decisively to nip this developing trend in the bud before the current flow of Indians across the Channel grows out of control (as was the case with Albanians in 2022). This means expanding the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agreed with India on illegal immigration in 2021 and press Delhi to act quickly to document and accept back its citizens. The 2021 MOU clearly failed to take account of actions like the intentional destruction of documents which greatly inhibits returns. The MOU was part of a wider package that granted access to the UK for 3,000 young Indians a year. We felt at the time that this would not be enough for the Indian government and so it has proved.

No doubt, India will be as slow and obstructive as it has in the past over documenting and accepting back its citizens. Its frequent ploy has been to link immigration with trade and even, on occasion, make trade agreements dependent on greater immigration access for its citizens. It is of paramount importance that the commendable Kemi Badenoch continues to resist such pressure. The UK has been negotiating a trade deal with India for the past couple of years and Delhi will insist upon greater legal immigration access to the UK in return for meeting their own responsibilities. The Rwanda plan could help solve the new Indian Channel problem. Add to this detention and speedy returns and we could see a decline in illegal Indian crossings similar to the one experienced with Albanians.




@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @RexRex @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti

Why are they coming in illegally and abusing the asylum system? Why don't they stay in NUMBER ONE INDIA? :yk

Very embarrassing.
 
Hindutva threat to the UK from a Hindu’s mouth



heres is the Guardian link:

Misogyny identified as breeding ground for extremism in UK, says leaked report​




The ‘manosphere’ and Hindu nationalism were also identified by report commissioned after last summer’s riots

Rajeev Syal Home affairs editor
Mon 27 Jan 2025 22.00 GMT
Share


Hindu nationalism, misogyny and the “manosphere” have been identified as breeding grounds for extremism in a leaked report commissioned by Yvette Cooper after last summer’s riots.

The home secretary’s “rapid analytical sprint” also dismissed claims of “two-tier policing” as a “rightwing extremist narrative”. It argued that the authorities should adopt a “behaviour-based and ideologically agnostic approach” to clamping down on extremism rather than focus resources primarily on “ideologies of concern”.


The report, which was leaked to the right-leaning thinktank Policy Exchange, comes amid deepening scrutiny of the government’s approach to extremism. On Sunday, it emerged that counter-terrorism officers did not believe the Southport killer Axel Rudakubana was “in danger of being radicalised”.

Yvette Cooper arriving at Downing Street
View image in fullscreen
Yvette Cooper commissioned the report. Photograph: Andy Rain/EPA
Cooper commissioned the rapid review in August. For the first time, it identifies Hindu nationalist extremism, and Hindutva, as ideologies of concern after unrest in Leicester in 2022.



“Hindu nationalist extremism is an extremist ideology that advocates for Hindu supremacy and seeks to transform India into an ethno-religious Hindu state.

“Hindutva is a political movement distinct from Hinduism which advocates for the hegemony of Indian Hindus and the establishment of a monolithic Hindu Rastra or state in India,” the report said.

“Tensions between Hindu and Muslim communities in the UK are still evident and the events in Leicester show how disinformation can play a role in offline action,” it said.

Under the heading “extreme misogyny”, the report said “an online subculture called the ‘manosphere’ contains a significant amount of content directly focused on misogyny, and sometimes absorbs extremist rightwing tropes.

“The ‘manosphere’ encompasses a wide array of communities that include men’s rights activists; pickup artists; men going their own way; and involuntary celibates or ‘incels’.

“There is an overlap between some manosphere narratives, in particular incel beliefs, and extreme rightwing [ERW] ideology including racist narratives. Globalisation and multiculturalism, which are at the centre of many ERW narratives, are often blamed as factors in incels’ celibacy.”


The report also says that the activity of grooming gangs is frequently exploited by the far right, and that rightwing extremist ideologies and beliefs are “leaking” into the mainstream.

“Rightwing extremist narratives (particularly around immigration and policing) are in some cases ‘leaking’ into mainstream debates. Claims of ‘two-tier’ policing – where two groups are allegedly treated differently after similar behaviour – is a recent example,” the report said.

The government’s approach to extremism should no longer be based on “specific ideologies of concern, but on behaviours and activity”, the report said.

