unemployedgm
Tape Ball Star
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2018
- Runs
- 725
- Post of the Week
- 2
Whenever there is a coaching vacancy in the Pakistan Setup, there is a myriad of opinions on the matter. One idea often bandied about is the necessary inclusion of Wasim Akram as a Bowling Coach or even a Head Coach. The many problems with that suggestion aside, the biggest problem is the Economics of Being a Coach. Two years ago, the newly minted Multan Sultans gave Wasim Akram reportedly $250,000 to be the Team Director. Along with making cricket decisions in concert with ownership, Akram was essentially a Brand Ambassador and a unique acquaintance for the beleaguered owners. For minimal work and performance Akram made $250,000. On top of this handsome salary, Akram has plenty of commitments as a Cricket Commentator and as a Brand Ambassador for several major brands in Pakistan. He transitioned from his role with the Multan Sultans to become the President of the Karachi Kings. As we all know, the Kings love throwing around ridiculous titles.
On the other hand, Mickey Arthur's reported salary as Head Coach for Pakistan was $300,000. Arthur as explained to me by someone close to him, took the job because the money was too good to give up. Unlike Akram, Arthur worked tirelessly throughout the year, and along with Sarfraz Ahmed he was expected to be a human shield for the Board's poor choices. Lets not forget the travel.
The Economics of Coaching and Cricket although appealing to the common folk, is not appealing to a legendary cricketer like Wasim Akram. Why would a man leave his young family to be on the road for 9-10 months out of the year for a sum he can potentially make in a month? He wouldn't!!! Hence, it is far easier to hire someone like Ijaz Ahmed over Younis Khan.
On the other hand, Mickey Arthur's reported salary as Head Coach for Pakistan was $300,000. Arthur as explained to me by someone close to him, took the job because the money was too good to give up. Unlike Akram, Arthur worked tirelessly throughout the year, and along with Sarfraz Ahmed he was expected to be a human shield for the Board's poor choices. Lets not forget the travel.
The Economics of Coaching and Cricket although appealing to the common folk, is not appealing to a legendary cricketer like Wasim Akram. Why would a man leave his young family to be on the road for 9-10 months out of the year for a sum he can potentially make in a month? He wouldn't!!! Hence, it is far easier to hire someone like Ijaz Ahmed over Younis Khan.
