- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Runs
- 217,977
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First session is gone for sure. There can be around 40-50 overs of play given that bad light will also cause some problems in the final hour of the day.
It will be a deserved draw for Pakistan IMO if they can bat for 50 more overs as they have survived 50+ already.
Deserving draw? England should have bowled 180 overs at us and now they will end up bowling around a 100.
If we draw this because of rain, it will be nothing but pure luck.
If Pakistan can survive 100 overs in total, why isn't it a deserved draw?
It is not necessary that a draw means both teams should be on par. A hard-fighting draw needs to be appreciated even if England were a better team in this match and throughout the series.
If Pakistan can survive 100 overs in total, why isn't it a deserved draw?
It is not necessary that a draw means both teams should be on par. A hard-fighting draw needs to be appreciated even if England were a better team in this match and throughout the series.
Deserving draw? England should have bowled 180 overs at us and now they will end up bowling around a 100.
If we draw this because of rain, it will be nothing but pure luck.
If Pakistan can survive 100 overs in total, why isn't it a deserved draw?
It is not necessary that a draw means both teams should be on par. A hard-fighting draw needs to be appreciated even if England were a better team in this match and throughout the series.
Luck is not a concept that great teams and athletes consider. You make your own luck. The weather conditions are part of the game in England.
The conditions were well predicted for yesterday and today (Storm Francis). It was known by both teams at the start. If England had wanted they could have declared much earlier or indeed, as England won the toss, they could have put us in, bowled us out cheaply (as I am sure you believe they would have done), batted and declared and bowled us out cheaply again.
Luck does not come into it. You would (rightly in my opinion) be hard on those who post we have had “bad luck”. You make your own luck.
If we draw this game, it is not luck.
Talking about Luck, when Pak were in commanfing position in first test someone claimed Pak were lucky to win toss. In this test England qon toss so they must have been lucky to bat in more favourable condition then Pak had to. Was Pak unluvky with Fawad dismissal of no ball? Were Pak unluck with so called freat umpire Gough giving two decisions against them that looked to be at best just clipping. If it had been England batting Gough would not had been that eager.
So if this match is a no result due to rain, basically Misbah and Azhar could go back to Pakistan and claim that it was a closely contested series and Pakistan just had one bad session which cost them the series.
any realistic chance of play happening within the next hour?
Australia vs India in the World test championship final?
The drainage at Southampton seems fairly ordinary by English standards.
I know it's unreasonable to expect the ECB to employ as many ground staff as they do in Sri Lanka, but after what has happened in the last two weeks with the rain delays, the standard of work done by the ground staff needs to be questioned at least.
Well played Azhar Ali, his knock saved Pakistan from a loss
Haters will cry but England got lucky in the first test due to inexperience pace attack of Pakistan. Despite home notoriously overcast conditions and 5 bowler attack with lots of experience, home umpires more happy to give pak batsmen out then english batsmen for marginal decisions, and abundamce of capable tailend batting, England could not spank Pakistan like they do teams like India at home.
So England were lucky even though they won fair and square but Pakistan aren't when it's rain that is literally saving them from a 2-0 spanking. Got it.![]()
Read mesage where I have claimed they got lucky due ro our inexperienced pacers and England knew it will rain so gutsy batting by Pakistan overcamwe their plans in the match. Its not like they did not know it would rain, many matches are won in 4 days, and a much higher rank team playing at home agsinst this poor Pak team should have won with available time.So England were lucky even though they won fair and square but Pakistan aren't when it's rain that is literally saving them from a 2-0 spanking. Got it.![]()
If this match ends in a draw than its England‘s own fault. Weather forecast was there for everyone to see even before the match started. Instead of declaring their innings earlier at around 500 runs they kept on batting late into day two trying to get their score upto 600. In my opinion, it is not that pak have become lucky because of rain, it is because of englands stupidity.
Anyways there is a possibility of getting around 40 to 50 overs in and it is possible that pak batting lives upto the expectations and collapse once again.
Read mesage where I have claimed they got lucky due ro our inexperienced pacers and England knew it will rain so gutsy batting by Pakistan overcamwe their plans in the match. Its not like they did not know it would rain, many matches are won in 4 days, and a much higher rank team playing at home agsinst this poor Pak team should have won with available time.