“Not basing his majesty’s government’s approach on a definition or specific ideologies of concern but on behaviours and activity of concern helps to future-proof the approach. It will also reduce both the training burden for practitioners and continual identification burden on government,” it said.


This article is more than 10 months old

Misogyny identified as breeding ground for extremism in UK, says leaked report​

This article is more than 10 months old
The ‘manosphere’ and Hindu nationalism were also identified by report commissioned after last summer’s riots

Rajeev Syal Home affairs editor
Mon 27 Jan 2025 22.00 GMT
Share


Hindu nationalism, misogyny and the “manosphere” have been identified as breeding grounds for extremism in a leaked report commissioned by Yvette Cooper after last summer’s riots.

The home secretary’s “rapid analytical sprint” also dismissed claims of “two-tier policing” as a “rightwing extremist narrative”. It argued that the authorities should adopt a “behaviour-based and ideologically agnostic approach” to clamping down on extremism rather than focus resources primarily on “ideologies of concern”.


The report, which was leaked to the right-leaning thinktank Policy Exchange, comes amid deepening scrutiny of the government’s approach to extremism. On Sunday, it emerged that counter-terrorism officers did not believe the Southport killer Axel Rudakubana was “in danger of being radicalised”.

Yvette Cooper arriving at Downing Street
View image in fullscreen
Yvette Cooper commissioned the report. Photograph: Andy Rain/EPA
Cooper commissioned the rapid review in August. For the first time, it identifies Hindu nationalist extremism, and Hindutva, as ideologies of concern after unrest in Leicester in 2022.


“Hindu nationalist extremism is an extremist ideology that advocates for Hindu supremacy and seeks to transform India into an ethno-religious Hindu state.

“Hindutva is a political movement distinct from Hinduism which advocates for the hegemony of Indian Hindus and the establishment of a monolithic Hindu Rastra or state in India,” the report said.

“Tensions between Hindu and Muslim communities in the UK are still evident and the events in Leicester show how disinformation can play a role in offline action,” it said.

Under the heading “extreme misogyny”, the report said “an online subculture called the ‘manosphere’ contains a significant amount of content directly focused on misogyny, and sometimes absorbs extremist rightwing tropes.

“The ‘manosphere’ encompasses a wide array of communities that include men’s rights activists; pickup artists; men going their own way; and involuntary celibates or ‘incels’.

“There is an overlap between some manosphere narratives, in particular incel beliefs, and extreme rightwing [ERW] ideology including racist narratives. Globalisation and multiculturalism, which are at the centre of many ERW narratives, are often blamed as factors in incels’ celibacy.”


The report also says that the activity of grooming gangs is frequently exploited by the far right, and that rightwing extremist ideologies and beliefs are “leaking” into the mainstream.

“Rightwing extremist narratives (particularly around immigration and policing) are in some cases ‘leaking’ into mainstream debates. Claims of ‘two-tier’ policing – where two groups are allegedly treated differently after similar behaviour – is a recent example,” the report said.

The government’s approach to extremism should no longer be based on “specific ideologies of concern, but on behaviours and activity”, the report said.

“Not basing his majesty’s government’s approach on a definition or specific ideologies of concern but on behaviours and activity of concern helps to future-proof the approach. It will also reduce both the training burden for practitioners and continual identification burden on government,” it said.



Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
after newsletter promotion

In a recommendation that will concern activists, the report calls for the creation of a “dedicated national investigations capability” to “coordinate and take on protest and low-level extremism operations and investigations” and a digital “national centre of excellence for the monitoring and disruption of protest”.

It recommends “reversing” a code of practice, brought in by the previous government, to limit the recording of “non-crime hate incidents” against individuals. Non-crime hate incidents have been criticised as a waste of police time and a threat to free speech.

The report follows claims made last week by the prime minister, Keir Starmer, in the wake of the Southport killings, where he equated extreme violence with extremism and likened terrorism to any act that terrorises.

Starmer’s comments were criticised by the former police counter-terror commander Neil Basu and by the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, Jonathan Hall KC, for bringing too much into scope.

Paul Stott and Andrew Gilligan, the authors of the report, said: “Many of these supposed other extremisms simply do not meet the test of harming national security or safety. Government should certainly be alarmed by, and should tackle, violence against women and other social harms – but they do not constitute extremism as defined up till now.

“This new approach risks swamping already-stretched counter-extremism interveners and counter-terror police with tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of new cases, making it more likely that dangerous people will be missed.”





Cant wait to read from the Indians, @Rajdeep your best friend Tommy Robinson gets labelled again

@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @RexRex @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti @kron @globetrotter @Hitman @jnaveen1980



#FreeMinoritiesOfIndiaFromHindus

#SaveAllIndianMinorities

#FreeIndiaFromHinduExtremism

#SanctionIndia
 
Hindutva threat to the UK from a Hindu’s mouth



heres is the Guardian link:

Misogyny identified as breeding ground for extremism in UK, says leaked report​




The ‘manosphere’ and Hindu nationalism were also identified by report commissioned after last summer’s riots

Rajeev Syal Home affairs editor
Mon 27 Jan 2025 22.00 GMT
Share


Hindu nationalism, misogyny and the “manosphere” have been identified as breeding grounds for extremism in a leaked report commissioned by Yvette Cooper after last summer’s riots.

The home secretary’s “rapid analytical sprint” also dismissed claims of “two-tier policing” as a “rightwing extremist narrative”. It argued that the authorities should adopt a “behaviour-based and ideologically agnostic approach” to clamping down on extremism rather than focus resources primarily on “ideologies of concern”.


The report, which was leaked to the right-leaning thinktank Policy Exchange, comes amid deepening scrutiny of the government’s approach to extremism. On Sunday, it emerged that counter-terrorism officers did not believe the Southport killer Axel Rudakubana was “in danger of being radicalised”.

Yvette Cooper arriving at Downing Street
View image in fullscreen
Yvette Cooper commissioned the report. Photograph: Andy Rain/EPA
Cooper commissioned the rapid review in August. For the first time, it identifies Hindu nationalist extremism, and Hindutva, as ideologies of concern after unrest in Leicester in 2022.



“Hindu nationalist extremism is an extremist ideology that advocates for Hindu supremacy and seeks to transform India into an ethno-religious Hindu state.

“Hindutva is a political movement distinct from Hinduism which advocates for the hegemony of Indian Hindus and the establishment of a monolithic Hindu Rastra or state in India,” the report said.

“Tensions between Hindu and Muslim communities in the UK are still evident and the events in Leicester show how disinformation can play a role in offline action,” it said.

Under the heading “extreme misogyny”, the report said “an online subculture called the ‘manosphere’ contains a significant amount of content directly focused on misogyny, and sometimes absorbs extremist rightwing tropes.

“The ‘manosphere’ encompasses a wide array of communities that include men’s rights activists; pickup artists; men going their own way; and involuntary celibates or ‘incels’.

“There is an overlap between some manosphere narratives, in particular incel beliefs, and extreme rightwing [ERW] ideology including racist narratives. Globalisation and multiculturalism, which are at the centre of many ERW narratives, are often blamed as factors in incels’ celibacy.”


The report also says that the activity of grooming gangs is frequently exploited by the far right, and that rightwing extremist ideologies and beliefs are “leaking” into the mainstream.

“Rightwing extremist narratives (particularly around immigration and policing) are in some cases ‘leaking’ into mainstream debates. Claims of ‘two-tier’ policing – where two groups are allegedly treated differently after similar behaviour – is a recent example,” the report said.

The government’s approach to extremism should no longer be based on “specific ideologies of concern, but on behaviours and activity”, the report said.

“Not basing his majesty’s government’s approach on a definition or specific ideologies of concern but on behaviours and activity of concern helps to future-proof the approach. It will also reduce both the training burden for practitioners and continual identification burden on government,” it said.


This article is more than 10 months old

Misogyny identified as breeding ground for extremism in UK, says leaked report​

This article is more than 10 months old
The ‘manosphere’ and Hindu nationalism were also identified by report commissioned after last summer’s riots

Rajeev Syal Home affairs editor
Mon 27 Jan 2025 22.00 GMT
Share


Hindu nationalism, misogyny and the “manosphere” have been identified as breeding grounds for extremism in a leaked report commissioned by Yvette Cooper after last summer’s riots.