As I said - you are still in denial ......
Read mesage where I have claimed they got lucky due ro our inexperienced pacers and England knew it will rain so gutsy batting by Pakistan overcamwe their plans in the match. Its not like they did not know it would rain, many matches are won in 4 days, and a much higher rank team playing at home agsinst this poor Pak team should have won with available time.
No, rain saved Pakistan from a loss.
No batting lineup in the world, let alone the Pakistani one, would have been able to bat out two days on day 4 and 5 in this situation.
To think Pak could have won this series if not for the choke in the 1st test.
I am not denying anything England are much better than Pakistan in their home consitions.That does not take anything away from Pakistan bwing the most dominant team in the first test, on level term in the second test of whatever play was possible,and England unable to beat Pakostan , so far, with available time and mammoth first inning score pressure.
No bro, PAK never was the dominant team in first Test. They were extremely lucky to get such a wicket in UK, then winning toss and Shan earning his life time achievement and top 4 English players having an off Test - still it wasn’t enough. I always say that it’s difficult to make any upset in Test cricket because better team gets multiple chances to make a come back. On that track, from that position after first innings what England did only tells how wide the gap is - it basically tells that England is good enough to match PAK with one innings against two.
The dummy that PAK “fans” try to sell for second Test, will face difficulties to find a customer out of me. This series, Poms had been down to 62/4, 117/5, 127/4 and from there on posted 226, 277/5 & 583/8d. ..... and they were 114/4 when the game was washed out ... while PAK has been soft in second time - both with bat & ball ..... how that Test would have gone if there was another 200 overs possible.... you’ll see it today, if there is around 60 overs possible.
Only point that has a valid merit here is that Poms are playing at home and they have won almost every series there in last decade for a reason. No shame for PAK losing this series 2-0 and if they can bail out a draw today surviving another around 4 hours of play, it indeed will be praise worthy.
No bro, PAK never was the dominant team in first Test. They were extremely lucky to get such a wicket in UK, then winning toss and Shan earning his life time achievement and top 4 English players having an off Test - still it wasn’t enough. I always say that it’s difficult to make any upset in Test cricket because better team gets multiple chances to make a come back. On that track, from that position after first innings what England did only tells how wide the gap is - it basically tells that England is good enough to match PAK with one innings against two.
The dummy that PAK “fans” try to sell for second Test, will face difficulties to find a customer out of me. This series, Poms had been down to 62/4, 117/5, 127/4 and from there on posted 226, 277/5 & 583/8d. ..... and they were 114/4 when the game was washed out ... while PAK has been soft in second time - both with bat & ball ..... how that Test would have gone if there was another 200 overs possible.... you’ll see it today, if there is around 60 overs possible.
Only point that has a valid merit here is that Poms are playing at home and they have won almost every series there in last decade for a reason. No shame for PAK losing this series 2-0 and if they can bail out a draw today surviving another around 4 hours of play, it indeed will be praise worthy.
Rain is not called making your own luck. England did nothing wrong. They demolished our much hyped bowling attack, secured a massive lead and then enforced the follow-on with two full days to dismiss Pakistan and win the match.
They have played a perfect game of cricket, and no batting lineup in the world, let alone a pathetic one like ours, would survive two days against them in this situation.
When you have absolutely no chance of surviving without rain, then it is indeed a matter of pure luck.
Now you are in denial and making excuses for England poor performance in first test and undermining Pak who won most sessions in the first test. Dont believe me go and watch highlights and listen to Wnglish media analysis. In second test pak wereall over English batting and conditions were such that each ball was threatening to be wicket taking one.
As I said Pak is a poor team away from home and delivered as per expected with poor selections adding to their ineffectiveness.
You are talking as if it's the first time that rain has helped any team in saving the game...the forecast was known well in advance and Eng should have been more proactive in their batting or perhaps they didn't account for that Azhar knock.
There's no shame in being helped by rain as the weather is also a big component of test cricket in England.
Rain has helped many teams in the past.
I recall India winning the series in Eng in 2007 due to rain rescuing India (on the verge of defeat) in the 1st test.
Credit to Pakistan(and India in 2007) who managed to drag the game to a stage where rain can come in play.
Still a lot can happen if there's atleast 35-45 overs of play today.