The home secretary’s “rapid analytical sprint” also dismissed claims of “two-tier policing” as a “rightwing extremist narrative”. It argued that the authorities should adopt a “behaviour-based and ideologically agnostic approach” to clamping down on extremism rather than focus resources primarily on “ideologies of concern”.


The report, which was leaked to the right-leaning thinktank Policy Exchange, comes amid deepening scrutiny of the government’s approach to extremism. On Sunday, it emerged that counter-terrorism officers did not believe the Southport killer Axel Rudakubana was “in danger of being radicalised”.

Yvette Cooper arriving at Downing Street
View image in fullscreen
Yvette Cooper commissioned the report. Photograph: Andy Rain/EPA
Cooper commissioned the rapid review in August. For the first time, it identifies Hindu nationalist extremism, and Hindutva, as ideologies of concern after unrest in Leicester in 2022.


“Hindu nationalist extremism is an extremist ideology that advocates for Hindu supremacy and seeks to transform India into an ethno-religious Hindu state.

“Hindutva is a political movement distinct from Hinduism which advocates for the hegemony of Indian Hindus and the establishment of a monolithic Hindu Rastra or state in India,” the report said.

“Tensions between Hindu and Muslim communities in the UK are still evident and the events in Leicester show how disinformation can play a role in offline action,” it said.

Under the heading “extreme misogyny”, the report said “an online subculture called the ‘manosphere’ contains a significant amount of content directly focused on misogyny, and sometimes absorbs extremist rightwing tropes.

“The ‘manosphere’ encompasses a wide array of communities that include men’s rights activists; pickup artists; men going their own way; and involuntary celibates or ‘incels’.

“There is an overlap between some manosphere narratives, in particular incel beliefs, and extreme rightwing [ERW] ideology including racist narratives. Globalisation and multiculturalism, which are at the centre of many ERW narratives, are often blamed as factors in incels’ celibacy.”


The report also says that the activity of grooming gangs is frequently exploited by the far right, and that rightwing extremist ideologies and beliefs are “leaking” into the mainstream.

“Rightwing extremist narratives (particularly around immigration and policing) are in some cases ‘leaking’ into mainstream debates. Claims of ‘two-tier’ policing – where two groups are allegedly treated differently after similar behaviour – is a recent example,” the report said.

The government’s approach to extremism should no longer be based on “specific ideologies of concern, but on behaviours and activity”, the report said.

“Not basing his majesty’s government’s approach on a definition or specific ideologies of concern but on behaviours and activity of concern helps to future-proof the approach. It will also reduce both the training burden for practitioners and continual identification burden on government,” it said.



Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
after newsletter promotion

In a recommendation that will concern activists, the report calls for the creation of a “dedicated national investigations capability” to “coordinate and take on protest and low-level extremism operations and investigations” and a digital “national centre of excellence for the monitoring and disruption of protest”.

It recommends “reversing” a code of practice, brought in by the previous government, to limit the recording of “non-crime hate incidents” against individuals. Non-crime hate incidents have been criticised as a waste of police time and a threat to free speech.

The report follows claims made last week by the prime minister, Keir Starmer, in the wake of the Southport killings, where he equated extreme violence with extremism and likened terrorism to any act that terrorises.

Starmer’s comments were criticised by the former police counter-terror commander Neil Basu and by the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, Jonathan Hall KC, for bringing too much into scope.

Paul Stott and Andrew Gilligan, the authors of the report, said: “Many of these supposed other extremisms simply do not meet the test of harming national security or safety. Government should certainly be alarmed by, and should tackle, violence against women and other social harms – but they do not constitute extremism as defined up till now.

“This new approach risks swamping already-stretched counter-extremism interveners and counter-terror police with tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of new cases, making it more likely that dangerous people will be missed.”





Cant wait to read from the Indians, @Rajdeep your best friend Tommy Robinson gets labelled again

@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @RexRex @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti @kron @globetrotter @Hitman @jnaveen1980



#FreeMinoritiesOfIndiaFromHindus

#SaveAllIndianMinorities

#FreeIndiaFromHinduExtremism

#SanctionIndia

UK should crack down on the sanghis. Not just UK but all countries.

Sanghi extremism shouldn't be allowed in any civilized country. :inti
 

What is Hindu nationalism and how does it relate to trouble in Leicester?​






Hindutva is the predominant form in India and has been associated with rightwing extremism

Hindu nationalism is a political ideology that dates back to the 19th century. It encompassed a broad range of groups but at its core is a belief that Indian national identity and culture are inseparable from the Hindu religion.

It began to gain prominence in the early 20th century as part of the independence movement in India, which sought to separate itself from the identity of British colonial rule and the Islamic Mughal dynasty, which had previously governed India from the 16th century.


Hindutva – a term coined in the 1920s in the writings of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar meaning “Hindu-ness” – is the predominant form of Hindu nationalism in India. Hindutva is the belief in the hegemony of Hinduism in India and the establishment of the country as a Hindu, rather than secular, state. Hindus are viewed more as an ethnic, rather than religious, group.

The Hindutva ideology has been associated with rightwing extremism and fascism due to the purist racial elements of the movement and its association with intolerance of minorities, in particular anti-Muslim sentiment and violence in India, which is 80% Hindu and 14% Muslim.

Who are the RSS?​

At the heart of the Hindu nationalist movement in India is the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), an all-male Hindu nationalist volunteer group, often described as a paramilitary organisation, formed in the 1920s.

It was formed to provide unity and discipline to the Hindu community in order to build the Hindu Rastra (the Hindu state). It continues to work today to spread the ideology of Hindutva, with upwards of five million members.


The RSS is the leader of the “Sangh Parivar’’, an umbrella group of Hindu nationalist organisations who have set up schools, charities and clubs but which have also been associated with communal violence. The RSS has been banned three times since it was established, including after Mahatma Gandhi was assassinated by a former RSS member in 1948.

It was out of the RSS that India’s ruling political party, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), emerged and they remain closely linked.

Who is the BJP and what is its association with Hindu nationalism?​

Hindu nationalism has been part of Indian politics for decades and, at various points, has been deployed as a populist political tool by both of India’s major political parties, Congress and the BJP, as a way to win the vote of the country’s Hindu majority.

However, since the BJP came to power in 2014, led by the prime minister, Narendra Modi, Hindu nationalism has come to entirely dominate the Indian political landscape. The BJP is widely seen as the political wing of the RSS – Modi was an RSS youth member – and rightwing Hindu nationalism is at the centre of their political agenda. The BJP openly prescribes to Hindutva but has downplayed its associations with violence, instead proclaiming it is a cultural agenda that promotes India’s heritage and history.

India’s constitution, drawn up in 1950 after independence, enshrines India as a secular democracy. However, the BJP has been accused of passing policies and pursuing a religiously divisive agenda, which seeks to make India a Hindu state and has led to a rising tide of intolerance and communal violence in India and the targeting of Muslim activists, journalists and civil society.

The mainstreaming of Hindutva politics has led to a widespread yet unfounded narrative that Hindus in India are under threat from Muslims, be it through population shifts, interfaith marriage (known as “love jihad”) and illegal Muslim immigrants. It has led to new laws being passed under the BJP around citizenship and marriage which have been described as discriminatory to minorities.

How has Hindutva spread outside India?​

Since Modi and the BJP came to power in 2014, there have been highly successful efforts to mobilise the vast Indian diaspora in support of the BJP, particularly in the UK, US and Australia, primarily through the use of social media.

While overseas Indians cannot vote, they are known to retain strong connections to their communities still in India and often wield a lot of wealth and influence. In 2019, when Modi visited the US, a “howdy Modi” event was organised by his supporters in Texas, which was attended by then-US president, Donald Trump, and 50,000 supporters.

The rise in global support for the BJP has also coincided with a rise in prominence of Hindutva groups and charities in the US. Some of these groups have been accused of trying to undermine academic freedom on university campuses by targeting academics whose work has focused on India’s Islamic history. In September 2021, organisers of an academic conference on Hindutva held in the US were bombarded with thousands of threats of rape, violence and death, allegedly by such groups.

In August, the Indian Business Association (IBA) came under fire for bringing bulldozers, adorned with the faces of Modi and the hardline Hindutva BJP minister Yogi Adityanath, to two India Day parades in the state of New Jersey. Bulldozers have become a symbol of anti-Muslim oppression in India after they were used repeatedly to demolish the homes of Muslim activists and citizens under the guise of the structures being illegal. Hindutva hardliners have celebrated Adiyanath as “bulldozer baba” for the demolitions.

The Hindu nationalist ideology has also recently begun to rear its head in the UK. In November 2019, British Hindus were targeted with WhatsApp messages, which included videos by far-right anti-Muslim activists.

Over the weekend, violence erupted in Leicester between Hindu and Muslim communities, which began after a group of Hindu men marched through the streets of the city shouting “jai shri Ram”, a Hindu greeting that has become a clarion call for Hindutva mobs and perpetrators of anti-Muslim violence in India. The situation quickly escalated, with a Hindu flag burned and another torn down from outside a temple.



@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti @kron @globetrotter @Hitman @jnaveen1980

#FreeMinoritiesOfIndiaFromHindus

#SaveAllIndianMinorities

#FreeIndiaFromHinduExtremism

#SanctionIndia
 
An Indian man, Laxman Lal was arrested in London after he was allegedly caught shoplifting while disguised in a Muslim woman's outfit. #ARYStories #ARYNews #Indianman #LaxmanLal







OIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII, rajjy rajjy rajjy;

@sweep_shot

@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti @kron @globetrotter @Hitman @jnaveen1980


#FreeMinoritiesOfIndiaFromHindus

#SaveAllIndianMinorities

#FreeIndiaFromHinduExtremism

#SanctionIndia
 
An Indian man, Laxman Lal was arrested in London after he was allegedly caught shoplifting while disguised in a Muslim woman's outfit. #ARYStories #ARYNews #Indianman #LaxmanLal







OIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII, rajjy rajjy rajjy;

@sweep_shot

@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti @kron @globetrotter @Hitman @jnaveen1980


#FreeMinoritiesOfIndiaFromHindus

#SaveAllIndianMinorities

#FreeIndiaFromHinduExtremism

#SanctionIndia

This type of scumbag tactic is expected from the sanghis. :inti

They are starting to get caught too. LOL. They are very stupid.
 
Just typne in google = london demographics indian pakistani and it shows:


  • Indian Community: Around 656,272 people (7.5% of London's population) identified as Indian or British Indian.
  • Pakistani Community: Roughly 290,549 people (3.3% of London's population), forming the largest UK Pakistani community.
Geographical Concentrations
  • Indian: Strong presence in West London boroughs like Harrow, and also significant in Newham, Ealing, and Hounslow.
  • Pakistani: Large communities in East London (especially Redbridge, Waltham Forest, Newham, Barking & Dagenham) and significant populations in West (Ealing, Hounslow) and South London (Merton, Croydon).


Concentration in London
The main hubs for these communities are in Outer London boroughs, which are not typically classified as South London:
  • Indian communities are most concentrated in West London, particularly in Harrow (28.8%).
  • Pakistani communities are highly concentrated in Redbridge (East London, 14.2%) and Waltham Forest (East London, 10.4%). Southall, in West London (Ealing), is also known for its strong Indian and Pakistani roots.

What are the demographics of South London?


52.8% people are white, 24.6% people are black, 10.3% people are asian. 44.2% are Christian, 35.3% have no religion, 8.4% are Muslim.
 

“Police Shut Down Christmas Market | Indians Arrested in UK​





Will the below lot blame the muslims???


@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti @kron @globetrotter @Hitman @jnaveen1980



#FreeMinoritiesOfIndiaFromHindus

#SaveAllIndianMinorities

#FreeIndiaFromHinduExtremism

#SanctionIndia

Sanghis are like mental patients. They love to blame random people for Indian crimes.:inti

They are always misinformed and they make up a lot of facts out of thin air.

gioated-family-guy.gif
 
Crowbar Attack Injures Six at Merseyside Hospital

On December 30, a 20-year-old man from Afghanistan, living locally in Newton-le-Willows, Merseyside, waited 90 minutes at Newton Community Hospital after being turned away for lacking a GP registration. Growing agitated, he smashed a counter and attacked with a crowbar, injuring six people including staff and patients with non-life-threatening wounds like head lacerations and bruising. All victims received treatment and were discharged; police arrested him at the scene for wounding, affray, and damage, now detaining him under the Mental Health Act as they review CCTV and forensics. The NHS Trust is supporting staff, patrols have increased for reassurance, and local MP Sarah Pochin called the incident horrendous.


 
Crowbar Attack Injures Six at Merseyside Hospital

On December 30, a 20-year-old man from Afghanistan, living locally in Newton-le-Willows, Merseyside, waited 90 minutes at Newton Community Hospital after being turned away for lacking a GP registration. Growing agitated, he smashed a counter and attacked with a crowbar, injuring six people including staff and patients with non-life-threatening wounds like head lacerations and bruising. All victims received treatment and were discharged; police arrested him at the scene for wounding, affray, and damage, now detaining him under the Mental Health Act as they review CCTV and forensics. The NHS Trust is supporting staff, patrols have increased for reassurance, and local MP Sarah Pochin called the incident horrendous.


afghan, must have learnt from thr new best friends = india
 

Hindutva Flags in Leicester Raise Alarm​





Reports have emerged of Bajrang Dal and other Hindutva-associated flags being displayed at a recent celebration in Leicester, sparking concern within local communities.

Given the findings of the new report into the 2022 unrest, authored by the UK Indian Muslim Council (UKIMC) and the Community Policy Forum – which highlighted intimidation fuelled by Hindutva extremism, the Muslim Council of Britain is calling for urgent action.

A spokesperson for the MCB said:

“This is not a neutral cultural or religious symbol but one tied to an extremist movement. Its use risks importing divisive overseas politics into our neighbourhoods and undermining the hard work done to restore peace since 2022.

We are raising this urgently with the Hindu Council, Police, and community leaders, and we repeat our call for Hindutva extremism to be recognised as a domestic security threat. Authorities must ensure local events are safe, inclusive, and free from political provocation.”

@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @RexRex @rpant_gabba, @Romali_rotti @kron @globetrotter @Hitman @jnaveen1980 @Local.Dada @CrIc_Mystique @Van_Sri


#FreeMinoritiesOfIndiaFromHindus

#SaveAllIndianMinorities

#FreeIndiaFromHinduExtremism

#SanctionIndiaIndians
 

Good Samaritan's rape hoax hell - but 1 thing he did proved his innocence​


A kind-hearted motorist was moved at the sight of sobbing, barefoot Rachael Jones, 38, and offered her a lift home - but then she concocted a fake rape claim.


A drunken, barefoot mother-of-five who falsely accused a Good Samaritan of rape after he kindly gave her a lift home admitted she was "silly and disgusting" when jailed for two years. And as Rachael Jones, 38, was led to the cells, a judge told her: "Because of behaviour like this, there may be lots of men out there who would say ‘No way am I stopping for a lone female, however distressed she looks'."

Chester Crown Court heard Jones had been returning home from a drunken night out with friends at midnight on April 18, 2022, when booted out of a taxi for arguing with the driver. Innocent father-to-be Salim Ullah, 33 - passing by in his car and "in an act of charity" - stopped and offered distressed Jones a ride home, dropping her off before rebuffing her odd pleas for "a hug".


But the court heard that after stepping inside her house, she concocted a completely false claim that she had been lured into a car and gangraped by Mr Ullah and two other Pakistani men in a layby.
Shocked Mr Ullah, from Stoke-on-Trent, Staffs, was traced through his car number plate, arrested at his home in front of his sister and held in a police cell for 30 hours - submitting to intrusive examinations.

He remained a suspect for up to four days, suffering malicious gossip in his neighbourhood, before police concluded no rape had taken place.
Inquiries revealed Mr Ullah had the "foresight" to record his encounter with Jones on his mobile phone, which proved to police that he had done absolutely nothing wrong.
Jones of Hassall Green, near Sandbach, Cheshire, admitted perverting the course of justice and was jailed for two years.


Judge Steven Everett told her: "Mr Ullah behaved in an exemplary fashion and did what many people would not have done and went to your aid.
"Sadly the reason why many other people would not have gone to the aid of a lone woman distressed in the middle of the road without shoes, is due to what happened to him as a result of his act of charity.
"There will be many people who will say ‘I am not doing that just in case a serious allegation is made.

"Your behaviour has consequences for people genuinely in need and you were doing a disservice to those victims who have been genuinely attacked, assaulted and sexually assaulted and are left on the side of the road and are maybe left there because people who drive by say 'I am not taking the risk'.
"Mr Ullah was driving you home. He behaved as a perfectly good Samaritan but happily and fortunately he had foresight to record the conversation in the car.
"You were looking for a hug and he was prepared to give you a high five as it were in the hope that it would satisfy you.
"You got out of the car, the first thing you did was to complain to the people in the house - what you made up is as bad as it could possibly be.

"It does not bear thinking about what would have happened if he had not recorded that conversation. I have no doubt he would have been prosecuted for rape and you would have carried on your merry way."
The incident occurred when Jones had got drunk during a night out with friends following a tiff with her partner.
Prosecutor Thomas McLoughlin said: "She and her friends shared a taxi home but the defendant became argumentative with the driver and others and ultimately she was dropped off at the side of the road.
"Friends made arrangements to pick her up but when they met up she reported being raped. Out of concern for her safety they reported it to police and she told officers she had been raped by three Pakistani men.
"She agreed she had been on a night out and got kicked out of the taxi but a vehicle pulled up and the driver offered her a lift.

"She said there were others in the car along with the driver and that they took her to a different location and threatened to kill her if she did not do what she was told.
"She gave descriptions and said the incident lasted for 45 minutes. Police embarked upon a thorough and very lengthy investigation to identify and arrest Mr Ullah, and he was held in custody for 30 hours.
"But the account given by the defendant was completely false. What really happened was Mr Ullah had happened to be driving by and noticed a lone female at the side of the road.

"He wanted to help her. Concerned for her wellbeing he offered her a lift home to make sure that she was safe. It's the sort of thing he would wish any other person would do for his sisters and loved ones.
"The journey passed with no incident, and while still intoxicated, she tried to hug him - he offered her a high five.
"Fortunately for Mr Ullah he recorded the whole incident and officers told him after 30 hours he could be released. It was a very detailed police investigation that quite frankly wasted police time and resources."
Jones was later interviewed about her account, and she admitted making it up - she blamed her lies on being drunk.

She told officers: "I got myself in such a stupid state. I said things I should never have said. I am a silly woman. I am disgusting. I am sorry. I am so sorry."
Mr Ullah later told the court: "My wife was six months pregnant at the time and this allegation brought a lot of stress to us.
"I should have been fully there for my wife - however, we were worried about what would happen at the end of the case.
"I was worried that I might not be there for the birth of the baby and I just feel lucky I recorded the incident."
He added: "This whole incident has left me feeling very insecure. I feel like I'm being judged and I still feel like people are judging me and thinking wrong about me. The impact on my life has been unforgivable."

Patrick Williamson, defending, said: "There was an issue with her partner who behaved in a way that was far from supportive and her reaction to an argument that she had was to go out and get drunk. She was in a difficult place.”
At the time of the incident, Cheshire police described it as a "horrendous attack" before issuing an update two days later saying no crime had taken place.

No public message of regret was offered over Mr Ullah's arrest and instead Chief Inspector Claire Jesson said: "I do not want this to deter people from reporting such crimes to us for fear that they will not be believed – nothing could be further from the truth.

"We work really hard to encourage people who have been a victim of sexual abuse – no matter how long ago - to report it."
Cheshire Police were asked to provide a mugshot of Jones for press publication, but refused, citing 'concerns' for her welfare.



Source:



She was only jailed for 2 years - most likely will only serve 1 yr and get released early.
 
Back
Top